Urban Hub51:Urbanism & Syntoniety - ExploringTheEdges

5
Urban Hub
1
Urbanism & SyntonietyExploring the Edges
Paul van Schaik
integralMENTORS
a meta-pragmatic approach
Thriveable Worlds
IntegralUrbanHub

Integral UrbanHub
Thriveable Worlds
speculative ideas from
the edges of urbanism
explorations @ the edge
Paulvan Schaik

Copyright © Paul van Schaik - October 2025
‘In fullness and Freedom
integralMENTORS & integral UrbanHub co-lab
Thriveable Cities-Worlds.
Founder & Managing Editor Paul van Schaik
involution & evolution

context

A curated tapestry of visions, ideas, theories, and actions that reﬂect the
kaleidoscope of human thought and experience. It is an invitation to explore the
vast spectrum of perspectives, ancient and modern, visible and undiscovered -
that shape our understanding of the world.
Our Path Forward: Humanity’s success hinges on our ability to integrate the most
vital elements of these diverse worldviews. By weaving together wisdom from
across cultures, eras, and disciplines - science and spirituality, innovation and
tradition, we can cultivate systems that are equitable, regenerative, and resilient.
At the heart of this journey lies a profound commitment to care, for one another,
for the planet, and for the interconnected systems that sustain life.
The How: This series embraces an Integral Mythological Pluralistic idea, a dynamic
blend of storytelling, dialogue, and experimentation. By sharing philosophies,
cosmologies, and lived experiences, we can forge new theories and practices.
Rigorous research, archetypal exploration (“archology”), and collaborative
prototyping will guide us in designing interventions that nurture compassion,
justice, and ecological stewardship.
The Balance: Success demands both courage and humility. Too little boldness,
and we stagnate; too much rigidity, and we repeat past mistakes. Instead, we must
embrace adaptive learning, testing ideas, reﬁning strategies, and regrouping
when needed. This is not a linear path but an emergent process, fuelled by
“generative synergy”: the alchemy of diverse voices co-creating solutions greater
than the sum of their parts.
Beyond Existing Frameworks: While drawing on models like Integral Theory
(AQAL), we must also transcend their limitations. A broader, culturally inclusive
lens is needed - one that ampliﬁes marginalized voices and blends ancestral
knowledge with cutting-edge innovation.
The Call: Engage with these ideas not as ﬁxed truths, but as seeds for possibility.
Enfold them into your work, community, and vision. Evolve from passive
stakeholders to active thrive-holders - gardeners of a world where all life
ﬂourishes. The future is not predetermined; it is shaped by our collective care,
creativity, and willingness to step boldly into the unknown.
What is this series?
Explore - Experiment - Iterate & above all, collaborate

Other Worlds
Act, Don’t Just Articulate "Walking & talking in the world."
Visions Are Compasses, Not Blueprints: No single vision - no matter how
profound, can chart the full complexity of our world. Visions serve as guides, but
they only gain life through collective action and creative iteration. It is in the doing,
the messy, collaborative dance of experimentation and adaptation, that ideas
evolve from abstraction into the fabric of a thriving society.
Beyond Monocultures of Thought: To ignore the plurality of worldviews coexisting
today is to fracture communities and perpetuate division. Our task is not to
homogenize perspectives but to weave them into a dynamic mosaic. This requires
intentional design, creating structures where diverse philosophies, traditions, and
values can interact constructively - without erasing their uniqueness or forcing
conformity.
Cultivating Healthy Ecosystems of Belief: A regenerative future demands more
than passive tolerance; it requires actively nurturing the healthiest expressions of
every worldview. By grounding these systems in equity, care, and respect for
Earth’s ecological limits, we transform ideological diversity from a source of
conflict into a wellspring of resilience.
From Dialogue to Doing: Endless debate paralyzes action propels. This series is
not a static archive but a provocation to engage, test ideas, and prototype
solutions. Use these resources as sparks for discussion, yes, but also as fuel for
pilots, partnerships, and policies. Progress lies in the courage to iterate, adapt,
discard, and reinvent as contexts shift.
Catalysts, Not Canons: Think of these curations as living seeds, not rigid doctrines.
Their purpose is to germinate collaboration, cross-pollinate insights, and evolve
through generative synergy. Modify them, merge them, let them morph in
response to new challenges and wisdom.
A Note on Frameworks: While integral theory (referenced in earlier works) offers a
scaffold, our ambition stretches beyond existing models. True integration
demands humility - recognizing that no framework is complete, and every system
must remain open to unlearning.
The call? Stop preaching change. Start practicing it - in community, with curiosity,
and through relentless, care-rooted action.
“You can’t stop the waves, but you can learn to surf.”

content

Foreword: The Call of the Urban Heart (Sets the personal, emotional stakes)
Introduction: The Call for a Resonant Urban Future (Diagnoses the crisis and introduces
the core response: Syntoniety)
Part 1: A New Philosophy for Cities: From Machine to Organism
This section dismantles the old worldview and installs a new, holistic operating system for
urbanism.
Chapter 1: The Crisis of the Machine City
Critique of industrial-modernist and "smart city" paradigms.
Symptoms of Dissonance: loneliness, ecological degradation, placelessness.
New Integration: The Tyranny of Linear Time as a root cause of the crisis.
Chapter 2: Syntony: The Principle of Resonant Alignment
Deﬁning Syntony: resonance over mere connection.
The City as a Living, Complex System.
The Syntonious Spectrum: Attunement -> Alignment -> Attainment.
Warm Data: The methodology for seeing relational aliveness, essential for
Attunement.
Temporal Syntony: Introducing cyclical, deep, and Kairos time as facets of a living city.
Chapter 3: Pluriversality: Honouring the Many Worlds in One City
Rejecting universal blueprints; embracing multiple ways of knowing and being.
The City of Many Stories: how space is lived differently.
Chapter 4: Ma (間): The Architecture of the In-Between
Deﬁning Ma as sacred space (spatial, temporal, social).
Designing the container, not the content.
Ma as the vessel for experiencing the Spirit of Place and stepping into non-linear time.
Chapter 5: Ubuntu: "I Am Because We Are" – The Ethical Core
Philosophy of interbeing and mutual humanity.
Ubuntu as the moral imperative for urbanism: from individual rights to communal
thriving.
Chapter 6: Weaving the Threads: The Soul of the City
Introduces Spirit of Place (Genius Loci) and Soul of the City as the ultimate goals of
syntonious practice.
Deﬁnes the city as a living, relational system co-created by people and place.
Chapter 7: Seeing the Whole City: A Decolonised Integral Framework
Decolonising Wilber: Replacing hierarchy with Zones of Knowing.
Applying the 4 Quadrants and 8 Zones to ensure no dimension of city life is ignored.
Provides structure for Warm Data gathering.
Contents

Part 2: The Syntonious Toolkit: Practices for Weaving the Resonant City
This section translates philosophy into actionable practices for urbanists, planners, and
communities.
Chapter 8: The Foundational Practice: Syntonious Attunement
The art of deep listening across all Integral Zones.
Methods for gathering Warm Data: relational sensing, narrative inquiry, embodied
mapping.
Specific methods for attuning to the Spirit of Place (e.g., deep mapping, more-than-
human councils).
Chapter 9: The Core Skill: Syntonious Facilitation
Shifting from expert to host/weaver.
Hosting the pluriversal roundtable: working with conflict, crafting invitations.
Protocols for co-creation (World Café, Open Space).
Chapter 10: The Decision-Making Engine: Syntonious Calculus
A values-based matrix to replace cost-benefit analysis.
Core Filters: Ubuntu, Resonance, Pluriversality, Regenerative Potential, Elegance (Ma),
the Soul Filter ("Does this create a more beautiful, authentic story for our city?") and
the Seventh Generation Principle.
Chapter 11: The Design Principle: Crafting Ma
Spatial Ma: Designing parks, plazas, and greenways as flexible containers.
Temporal Ma: Curating festivals, quiet hours, and temporary uses.
Social Ma: Holding space for dialogue (ties to Facilitation).
Chapter 12: Confronting Power, Scale, and Speed: Syntony in the Real World
Syntonious Power Analysis: mapping stakeholders and influence.
Working with Conflict as a catalyst.
Navigating the Velocity Paradox: tiered action (tactical prototypes -> strategic
change).
Chapter 13: Syntonious Economics & Governance
The Syntonious Economics Canvas: evaluating projects for Wealth Democracy,
Circulatory, Regenerative, and Rooted-in-Place values.
Governance Innovations: Departments of Attunement, Citizen Assemblies, Rights of
Nature, Participatory Budgeting.
Chapter 14: The Long Game: Stewardship, Evolution, & Dissolution
Cultivating Syntoniousness (the personal & collective muscle).
Syntonious Adaptation and the graceful art of Syntonious Dissolution.
The concept of Syntonious Resistance - using the toolkit in hostile environments
through prefigurative intervention, institutional jiu-jitsu, and networked solidarity.
Part 3: Case Studies from the Edge: Syntony in Action
Analysing real-world projects through the syntonious lens.
Chapter 15: Radical Inclusion: Superkilen (Copenhagen) - Pluriversality, Warm Data,
Ubuntu

Chapter 16: Indigenous Place-Making: Trinity River Park (Dallas) - Spirit of Place, Deep
Time, Rights of Nature
Chapter 17: Tactical Urbanism: PARK(ing) Day & Times Square - Temporal Ma,
Adjustment/Adaptation, Prefiguration
Chapter 18: Systemic Resonance: Ciclovía (Bogotá) - City-Scale Attainment, Temporal
Ma, Ubuntu
Chapter 19: Learning from Discord: A Failure Analysis - Shadow Work, Integration,
consequences of ignoring the calculus.
Conclusion: The Syntonious City - A Manifesto for Urban Aliveness
Final Integration: Weaving together the Spirit of Place, the Soul of the City, and the
rhythms of non-linear time into a compelling vision of an ensouled urban future.
The Weaver’s Song
Annex: The difference between Multicultural and Pluricultural
Biography
----
Urban Hub 51a: The Weaver's Protocol: A Field Guide to Syntonious Urbanism
Subtitle: Practical Steps for Facilitating Resonance in Your Place

Call of the Urban Heart
Foreword

Have you ever stood on a busy street corner and felt a profound sense of isolation, even
amidst a crowd? Have you ever looked out at a glittering skyline of steel and glass and
felt, not inspiration, but a quiet, unnamed grief? Have you ever wondered why, for all our
technological marvels and architectural achievements, our urban lives can feel so
fragmented, so out of tune with our own humanity and the natural world?
This feeling is not your failing. It is the logical outcome of a centuries-old story we have
been telling ourselves about what a city is for. It is the story of the city-as-machine, a tale of
efﬁciency, control, and endless growth that treats people as data points, nature as a
resource, and history as an obstacle to be bulldozed. We have been living inside this story
for so long we mistake it for reality.
But a new story is struggling to be born. It is emerging in the cracks of the old paradigm:
in the community garden thriving in a vacant lot, in the playful rebellion of a pop-up park,
in the courageous conversations of citizens demanding a voice. This story speaks a
different language. It speaks of resonance, not just connectivity. It speaks of care, not just
sustainability. It speaks of belonging, not just occupancy.
This book, Urbanism & Syntoniety: Exploring the Edges, is a guide to this new story. It is
for everyone who has ever felt that our cities could be so much more: not just smarter, but
wiser; not just richer, but more joyful; not just greener, but more alive.
The journey you are about to begin does not offer easy answers or one-size-ﬁts-all
blueprints. Instead, it offers something far more valuable: a new compass. Its points are
not north, south, east, and west, but:
Syntony: The pursuit of resonant alignment between people, place, and planet.
Pluriversality: The commitment to honouring the many coexisting worlds within one city.
Ma (間): The art of crafting the sacred spaces and pauses where life can ﬂourish.
Ubuntu: The profound ethic that declares, “I am because we are.”
This is not just a new set of ideas; it is a new practice. This book provides a toolkit for the
transition from being urban consumers to becoming citizen-weavers. You will learn the
skills of deep attunement, facilitative leadership, values-based decision-making, and the
conscious design of space and time for human connection.
The path ahead is demanding. It asks us to rethink everything we thought we knew about
cities. It requires the courage to listen, the agility to adapt, and the will to act lightly and
ﬁercely in service of life. But it is a path of profound hope.
The syntonious city is not a distant utopia. It is a potential waiting to be unlocked in every
street, every neighbourhood, and every human heart. It begins with a simple, radical act:
the decision to listen to the call of your own urban heart, and to answer it.
Turn the page, and let’s begin the work of tuning our world to a new, more beautiful
frequency.

Paul van Schaik
Hout Bay - October 2025
The Call of the Urban Heart

Call for a Resonant
Urban Future
Introduction

We live in the Urban Century. For the first time in human history, more than half of us call
cities home. These dense aggregations of human life are the engines of our culture, the
drivers of our economy, and the crucibles of our innovation. Yet, for all their brilliance and
opportunity, our urban centres are sending out a distress signal - a deep, pervasive, and
unmistakable cry of anguish.
Walk through the financial district of any major city at night and feel the hollow silence of
its windswept plazas. Sit in the traffic jam on an eight-lane arterial road, feeling the
simmering frustration and isolation inside every single metal box. Visit a sprawling
suburban subdivision and notice the profound absence of a shared, beating heart. This is
the legacy of the urban paradigms that have brought us to this point: the city as a
machine for production, and more recently, the city as a computer for optimization.
We have perfected the science of urbanism, but we have lost its soul. We have:
Prioritized Efficiency over Life: Zoning has meticulously segregated the functions of life,
creating dormitory suburbs, sterile business parks, and commercial strips, severing the
organic, messy connections that make a community.
Worshipped at the Altar of Speed: We have dedicated our most valuable public space -
our streets - to the rapid movement of vehicles, at the expense of the slow, meandering,
human interactions that foster belonging.
Valued the Abstract over the Particular: International-style architecture and standardized
planning solutions have created a geography of nowhere, where a street in Dallas is
indistinguishable from one in Dubai, erasing local identity and Spirit of Place.
Placed Our Faith in Data over Wisdom: The "smart city" model, for all its benefits, risks
reducing citizens to data points to be analysed and optimized, creating landscapes of
surveillance and control that are efficient, yet often feel sterile and inhuman.
The result is a widespread urban malaise. We see it in the epidemics of loneliness and
anxiety, in the fierce battles over gentrification and displacement, in the quiet grief over
lost sunlight and paved-over ecosystems. Our cities are suffering from a profound
dissonance - a state of being out of tune with human nature and the rhythms of the living
world.
This book is born from a simple, belief: It does not have to be this way.
There is a different path forward. It does not lie in smarter traffic lights or more efficient
zoning, though it does not reject technology. It lies in a fundamental recalibration of our
purpose. The goal of urbanism must shift from creating efficient systems to nurturing
resonant relationships - between people, between neighbourhoods, and between the city
and the biosphere that sustains it.
This book names this goal Syntoniety.
Syntoniety (from the Greek syntonia, meaning "agreement" or "accord") is the state of a
city that is in deep harmony with itself and its context. It is the palpable experience of
feeling that a place is alive, coherent, and whole. It is the buzz of a vibrant public market,
the serene balance of a rewilded urban creek, the effortless flow of a community where
people feel seen, heard, and connected.
The Call for a Resonant Urban Future

A city exhibiting Syntoniety is not just sustainable; it is regenerative, healing its social and
ecological wounds. It is not just smart; it is wise, using its intelligence for the long-term
well-being of all its inhabitants. It is not just connected by ﬁbre optics; it is resonant with a
sense of mutual care and belonging.
Achieving this is not a technical challenge; it is a philosophical and practical one. It
requires a new kind of urban practitioner - and a new kind of citizen. Not planners, but
facilitators. Not consumers, but stewards. Not users of space, but weavers of place.
This book is divided into three parts to guide this transformation:
Part 1: A New Philosophy for Cities dismantles the outdated machine-age operating
system and introduces a new one, built on the core principles of Syntony, Pluriversality,
Ma, and Ubuntu.
Part 2: The Syntonious Toolkit translates this philosophy into actionable practices for
deep listening, hosting dialogue, values-based decision-making, and designing for life.
Part 3: Case Studies from the Edge analyses real-world projects through the syntonious
lens, learning from both their triumphs and their failures.
The journey ahead is a call to adventure. It asks us to rethink everything we thought we
knew about cities. It requires the courage to listen deeply, the humility to learn from the
land, and the will to act with ﬁerce compassion.
The resonant urban future is not a distant utopia. It is a potential waiting to be unlocked in
every street, every policy meeting, and every community gathering. It begins with a
single, radical act: the decision to stop building cities for people, and to start nurturing
them with people.

