Traffic Project Report

We can overcome traffic by seeing some basic criteria for problem. I personally conclude that traffic is problem to everyone.However we can implement traffic sensation technology to resolve the problems. Technology depends upon our ideas such as bus moving on cables at the heights.

1. GUJARAT TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

Pacific School of Engineering, Surat

Affiliated with GTU





A
Project report
On

“TRAFFIC ”


Prepared as a part of the requirements for the subject of

DESIGN ENGINEERING – 1A (2130005)
B. E. Semester – 3
(Chemical Branch)
Submitted by Group:

Sr. Name of student Enrollment No
1 RADADIYA URVISH 151120105067
2 RANPARIYA RONAK 151120105051
3 VAGHANI MITUL 151120105068
4 RAKHOLIYA GAURAV 151120105049
5 SAVALIYA HENIT 151120105057


(Faculty Guide)
Prof. Shweta Joshi
Chemical Engineering Department
Pacific School of Engineering, Surat



Academic year
(2016-2017)

2. PACIFIC SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING, SURAT
Chemical Engineering Department



CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that the project entitled “TRAFFIC” Submitted by
Sr.No. Name of student Enrollment No
1 RADADIYA URVISH 151120105067
2 RANPARIYA RONAK 151120105051
3 VAGHANI MITUL 151120105068
4 RAKHOLIYA GAURAV 151120105049
5 SAVALIYA HENIT 151120105057

In partial fulfillment of the requirement for the DESIGN ENGINEEING-1A (2130005) in
PACIFIC SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING, SURAT is recorded on their own work carried out
under my supervision and guidance. The matter embodied here is not being submitted
elsewhere forward of any degree.



Guided By :


Prof.Shweta Joshi
Chemical Engineering Department
Pacific School of Engineering, Surat






Prof .PiyushModi
Head of Department
Chemical Engineering Department
Pacific School of Engineering, Surat

3. PACIFIC SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING, SURAT
Chemical Engineering Department


EXAMINER’S CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL
This is to certify that the project entitled “TRAFFIC” Submitted by
Sr.No. Name of student Enrolment No
1 RADADIYA URVISH 151120105067
2 RANPARIYA RONAK 151120105051
3 VAGHANI MITUL 151120105068
4 RAKHOLIYA GAURAV 151120105049
5 SAVALIYA HENIT 151120105057


In partial fulfilment of the requirement for the DESIGN ENGINEEING-1A (2130005) in
PACIFIC SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING, SURAT is here by approved for submitted their
DE Report for 3
th
semester.

Place: Surat
Date:





Internal Examiner Sign External Examiner Sign

4. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

It is always pleasure to remind the experts in the science guidance which I
received to hold my practical as well as theoritical skills in engineering.
I am thankful to our H.O.D Prof.PiyushModi and our regarding all faculties
for giving me an opportunity to enhance my skills as an engineer by allowing
us to join this esteemed organization as training.
I would also like to thank Our Internal Guide Prof. Shweta Joshi
guided us in getting our project. It gives me immense pleasure in
expressing our deep sense of gratitude whom our successfully complete
our project in their department.

I also thankful our all supporting faculty will help to create 2
nd
year,
3rd semester DESIGN ENGINEERING project by sharing their
knowledge. They helped us in all possible ways to solve our doubts
regarding application and implementation of knowledge. It has been a
great experience to work under their supervision as always kept my
moral high.

Finally, I apologize all other unnamed who helped me in various ways
to have a safe and good training.

5. TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE I
CERTIFICATE II
EXAMINER’SCERTIFICATE III
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IV
TABLE OF CONTENT V
ABSTRACT VI

1. CASE STUDY

2. INTRODUCTION
1
2
3. PROBLEM DEFINITION 3
4. CANVAS FRAME WORK 4
4.1 AEIOU Summary 4
4.2 Empathy Mapping 7
4.3 Ideation 10
4.4 Product Development Canvas 12
4.5 Mind Mapping 16
5. FUTURE SCOPE OF WORK 17
6. CONCLUSION 18
7. REFERENCES 19

6. “TRAFFIC CONTROL ”

Submitted By
Sr.No. Name of student Enrollment No
1 RADADIYA URVISH 151120105067
2 RANPARIYA RONAK 151120105051
3 VAGHANI MITUL 151120105068
4 RAKHOLIYA GAURAV 151120105049
5 SAVALIYA HENIT 151120105057

