THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE

ClaraSimmone 1,513 views 20 slides Dec 27, 2022
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 20
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20

About This Presentation

The theory of knowledge


Slide Content

THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE INTRODUCTION TO YOUR NEW WORLD

Theory of Knowledge Epistomology, the study of theory of knowledge, is among the most important areas of philosophy, ToK is a class of questions more than answers..... The questions that it addresses include the following:

What is Knowledge? There is a tradition that goes back as far as Plato that holds that three conditions must be satisfied in order for one to possess knowledge. You have to believe it. You must b able to justify youe belief--provide some evidence for it. Your justified belief must be true as well.

The Tripartite Theory of Knowledge Belief The first condition for knowledge, according to the tripartite theory, is belief. Unless one believes a thing, one cannot know it. Even if something is true, and one has excellent reasons for believing that it is true, one cannot know it without believing it. Truth The second condition for knowledge, according to the trpartite theory, is truth, if on knows a thing then it must be true. No matter how well justified or sincere a belief, if it is not true that it cannot constitute knowledge. If a long-held belief is disovered to be false, then one must concede that what known; knowledge must be knowledge of the truth Justification The third condition for knowledge is justification. In order to know a thing, it is not enogh to merely correctly believe it to be true; one must also have a good reason for doing so. Lucky guesses cannot constitute knowledge; we can only know what we have good reason to believe.

Let’s test Ploto’s theory You Claim : “I know that a circle has three corners” Belief: Maybe you believe it... Justify/provide evidence: But can you justify it? Is it true? If a statement is false(not true), you cannot possibly know it...

From where do we get our Knowledge A second imortant issue in TOK concerns the ultimate source of our knowledge. There are two traditions: Empiricism , which holds that our knowledge is primarily based in experience, and Rationalism , which holds that our knowledge is primarily based in reason. Although the modern scientific worldview borrows heavily from empiricism, there are reasons for thinking that a synthesis of the two traditions is more plausible than either of them individually

How are our beliefs justified? There are better and worse ways to form beliefs. In general terns, it is important to consider evidence when deciding what to believe, because by doing so we are more likely to form beliefs that are true. Precisely how this should work, when we are justified in believing something and when we are not, opens up new and more complex topics in the theory of kowledge. We will get to those

How do we perceive the world around us? Much of our knowledge, it seems, does come to us through our senses, through perception. Percption, through, is a complex process. The way that we experience th world may be determined in part by the world, but it is also determined in part by us. We do not passively receive information through our senses; arguably, we contribute just as much to our experiences as do the objects that they are experiences of. How we are to understand the process of perception, and how this should effect our understanding of the world that we inhibit, is therefore vital for epistemology.

Do we know anything at all? Philosophical skepticism: Alongside the questions of what knowledge is and how we come to acquire it is the question whether we do in fact know anything at all. There is a long philosophical tradition that says that we do no, and the arguments in support of this position, though resisted by most, are remarkably difficult to refute. The most persistent problem in the theory of knowledge is not wha knowledge is or what is comes from, but whether there is any such thing at all.

Knowing What and Knowing How Types of Knowledge Philosophers typically divide knowledge into three categories: personal, procedural, and propositional. Understanding the connections between the three types of knowledge can be helpful in clearly understanding what is and what is not being analyzed by the various theories of knowledge.

Knowing What and Knowing How Personal Knowledge T he first kind of knowledge is personal knowledge , or knowledge by acquaintance. This is the kind of knowledge that we are claiming to have when we say things like ‘”I Know Mozart’s music.”

Knowing What and Knowimng How Procedure Knowledge The second kind of knowledge is procedural knowledge , or knowledge how to do something. People who claim to know how to juggle, or how to drive, are not simply claiming thqt they understand the theory involved in those activities. Rather, they are claiming that actually possess the skills involved, that they are able to do these things.

Propositional Knowledge The third kind of knowledge, the kind that philosophers care about most, is propositional knowledge , or knowledge of facts. When we say things like “I know that the internal angles of a triangle add up to 180 degreed” or “ I know that it was you that ate my sandwich,” we are claiming to have propositional knowledge.

Knowing What and Knowing How Types of Knowledge Philosophers typically divide knowledge into three categories: personal, procedural, and propositional. Understanding the connections between the three types of knowledge can be helpful in clearly understanding what is and what is not being analyzed by the various theories of knowledge. Personal Knowledge T he first kind of knowledge is personal knowledge , or knowledge by acquaintance. This is the kind of knowledge that we are claiming to have when we say things like ‘”I Know Mozart’s music.” Procedure Knowledge The second kind of knowledge is procedural knowledge , or knowledge how to do something. People who claim to know how to juggle, or how to drive, are not simply claiming thqt they understand the theory involved in those activities. Rather, they are claiming that actually possess the skills involved, that they are able to do these things. The third kind of knowledge, the kind that philosophers care about most, is propositional knowledge , or knowledge of facts. When we say things like “I know that the internal angles of a triangle add up to 180 degreed” or “ I know that it was you that ate my sandwich,” we are claiming to have propositional knowledge.

How Do We Know? What counts as Knowledge? How does it grow? What are its limits? Who owns knowledge? what is the value of knowledge? What are the implications of having, or not having, knowledge?

Theory of knowledge The theory of knowledge (TOK) requirement is central to the educational philosophy of the Diploma programme. It offers students and their teachers the opportunity to: reflect critically on diverse ways of knowing and on areas of knowledge. consider the role and nature of knowledge in their own culture, in the cultures of others and in the wider world. In addition, it promotes students to: be aware of themeselves as thinkers, encouraging them to become more aquainted with the complexity of knowledge Recognize the need to act responsibly is an increasingly interconnected but uncertain world. As a thoughtful and purposeful inquiry into different ways of knowing, and into different kinds of knowledge, TOK is composed almost entirely of questions. The most control of these is “how do we know?” TOK also has an important role to play in providing coherence for the student as it transcend and link academic subject areas, thus demonstrating the ways in which they can apply their knowledge with greater awareness and credibility.

Welcome to TOK, Theory of Knowledge At the end of the course, we hope we will have achieved these goals together - that you will be able to: think more clearly, argue more effectively, identify and explain what you think and why you think it, feel more secure, but much less arrogant or defenive about your opinions, understand better and enjoy more the opinions of others, be more aware and intrigued, but less unnerved by the “not yet known” and “the unknowable” things in life.

KC’s and KI’s Knowledge claim is a logical aertion of truth. Knowledge issues are questions that directly refers to our understanding of the world, ourselves an others, in connection with the acquisition, search for, production, shaping and acceptance of knowledge. These issues are intended to open to inquiry and to explore not only problems but also strenghts of knowledge.

Terms to Keep, Consider, “Know” Epistemology Knower Ways of Knowing Areas of Knowledge Knowledge Claims Knowledge Issues Add to list as we go..............