…dismantles the old
worldview and installs a
new, holistic operating
system for urbanism
Part 1

This section dismantles the old worldview and installs a new, holistic operating system for
urbanism.
Chapter 1:
The Crisis of the Machine City
We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us.
– Marshall McLuhan
Walk through the heart of any major modern city. Feel the wind tunnel between glass and
steel towers. Navigate the multi-lane arterial road that severs one neighbourhood from
another. Wait on a vast, barren plaza for the pedestrian light to change, with nowhere to
sit, nothing to touch, no reason to linger. This is not an accident of design; it is the logical
outcome of a centuries-old philosophy. Our urban environments are suffering from a
profound crisis of dissonance because we have built them based on two powerful, yet
fatally ﬂawed, metaphors: the city as a machine and, more recently, the city as a computer.
The Industrial-Modernist Legacy: Efﬁciency Over Life
The Industrial Revolution gifted us a new model for the world: the clockwork universe.
This logic, applied to urbanism, gave birth to the machine-city. Its primary values are
efﬁciency, standardisation, separation, and control.
Zoning: The city was divided into single-use zones - here we sleep, there we work, over
there we shop. This maximised logistical efﬁciency for industry and the automobile but
shattered the organic, mixed-use patterns of urban life, creating dormitory suburbs and
lifeless business districts after hours.
The Tabula Rasa Approach: Complex, messy, historical urban fabric was seen as a
problem. The solution was the bulldozer - clearing "slums" to create blank slates for
grandiose master plans that prioritized trafﬁc ﬂow and abstract geometric order over
existing communities and social networks. The philosophy was one of eradication, not
evolution.
The Primacy of the Automobile: Streets, once the multi-use public spaces of the city,
were engineered solely for the rapid movement of cars. Scale was lost, human proximity
became dangerous, and the constant noise and pollution created a pervasive low-level
stress, eroding the possibility of quiet contemplation and casual street-level interaction.
The machine-city promised a rational, orderly utopia. It delivered something else:
environments that are physically functional but socially and ecologically bankrupt.
The "Smart City" Upgrade: Control Over Connection
In recent decades, the machine-city has received a digital upgrade. The new paradigm is
the smart-city, which replaces the mechanical metaphor with a computational one. Its
promise is optimisation through data, sensors, and algorithms.
While offering tools for managing complexity, the smart-city paradigm often doubles
down on the mistakes of its predecessor:
Data as a Proxy for Life: It prioritises "Cold Data" - quantitative metrics like trafﬁc
volume, energy consumption, and footfall - over the qualitative, relational "Warm Data"
A Philosophy for Cities:
From Machine to Organism

that describes how people actually experience and feel about their city. It knows how
many people cross a square but not why they avoid it, or what stories are told there.
The Citizen as Data-Point: The lived experience of residents is often reduced to data
points to be analysed and optimised. This is a fundamentally extractive relationship,
turning human life into a resource for the system's efﬁciency, rather than the system
serving human ﬂourishing.
The Illusion of Apolitical-Tech: The smart city is presented as a neutral, technical
solution. But algorithms have biases, and surveillance infrastructure, even for "benign"
purposes like optimising trash collection, creates a panopticon of control, further
distancing citizens from a sense of agency and authentic participation.
The smart city, in its worst form, is the machine-city made intelligent; it is more efﬁcient at
being empty.
The Symptoms of Dissonance: A City Out of Tune
The result of these paradigms is a deep and pervasive urban dissonance, a state of being
profoundly out of tune with human nature and ecological reality. The symptoms are
everywhere:
1. The Loneliness Epidemic: We have never been more connected digitally, yet never
more isolated physically. The machine-city, with its privatised spaces, car-dependent
isolation, and lack of third places, actively dismantles the casual, everyday interactions
that are the bedrock of community and belonging.
2. Ecological Degradation: The city is designed as a linear, extractive system: resources
in, waste out. It sees nature as something to be controlled, paved over, or relegated to
decorative landscaping. This creates urban heat islands, severs watersheds, demolishes
biodiversity, and makes the city a primary driver of climate change, utterly
disconnected from the living systems that sustain it.
3. Placelessness: The logic of globalised standardisation has created a geography of
nowhere. The same glass tower, the same chain store, the same street signage appear
in Dubai, Toronto, and Shanghai. The unique Spirit of Place, the genius loci born from
local history, culture, ecology, and materials, is erased, resulting in anodyne
environments that feel rootless and lack meaning.
The Root of the Crisis: The Tyranny of Linear Time
Beneath these symptoms lies a deeper, metaphysical ﬂaw: our unquestioning adherence
to a linear, progressive model of time. This is the ultimate operating system of the
machine-city.
In this model, time is an arrow. The past is behind us, a repository of outdated things to be
overcome. The present is merely a ﬂeeting stepping stone. The future is the sole
destination, an ever-receding horizon of "progress," deﬁned almost exclusively by
economic growth and technological advancement.
This tyranny of linear time manifests in urbanism as:
The Myth of the Blank Slate: The past has no intrinsic value. History is a burden. This
justiﬁes the tabula rasa approach, severing communities from their memory and
heritage.

Short-Termism: Political and economic cycles (quarterly reports, election terms) force
decisions that prioritize immediate, visible results over long-term resilience and
regeneration. A forest is cut for a development now; the cost of biodiversity loss is a
problem for the future.
The Cult of Speed: Efficiency is the highest good because it "saves time." But time is
treated only as a quantity to be minimised (commute time, wait time), never as a quality
to be experienced (leisure time, ritual time, Kairos).
Disconnection from Cycles: The linear model is alienated from the natural cycles of day
and night, the seasons, and the tides. The city operates under eternal, artificial light,
trying to defy the rhythms that govern all life. It consumes resources without thought for
their renewal, a straight line leading to entropy.
This temporal tyranny is the root cause of our dissonance. A city that exists only on a
narrow, forward-thrusting vector of time cannot possibly be in tune with the cyclical
rhythms of nature or the deep, multi-generational time of human culture and ecology. It is
a city perpetually off-balance, racing toward a future it is unintentionally making
uninhabitable.
The crisis of the modern city, therefore, is not one of insufficient technology or inefficient
design. It is a crisis of philosophy and time. To heal our cities, we must first change our
metaphors and escape the tyranny of the clock. We must learn to build not for an abstract,
linear future, but for a rich, resonant, and enduring now, a now that honours the past,
cherishes the present, and stewards the future all at once. This is the foundation upon
which a syntonious urbanism must be built.

Syntony: The Principle of Resonant Alignment
If the crisis of the modern city is one of dissonance - a result of machine-logic and linear
time, then its healing lies in the pursuit of its opposite: syntony. This is our new central
principle. Derived from cybernetics and systems theory, syntony (from the Greek syntonia,
"agreement" or "accord") describes the phenomenon where two or more distinct entities
fall into a shared rhythm. It is the process of tuning to a common frequency. To move from
an urbanism of machines to an urbanism of living systems, we must learn to listen for,
nurture, and design for syntony.
Beyond Connection: Toward Resonance
The prevailing paradigms have focused on connection. We build networks: road
networks, fibre-optic networks, social networks. But connection is merely a structural state
- a description of linkage. A city can be hyper-connected and profoundly lonely, its citizens
isolated behind screens in towering hives of activity.
Syntony seeks something deeper: resonance. Resonance is a dynamic, qualitative
experience. It is the feeling of being in sync. It is the palpable buzz of a vibrant public
square where conversations hum and life unfolds effortlessly. It is the quiet serenity of a
green corridor where the sounds of the city are softened by the rustle of leaves. It is the
effortless flow of an integrated transport system that feels like a gift of time, not a drain on
it.
A connected city has Wi-Fi everywhere. A syntonious city has a sense of collective well-
being everywhere. Connection provides the wires; resonance is the music that flows
through them.
The City as a Living, Complex System
To understand how to cultivate resonance, we must first see the city for what it truly is: not
a machine, but a living, complex adaptive system. This shift in perspective is fundamental.
Unlike a machine, a living system:
Is self-organising: Its order emerges from the bottom-up through countless interactions,
not from a top-down blueprint.
Thrives on feedback loops: It constantly learns and adapts based on information flowing
through its networks (e.g., people avoiding a dangerous street, businesses clustering
together).
Is non-linear: Small actions can have large, unpredictable effects (the butterfly effect), and
large interventions can sometimes have disappointingly minor results.
Exists at the Edge of Chaos: It finds its vitality and creativity in the dynamic balance
between rigid order and chaotic disorder.
The machine-city tries to suppress this aliveness in the name of control. The syntonious
city learns to dance with it. It understands that the goal is not to dictate a final form, but
to cultivate the conditions from which healthy, vibrant, and resilient patterns can emerge.
Chapter 2

The Syntonious Spectrum: A Practice of Relationship
Syntony is not a fixed state to be achieved but a continuous practice - a spectrum of
activities that move a system toward resonance. We can understand this through three
interdependent phases:
1. Syntonious Attunement (Listening): This is the foundational practice of deep,
empathetic listening. It is the process of tuning into the existing frequencies of a place
and its people. It asks: What is already here? What is trying to emerge? What are the
dreams, the wounds, the rhythms, the stories? Attunement is the act of gathering Warm
Data.
2. Syntonious Alignment (Designing): Based on what is learned through attunement,
this is the practice of designing structures, physical, social, economic - that are aligned
with and supportive of the life of the system. It is adjusting the institutional and
architectural settings to better receive the signal. This includes policies like mixed-use
zoning, pedestrian-priority streets, and community land trusts that create a framework
for resonance to flourish.
3. Syntonious Attainment (Experiencing): This is the moment of arrival, the experience
of resonance itself. It is the feeling of "rightness" when a place is humming with life. It is
not a permanent state but a fleeting, magical culmination of successful attunement and
alignment. We know it when we feel it.
These are not sequential steps but a continuous cycle. A moment of Attainment provides
new information for Attunement, which informs new strategies for Alignment.
The Methodology of Aliveness: Warm Data
The primary tool for Syntonious Attunement is Warm Data. As coined by Nora Bateson,
Warm Data is contextual, relational information about the interrelationships within a
complex system. It is the antidote to the "Cold Data" of the smart city.
Gathering Warm Data requires becoming relational researchers. It involves methods like
participatory mapping, ethnographic interviews, community dialogues, and sensory walks.
It means listening not just to people, but to the land, the history, and the more-than-
human world. This process is the practical application of Experiential and Presentational
Knowing; it is how we feel and image the presence of the city's living patterns.
Temporal Syntony: Tuning to the Many Times of the City
A living system does not run on clock time alone. To achieve syntony, we must escape the
tyranny of linear time and learn to harmonise with the multiple temporalities that pulse
through the urban fabric.
Cyclical Time: The time of seasons, tides, circadian rhythms, and cultural festivals. A
syntonious city attunes to these rhythms with daylight-sensitive lighting, seasonal markets,
and policies that allow for natural ﬂood plains instead of ﬁghting them with concrete.

Deep Time (The Long Now): The vast, slow time of geology, evolution, and
intergenerational responsibility. This asks us to make decisions based on their impact
seven generations hence. It is the time of Syntonious Stewardship, of planting oak trees
whose shade we will never sit under.
Kairos Time: The qualitative, opportune moment. Ancient Greeks distinguished Kronos
(quantitative clock time) from Kairos - the right or critical moment for action. Syntonious
Facilitation requires a mastery of Kairos: knowing when to introduce an idea, when to
pause a meeting, when the community is ready for change.
A city that embraces Temporal Syntony is no longer a projectile hurtling toward a single
future. It becomes a temporal tapestry, weaving together the past, present, and future into
a rich, coherent, and resilient whole. It ﬁnds its rhythm in the dance of its own many times.
Syntony, therefore, is the master principle that realigns urbanism with life. It offers a path
from the disconnected, dissonant machine-city toward a resonant urban ecosystem, tuned
to the frequencies of its people, its place, and its own deep, multi-layered time. The
following chapters will provide the tools to begin this great retuning.

Pluriversality: Honouring the Many Worlds in One City
A city is not a problem to be solved, but a multitude of worlds to be hosted.
– Inspired by Arturo Escobar
The machine-city paradigm, in its pursuit of efﬁciency and order, operates on a
fundamental premise: that there is one ideal, universal way to design, plan, and live. This
philosophy produces standardized solutions - the same glass tower, the same zoning
code, the same public plaza - that are dropped into contexts from Dubai to Dallas, erasing
difference in the name of progress. If syntony is the process of tuning a city to resonance,
then pluriversality is the acknowledgment of the many different songs that need to be
heard, and the many different instruments that need to be tuned, for that resonance to
occur. It is the commitment to a city of many worlds, coexisting in a shared space.
The End of the Universal Blueprint
Pluriversality begins with a simple but radical rejection: there is no universal blueprint for
urban life. What works in one cultural, ecological, and historical context may be actively
harmful in another. The international style of modernism was the ultimate expression of
the universal blueprint, and its legacy is one of placelessness and social disruption.
A pluriversal approach understands that ways of knowing, being, and dwelling are:
Situated: They emerge from speciﬁc places, histories, and ecosystems.
Partial: No single perspective can ever grasp the full complexity of the urban whole.
Legitimate: Different knowledge systems - from indigenous land stewardship to the lived
experience of a street vendor to the technical knowledge of an engineer - are all valid in
their own domains.
The goal of urbanism, therefore, shifts from applying solutions to hosting conversations
between these different worlds. The question is no longer "What is the right answer?" but
"How can we create a space where our many different answers can meet, negotiate, and
create something new together?"
The City of Many Stories: A Single Space, a Multitude of Realities
The most powerful way to understand pluriversality is to walk through any urban space
and see it not as one thing, but as many things simultaneously. Every street, park, and
building is a different place depending on who you are.
Consider a typical city park: For a group of teenage skateboarders, the park is a terrain of
challenge and social bonding. The marble ledge of a planter is not a barrier; it is an
opportunity for creativity and skill, a stage for performance and identity formation. Their
world values risk, artistry, and peer recognition.
For an elderly retiree, that same park is a sanctuary of quiet contemplation and a vital
connection to the outside world. The bench under a mature tree is a lifeline against
isolation, a place to feel the sun and watch the seasons change. Their world values safety,
tranquillity, and the simple gift of presence
Chapter 3

For a new parent, the park is a nerve-wracking ecosystem of threats and joys. The world is
seen at knee-level, focused on safe surfaces, shaded areas, and the potential for casual
connection with other adults. Their world values security, community, and a respite from
domestic isolation.
For a city ecologist, the park is a node in an urban habitat network. They see the invasive
species, the nesting opportunities for birds, the soil compaction from foot traffic, and the
health of the canopy. Their world values biodiversity, resilience, and ecological function.
None of these stories is more "true" than the others. The machine-city, however, will
inevitably design for one story at the expense of the others - e.g., installing "skate-
stoppers" on the ledge to privilege the retiree's need for order, thereby erasing the
teenagers' world and triggering conflict.
A syntonious, pluriversal approach seeks to design for the negotiation between these
stories. Could the park have a designated, well-designed skating area and a protected
quiet zone? Could the ecologist work with the teenagers and parents to plant native,
robust species? The aim is not a bland compromise that makes everyone equally
unhappy, but a creative synthesis that allows multiple realities to flourish side-by-side,
enriching the whole.
Designing for Coexistence, Not Assimilation
This leads to a new set of design principles for the pluriversal city:
From Master Planning to Curated Emergence: Instead of a single, fixed master plan, the
urbanist’s role is to create a flexible framework - a set of relational guidelines - that allows
different communities to imprint their identity on a space over time. This is about
designing the process as much as the product. It means using tools like form-based codes
that regulate the relationship between buildings (massing, height, permeability) rather
than their prescribed use, allowing for organic, mixed-use adaptation.
The Right to Difference: Pluriversality actively protects the right of communities to be
different, to express their identity in the urban fabric, and to have their way of life
respected. This means supporting cultural centres, allowing for informal street markets,
and designing public spaces that can be adapted for different cultural rituals and
gatherings. It is the architectural equivalent of linguistic diversity.
Conflict as a Resource: When different worlds collide (e.g., noise from a festival
disturbing nearby residents), the pluriversal city sees this not as a nuisance to be
eliminated, but as a vital signal that different realities are present. These conflicts become
the raw material for negotiation and creative problem-solving, facilitated through the
practices of Syntonious Facilitation (see Chapter 9). A conflict over space is an invitation
to create more nuanced, layered, and intelligent design.
The Cosmopolitan Local: The pluriversal city is both deeply local and globally
connected. It draws on global ideas but adapts them to local contexts. It allows a
neighbourhood to be distinctly of its place while being a haven for people from all over
the world. Superkilen in Copenhagen, with its collection of artefacts from over 60
nationalities, is a physical manifestation of this idea - a park that is a global collection of
local memories.