Supervised By
Prof. Shweta Joshi
Chemical Engineering Department
Pacific School of Engineering, Surat

ABSTRACT

Improved traffic management and control systems are widely reported to be cost-effective
investments. Simply retiming signals can provide significant benefits by reducing vehicle
stops, travel times, and fuel consumption. The installation of advanced traffic management
systems (ATMS) can provide even greater savings. However, many hardware and software
obstacles have impeded the actual implementation of advanced traffic management systems.
The general hardware and software limitations of current traffic signal control technology are
reviewed. The impact of these deficiencies is discussed in the context of three example
applications. Based on this discussion, the paper identifies several computing issues that
should be addressed in order to reduce the effort involved with integrating existing traffic
control devices. Adoption of software engineering models are recommended.

7. Chapter 1: Case Study
Design Engineering at Third Semester of BE

The case study, presented in the following pages was prepared by a team of Faculty Members in a
few evenings. This problem is the very first attempt made by the team. One can use this as a
sample and one may be able to build his/ her design engineering problems, which may be much
better.

Case Study on Traffic controlling and resolving.

 On the first day, we got the basic knowledge of design engineering. What is design
engineering and why we need design engineering? How this subject will be useful to the
student? All this questions has been cleared properly and also that how this activity will
be useful in design engineering.


 GTU Innovation Council (GIC) committee explain to us that how to explore the mind of
user? How to find out problem? Where the problem is occurring? All these points are
cleared out. They gave us brief knowledge of the different activities that we have to
perform during this workshop.


 GIC committee provided us Four Canvases

 Canvas 1: Users
 Canvas 2: Ideation
 Canvas 3: Product Development
 Canvas 4: Design thinking venture




 Purpose:
“Main Aim” of our project is to over control on traffic easily by the society.

8. Chapter 2: Introduction
Our project topic was Traffic Control. It was chosen by us. Because It was very relevant for
the society welfare. We started working on this project by many days and taught us different
things and give us many ideas.

We used to go different places in our Surat city. Our groups members saw everything and
observe it carefully .We make a note on that observation .Moreover we used to do some basic
activities by contributing ourselves in the place of traffic police.

First we met our traffic police who was head of that area or locality.

9. Chapter 2: Canvas


Following are the various steps in all canvases, so students can easily understand what
they have to identify?

Canvas 1: User

These are the first step of the project or problem. In this canvas, you have to find out
 What is user to your problems?
 What is a stakeholder?
 What are activities?
 And what are broad stories of their activities?

1. Users
 In this stage, we find the various users which are directly or indirectly related to our
project.
 Students
 Vendors
 Labors


2. Stakeholders
 Stakeholders mean a person or organization with an interest.
 In this stage, we find the user who will directly or indirectly related to users.
 Engineers
 Workers
 Employee
 Businessman

10. Chapter 2: Canvas

3. Activities

 Activities are directly or indirectly related to stakeholders.
 Construction
 Advertisement on Led
 Market
 Signal change
 Stray cattle’s
 Bargaining
 Road Crossing
 People shouting







4. Story Boarding


 Happy
Once we were going to the observation for our project traffic at that moment we saw traffic
Police man at hirabaug and manages traffic very carefully and perfectly.
Once we were going to the observation for our project traffic were standing at traffic jam
policeman saw ambulance took quick action and made way for ambulance.

11. Chapter 2: Canvas





 Sad
One day I was going to the my college for my exam . I was going on bike but imet with a
traffic on the middle road of my college and I was stuck in the traffic. I became very late
for the exam and I missed that.
Traffic signals are not working properly so due to it accident occurs and there is a long way
of traffic jam.
HIRABAUG
At the time of observation of the traffic 13.10.2016 only there were two wheelers, four
wheelers& Rickshaw that was in huge.
MAPPING
This is the first step of the project or the problem in this canvas. The canvas shows that who
are involved to solve the problems or situation?

