UNIT 3 Capital Structure and Leverages.pptx

CAPITAL STRUCTURE THEORY

1. Unit 3: Capital Structure and Leverages Capital structure: meaning, optimum capital structure, factors determining capital structure, theories of Capital structure (Theory only), problems on EBIT-EPS analysis; Leverages : operating leverage, financial leverage, combined leverage.

2. A firm needs funds for long term requirements and working capital. These funds are raised through different sources both short term and long term. The long term funds required by a firm are mobilized through owner’s funds (equity share, preference shares and retained earnings) and long term debt (debentures and bonds). A mix of various long term sources of funds employed by a firm is called capital structure. CAPITAL STRUCTURE According to Gerestenberg, “Capital structure of a company refers to the composition or make-up of its capitalization and it includes all long term capital resources, viz , loans, bonds, shares and reserves”. Thus capital structure is made up of debt and equity securities and refers to permanent financing of a firm.

3. Financial Manager has to plan the appropriate mix of different securities in total capitalization in such a way as to minimize the cost of capital and maximize the earnings per share to the equity shareholders. There may be four fundamental patterns of capital structure as follows: (i) Equity capital only (including Reserves and Surplus) (ii) Equity and preference capital (iii) Equity, preference and long term debt i.e. debentures, bonds and loans from financial institutions etc. (iv) Equity and long term debt. Some authors use capital structure and financial structure interchangeably. But, both are different concepts. Financial structure refers to the way in which the total assets of a firm are financed. In other words, financial structure refers to the entire liabilities side of the Balance Sheet. But, capital structure represents only long term sources of funds and excludes all short term debt and current liabilities. Thus , financial structure is a broader one and capital structure is only part of it.

4. Features of an Appropriate Capital Structure A capital structure will be considered to be appropriate if it possesses following features: Profitability : The capital structure of the company should be most profitable. The most profitable capital structure is one that tends to minimize cost of financing and maximize earnings per equity share. (ii) Solvency: The pattern of capital structure should be so devised as to ensure that the firm does not run the risk of becoming insolvent. Excess use of debt threatens the solvency of the company. The debt content should not, therefore, be such that which increases risk beyond manageable limits. (iii) Flexibility: The capital structure should be flexible to meet the requirements of changing conditions. Moreover, it should also be possible for the company to provide funds whenever needed to finance its profitable activities. (iv) Conservatism: The capital structure should be conservative in the sense that the debt content in the total capital structure does not exceed the limit which the company can bear. In other words, it should be such as is commensurate with the company’s ability to generate future cash flows. (v) Control: The capital structure should be so devised that it involves minimum risk of loss of control of the company.

5. Optimal Capital Structure The theory of optimal capital structure deals with the issue of the right mix of debt and equity in the long term capital structure of a firm. This theory states that if a company takes on debt, the value of the firm increases up to a point. Beyond that point if debt continues to increase then the value of the firm will start to decrease. Similarly, if the company is unable to repay the debt within the specified period then it will affect the goodwill of the company in the market and may create problems for collecting further debt. Therefore, the company should select its appropriate capital structure with due consideration to the factors mentioned earlier.

6. Theories of Capital Structure the existence of an optimum capital structure is not accepted by all. There are two extreme views or schools of thought regarding the existence of an optimum capital structure. As per one view, capital structure influences the value of the firm and cost of capital and hence there exists an optimum relevance and hence there exists an optimum capital structure. On the other hand, the other school of thought advocates that capital structure has no relevance and it does not influence the value of the firm and cost of capital. Reflecting these views, different theories of capital structure have been developed. The main contributors to the theories are David Durand, Ezra Solomon, Modigliani and Miller.

7. 1 . Net Income Approach This approach was identified by David Durand. According to this approach, capital structure has relevance, and a firm can increase the value of the firm and minimize the overall cost of capital by employing debt capital in its capital structure. According to this theory, greater the debt capital employed, lower shall be the overall cost of capital and more shall be the value of the firm.

8. 2 . Net Operating Income Approach This net operating income (NOI) approach is also suggested by David Durand. This represents another extreme view that capital structure and value of the firm are irrelevant. This capital structure of the firm does not influence cost of capital and value of the firm. According to this theory, the use of less costly debt increases the risk to equity shareholders. This causes the equity capitalization rate ( Ke ) to increase. As a result, the low cost advantage of debt is exactly offset by the increase in the equity capitalization rate. Thus, the overall capitalization rate ( Ko ) remains constant and consequently the value of the firm does not change.

9. The above diagram shows that Ko and Kd are constant and Ke increases with leverage continuously. The increase in cost of equity ( Ke ) exactly offsets the advantage of low cost debt, so that overall cost of capital ( Ko ) remains constant, at every degree of leverage. It implies that every capital structure is optimum and there is no unique optimum capital structure.

10. 3 . The Traditional View This approach, which is also known as intermediate approach, has been popularized by Ezra Solomon. It is a compromise between the two extremes of Net Income Approach and Net Operating Income Approach. According to this approach, cost of capital can be reduced or the value of the firm can be increased with a judicious mix of debt and equity. This theory says that cost of capital declines with increase in debt capital upto a reasonable level, and later it increases with a further rise in debt capital.

11. It is evident from above graph that the overall cost of capital declines with an increase in leverage upto point L and it increases with rise in the leverage after point L1. Hence, the optimum capital structure lies in between L and L1.

12. 4 . Modigliani – Miller (MM) Hypothesis The Modigliani – Miller hypothesis is identical with the Net Operating Income Approach. Modigliani and Miller argued that, in the absence of taxes the cost of capital and the value of the firm are not affected by the changes in capital structure. In other words, capital structure decisions are irrelevant and value of the firm is independent of debt – equity mix.