Pluriversal Knowing in Policy: This extends beyond physical design. Budgeting
processes embrace participatory budgeting, allowing residents to directly decide on
spending priorities. Planning departments employ community liaisons and ethnographers
to gather Warm Data, ensuring that the "expert" knowledge of institutions is in constant
dialogue with the lived experience of communities.
In essence, pluriversality is the politics of syntony. It is the acknowledgment that
resonance cannot be imposed from a single perspective. True urban harmony is not a
single note held by everyone; it is a complex chord, richer and more beautiful precisely
because of its different, and sometimes dissonant, notes.
It is the understanding that the strength of the urban fabric lies in the weave of its many
threads, not in the uniformity of its colour. By honouring the many worlds within one city,
we don’t create chaos; we create the only kind of harmony worth having - one that is alive,
dynamic, and resilient. A city that embraces pluriversality says to all who dwell within it:
"You belong here, and it is your presence, in all your beautiful difference, that makes this
place whole."

Ma (間): The Architecture of the In-Between
In the syntonious city, the most important thing is not the thing itself, but the space
between things. The pause between musical notes that makes the melody. The silence
between thoughts that allows for understanding. The gap between buildings that lets in
the light and air. This is the essence of Ma (間), a Japanese concept that transcends simple
translation. It is the fundamental, sacred interval that holds relationship and gives meaning
to form. If syntony is the goal and pluriversality is the ethos, then Ma is the primary
medium through which we achieve them.
Deﬁning the Sacred Interval
Ma is not merely emptiness or negative space. It is engaged emptiness, a purposeful and
pregnant pause. It is the experiential difference between space (an abstract, measurable
area) and place (a location charged with meaning, memory, and potential). We can
understand Ma through three interconnected dimensions:
Spatial Ma: This is the most tangible form. It is the in-between that gives form its power.
Examples: The public plaza between buildings. The alleyway that becomes a children's
playground. The canopy of a tree that creates a room without walls. The purposeful gap
left between two structures to frame a view of a mountain. A well-designed bench
under a light post, creating a world for one person.
In the machine-city, these spaces are seen as leftovers, voids to be ﬁlled with more stuff.
In the syntonious city, these spaces are the most valued real estate - the containers for
life itself.
Temporal Ma: Ma is also a temporal phenomenon - the pause in time that allows for
reﬂection and emergence.
Examples: The daily quiet hour in a bustling district. The weekly closure of a street to
cars for a farmers' market or ciclovía. The seasonal festival that breaks the routine of the
year. The moment of silence in a meeting before a decision is made.
This is the deliberate creation of Kairos, the opportune moment, within the relentless
ﬂow of Chronos (clock time). It is the recognition that life needs rhythm, not just pace.
Social Ma: This is the relational space between people - the container that allows for
genuine meeting.
Examples: The carefully set agreements at the start of a community dialogue that allow
people to speak freely. The circle of chairs with no head, implying equality. The shared
meal that precedes a difﬁcult negotiation. The facilitator who holds the space without
controlling the conversation.
Social Ma is the embodiment of Ubuntu; it is the actively nurtured condition that allows
us to see and afﬁrm each other's humanity.
Together, these three dimensions form the architecture of relationship. A great public
square (Spatial Ma) that hosts a weekly market (Temporal Ma) where diverse communities
feel safe to interact (Social Ma) is the ultimate expression of urban Ma.
Chapter 4

Designing the Container, Not the Content
This understanding of Ma necessitates a radical shift in the role of the urbanist: from
designer of content to designer of container. The old paradigm seeks to control the
outcome - to design the exact look, function, and experience of a space. This is a brittle
approach that often fails because it cannot anticipate the ﬂuid, living needs of people.
The syntonious approach, guided by Ma, is different:
We design the loom, not the weave. We create robust, well-deﬁned, yet ﬂexible
containers and then trust that the community will weave its own rich and unpredictable
patterns of life within them.
We provide the stage, not the script. We focus on creating a safe, inviting, and
adaptable public realm - the spatial and social stage - upon which the countless daily
dramas of urban life can unfold, unscripted by us.
The key design question shifts from "What should go here?" to "What conditions will
allow for the most life, connection, and beauty to emerge here?"
This means prioritizing things like:
Permeable edges that invite interaction, not blank walls or fences.
Robust, non-precious materials that can bear the marks of use and adaptation.
Moveable furniture that allows people to conﬁgure their own spaces.
Multi-functional infrastructure that can support different activities at different times
(e.g., electrical outlets in a plaza for night markets or performances).
Ma as the Vessel for Spirit and Time
When we design for Ma, we accomplish two profound things:
1. We create vessels for the Spirit of Place (Genius Loci). The Spirit of Place is not
found in the built form alone, but in the unique interplay of light, sound, history, and
ecology in the spaces between. By crafting thoughtful intervals, a frame that captures
the sunset, an acoustic buffer that preserves tranquillity, a path that follows an old creek
bed, we don't create meaning; we curate the conditions for the unique genius of a
place to express itself and be experienced. Ma is the conductor that allows the Spirit of
Place to be heard.
2. We create portals to non-linear time. A space designed with Ma allows us to step out
of the frantic, linear ﬂow of clock time. Sitting in a quiet courtyard, you might feel the
deep time of the stone, the cyclical time of the planting, and the Kairos time of a
meaningful conversation, all at once. Temporal Ma, the scheduled pause, the festival -
ritualizes this break from productivity, reminding us that we are biological beings in a
natural world, not just cogs in an economic machine. In these pauses, we can
experience the Everywhen, where past, present, and future coexist.
Ma, therefore, is the practical magic of syntonious urbanism. It is the humble yet powerful
practice of knowing what not to build, where not to program, and when not to speak. It is
the conscious creation of nothing, so that everything, the messy, beautiful, and
unpredictable everything of urban life, has a place to be.

Ubuntu: "I Am Because We Are" – The Ethical Core
A person is a person through other persons.
– Ubuntu proverb (Zulu translation: Umuntu ngumuntu ngabantu)
We have explored a new goal (Syntony), a new respect for difference (Pluriversality), and a
new medium for design (Ma). Yet, a critical question remains: Why should we do this?
What is the moral compass that guides us toward resonance and away from dissonance?
For this, we turn to the ancient African philosophy of Ubuntu, which provides the
indispensable ethical core for syntonious urbanism. It is the answer to the "why" that fuels
the "how."
The Philosophy of Interbeing
Ubuntu, originating from the Nguni Bantu languages of Southern Africa, is a worldview
that posits our very humanity is not an individual possession, but a collective achievement.
It asserts that we are fundamentally interconnected and that our sense of self is
constituted through our relationships with others.
The core tenets of Ubuntu can be understood as:
Relationality Over Individualism: Identity is not "I think, therefore I am," but rather, "I am
because we are." The self is a node in a network of reciprocal relationships. My humanity
is inextricably bound up with yours.
Mutual Recognition and Care: To be human is to recognize the humanity in others and
to actively afﬁrm it through compassion, respect, and solidarity. It is the practice of
seeing yourself in others and others in yourself.
Communal Thriving: Individual well-being is impossible without communal well-being.
The highest good is the health, harmony, and vitality of the community as a whole.
Success is measured by the well-being of the most vulnerable.
In essence, Ubuntu is a philosophy of interbeing. It tells us that we are not isolated atoms
colliding in a void, but threads in a living tapestry. To damage another thread is to fray the
entire fabric, including oneself.
Ubuntu as the Moral Imperative for Urbanism
Translating this philosophy into urban practice represents a radical shift from the
underlying values of the machine-city and even many well-intentioned "sustainable"
models. It moves urbanism from a technical discipline to a moral one.
From Individual Rights to Communal Responsibilities:
The modern city, particularly in the West, is largely built around the concept of individual
rights: the right to property, the right to mobility (often by car), the right to privacy. These
are not unimportant, but when they become the primary focus, they lead to a landscape
of isolation - gated communities, private cars, and backyard decks that replace front
porches
Chapter 5

Ubuntu challenges us to balance rights with responsibilities. It asks:
- What is my responsibility to my neighbour?
- What is our collective responsibility to the well-being of this street, this park, this
watershed?
- How does my claim to a right (e.g., to unlimited car use) impact our collective right to
clean air, safe streets, and a healthy community?
A city guided by Ubuntu would measure its success not by its GDP or its number of luxury
condos, but by its communal thriving. It would ask:
- Do our public spaces foster mutual recognition and connection, or do they isolate us?
- Do our housing policies strengthen community bonds or fracture them?
- Does the economic life of the city uplift everyone, or does it create isolated pockets of
wealth amidst poverty?
- Are our systems designed to care for the most vulnerable among us?
The Ubuntu Filter: A Guide for Action
Ubuntu is not an abstract ideal; it is a practical ﬁlter for every decision, from a massive
infrastructure project to a local zoning change. It directly informs the Syntonious Calculus
(see Chapter 10) with its most crucial question:
"Does this action afﬁrm our shared humanity? Does it recognise that ‘I am
because we are’?"
Applying this ﬁlter has profound implications:
A Highway Project: A standard cost-beneﬁt analysis might approve an expansion that
severs a neighbourhood because it saves commuters time. The Ubuntu ﬁlter would
reject it, because it actively damages the relational fabric of a community, destroying the
"we" for the beneﬁt of the "I."
A Vacant Lot: A developer might propose a high-security luxury apartment building. The
Ubuntu ﬁlter would instead ask: What would most afﬁrm the community's humanity?
Perhaps a community land trust for affordable housing, a public park, or a community
garden - projects that build the "we."
Public Space Design: A plaza designed with Ubuntu would not just have benches; it
would have benches arranged to encourage conversation. It would have water fountains,
playable art, and shade - features that say, "You are welcome here; your needs are
recognized; you are part of us.”
Ubuntu as the Soul of the Syntonious Toolkit
Ubuntu breathes ethical life into the entire syntonious framework:
Syntonious Attunement is the practice of Ubuntu - the deep listening that says, "Your
story is part of my story."
Pluriversality is Ubuntu in practice - the active respect and celebration of different ways
of being that says, "Your humanity is different from mine, and it is essential to our whole."
Designing Ma is the physical creation of containers for Ubuntu to ﬂourish - the spaces
where the "we" can be nurtured.
Syntonious Facilitation is the hosting of Ubuntu - the skilled practice of weaving a
diverse group into a temporary, purposeful "we."

Without Ubuntu, the syntonious city risks becoming another sophisticated but ultimately
hollow technocracy - efficient at creating "vibrancy" but blind to justice, care, and mutual
responsibility. With Ubuntu, syntonious urbanism becomes a radical, compassionate, and
essential practice. It is the courage to declare that a city’s most important infrastructure is
not its roads or fibre optics, but the strength, compassion, and resilience of its human
bonds. It is the understanding that we will build resonant cities only when we remember
that we are, and always will be, in this together.

Weaving the Threads: The Soul of the City
We have passed through the critique of the machine and arrived at a new set of
principles: the pursuit of Syntony, the respect for Pluriversality, the design of Ma, and the
ethic of Ubuntu. Individually, they are powerful tools. Together, they form a coherent
philosophy with a single, ultimate purpose: to midwife the Soul of the City into being by
honouring the Spirit of the Place. This is the final, synthesizing thread of our new
foundation.
This chapter moves from a philosophy of urbanism to a poetics of urbanism. It argues that
the highest calling of city-making is not to build structures, but to cultivate meaning; not
to design spaces, but to nurture belonging. It is to transform a settlement of structures
into a beloved community that is alive, conscious, and resonant.
Spirit of Place (Genius Loci): The Song of the Land
Long before we built cities, the land spoke. Every place on earth has its own unique
character - a personality formed by the interplay of geology, ecology, light, sound, history,
and memory. The Romans called this Genius Loci, the Spirit of the Place.
The Spirit of Place is not a metaphor. It is the palpable atmosphere of a location. It is:
- The way the afternoon light falls on a particular stone wall.
- The cool breeze that always seems to travel down a specific alleyway.
- The specific mix of sounds - birds, water, distant traffic - that forms the acoustic
fingerprint of a neighbourhood.
- The stories of triumph and tragedy embedded in the ground, waiting to be
remembered.
- The ancient pathway that became a modern street, retaining its energy of movement.
The machine-city, with its tabula rasa approach, actively silences this spirit, paving over
creeks, bulldozing hills, and standardizing landscapes. It creates a deafening monotony.
Syntonious urbanism begins with the humble act of listening to this spirit. The first
duty of a weaver is not to impose a vision, but to attune to the existing song of the land
and ask: What is this place trying to be? What does it need to sing its song more clearly?
Soul of the City: The Emergent Chorus
If the Spirit of Place is the eternal, underlying song, then the Soul of the City is the
dynamic, evolving chorus that is co-created by all its inhabitants - human and more-than-
human - over time.
The Soul of the City is:
- The shared identity and emotional landscape of its people.
- The collective character - is the city bold, reserved, playful, solemn?
- The myths, struggles, and aspirations that define its ongoing story.
- The unique "personality" a visitor can feel when they spend time there.
Chapter 6

A city has a soul when it is more than just a collection of buildings and people. It has a
soul when it has a heart - a central, animating purpose and sense of self that is greater
than the sum of its parts. This is not imposed by a logo or a branding campaign; it
emerges from the complex, relational alchemy between people and the place they call
home.
The Symbiotic Relationship: Spirit and Soul in Dialogue
The relationship between Spirit of Place and Soul of the City is symbiotic and dialogic.
They call to each other across time.
1. The Spirit Nourishes the Soul: A city that respects its Spirit of Place, that incorporates
its geography, honours its history, and listens to its ecology, provides a rich, authentic
ground from which a unique Soul can emerge. The spirit provides the raw materials of
identity.
2. The Soul Protects the Spirit: A city with a strong, caring soul, guided by Ubuntu, will
act as a steward for its Spirit of Place. It will fight to protect its waterways, celebrate its
local culture, and design in ways that enhance rather than erase its unique character.
The soul becomes the guardian of the spirit.
A city in syntony is one where this dialogue is healthy and vibrant. The soul reflects the
spirit, and the spirit nourishes the soul.
The City as a Living, Relational System Co-Created by People and Place
This brings us to our final, synthesized definition of the city. It is not a machine. It is not a
computer.
The city is a living, relational system, continuously co-created by the active,
conscious participation of its people in dialogue with the Spirit of its Place.
This definition changes everything:
Living: The city is an ecosystem, subject to growth, adaptation, illness, and healing. It
has a metabolism and evolves over deep time.
Relational: Its essence exists not in its objects, but in the relationships between them -
between people, between neighbourhoods, between built form and nature, between
past and future.
Co-created: The city is not made by experts and consumed by residents. It is a collective
project. Every citizen is a co-author of the urban text, through their actions, stories, and
care.
Dialogue with Place: We are not building on the land; we are building with it. The land
is an active participant in the process, with its own agency, limits, and gifts.
The Syntonious Practice as Soul-Weaving
The principles we have explored are the tools for this great work of co-creation. They are
the means by which we weave the Soul of the City in harmony with the Spirit of the Place.
We practice Syntonious Attunement to listen to the song of the land and the dreams of
the people.

