Traditional vs Modern Hiring - What is the best method for you?

The search for the best employees is a constant battle between companies where HR leaders are constantly striving to develop relevant strategies. In order to hire the best talent, organizations resort to more than one recruitment method to influence a large number of qualified applicants and it improves the level of visibility of a vacancy amongst the targeted audience. Choosing the right method involves an elaborate process of consideration of factors like cost, time scale, type of vacancy, the target population, and the company’s reputation. Let’s analyze both the methods to understand which is best for your company.

Read the full article here: https://www.hirequotient.com/blog/traditional-vs-modern-hiring

1. Traditional vs Modern Hiring Comparing traditional and modern hiring methods. by Amit Thokal

2. Traditional Hiring Process Conventional Methods Job postings, in-person interviews, resume reviews, tests, reference checks, referral programs, and recruitment agencies. Pros Familiarity, personal connection, established processes. Cons Limited reach, time-consuming, bias, limited data.

3. Modern Hiring Process 1 Online Platforms Video interviews, AI and machine learning, blind resumes, virtual reality, digital portfolios, and online assessments. 2 Pros Wide reach, efficiency, candidate experience, data-driven. 3 Cons Lack of personal connection, technical issues, limited experience, unproven effectiveness.

4. Key Differences Speed Modern methods are faster due to technology. Reach Modern methods access a wider candidate pool. Diversity Modern methods reduce bias, promoting diversity. Candidate Experience Modern methods offer a more transparent and remote experience.

5. Conclusion Merits and Drawbacks Both traditional and modern hiring methods have their merits and drawbacks. Choosing the Right Approach Depends on factors like company culture, resources, and desired outcomes.