Theory of Implicature_pragmatics and semantic.pptx

itxknighter107 13 views 18 slides Mar 12, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 18
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18

About This Presentation

Linguistics Notes


Slide Content

Theory of Implicature

Paul Grice coined the term 'implicature' and the two sub-categories of it: conventional implicature and conversational implicature. Speakers convey their conventional implicatures by means of linguistic conventions. Consider the example of a speaker saying, " He is an Englishman; he is, therefore, brave ." According to Grice, the speaker has only literally said that he [the person referred to] is an Englishman and that he is brave. The speaker has conventionally implicated that his bravery is a consequence of his Englishness by means of the conventional meaning of 'therefore

a. She gave him the key and he opened the door. Implicature : She gave him the key  and then  he opened the door. b. The water is warm. Implicature : The water is not hot. c. Some of the boys went to the rugby match. Implicature : Not all of the boys went to the rugby match. d. John has most of the documents. Implicature : John does not have all of the documents .