We embrace Pluriversality to ensure the emerging chorus has many voices, many stories.
We design Ma to create the sacred containers - the spatial, temporal, and social pauses -
where this dialogue can unfold.
We are guided by Ubuntu to ensure the process is one of mutual recognition and care,
afﬁrming that our humanity is bound up with each other and with the place itself.
The ultimate goal of syntonious urbanism is therefore the emergence of the Ensouled
City. This is a city that is not just efﬁcient, but wise; not just sustainable, but regenerative;
not just connected, but resonant. It is a city that knows who it is and why it is here. It is a
city that has become a true home - a living, breathing, beloved community that sings its
unique song into the world, a song forged in the sacred dialogue between people and
place. This is the city worth building.

Seeing the Whole City: A Decolonised Integral
Framework
We now possess a new philosophy for the city: a living, relational system whose soul
emerges from the dialogue between people and place, guided by syntony, pluriversality,
Ma, and Ubuntu. But how do we operationalize this? How do we ensure that in our pursuit
of resonance, we do not ourselves fall into the trap of seeing only one part of the picture?
To avoid creating new blind spots, we need a map - a comprehensive framework that
ensures no dimension of the city’s life is ignored.
Integral theorist Ken Wilber’s AQAL (All Quadrants, All Levels) model provides a powerful
meta-framework for this. However, in its standard form, it can risk imposing the very
universalism and hierarchy that syntonious urbanism seeks to transcend. Therefore, we
must ﬁrst decolonise it, transforming it from a rigid schema into a ﬂexible, relational tool
for seeing the whole.
Decolonising Wilber: From Hierarchy to Zones of Knowing
The standard Integral model is often presented with a vertical, hierarchical notion of
consciousness (“archaic,” “magic,” “mythic,” “rational,” “integral”). This implies a linear
progression toward a “higher” or “more evolved” state - a concept that is culturally
speciﬁc and often used to dismiss other worldviews as “less developed.”
Our decolonised integral framework makes three crucial shifts:
1. Replacing “Levels” with “Zones of Knowing”: We move away from a vertical
hierarchy to a ﬂatter, relational topography. Instead of “levels,” we speak of different but
equally valid Zones of Knowing - distinct modes of engaging with reality that are always
present and interacting. The technical knowledge of an engineer is not “higher” than
the embodied knowledge of a dancer; they are different zones, each essential and
context-dependent.
2. Emphasising Relationality over Transcendence: The quadrants are not separate
domains to be integrated by a transcendent, “integral” self. Instead, they are
understood as co-arising, mutually inﬂuencing aspects of a single, relational ﬂow. This
aligns perfectly with Ubuntu and the concept of the city as a relational system. We look
for how the “I” shapes the “IT” and is shaped by the “WE,” in a continuous, non-
hierarchical dance.
3. Centring Pluriversality: Each quadrant and zone must be seen as containing a
multitude of culturally speciﬁc expressions. There is not one “I” or one “WE,” but many
ways of being an individual and many ways of being a collective, all of which must be
honoured in our analysis.
The Four Quadrants of the City: A Relational View
The decolonised framework retains Wilber’s four quadrants as a brilliantly simple way to
ensure we are looking at every major dimension of any situation. We can adapt them to
view the city as a dynamic process:
Chapter 7

Upper-Left (UI): The Interior of the Individual. The psychological and emotional
landscape of the citizen. Their sense of self, well-being, mental health, fears, hopes,
dreams, and aesthetic experience of the city. This is the domain of personal meaning
and consciousness.
Upper-Right (UR): The Exterior of the Individual. The objective, measurable aspect of
the person. Their physical health, body, daily behaviours, commute route, housing type,
carbon footprint. This is the domain of individual behaviour and material needs.
Lower-Left (LL): The Interior of the Collective. The shared, cultural dimension. The
worldviews, values, shared identity, unwritten rules, stories, and ethos of a community
or neighbourhood. This is the domain of culture, shared meaning, and Ubuntu.
Lower-Right (LR): The Exterior of the Collective. The tangible, systemic structures of
the city. The infrastructure, laws, zoning codes, transport networks, economic models,
and architectural forms. This is the domain of systems, planning, and design.
A city’s dissonance is often a failure across quadrants. A beautiful new park (LR) will fail if it
conﬂicts with the cultural values of the community (LL), leading people to feel unsafe or
unwelcome (UI), and therefore not use it (UR).
The Eight Zones: A Guide for Warm Data Gathering
To make this truly practical for Syntonious Attunement, we deepen the quadrants with
the concept of the “Eight Zones,” which distinguish between the inside and outside
perspective of each quadrant. This is where we integrate Warm Data and Heron &
Reason’s Four Ways of Knowing.
For each quadrant, we ask two types of questions:
1. The Phenomenological Question (The "Inside" of the zone): How does it feel? What
is the lived experience? This requires Warm Data, gathered through Experiential and
Presentational Knowing (story, art, dialogue, sensing).
2. The Structural Question (The "Outside" of the zone): How is it structured? What are
its observable patterns? This is gathered through Cold Data and Propositional and
Practical Knowing (maps, statistics, models, audits).
Applying the Framework: The Integral City Scan
This framework becomes our primary tool for Attunement. Before any intervention, we can
“scan” a situation across all eight zones. For example, let’s consider a street redesign:
UL (I) / Interior-Individual:
Phenomenological (Warm): How do residents feel walking on this street? (e.g.,
interviews, narratives about fear, joy, belonging).
Structural (Cold): What are the demographic proﬁles? Mental health statistics? (e.g.,
data on loneliness in the area).
UR (IT) / Exterior-Individual:
Phenomenological (Warm): What is the embodied experience? (e.g., sensory walks
noting noise, heat, smells).
Structural (Cold): What is the footfall, trafﬁc volume, accident data, air quality index?

LL (WE) / Interior-Collective:
Phenomenological (Warm): What are the shared stories and values here? (e.g.,
community dialogues about the street’s history, conflicts between cyclists and drivers).
Structural (Cold): What are the cultural institutions? Community groups? Social
networks? (e.g., mapping of local associations, faith groups).
LR (ITS) / Exterior-Collective:
Phenomenological (Warm): How do the systems feel to interact with? (e.g., user
experience of crossing the street, waiting for a bus).
Structural (Cold): What are the policies, budgets, ownership maps, engineering
standards, and physical infrastructures in place?
Syntony as Integral Weaving
The purpose of this map is not to categorize and control, but to identify dissonance and
foster resonance across all domains. The integral scan reveals where the city is out of tune
with itself.
A syntonious intervention aims to create alignment across the quadrants. For example:
A new park (LR: ITS) should be designed based on the cultural values and desired
experiences of the community (LL: WE / UL: I), which will improve individual well-being
(UL: I) and be reflected in improved public health data and usage patterns (UR: IT).
Syntonious Facilitation is, therefore, the skill of holding this entire complex, integral
picture and weaving together insights from all zones and quadrants, using the
Syntonious Calculus (informed by Ubuntu) to make decisions that create harmony across
the whole system.
This decolonised integral framework is the loom on which the threads of syntony are
woven. It ensures our practice is truly holistic, guarding us against the arrogance of single-
perspective solutions and empowering us to see, and therefore serve, the glorious,
pluriversal wholeness of the city.

The Syntonious Toolkit:
Practices for Weaving the
Resonant City
Part 2

The Syntonious Toolkit:
Practices for Weaving the Resonant City
Introduction
Philosophy without practice is a melody never played. This section bridges the world of
ideas and the work of hands-on-the-ground change. We now move from seeing the city as
a living, relational system to the art of intervening in it as one. The following chapters are
not a rigid manual but a set of adaptable practices, values, and tools for fostering Urban
Syntoniety. They are offered in the spirit of the Golden Thread: with courage, agility, and a
ﬁerce will to act in service of life.
Chapter 8:
The Foundational Practice: Syntonious Attunement
Before a weaver touches a single thread, they must ﬁrst study the wool: its texture, its
strength, its colour, its memory. To weave a syntonious city, we must begin with the same
deep, empathetic study of the place and its people. This is Syntonious Attunement: the
foundational practice of listening for and understanding the existing patterns of life, both
visible and invisible. It is the process of tuning ourselves to the city’s frequency before we
attempt to play a new note.
Attunement is the radical opposite of the expert-led, top-down analysis that characterizes
the machine-city. It is not about diagnosing problems from a distance but about building
relationships from within. It answers the question: What is already here? What is trying to
emerge?
The Art of Deep Listening: The Integral City Scan in Action
Syntonious Attunement requires listening across all dimensions of the city’s life, using the
decolonised integral framework from Chapter 7 as our guide. This is the practical
application of the Integral City Scan. Our aim is to gather information across all four
quadrants and eight zones, ensuring we capture both Cold Data and, most importantly,
the Warm Data that reveals the life within the system.
A true attuner moves through the city with a question for each quadrant:
Upper-Left (I): What are the hopes, fears, and dreams of individuals here?
Upper-Right (IT): What are the observable behaviours and physical realities?
Lower-Left (WE): What are the shared stories, values, and cultural norms?
Lower-Right (ITS): What are the systems and structures that govern life?
This holistic listening reveals the connections and dissonances between these domains -
for example, how a city policy (LR) might be causing psychological stress (UL) by
contradicting a community’s values (LL).
Methods for Gathering Warm Data: Beyond the Survey
To truly attune, we must employ methods that capture context and relationship. This
moves us far beyond surveys and spreadsheets into the realm of relational research.
Relational Sensing: This is the practice of tuning into the emotional and social ﬁeld of a
place. It involves quiet observation and reﬂexive note-taking. How does it feel to be in this
plaza? Is there tension, joy, ease, or anxiety in the air? How are people moving? Are they
making eye contact? This is the skill of reading the unspoken language of space.

Participatory Narrative Inquiry: Stories are the vessels of Warm Data. This method
involves collectively collecting and analysing stories about a place. Instead of asking for
opinions (“Do you like this park?”), we ask for experiences (“Tell me about a time you had
a meaningful moment in this park”). The patterns that emerge from these stories - the
metaphors, the conﬂicts, the joys - reveal the deeper meaning and identity of a place.
Embodied Mapping: We do not experience the city only in our minds; we experience it
in our bodies. Embodied mapping involves walking through a space with residents, using
all our senses, and mapping not just assets, but feelings, memories, and desires.
Participants might use coloured pencils to draw where they feel safe (green), anxious (red),
or joyful (yellow) onto a base map, creating a powerful visual representation of collective
lived experience.
Digital Ears: Technology for Deeper Listening.
Key Idea: AI can help us sense patterns in the vast amount of qualitative data a city
produces, but it must be guided by human wisdom.
Speciﬁc Applications:
Sentiment Analysis for Warm Data: Using AI to analyse thousands of responses from
town hall meetings, social media (with consent), and public comments to identify
underlying emotional tones, emerging concerns, and shared values that might be
missed by human readers alone. This augments, but does not replace, deep
ethnographic listening.
Pattern Recognition in Urban Systems: AI models can analyse complex, multi-layered
data (trafﬁc ﬂow, air quality, noise levels, social media activity) to identify hidden
correlations. For example, it might reveal that a spike in local anxiety (measured through
language in community forums) correlates with speciﬁc trafﬁc patterns or air pollution
levels, providing a more holistic view of a neighbourhood’s dissonance.
Generative AI for Scenario Visualization: Using AI image generators to quickly create
visual "what-if" scenarios based on community descriptions. A resident says, "I want a
greener, safer street for my kids," and an AI can generate multiple, low-ﬁdelity images to
spark a more concrete co-design conversation.
Attuning to the Spirit of Place: Deepening the Practice
To move beyond the human-centric, attunement must also listen to the more-than-human
world - the land, the ecology, the history, and the Spirit of Place itself.
Deep Mapping: This technique layers multiple types of information onto a single map to
reveal the deep history and character of a place. A deep map might overlay:
- Current land use with historical maps showing old creek beds or footpaths.
- Geological surveys with community-generated maps of cherished trees or views.
- Audio recordings of stories from elders onto the locations where they happened.
This creates a rich, palimpsestic portrait that reveals the Genius Loci.
More-Than-Human Councils: This facilitated practice gives a literal “seat at the table” to
non-human stakeholders. In a community meeting about a riverfront, empty chairs can be
designated for “the River,” “the Cottonwood Trees,” or “the Salmon.” Participants are
invited to speak on behalf of these entities, answering questions like: “What does the
River need to thrive?” This is not mere role-play; it is a profound methodological tool
based on the indigenous principle of considering the impact of decisions on the seventh
generation. It operationalizes the understanding that the city is a co-creation between
people and place, forcing a shift from a human-centric to an eco-centric perspective.

Temporal Attunement: Listening also means listening to time. This involves:
Historical Research: Understanding the layers of history - the triumphs, traumas, and
transformations - that have shaped the present.
Seasonal Observation: Noting how light, wind, water, and life change with the seasons,
and how the city supports or hinders these cycles.
Future Visioning: Facilitating exercises where community members project themselves
decades or generations into the future to describe the legacy they wish to leave.
Syntonious Attunement is, therefore, a form of active love. It is the courageous, humble,
and patient work of paying attention. It is the essential ﬁrst step because we cannot hope
to resonate with a system we have not ﬁrst taken the time to understand and love for what
it already is. The data gathered here becomes the threads we will later weave. Without this
deep listening, any intervention, no matter how well-intentioned, risks being just another
form of dissonant imposition. With it, we begin the true work of weaving a resonant future.
Crucial Caveat: The "Syntonious Technology" Principle
A syntonious city uses technology to foster connection, not replace it. AI must be a
tool for deepening empathy and understanding, not for automating control. The
goal is not a city that is smart because of its technology, but a city that is wise
because of how its people use that technology to serve life.
By integrating technology in this way, we position it as a powerful ally in the great work of
weaving syntony, while remaining true to the book's core critique of the sterile,
controlling "smart city" model. It becomes a thread in the loom, not the weaver.

The Core Skill: Syntonious Facilitation
If Syntonious Attunement is learning to hear the city’s many songs, then Syntonious
Facilitation is the art of conducting them into a harmonious chorus. It is the essential
practice that brings the philosophy of syntony to life. This chapter marks a profound
identity shift for the urban practitioner: from the traditional role of the expert who designs
solutions for a community, to the role of the host or weaver who designs a process with
the community.
This is not merely a new set of techniques; it is a radical transformation of power,
responsibility, and purpose. The facilitator’s authority comes not from technical
knowledge, but from the ability to build trust, host courageous conversations, and
midwife collective intelligence. They are the embodied expression of the Golden Thread,
holding the space with the courage to listen, the agility to adapt, and the will to act in
service of the whole.
The Shift from Expert to Weaver
The machine-city was built by experts - planners, engineers, architects - who applied
standardized blueprints from a position of detached authority. The syntonious city is
woven by facilitators who understand that the most valuable expertise is distributed
throughout the community.
This shift changes everything:
Chapter 9
The weaver’s primary tool is not a CAD drawing or a zoning code, but a well-crafted
question. Their canvas is not paper, but the relational space between people.
Hosting the Pluriversal Roundtable
The core task of the syntonious facilitator is to host what we call the Pluriversal Roundtable
- a container where the city’s many worlds, with their different knowledge systems and
often competing needs, can meet not as adversaries, but as co-creators. This is the
practical enactment of the philosophy of pluriversality.