12. Chapter2: Canvas
AEIOU SUMMARY
Users: - Our project users are as follows:-
 Students
 Labors
 Engineer
 Traffic Police
 Beggars


Activities:-
 Market
 Construction
 Marriage Celebration
 SMC Parking
 Traffic Control
 Bargaining
 Road Crossing
 People shouting
 Signal change
 Stray cattle’s
 Advertisement
 SMC Gardening
 Emergency Transport

13. Chapter 2: Canvas

Environment:-
 Noisy
 Full of crowd
 Darkness
 Humid
 Cloudy


Interaction:-
 Pest Controller
 Beggar
 Traffic Police
 Cheap jack
 Vendor
 Worker

14. Chapter 2: Canvas


Objects:-
 Traffic booth
 Speed Sensor
 Identify Sensor
 Direction Signal
 Traffic Signal
 Speed Breaker
 Stop Signal
 CCTV

15. Chapter2: Canvas

Canvas 2: IDEATION
These are the second step of the project or problem. From the user canvas, you have an idea
what are the people? In ideation canvas, you have to carry out which type of activities is
related to your project and people? What is situation and location regarding to activities?
Then after you find the possible solutions. It is depend or not depend to your activities.

People:-
 Labour
 Student
 Traffic Police
 Beggar
 Workers
 Engineers





Activities:-
 Construction
 Advertisement
 Signal change
 Bargaining
 Road Crossing
 Traffic Control

16. Chapter 2: Canvas

Situation/Context/Location: -
 Full of Traffic
 Smoky
 Crowds
 Near Petrol pump
 Near Hospital
 Near Market


Props/Possible Solutions: -
 Traffic signal
 Camera
 Sensor
 Speed Breaker
 Computer
 Operator
 Speaker

17. Chapter2: Canvas

Canvas 3: Product Development
Third step is development of the product. From possible solutions, you have idea about what
is product? In this canvas, following things is to do.
Purpose :-
 To control Traffic
 To make environment clean.



People: -
 Labour
 Student
 Traffic Police
 Beggar




Product Function :-
 Good Security
 Traffic reductions

18. Chapter 2: Canvas

Product Features:-
 Save Time
 For Better Transportation
 Save Fuel





Components: -
 G.P.S
 Camera
 Computer
 Speaker
 Operator
 Speed Breaker
 Crossing

19. Chapter 2: Canvas


Product Experience: Fuel saving, time saving, ability to handle large traffic, Increasing
comfortless

 Good Feature
 Time Saving





Customer Revalidation:

 More satisfaction for people
 To decrease of Traffic
 To decrease accident

20. Chapter 2: Canvas


Reject, Redesign and Retain (3-R): -

 To Aware People for Traffic

 To invent new control of traffic system

21. Chapter 2: Canvas

Mind Mapping

22. Chapter 3: Future Scope of Work

FUTURE SCOPE OF WORK

As we, all know that problem of traffic is common for everyone so it is responsibility to develop
the technology. However we can implement traffic sensation technology to resolve the
problems. Technology depends upon our ideas such as bus moving on cables at the heights.

23. Chapter 4: Conclusion


CONCLUSION

We can overcome traffic by seeing some basic criteria for problem. I personally conclude that
traffic is problem to everyone. We work According to guidance and work for analysis for
better solution to the public fulfillment.

24. Chapter 4: Reference

REFERENCES

Chase, M. J. and Hensen, R. J. (1989). "Traffic control systems—past, present and
future." Applications of advanced technologies in transportation engineering, ASCE,
New York, N.Y., 257-262.
Elwart, S. P., and Martin, P. G. (1990). "New software structures extend control
capabilities." Control Engrg., 37(7), 16-17.
"Evaluation of optimized policies for adaptive control (OPAC) strategy." (1989).
Technical Report FHWA-RD-89-135, Faradyne Systems, Inc., Rockville, Md.
Kessmann, R. W., Ku, C. S., and Cooper, D. L. (1985). "1.5 Generation feasibility
study." Technical Report, Kessmann and Associates, Houston, Tex.
Lawson, H. W. (1990). "Philosophies for engineering computer-based systems."
Computer, 23(12), 52-62.
Marshal, P. S., and Berg, W. D. (1990). "Evaluation of railroad preemption capabilities
of traffic controllers." Transp. Res. Rec, (1254), 44-49.
Naur, P., and Randell, B., eds. (1969). "Software engineering: A report on a conference
sponsored by the NATO science committee." Technical Report, NATO,
Brussels, Belgium.
Pressman, R. S. (1987). Software engineering: A practitioner's approach. McGraw-
Hill Book Company, New York, N. Y.
Quinlan, T. (1989). "Evaluation of computer hardware and high-level language
software for field traffic control." Tech. Report FHWA/CA/TL-89/13, California