Hosting this roundtable requires mastering three essential skills:
1. Crafting the Syntonious Invitation
The ﬁrst act of facilitation is the call to engage. A syntonious invitation is not a notice; it is a
story that speaks to the heart of each world within the community. It must:
Speak to the "Why": Lead with the Edge of Potential - "We are working at the edge of
[CHALLENGE] to explore the potential for [OPPORTUNITY]."
Honour Pluriversality: Be translated and distributed through diverse channels
(community centres, places of worship, social media groups, local markets) to reach
beyond the "usual suspects."
Set the Container: Clearly state the values of the gathering (e.g., based on Ubuntu and
the Golden Thread), the level of decision-making power participants will have, and
what they can expect.
Be an Act of Respect: Acknowledge the value of people's time and wisdom. The
invitation itself is the ﬁrst signal of whether this will be an extractive or generative
process.
2. Working with Conﬂict as a Resource
In a pluriversal city, conﬂict is not a sign of failure but a sign of life - evidence that different
realities are meeting. The facilitator’s job is not to suppress conﬂict but to harness its
creative energy.
Reframe the Narrative: Shift from "us vs. them" to "all of us vs. the problem." For
example, "We all seem to want a thriving street, but we have different ideas on how to
get there. Let's understand those ideas."
Practice Deep Listening: Use techniques like "paraphrasing until the other person feels
heard," forcing participants to truly understand the underlying needs and fears
behind positions.
Identify the Third Way: Move beyond binary choices. If the conﬂict is "skateboarders
vs. retirees," the facilitator asks, "What does a park look like that has a designated,
celebrated space for skating and a protected, tranquil garden for quiet
contemplation?" This transforms a problem of division into a creative design
challenge.
3. Holding the Social Ma
The facilitator’s most crucial role is to create and protect the social container - the
temporal and relational Ma - where magic can happen. This begins by co-creating
community agreements with the group at the outset:
Step Up, Step Back: Encourage those who speak often to make space, and those who
are quiet to step forward.
Listen to Understand, Not to Respond: Seek the meaning behind the words.
Assume Good Intention: Start from the premise that everyone wants what’s best for
the community.
Practice Conﬁdentiality: Create safety by allowing people to speak openly without
fear of their words being shared elsewhere without context.
The facilitator is the guardian of this container, gently reminding the group of their
commitments and ensuring the space remains safe for authenticity.
Protocols for Co-Creation
Beyond managing conversation, the facilitator employs speciﬁc, time-tested
methodologies to structure the collective intelligence of the group. These protocols are
designed to maximize participation and creativity.

World Café: Perfect for exploring large, complex questions with big groups. Participants
sit at small, café-style tables to discuss a key question. After a round of conversation, they
move to new tables, cross-pollinating ideas. A table host remains to welcome new guests
and share the essence of the previous conversation. It’s excellent for gathering diverse
perspectives and ﬁnding hidden connections.
- Syntonious Use: "How can our neighbourhood become a place where both people
and nature can thrive?"
Open Space Technology: A powerful, participant-driven method for organizing around
passion and responsibility. After a broad theme is set, anyone can propose a session topic
they care deeply about. Participants then self-organize, moving to the discussions that
most attract them. It operates on one law: "Whoever comes is the right people. Whatever
happens is the only thing that could have. Whenever it starts is the right time."
- Syntonious Use: "What are the most important opportunities for our community to
address in the next year?"
Circle Practice: A foundational method for building trust and ensuring equitable
speaking time. Participants sit in a circle, often with a talking piece (an object that grants
the holder the sole right to speak). This structure dissolves hierarchy, fosters deep
listening, and connects the group as a whole. It is the essential format for checking in,
processing conﬂict, and making meaningful decisions.
- Syntonious Use: Beginning and ending meetings, making collective decisions, sharing
stories.
The skilled facilitator is a methodological ecologist, not a mechanic. They know which
process to use when, and they adapt ﬂuidly to the energy and needs of the group. Their
ultimate goal is to make their own role obsolete - to weave the community’s capacity to
facilitate itself, leaving behind not just a plan, but a stronger, more resilient, and more
connected collective.

The Decision-Making Matrix: Syntonious Calculus
We have learned to listen deeply (Attunement) and host the conversation (Facilitation).
Now we arrive at the critical moment of choice. How do we decide which path to take?
The old paradigm offers a default tool: cost-beneﬁt analysis (CBA), a reductive calculus
that reduces value to ﬁnancial cost and monetary gain, inevitably privileging the powerful
and the short-term.
Syntonious urbanism requires a different tool, one that measures what actually matters for
the life of the city. This tool is the Syntonious Calculus: a values-based decision-making
matrix that ﬁlters every proposal, policy, and project through the core principles of our
philosophy. It is the practical application of the book’s heart and soul, ensuring our actions
create resonance, not dissonance.
Beyond Dollars: A Values-Based Matrix
The Syntonious Calculus moves beyond the "What is cheapest?" or "What is most
proﬁtable?" to ask a more profound set of questions: "What is most life-afﬁrming? What
creates the conditions for a more resonant and resilient future?"
It does not ignore practical constraints like budget, but it places them within a much larger
ethical and ecological context. A project might be ﬁnancially proﬁtable but syntoniously
bankrupt, and this calculus will reveal that truth. It is a tool for making the right kind of
value visible and paramount.
The Core Filters of the Calculus
Every signiﬁcant decision should be evaluated against these core ﬁlters. Each is answered
not with a simple yes/no, but on a spectrum (e.g., 1-5), allowing for a nuanced
assessment.
1. Ubuntu: Does this afﬁrm our shared humanity?
Guiding Questions: Does this decision build mutual care and recognition? Does it
isolate us or connect us? Does it prioritize the well-being of the most vulnerable? Does
it strengthen the community's ability to act collectively?
- A highway widening that severs a neighbourhood scores low. A community land
trust scores high.
2. Resonance (Syntony): Does this create more aliveness?
Guiding Questions: Does this feel right? Does it enhance the vibrant, emergent quality
of life? Does it create a sense of belonging and beauty? Does it support effortless,
joyful interaction?
- A sterile, wind-swept plaza scores low. A bustling, green, multi-use public square
scores high.
3. Pluriversality: Does this honour multiple worlds?
Guiding Questions: Does this design or policy allow different cultures, ages, and
species to coexist and express themselves? Does it eliminate difference or celebrate it?
Chapter 10

Who might be excluded by this?
- A generic, international-style building scores low. A design that incorporates
community art, flexible spaces, and local materials scores high.
4. Regenerative Potential: Does this heal social and ecological systems?
Guiding Questions: Does this give back more than it takes? Does it restore soil, water,
and biodiversity? Does it repair social bonds and create cycles of reciprocity? Is it net-
positive?
- A conventional development that creates stormwater runoff and waste scores low. A
project that generates clean energy, manages its own water, and provides training
and jobs scores high.
5. Elegance (Ma): Is this the lightest, most beautiful intervention?
Guiding Questions: Is this the simplest possible solution? Does it achieve the
maximum catalytic effect with minimal intervention? Does it create graceful, adaptable
spaces? Does it respect the power of the pause and the void?
- A large, expensive, fixed-structure solution scores low. A flexible, tactical, low-cost
prototype that can be adapted over time scores high. This is the urban equivalent of
wu wei - effortless action.
6. The Soul Filter: Does this create a deeper, more authentic story?
Guiding Questions: Does this action enrich the Soul of the City and honour the Spirit
of the Place? Does it feel authentic to who we are and where we are? Does it generate
a sense of pride and poetic meaning?
- A chain-store franchise scores low. A project that incorporates local history, art, and
ecology into its design scores high.
7. The Seventh Generation Principle: What is the impact seven generations from
now?
Guiding Questions: Does this decision ensure the health and well-being of children
seven generations into the future? Are we leaving a legacy of resilience or a burden of
liability? Would our ancestors approve?
- A project that relies on extractive resources or creates long-term pollution scores low.
Investing in timeless, durable infrastructure and restoring ecosystems scores high.
Applying the Calculus: A Step-by-Step Process
The Calculus is not a magic eight-ball but a structured process for deliberation.
1. Frame the Decision: Clearly state the proposal or choice at hand.
2. Gather the Weavers: Assemble a diverse group (community members, officials,
specialists) to score the proposal.
3. Score the Proposal: Work through each filter one by one. Discuss what the proposal
means for each principle. Debate. Use the Warm Data from the Attunement phase to
inform the scores. Assign a collective score (e.g., 1-5) for each filter.
4. See the Pattern: Lay out the scores visually. Does the proposal have consistently high
marks? Are there glaring low scores that reveal a fatal flaw? There is no "passing"
grade; the pattern tells the story. A proposal might score high on Elegance but low on
Ubuntu, revealing it is a clever but isolating intervention.
5. Iterate or Decide: Use the low scores as a creative brief. "How might we adapt this
proposal to score higher on Regenerative Potential?" The calculus is a design tool, not
just an evaluation tool. It guides the group toward a more syntonious solution.

Ultimately, the proposal with the strongest, most balanced scorecard should guide the
decision.
Modelling Resonance: Using AI to Stress-Test Decisions.
Speciﬁc Applications:
- Predictive Impact Modelling: Before building a new development, an AI model could
be fed the Syntonious Calculus criteria. It could simulate the project's potential impact
across the four quadrants: predicting likely effects on trafﬁc (UR), property values (LR),
community cohesion (LL), and even mental well-being (UL) based on similar past
projects. This allows the community to ask "What if?" and iterate on the design before
shovels hit the ground.
- Bias Detection: AI could be trained to scan policy documents, architectural plans, or
public communications for language or patterns that might inadvertently exclude
certain groups or violate pluriversality principles, acting as a "bias checker" for
proposed interventions.
Example: A Vacant Lot Redevelopment
Proposal A: A ﬁve-story luxury apartment building with underground parking.
Ubuntu: 1 (Creates unaffordable housing, no community space)
Resonance: 2 (Modern design but sterile streetscape)
Pluriversality: 1 (Designed for a single, wealthy demographic)
Regenerative: 1 (High embodied carbon, impervious surfaces, no habitat)
Elegance (Ma): 2 (Permanent, heavy-handed)
Soul: 1 (Generic, could be anywhere)
7th Generation: 1 (Increases density without improving resilience)
Result: A dissonant outcome. Reject or radically redesign.
Proposal B: A community land trust with affordable housing, a micro-park, a
community garden, and space for a local artist cooperative.
Ubuntu: 5 (Fosters care, provides affordable homes, creates shared space)
Resonance: 5 (Creates a lively, loved, human-scaled place)
Pluriversality: 5 (Serves diverse ages, incomes, and interests)
Regenerative: 4 (Green space, food production, likely lower carbon materials)
Elegance (Ma): 4 (Can be phased, adaptable uses)
Soul: 5 (Tells a story of community care and creativity)
7th Generation: 5 (Builds social and ecological capital for the future)
Result: A highly syntonious outcome. Proceed.
The Syntonious Calculus makes our values explicit, measurable, and actionable. It is the
indispensable engine that ensures our beautiful philosophy results in tangible,
transformative, and righteous action. It is how we ensure that the future we build is one of
resonance, belonging, and life.

The Design Principle: Crafting Ma
We have a new compass (Syntony), a new ethic (Ubuntu), and a new decision-making
engine (the Calculus). Now we arrive at the most tangible expression of syntonious
urbanism: the act of shaping the city itself. This is the practice of Crafting Ma - the
intentional design of the spatial, temporal, and social containers within which life can
flourish. If the facilitator weaves the social fabric, then this is the practice of weaving the
physical and temporal fabric of the city. It is the art of creating the conditions for
emergence, rather than imposing a final form.
Crafting Ma is the antithesis of the master plan. It understands that the role of the urbanist
is not to design the final, perfect state of a place, but to design a robust, adaptable, and
inspiring loom - a framework - on which the community can weave its own ever-evolving
patterns of life.
Spatial Ma: Designing the Flexible Container
Spatial Ma is the most visible form. It is the purposeful design of the void, the interval, the
in-between that gives built form its meaning and function. The goal is to create spaces
that are robust (well-defined and safe) yet flexible (adaptable to countless uses).
Principles for Designing Spatial Ma:
Define the Edges to Free the Centre: Strong, active, and permeable edges (e.g.,
building facades with doors and windows, low walls that double as seating, hedges)
create a sense of enclosure and safety. This very definition allows the centre of the space
to remain free and flexible for unpredictable activity. A great plaza is often defined by its
buildings, not by what is placed in its middle.
Prioritize Porosity over Walls: Create connections, not barriers. Spatial Ma allows for
flow and visual penetration, inviting people in and weaving the space into the wider
urban fabric. Arcades, gateways, and view corridors are tools of porosity.
Provide the Infrastructure, Not the Program: Instead of installing fixed chess tables,
provide a flat, shaded surface with moveable seats. Instead of a single-purpose
playground, create a topographically interesting landscape with water, sand, and
materials that children can adapt for their own games. Provide power outlets, water taps,
and Wi-Fi, and let the community decide how to use them.
Use Robust, "Soft" Materials: Choose materials that age gracefully (weathered wood,
natural stone) and can bear the marks of use, rather than ones that require pristine
perfection. Design with green infrastructure - trees, grass, water - that changes with the
seasons and softens the hard edges of the city.
Examples of Spatial Ma in Practice:
A "Pocket Park" created from a leftover lot, with simple seating, shade, and a water
feature.
A "Greenway" that is a continuous ribbon of habitat and recreation, connecting
neighbourhoods
"Parklets" that reclaim parking spots for human life.
"Buildings with Seams" that have awnings, recesses, and other features that create semi-
private niches at their edges.
Chapter 11

Temporal Ma: Curating the Rhythms of Time
A city only in sync with clock time is a city out of sync with life. Temporal Ma is the
deliberate design of the city's calendar and daily rhythms to create breaks from
commercial efﬁciency and open up pockets of possibility. It is the curation of time itself.
Principles for Designing Temporal Ma:
Ritualize the Pause: Create regular, predictable breaks in the normal ﬂow. This could be a
weekly street closure (e.g., Ciclovía), a daily quiet hour in a bustling district, or a seasonal
festival that marks the turning of the year. These rituals create a shared civic heartbeat.
Embrace Temporary Uses: Champion short-term, low-cost interventions. Grant permits
for pop-up gardens, night markets, or outdoor ﬁlm screenings in underused spaces.
These "urban acupunctures" test ideas, generate Warm Data, and demonstrate new
possibilities without the risk of permanent change.
Design for Diel and Seasonal Cycles: Let the city's operation harmonize with natural
time. Use lighting that dims and changes colour temperature after midnight. Design
parks that celebrate autumn leaves and spring blossoms. Allow natural ﬂood plains to
function in winter, rather than ﬁghting them with concrete year-round.
Create "Time Banks": Facilitate systems where residents can exchange services based on
hours worked, rather than money. This values all time equally and fosters reciprocal
community relationships outside the capitalist tempo.
Examples of Temporal Ma in Practice:
Paris's "Rues aux Enfants" (Children's Streets): Regular closures of residential streets to
cars for play.
Night Markets: Transforming parking lots into vibrant culinary and social hubs after dark.
"Park(ing) Day": An annual global event where people temporarily transform metered
parking spots into tiny public parks.
Social Ma: Holding the Space for Dialogue
Social Ma is the invisible architecture of relationship and process. It is the container - the
agreements, the ambience, the facilitation - that allows the Pluriversal Roundtable to
function. While Chapter 9 covered the skills of facilitation, this is about the design of the
social container itself.
Principles for Designing Social Ma:
Co-Create the Container: The social container is not imposed; it is built together at the
outset of any gathering. This is the practice of establishing community agreements (e.g.,
"listen to understand," "step up, step back") that everyone commits to upholding.
Design for Encounter: Spatial design can foster Social Ma. A circle of chairs is a social
container that implies equality. A shared meal before a meeting is a social container that
builds trust. A walking meeting side-by-side can dissolve hierarchies more effectively
than a boardroom table.
Institute Deliberative Processes: Embed designed social containers into governance.
Citizens' Assemblies are a powerful form of Social Ma - a temporary, representative
microcosm of the city given the time, information, and facilitation to deliberate on a
complex issue and make recommendations.
Create Rituals of Acknowledgement: Begin and end gatherings with a ritual that
acknowledges the land, the ancestors, or the shared purpose. This marks the time
together as special and distinct from ordinary conversation, deepening the quality of the
Social Ma.

The Golden Thread: The Weaver's Ethic
Crafting Ma in all its forms is an act of service guided by the Golden Thread:
- The Courage to create empty space in a world obsessed with ﬁlling it.
- The Agility to adapt the container as the needs of the community shift.
- The Will to protect these precious intervals from the relentless pressures of
development and efﬁciency.
Ultimately, to craft Ma is to practice a form of urban humility. It is to understand that the
highest skill of a designer is not to make their mark on the city, but to create the sheltered,
fertile, open spaces where the city can make its mark on us - where life, in all its beautiful,
unpredictable pluriversality, can truly take root. It is in these well-crafted containers of
space, time, and relationship that the Soul of the City has room to breathe, grow, and sing.

Confronting Power, Scale, & Speed: Syntony in the Real
World
The preceding chapters outline a beautiful, holistic vision. Yet, any practitioner attempting
to bring this vision to life will quickly encounter three formidable realities: entrenched
power, the vast scale of urban systems, and the urgent speed demanded by crises. To
ignore these forces is to risk building a lovely theory that shatters on contact with the real
world. This chapter does not compromise the syntonious vision; it arms it with the
strategic intelligence and pragmatic tools to be effective within complex, and often
resistant, environments.
Syntonious urbanism is not a practice for a perfect world; it is a practice for this world. It is
a form of courageous pragmatism.
Syntonious Power Analysis: Mapping the Terrain of Inﬂuence
Before a weaver can weave, they must understand the loom - its tensions, its loose
threads, its sturdy frames. Similarly, before engaging in any process of attunement or
facilitation, a syntonious practitioner must conduct a clear-eyed analysis of the power
landscape. This is not about assigning villainy; it is about understanding the terrain of
inﬂuence, incentives, and interests.
Tools for Power Analysis:
Stakeholder Mapping & The Power/Interest Grid: Plot all key actors (individuals,
organizations, agencies, community groups) on a simple 2x2 grid.
High Power, High Interest: Key players. Engage them deeply and early (e.g., a major
landowner, a powerful city councillor).
High Power, Low Interest: Their support is crucial, but they may not care. Work to
increase their interest by connecting the issue to their goals (e.g., a city department
focused on a different priority).
Low Power, High Interest: The most vulnerable and often the most passionate.
Empower them, ensure their voices are heard, and make them central to the process
(e.g., residents facing displacement).
Low Power, Low Interest: Monitor, but don't expend excessive energy here.
This map allows for strategic engagement, ensuring no key actor is surprised or
overlooked.
Inﬂuence Mapping: Go beyond formal titles. Chart the networks of informal inﬂuence.
Who are the trusted community elders? The behind-the-scenes connectors? The
inﬂuencers on local social media? Understanding these relationships is essential Warm
Data for navigating the social ecosystem.
Analysing Incentives: Ask, for each key actor: "What is their primary incentive? What are
they rewarded for? What do they fear?" A developer is incentivized by proﬁt and speed. A
city ofﬁcial may be incentivized by avoiding risk and political fallout. A community group is
incentivized by preserving culture and affordability. Understanding these drivers is not
cynical; it is strategic. It allows you to frame proposals in ways that speak to these interests
while advancing the syntonious good.
Chapter 12

Working with Conflict as a Catalyst
The pluriversal city is not a conflict-free city. It is a city where conflict is acknowledged as
the inevitable and necessary result of different worlds colliding. The syntonious approach
is not to suppress conflict but to host it productively, transforming it from a destructive
force into a catalyst for deeper understanding and innovation.
Strategies for Catalytic Conflict:
Reframing: Shift the narrative from "us vs. them" to "all of us vs. the problem." Facilitators
can say: "I hear two different expressions of a shared value. You both are describing a
desire for safety and belonging. Let's explore how we can achieve that for everyone."
Surface Interests, Not Positions: A position is what someone says they want (e.g., "No
bike lanes!"). The interest is why they want it (e.g., "I'm afraid losing parking will kill my
small business."). Syntonious facilitation digs for the underlying interests, which often
reveal common ground and create space for creative solutions.
Employ Restorative Practices: Move beyond debate towards healing and
understanding. Restorative circles bring together those in conflict to share the impact
the situation has had on them, to express feelings, and to collectively find a path forward.
This is not about who is right, but about how to repair the relational fabric.
Design "Safe Enough" Spaces: Create clear agreements for engagement that allow
people to express strong emotions without fear of personal attack. The facilitator's role is
to protect these boundaries, ensuring conflict remains focused on issues, not individuals.
Navigating the Velocity Paradox: The Tiered Action Approach
Perhaps the most common tension is the Velocity Paradox: the conflict between the slow,
deep time required for Syntonious Attunement and the fast, urgent time demanded by
political windows, funding deadlines, and immediate crises like homelessness or climate
disasters.
The solution is not to choose one over the other, but to adopt a tiered action approach
that operates on multiple timescales simultaneously.
The Three Tiers of Action:
1. Tactical & Prototypical (Fast Time: Days/Weeks):
Action: Implement rapid, low-cost, temporary interventions. This is the realm of tactical
urbanism: a pop-up park, a community-painted crosswalk, a temporary street closure
for an event.
Purpose: To act quickly, demonstrate intent, and generate immediate Warm Data.
These actions are framed explicitly as live experiments, not final solutions. They build
momentum, show what's possible, and turn citizens from spectators into actors.
Syntonious Value: Creates Temporal Ma, provides quick wins, and generates evidence
for slower, larger changes.
2. Strategic & Institutional (Medium Time: Months/Years):
Action: Use the learning from the tactical prototypes to inform policy changes,
regulatory adjustments (e.g., zoning reforms), and medium-scale investments.
Purpose: To codify the successful elements of the experiments into more durable
frameworks. This is where the Syntonious Calculus is formally applied to larger
projects.

Syntonious Value: Weaves successful innovations into the fabric of urban governance,
changing the system's rules to favour syntonious outcomes.
3. Cultural & Evolutionary (Deep Time: Years/Generations):
Action: The ongoing work of education, narrative change, and capacity building. This
includes mentoring new facilitators, embedding syntonious principles into school
curricula, and supporting long-term community stewardship groups.
Purpose: To slowly shift the underlying culture that dictates how the city operates. This
is the work of growing Syntoniousness - the collective muscle for resonant
relationship.
Syntonious Value: This is the work of Syntonious Evolution, ensuring that change is
not just project-based but leads to a fundamental transformation in the city's
identity and goals.
This tiered approach allows a community to say to a frustrated mayor: "We are acting now
with a tactical intervention to address the urgent need, while we continue the deeper
process of attunement to ensure the permanent solution we design in six months is the
right one." It resolves the paradox by making the fast action a part of the slow learning
process.
Confronting power, conﬂict, and speed is not a distraction from syntonious work; it is the
work. By meeting these challenges with strategic analysis, skilful facilitation, and a tiered
action plan, the syntonious practitioner moves from being a dreamer to an effective agent
of transformative change, weaving resonance into the very heart of the urban machine.

Syntonious Economics & Governance
We can attune, facilitate, and design with the best intentions, but if the underlying
economic and governance systems remain rooted in extraction and exclusion, our efforts
will be fleeting. A syntonious city cannot be woven on a loom designed for the machine
age. This chapter addresses the fundamental operating system of the city, proposing new
models for economics and governance that are consonant with the principles of syntony,
Ubuntu, and pluriversality. It is about redesigning the rules of the game so that they
naturally produce resonant outcomes.
The Syntonious Economics Canvas
The current economic operating system for cities is fundamentally extractive and
dissonant. It prioritizes land value capture for private wealth, short-term financial returns,
and growth that is often decoupled from human and ecological well-being. We need a
new tool to evaluate and design economic initiatives through a syntonious lens.
The Syntonious Economics Canvas is a values-based framework for communities,
developers, and policymakers to stress-test projects and policies. It moves beyond the
mono-culture of financial ROI to measure a project's contribution to the city's holistic
health.
The Four Core Criteria:
1. Wealth Democracy: Who Owns and Benefits?
Principle: Economic power must be distributed to build community resilience and
prevent extraction. Syntony requires that the value generated by a community
remains within and benefits that community.
Key Questions:
Does the project diversify ownership models (e.g., cooperatives, community land
trusts, employee-owned businesses)?
Does it create opportunities for local, small, and minority-owned enterprises?
Who captures the financial gains? Are they widely shared or concentrated?
A corporate-owned big-box store scores low. A development with commercial space
leased at below-market rates to local startups and a housing co-op scores high.
2. Circulatory: Does Wealth Circle Locally?
Principle: A healthy urban economy is a circular flow, not a leaky pipe. Money should
circulate within the local bioregion, strengthening the network of relationships.
Key Questions:
- Does the project prioritize local procurement of materials, goods, and services?
- Does it utilize local financial institutions (credit unions, community banks)?
- Does it minimize economic "leakage" to distant corporate headquarters?
- A franchise that sends most profits out of town scores low. A farmer's market or a
business that sources from local artisans and pays into a local pension fund scores
high.
3. Regenerative: Does It Give More Than It Takes?
Principle: The project must be net-positive, actively healing social and ecological
systems rather than merely minimizing harm.
Chapter 13

Questions:
- Does it generate more clean energy than it consumes?
- Does it manage its own water, waste, and nutrients in closed-loop systems?
- Does it create more habitat and biodiversity than it displaces?
- Does it provide living wages, training, and truly affordable housing?
A conventional development that is a net drain on municipal services and the
environment scores low. A project with regenerative agriculture, on-site renewable
energy, and a social equity plan scores high.
Speciﬁc Applications:
- Smart Grids for a Circular Economy: AI optimizing local energy microgrids to
maximize the use of renewable sources and enable peer-to-peer energy sharing
between buildings.
- Metabolic Management: AI systems managing urban metabolism in real-time -
directing waste streams to recycling or composting, optimizing water capture and
reuse, and reducing the city's overall ecological footprint. This turns the city from a
linear consumer into a circular ecosystem.
4. Rooted-in-Place: Is It Uniquely of This Place?
Principle: The economy should reﬂect and celebrate the unique assets, culture, and
ecology of its location, resisting the homogenizing force of globalization.
Key Questions:
- Is the project dependent on the unique cultural or ecological assets of this place?
- Does it draw on local history, stories, and aesthetic traditions?
- Could this project exist anywhere, or only here?
A generic chain hotel scores low. An ecotourism lodge that employs local guides and
celebrates indigenous knowledge, or a brewery that uses native plants, scores high.
Application: The Canvas is used to evaluate development proposals, guide public
investment, and help communities design their own enterprises. A project doesn't need a
perfect score, but the process reveals its alignment with the syntonious whole and
highlights areas for improvement.
Governance Innovations: Weaving Syntony into the System
Governance is the way a city manages its affairs and makes decisions. Syntonious
governance must be designed to be as participatory, adaptive, and relational as the city it
aims to foster.
1. The Department of Attunement:
Innovation: A new municipal department dedicated to the ongoing practice of
Syntonious Attunement.
Function: Its staff would be trained in Warm Data gathering, facilitation, and
ethnography. They would be responsible for maintaining a constant pulse on the
lived experience of all neighbourhoods, ensuring that policy is always informed by
deep listening. They would host regular community dialogues and serve as liaisons
between the government and the governed.
Impact: Transforms citizen engagement from a reactive, adversarial process (NIMBYism)
into a proactive, collaborative relationship.

2. Permanent Citizen Assemblies:
Innovation: Statutory bodies of randomly selected citizens (a democratic microcosm of
the city) empowered to deliberate on key strategic issues.
Function: These assemblies, supported by experts and facilitators, would meet over
several months to study complex issues (e.g., climate adaptation, housing strategy).
Their informed recommendations would carry signiﬁcant weight, going directly to the
city council for a vote or even having binding authority.
Impact: Counteracts short-term political cycles and special interest lobbying by
introducing informed, long-term, citizen-driven wisdom into the heart of decision-
making.
3. Rights of Nature Legislation:
Innovation: Legally granting rivers, forests, or ecosystems the right to exist, ﬂourish,
and regenerate their vital cycles.
Function: This appoints legal guardians (a mix of scientists, indigenous leaders,
community members) to represent these entities in urban planning processes. It
forces the city to consider the impact of its decisions on the more-than-human world
as a matter of law, not just policy.
Impact: Embeds ecological regeneration and intergenerational responsibility directly
into the legal framework, operationalizing the Seventh Generation Principle.

4. Participatory Budgeting as Standard Practice:
Innovation: Mandating that a signiﬁcant percentage (e.g., 10-20%) of the municipal
discretionary budget is allocated directly by residents through facilitated deliberative
processes.
Function: Communities brainstorm and pitch projects, then vote on which ones to fund.
This moves beyond consultation to direct decision-making power over real resources.
Impact: Builds civic muscle, fosters a sense of collective ownership, and ensures public
funds are spent on what communities truly need and value, as deﬁned by them.
These innovations are not mere add-ons; they are the essential infrastructure for a
syntonious city. They hard-code the practices of attunement, facilitation, and Ubuntu into
the very institutions that shape urban life. By redesigning economics and governance, we
move from planting ﬂowers in the cracks of a failing system to healing the ground itself, so
that a new, resilient, and resonant system can ﬁnally take root.
Crucial Caveat: The "Syntonious Technology" Principle
A syntonious city uses technology to foster connection, not replace it. AI must be a
tool for deepening empathy and understanding, not for automating control. The
goal is not a city that is smart because of its technology, but a city that is wise
because of how its people use that technology to serve life.
By integrating technology in this way, we position it as a powerful ally in the great work of
weaving syntony, while remaining true to the book's core critique of the sterile,
controlling "smart city" model. It becomes a thread in the loom, not the weaver.

The Long Game: Stewardship, Evolution, & Dissolution
The work of building a syntonious city is never finished. It is not a project with a ribbon-
cutting ceremony, but a continuous practice - a lifelong conversation between a people
and their place. This chapter moves beyond the initial intervention to explore how we
sustain and deepen this work over time. It is about cultivating the endurance, wisdom, and
courage needed to play the long game, embracing the fact that cities, like living
organisms, must constantly adapt, and sometimes, let go.
Cultivating Syntoniousness: The Personal and Collective Muscle
Syntoniousness is the cultivated capacity, both individual and collective, for resonant
relationship. It is the "muscle memory" for Ubuntu, attunement, and facilitation. Without it,
the tools in this kit remain unused concepts. With it, they become instinctual practices.
Personal Syntoniousness: This is the inner work of the weaver. It involves:
- Developing a Daily Practice: Regular meditation, time in nature, journaling - anything
that cultivates the inner quiet, necessary to listen deeply to the outer world.
- Shadow Work: Acknowledging and integrating one's own triggers, biases, and desire
for control. A facilitator who cannot manage their own reactivity will cannot hold a
container for others.
- Building Stamina for Uncertainty: Learning to dwell in the "not knowing," to trust the
process without needing to force a premature outcome.
Collective Syntoniousness: This is the cultural work of the community. It involves:
- Creating Rituals: Establishing regular community gatherings, shared meals, or annual
celebrations that reinforce bonds and remind people of their shared identity and
purpose.
- Mentorship & Succession Planning: Experienced weavers consciously mentoring the
next generation, ensuring skills and ethos are passed on. This builds a resilient
network of practice, not a dependency on a single leader.
- Embedding Practice in Institutions: Integrating the tools of attunement and
facilitation into school curricula, community centres, and local government training
programs. Syntoniousness becomes part of "how we do things here."
Syntonious Adaptation and the Graceful Art of Dissolution
A living system that cannot change is a dying system. Syntonious urbanism embraces
change not as a threat, but as the essential process of life.
Syntonious Adaptation: This is the practice of continuous, learning-oriented change. It
involves creating feedback loops, like regular community check-ins, environmental
monitoring, and after-action reviews, to assess what is and isn't working. It treats every
policy and project as a living prototype, always subject to refinement and evolution
based on new learning. A syntonious city is a learning city.
Syntonious Dissolution: This is the most advanced and least practiced skill: the graceful
art of letting go. It is the conscious decision to decommission or compost projects,
policies, or even buildings that no longer serve the whole.
Chapter 14

- Why it's necessary: Clinging to outdated infrastructure (e.g., a highway that severs a
neighbourhood) or failing programs prevents new, more resonant forms from
emerging. It leads to urban fossilization.
- How it's done: It begins by asking the Syntonious Calculus question: "Is this still
creating resonance?" If the answer is no, the community facilitates a process to
acknowledge its past service, harvest its wisdom, and consciously dismantle it. This
could be a ceremonial deconstruction of a vacant building to make way for a park, or
the sunsetting of a policy that has achieved its goal.
- The Ethic: Dissolution is not failure; it is a sacred act of making space for new life. It is
the ultimate expression of non-attachment and trust in the ongoing process of co-
creation.
Syntonious Resistance: The Toolkit in Hostile Environments
What happens when the existing power structures are actively hostile to syntonious
values? When the dominant paradigm is extraction, not care? The work does not stop; it
changes form. Syntonious Resistance is the application of the toolkit to challenge and
dismantle dissonant systems from within and without.
1. Preﬁgurative Intervention: This is the strategy of building the new world in the shell of
the old. It involves creating tangible, irresistible examples of syntony that render the
existing system obsolete.
Tactics: A guerrilla garden in a vacant lot. A "parklet" built without permission in a
parking space. A temporary street festival that reclaims public space for people.
Impact: These acts are not just protests; they are proofs of concept. They visually and
experientially argue for a better future, creating public desire and demonstrating that
another way is possible.
2. Institutional Jiu-Jitsu: This is the art of using the system's own rules, language, and
momentum against it to achieve syntonious ends.
Tactics: Using a city's own public health data on obesity and air pollution to argue for
pedestrianization, thereby achieving a people-centred outcome (resonance) through
a systems-acceptable argument (health cost savings). Framing a community land trust
as a tool for "economic development" and "neighbourhood stability" to secure
funding.
Impact: It outmanoeuvres opposition on their own turf, using cold data to advance
warm goals.
3. Networked Solidarity: This is the practice of building pluriversal alliances of counter-
power. It recognizes that isolated communities are easily ignored, but a networked
movement is resilient and powerful.
Tactics: Building coalitions between neighbourhood associations, ethical businesses,
unions, faith groups, and environmental NGOs around a shared syntonious vision.
Using shared tools like the Syntonious Calculus to develop a uniﬁed platform.
Impact: It creates a distributed and powerful force that can withstand pressure, share
resources, and present a uniﬁed front that cannot be easily dismissed. This is Ubuntu
as a strategy for systemic change.
The Counter-Calculus: A key tactic of resistance is to publicly perform the Syntonious
Calculus on a proposed development or policy. By revealing the true long-term costs to
relational health, ecological resilience, and community well-being that the standard cost-
beneﬁt analysis ignores, activists can reshape public debate and expose the poverty of
the old paradigm.

The Weaver's Endurance
The syntonious toolkit is therefore not just for times of harmony and collaboration. It is for
all times. It is for building anew, for tending what exists, for adapting to change, for letting
go with grace, and for standing firm against that which would cause harm.
The long game is won not by a single victory, but by the relentless, courageous, and
compassionate cultivation of Syntoniousness - in ourselves, our communities, and our
institutions. It is a commitment to never stop weaving, to never stop listening, and to
never stop believing that a more resonant world is possible. It is the understanding that
the city is not a noun, but a verb - a continuous act of collective becoming. And we are all
its weavers.
Conclusion to Part 2

Case Studies from the Edge
Syntony in Action
Part 3

Introduction
Theory ﬁnds its truth in practice. The following chapters analyse real-world urban
interventions through the integral lens of syntonious urbanism. We will explore what
succeeded, what failed, and most importantly, why. By examining the presence or
absence of Syntonious Attunement, Ubuntu-informed Calculus, and the deliberate design
of Ma, we transform abstract principles into a critical, practical understanding.
Part 3
Chapter 15
Radical Inclusion: Superkilen (Copenhagen) -
Pluriversality, Warm Data, Ubuntu
The Case: Superkilen is a one-kilometre-long urban park in the Nørrebro district of
Copenhagen, a neighbourhood known for its intense social and ethnic diversity, with
residents from over 60 countries. Designed by the art group Superﬂex, in collaboration
with Bjarke Ingels Group (BIG) and Topotek 1, the park is conceived as a giant collection
of global artefacts - a physical manifestation of the community's diversity.
Syntonious Analysis:
1. Pluriversality in Concrete and Steel
Superkilen is perhaps the world's most literal and boldest expression of pluriversal
urbanism. It explicitly rejects a singular, homogenizing Danish aesthetic in favour of a
curated cacophony of global symbols.
Design as Dialogue, Not Imposition: Instead of designing for the community, the
designers acted as curators and facilitators, asking residents to nominate objects from
their countries of origin that held deep cultural signiﬁcance. The result is a stunning array
of over 100 items: a neon sign from Qatar, Japanese cherry trees, a Moroccan fountain,
Iraqi swings, Russian bollards, and Armenian picnic tables.
The "Right to Difference" Embodied: Every element tells a story from a speciﬁc culture,
refusing to assimilate into a bland whole. This is not tokenism; it is a profound act of
recognition. The park does not say, "You are welcome here if you become like us." It
says, "You are welcome here because of who you are. Your story is essential to our
collective story."
Negotiation, Not Erasure: The design doesn't hide the tensions of a diverse community;
it puts them on display, side-by-side. The park becomes a stage for the ongoing
negotiation of difference, a conversation starter in its own right. It is the physical form of
the Pluriversal Roundtable.
2. The Primacy of Warm Data
The entire project was a masterclass in Syntonious Attunement. The design process was
fundamentally an exercise in gathering deep, relational, Warm Data.

Beyond Demographics: The designers didn't just look at cold data about residents'
countries of origin. They spent significant time in the community, listening to stories and
understanding the emotional and cultural weight behind specific objects. They asked:
What object from your culture tells a story? What do you love? What do you miss?
Methodology: This was achieved through extensive community workshops, interviews,
and collaboration with local liaisons. The designers acted as relational researchers,
prioritizing lived experience over abstract design principles.
From Data to Form: The collected Warm Data directly dictated the park's form. The iconic
giant red curved bench? It was inspired by a sketch made by a local Somali woman
during a workshop. The park is quite literally built from stories.
3. Ubuntu: "I Am Because We Are"
At its heart, Superkilen is a massive public investment in the ethic of Ubuntu. It operates
on the belief that the community's well-being is tied to the mutual recognition of its
members' humanity.
Affirming Humanity: The park's core function is to affirm the dignity and belonging of
immigrant communities. Seeing a familiar object from one's homeland in a Danish
public park is a powerful symbolic act of inclusion. It says, "You are seen. Your culture is
valued."
Building Mutual Recognition: For Danes and other residents, the park serves as a
fascinating museum of global cultures, fostering curiosity and understanding. It creates a
shared ground where difference is not a barrier but a reason for engagement. It builds a
"we" that is based on the celebration of many "I's.
The Outcome of Care: This investment in mutual recognition has paid dividends in social
cohesion. A formerly tense and sometimes troubled neighbourhood now has a central
pride point, a place that is talked about globally precisely because of its radical local
inclusivity.
The "Edge": Critiques and Syntonious Tensions
No project is perfect, and a syntonious analysis must be critical. Superkilen exists on
several edges:
The Edge of Chaos: The design is bold, brash, and intentionally disordered. Some critics
find it visually chaotic or accuse it of being a "theme park of diversity." This is the
inherent tension of pluriversality - the balance between celebration and clutter.
The Edge of Authenticity: Does placing objects outside of their original context risk
reducing them to aestheticized stereotypes? This is a risk the designers took. The
syntonious response is that the deep community engagement in selecting these objects
mitigates this, grounding them in authentic personal narrative rather than exoticism.
The Edge of Governance: Maintaining such a unique space requires ongoing care and
interpretation. The park demands a high level of Syntonious Stewardship from the city
to ensure it doesn't fall into disrepair, which would negate its message of care and value.
Conclusion: A Prefiguration of the Syntonious City
Superkilen stands as a powerful prefiguration of the syntonious city. It demonstrates that it
is possible to:
Design for pluriversality without creating chaos, but rather a new, more complex order.
Use Warm Data as the primary driver of design, creating spaces that are deeply resonant
because they are deeply listened to.

Embrace Ubuntu by using public space as a tool for mutual afﬁrmation and the building
of a shared identity based on difference.
It is not a template to be copied, but an inspiration to be adapted. It proves that the
radical act of listening to and celebrating a city's many worlds can itself become the
catalyst for creating a unique, beloved, and truly resonant place.

Indigenous Place-Making: Trinity River Park (Dallas) Spirit
of Place, Deep Time, Rights of Nature
The Case: The Trinity River Corridor in Dallas, Texas, represents one of the most signiﬁcant
urban redevelopment opportunities in the United States. For decades, plans have cycled
between grandiose, engineer-led visions of channelling the river for dramatic civic
monuments and more recent ﬂood control and recreational projects. A pivotal shift
occurred with the formal involvement of the Indigenous Peoples Task Force, advocating
for a design that honours the land's deep history, restores its ecological function, and
serves as a model of reconciliation and reciprocal stewardship. This case study focuses on
this transformative approach, often referred to in the broader vision for The Fields
parkland.
Syntonious Analysis:
1. Attunement to the Spirit of Place (Genius Loci)
Conventional planning often viewed the Trinity River ﬂoodplain as a "problem" to be
solved - a dangerous, untamed space separating downtown from its southern
neighbourhoods. The engineering solution was control: levees, channels, and concrete
banks.
The indigenous-led approach begins with a fundamental act of Syntonious Attunement:
listening to the Spirit of the Place itself.
Listening to the Land: This attunement goes beyond human communities to engage with
the river as a living entity. It asks: What is the river’s natural tendency? How did it
historically ﬂow and ﬂood? What ecosystems did it support? This involves understanding
the riparian ecology, the ancestral paths of wildlife, and the hydrological patterns that
deﬁned the region for millennia before European settlement.
Listening to Deep History: The attunement process actively incorporates the knowledge
and stories of the original caretakers of the land - the Caddo, Wichita, and Comanche
nations, among others. This is not a symbolic gesture but a foundational source of Warm
Data about the place's identity, its sacred sites, and its historical uses as a meeting
ground and transportation corridor.
From Problem to Partner: The river is re-framed from a threat to a life-giving partner. The
goal shifts from controlling the river to learning from it and accommodating its nature.
This is the ultimate expression of designing with the land, not on it.
2. Planning in Deep Time: The Seventh Generation Principle
The indigenous philosophy guiding this approach is inherently operatic in its temporal
scale. It operates on the principle of Seventh Generation stewardship, which mandates
that every decision be considered for its impact seven generations into the future.
Rejecting Short-Termism: This stands in direct opposition to the short-term political and
economic cycles (e.g., election timelines, quarterly proﬁts) that typically drive urban
development. A syntonious calculus based on Deep Time asks: Will this concrete
channel beneﬁt our descendants 150 years from now? Or will it be a costly, crumbling
liability?
Chapter 16

Intergenerational Responsibility: The project becomes an act of reciprocity with both
ancestors and descendants. It honours the past by restoring the land to a state that
would be recognizable to them, and it protects the future by creating a resilient,
adaptive, and life-supporting system. This is the practical application of Syntonious
Stewardship at its most profound level.
Healing, Not Just Building: The work is understood as healing the wounds inﬂicted
upon the land by centuries of industrial abuse and ecological disregard. The timeline for
this healing is biological and geological, not ﬁscal.
3. The Rights of Nature: A New Legal and Ethical Framework
The most radical syntonious innovation emerging from this and similar movements is the
formal adoption of a Rights of Nature framework. This is the legal and ethical embodiment
of the belief that the river is not a human property but a living entity with inherent rights.
From Anthropocentrism to Ecocentrism: This framework challenges the core of Western
legal systems, which treat nature as property to be owned and exploited. It argues that
ecosystems have the right to exist, ﬂourish, regenerate, and evolve.
Guardianship, Not Ownership: In practice, this means appointing legal guardians (a mix
of scientists, indigenous elders, and community members) to represent the river’s
interests in planning and policy decisions. These guardians would have standing in court
to argue against projects that would cause it harm, using the Syntonious Calculus to
demonstrate damage to ecological integrity.
Operationalizing Ubuntu for the More-Than-Human World: This is Ubuntu extended to
the entire web of life. It legally encodes the understanding that the well-being of the
human community is inextricably linked to the well-being of the river. To harm the river is
to harm ourselves.
The "Edge": The Frontier of Urban Praxis
This case exists on the cutting edge of syntonious urbanism, facing signiﬁcant tensions:
The Legal Edge: Implementing Rights of Nature requires a dramatic overhaul of
municipal codes and state laws. It pits a millennia-old indigenous worldview against
deeply entrenched systems of property law and economic interest.
The Epistemic Edge: It challenges the hegemony of Western scientiﬁc knowledge as the
sole valid basis for decision-making. It demands that Traditional Ecological Knowledge
(TEK) - the cumulative, place-based wisdom of indigenous peoples - be granted equal
standing with engineering data in the planning process. This is a true test of
Pluriversality.
The Economic Edge: The business case for a channelized river is easy to make in narrow,
short-term terms (developable land, ﬂood control). The "business case" for a restored,
living river is measured in ecosystem services, cultural value, and long-term resilience -
metrics that traditional economics struggles to value. This is where the Syntonious
Economics Canvas becomes an essential counter-tool.
Conclusion: The Syntonious City as a Healing Process
The Trinity River project, through its indigenous-led vision, demonstrates that the highest
calling of urbanism is not development but healing. It shows us that:
Syntonious Attunement means listening to the land and its original peoples.

Temporal Syntony requires planning on a scale of centuries, not election cycles.
The most profound act of Ubuntu is to grant legal standing to the more-than-human
world that sustains us.
This case is not just about creating a park; it is about initiating a process of cultural and
ecological reconciliation. It offers a path for cities to become not just smart or sustainable,
but wise - humbled by Deep Time, guided by the Spirit of Place, and responsible to all life,
for all time. It is the ultimate expression of a city seeking to become a true relative to its
land.

Tactical Urbanism: PARK(ing) Day & Times Square
Temporal Ma, Adjustment/Adaptation, Prefiguration
The Case: For decades, the paradigm of the machine-city seemed unassailable, with vast
swathes of public space permanently dedicated to the storage and movement of private
vehicles. Then, a simple, subversive act emerged: tactical urbanism. This approach
leverages short-term, low-cost, and scalable interventions to catalyse long-term change.
Two quintessential examples are PARK(ing) Day, an annual global event where citizens
transform metered parking spots into temporary public parks, and the pedestrianization
of New York City's Times Square, which began as a radical experiment with traffic cones
and cheap lawn chairs.
Syntonious Analysis:
1. The Ultimate Temporal Ma: Reclaiming Time and Space
Tactical urbanism is the conscious, strategic creation of Temporal Ma - a pause in the
normal flow of the city that creates a "breathing room" for new possibilities.
PARK(ing) Day as a Ritual: This annual event is a powerful urban ritual. For one day, the
relentless economic logic of the curb - which values a car’s right to park over a person’s
right to sit - is suspended. The space is transformed from a zone of storage into a place
for conversation, play, and rest. This temporary Ma is a profound cultural interruption, a
collective deep breath that asks, "What else could this space be?"
Times Square's "Beta Test": The initial transformation of Times Square was the ultimate
temporal intervention. Then Transportation Commissioner Janette Sadik-Khan didn't
launch a costly, permanent redesign. She launched a prototype. Using paint, traffic
cones, and $1.6 million worth of movable furniture (a pittance in infrastructure terms),
she closed Broadway to cars and gave the space back to people. This was not a
permanent decision; it was a test. It created a massive, city-scale Temporal Ma to see
what would happen.
2. Syntonious Adjustment & Adaptation: The Iterative Loop
Tactical urbanism operationalizes the scientific method for cities. It is a continuous cycle of
trying (adjustment), measuring (attunement), and learning (adaptation).
Adjustment (The Prototype): The initial intervention is a Syntonious Adjustment - a
minor, fine-tuning action. A parking spot becomes a park. A traffic lane becomes a plaza.
It is light, quick, and cheap, minimizing the risk of failure.
Attunement (Gathering Warm & Cold Data): During the temporary intervention, the city
becomes a living laboratory. Planners can gather powerful, irrefutable data:
Cold Data: In Times Square, the city measured traffic flow, travel times, economic
activity, and crash statistics. The data showed improved traffic and a dramatic drop in
injuries.
Warm Data: More importantly, they could see and feel the change. The palpable
energy, the joy of people occupying space that was once lethal, the photos of families
lounging in the heart of the city - this was the Warm Data of resonance.
Chapter 17

Adaptation (The Permanent Change): The successful, data-supported prototype builds
an undeniable case for permanent change. The temporary adjustment paves the way for
Syntonious Adaptation - a fundamental shift in the system itself. The lawn chairs in
Times Square were replaced with permanent granite benches and redesigned
streetscapes because the experiment proved the value of the new configuration. The
tactic became strategy.
3. Prefiguration: Building the New World in the Shell of the Old
At its heart, tactical urbanism is a practice of prefigurative politics. It doesn't just
demand a better future; it enacts that future in the present, however temporarily, making it
tangible and irresistible.
A Physical Argument: A pop-up park is not a request; it is a demonstration. It is a
physical, experiential argument for a different set of values. It visually performs the
Syntonious Calculus, showing that prioritizing people over vehicles creates more
aliveness, joy, and economic activity. It answers the question "But where will the cars
go?" by showing the profound human benefit of the space they vacate.
Democratizing Urban Design: PARK(ing) Day is radically democratic. It takes the power
to shape the city out of the exclusive hands of planners and engineers and puts it into
the hands of anyone with a few dollars for a parking meter and some creativity. This
empowers citizens as co-creators, building the collective "muscle" of Syntoniousness.
Overcoming Inertia: Bureaucracies are often resistant to change. A temporary, low-cost
experiment bypasses this inertia. It is far harder for officials to argue against a proven
success, backed by data and public delight, than to reject an abstract plan on a drawing
board. This is Syntonious Resistance at its most effective.
The "Edge": The Limits of the Tactical
While powerful, the tactical approach exists on the edge of legitimacy and must be
understood critically:
The Risk of Co-option: There is a danger that tactical urbanism becomes a cheap
substitute for lasting, equitable investment. A city might install a few token parklets while
continuing to fund highway expansions. The tactic must be a stepping stone to systemic
Syntonious Adaptation, not a dead end.
The Equity Question: Who gets to play? Temporary interventions often rely on existing
community capacity and social capital. The most marginalized neighbourhoods may lack
the resources to organize a PARK(ing) Day installation. A syntonious approach must
actively support tactical interventions in these areas to ensure they too can prefigure
their desired future.
From Gesture to Governance: The ultimate goal is not to have a city full of temporary
projects, but to change the underlying policies that make such acts necessary. The
success of tactical urbanism is measured by its own dissolution - by its ability to make the
temporary permanent and to rewrite the rules of urban design to favour people by
default.
Conclusion: The Acupuncture of the Urban Body
Tactical urbanism is the acupuncture of the syntonious city. Through precise, temporary
interventions, it unblocks energy flows, releases tension, and stimulates the urban body’s
innate ability to heal itself. PARK(ing) Day and Times Square demonstrate that

monumental change does not always require monumental plans and budgets. It can
begin with a single parking spot, a few trafﬁc cones, and the courage to ask a simple,
subversive question: "What if?”
These cases prove that the path to the syntonious city is iterative and experiential. It is
built not through a single master plan, but through a thousand small experiments - a
continuous process of trying, learning, and adapting, always guided by the warm data of
human experience. It is urban evolution in action.

Systemic Resonance: Ciclovía (Bogotá) – City Scale
Attainment, Temporal Ma, Ubuntu
The Case: Every Sunday and public holiday, the city of Bogotá, Colombia, performs a
miracle of urban alchemy. Over 120 kilometres of its streets are closed to automotive
trafﬁc. In their place, a river of humanity ﬂows - over two million people on bicycles,
skateboards, rollerblades, and foot. This is Ciclovía (meaning cycleway), a weekly event
that has transformed the social, physical, and psychological landscape of a megacity. It is
not merely a recreational program; it is a radical, city-scale experiment in what becomes
possible when a city prioritizes people over vehicles.
Syntonious Analysis:
1. Syntonious Attainment at Scale: The City as a Single Organism
Most examples of syntony are localized - a park, a plaza, a street. Ciclovía is unique in its
scale. It is a moment of city-wide Syntonious Attainment, where the entire urban
organism achieves a state of resonant alignment.
The Resounding "Hum": The dominant sensory experience of the city is utterly
transformed. The deafening, stressful roar of internal combustion engines is replaced by
a new soundscape: the resonant hum of human activity - conversation, laughter, music,
and the whir of bicycle wheels. This is the acoustic signature of a city in tune with itself.
Emergent, Collective Joy: The event generates a palpable, collective effervescence.
Strangers smile at one another. Families reclaim the asphalt as their backyard. The fear
and aggression fostered by car-centric design evaporate, replaced by a spontaneous
culture of cooperation and shared enjoyment. This is the feeling of resonance, scaled to
the metropolitan level.
Proof of Concept: Ciclovía acts as irrefutable proof that the city's primary infrastructure,
its street network, can and should serve a completely different, more human-centred
purpose. It demonstrates that the problem of urban mobility has a solution that
generates not just efﬁciency, but outright joy.
2. The Ultimate Temporal Ma: A Weekly Urban Sabbath
Ciclovía is the most powerful example of Temporal Ma in the world. It is a meticulously
designed, recurring pause in the normal economic and transport logic of the city.
A Ritual of Interruption: The event is a collective ritual that breaks the tyrannical rhythm
of the workweek. It creates a massive, predictable, and reliable container for spontaneity,
play, and connection. For a few hours, the city is no longer a machine for moving goods
and people with maximum efﬁciency; it becomes a playground, a gym, a town square,
and a park, all woven together.
Reclaiming Chronos for Kairos: Ciclovía suspends Chronos - the quantiﬁed, economic
time of schedules and commutes - to make space for Kairos - the qualitative, experiential
time of meaningful human connection and bodily presence. It is a weekly invitation to
step out of linear time and into the cyclical, celebratory time of community.
Accessibility as Core Design: This Temporal Ma is not a luxury for the wealthy. It is free
Chapter 18

and occurs along primary arteries that connect rich and poor neighbourhoods, creating
a truly democratic public space that is accessible to the vast majority of citizens. It is Ma
for the 99%.
3. Ubuntu on Two Wheels: "I Am Because We Are" in Motion
The ethical core of Ciclovía is a profound, if unspoken, practice of Ubuntu. The event
physically manifests the understanding that our individual well-being is bound up in our
collective well-being.
The Embodiment of Mutual Care: The event only works because of a shared social
contract. Participants must be aware of others, slow down, share space, and help one
another. This is not enforced by trafﬁc police but by a collective ethic. It is a weekly civic
lesson in reciprocity and respect, teaching empathy through embodied experience.
The Dissolution of Barriers: On the Ciclovía route, the stark social and economic
divisions that typically deﬁne Bogotá are temporarily softened. A business executive on
an expensive racing bike shares the road with a factory worker on a beat-up cruiser.
Children pedal alongside elders. The event creates a rare space of social levelling and
recognition, where people see each other not as obstacles or threats, but as fellow
participants in a shared civic celebration.
Public Health as a Common Good: Ciclovía frames health not as an individual
responsibility but as a public good fostered by collective infrastructure. The city actively
provides the means for its citizens to be healthy, together. This is a powerful enactment
of a government's role in afﬁrming the humanity and dignity of its people by creating
the conditions for their ﬂourishing.
The "Edge": Sustaining the Miracle
Despite its success, Ciclovía exists in a perpetual state of tension, highlighting the
challenges of maintaining syntony:
The Political Edge: The event requires continued political will to defend its road space
from the relentless pressure of automotive interests. Every year, its existence is a
negotiation, a testament to the fact that resonant systems must be actively stewarded
against the pull of the dissonant status quo.
The Scalability Edge: While the event itself is massive, the challenge for Bogotá has been
to convert this weekly proof-of-concept into permanent infrastructure. The struggle to
build a continuous, protected bike lane network shows the difﬁculty of transitioning from
Temporal Ma to Spatial Ma.
The Evolution Edge: As the city changes, Ciclovía must adapt. How does it accommodate
even more participants? How does it integrate new forms of mobility? How does it
ensure it doesn't become a victim of its own success, becoming too crowded and losing
its joy? This requires ongoing Syntonious Adjustment.
Conclusion: The Ritual That Could Redeem the City
Ciclovía is more than a bike ride; it is a social technology for producing syntony. It
demonstrates that the transformation of the city does not always require colossal
investment in concrete and steel. Sometimes, it simply requires the courage to stop - to
regularly halt the dominant system to make space for a new one to emerge.
It is a living, breathing example that another urban reality is possible. It provides a weekly

taste of the syntonious city: a city that is healthy, connected, joyful, and equitable. It is a
ritual that, by offering a temporary glimpse of utopia, makes that utopia feel inevitable. In
doing so, it builds the public mandate and the collective imagination necessary to
eventually make that vision a permanent reality. Ciclovía doesn't just open streets; it
opens minds, and in doing so, it opens the way to the future.

Learning from Discord: A Failure Analysis - Shadow Work,
Integration, consequences of ignoring the calculus.
Introduction to the Chapter
A philosophy is only as strong as its ability to confront failure. To complete our exploration
of syntonious urbanism, we must turn our gaze to projects that have generated
dissonance, conflict, and harm. These are not mere mistakes; they are powerful teachers.
This chapter analyses urban interventions that failed because they ignored the principles
of this book. By examining these failures through the syntonious lens, we perform
essential shadow work - integrating the lessons of discord to strengthen our practice and
affirm the vital importance of the path we have outlined.
The Case: We will analyse two types of failure:
1. The Blatant Oversight: The initial proposal for Amazon's HQ2 in Long Island City,
New York (2017-2019). A secretive, top-down, massive-scale development deal
negotiated without community input.
2. The Well-Intentioned Harm: Green Gentrification: A common scenario where a new
park, bike lane, or sustainability initiative, while environmentally sound, leads to rising
property values, displacement of long-term, low-income residents, and the erasure of
community character.
Syntonious Analysis:
1. The Failure of Attunement: The Deafened City
Both cases represent a catastrophic failure of Syntonious Attunement. The necessary
deep listening simply did not occur.
HQ2: The Closed Door: The negotiations for HQ2 were conducted in secret between
Amazon and city/state officials. The community, the very people who would be most
impacted by the massive influx of jobs, the strain on infrastructure, and the skyrocketing
cost of living, was treated as an obstacle, not a partner. There was zero effort to gather
Warm Data. The lived experience, fears, and aspirations of Long Island City residents
were irrelevant to the calculus of the deal. This was urbanism as a transaction, not a
relationship.
Green Gentrification: Listening to the Wrong Thing: In cases of green gentrification,
attunement is often selective. Planners may have listened to environmental data (Cold
Data) about the benefits of green space, and to the desires of a more affluent, future
demographic they hoped to attract. But they failed to listen to the existing community.
They did not ask: "How will this change impact your ability to stay here?" or "What are
your fears?" The Spirit of Place - the existing cultural fabric and social networks - was
ignored in favour of a generic, greenwashed vision of improvement.
2. A Flawed Calculus: Valuing the Wrong Things
These projects proceeded because they were evaluated with a dangerously narrow
calculus, one that ignored the syntonious filters.
Chapter 19

The HQ2 Calculus: The decision-making equation was simplistic: 25,000 jobs + $2.5
billion in investment = undeniable good. It applied a purely economic filter, valuing
numbers over people, growth over well-being. It completely failed the syntonious
criteria:
- Ubuntu: It would have shattered the community (Score: 0).
- Pluriversality: It was a monolithic corporate culture imposed on a diverse
neighbourhood (Score: 0).
- Wealth Democracy: It would have concentrated wealth and power enormously
(Score: 0).
- The Soul Filter: It was the antithesis of an authentic, local story (Score: 0).
The Green Gentrification Calculus: The calculus here is more insidious because it
partially satisfies the framework. It scores highly on Regenerative Potential
(environmentally) and sometimes Resonance (for the new residents). However, it fails
catastrophically on:
- Ubuntu: It actively harms the existing community by displacing it.
- Wealth Democracy: It redistributes wealth upward, benefiting property owners and
displacing renters.
- Rooted-in-Place: It replaces a unique local character with a bland, affluent
homogeneity.
This is a warning: you cannot cherry-pick syntonious principles. A project that excels in
one area but fails in another is, by definition, dissonant.
3. The Absence of Ma: No Container for Life or Dialogue
In both cases, there was a complete absence of Ma - the essential container for process
and relationship.
No Social Ma: There was no Pluriversal Roundtable, no Syntonious Facilitation, no co-
created container for dialogue. In the case of HQ2, the announcement was a fait
accompli. In green gentrification, community meetings are often held after the key
decisions are made, becoming theatres of frustration rather than genuine collaboration.
No Temporal Ma: There was no prototyping, no tactical urbanism to test ideas and
build trust. The plans were presented as final, large-scale, and non-negotiable. There was
no pause for reflection, only a headlong rush toward implementation.
The Consequences: The Price of Dissonance
The result of ignoring the syntonious framework is not just a "suboptimal outcome"; it is
active harm:
1. Erosion of Trust: The most damaging long-term consequence. When communities are
ignored, they learn that the system is rigged against them. This makes future
collaboration, even on worthy projects, incredibly difficult. It breeds cynicism and
NIMBYism.
2. Cultural and Social Erasure: Green gentrification doesn't just displace people; it
displaces culture, history, and social networks. The very thing that made a
neighbourhood attractive in the first place - its soul - is destroyed by the process of
"improvement.”
3. The Reinforcement of Inequity: These projects become engines of inequality,
leveraging public money and policy to subsidize the wealthy at the expense of the
vulnerable. They spatialize injustice into the very map of the city.

4. The Wasted Opportunity: The greatest cost is the future that wasn't built. The
resources, energy, and land expended on these dissonant projects could have been
used to co-create something truly resonant, regenerative, and beautiful.
Syntonious Integration: Harvesting the Wisdom from Failure
The syntonious approach does not hide from these failures; it integrates them. This is the
practice of shadow work: to look squarely at the damage and ask, "What can this teach
us?"
A Diagnostic Tool: This analysis proves the Syntonious Calculus is not an academic
exercise. It is a crucial diagnostic tool to prevent such failures. Had it been applied to
HQ2, the project's devastating social ﬂaws would have been glaringly obvious before a
single pen was put to paper.
The Mandate for Early Attunement: These cases become canonical warnings that justify
the upfront, seemingly slow work of Syntonious Attunement. They answer the impatient
question, "Why are we spending so much time listening?" with a powerful retort: "To
avoid becoming that."
The Call for Dissolution: In cases of active harm like green gentriﬁcation, the syntonious
response might indeed be Syntonious Dissolution. This could mean dismantling the
policies that enable displacement (e.g., lack of rent control, weak tenant protections) in
tandem with adding green space, or even pausing a project to go back and do the
attunement work that should have been done ﬁrst.
Conclusion: Failure as the Essential Teacher
A syntonious urbanism is not a utopian urbanism that never fails. It is a resilient urbanism
that learns how to fail well. It builds feedback loops not as an afterthought, but as its core
nervous system. It understands that discord is data.
These failures teach us that the principles in this book are not a luxury. They are a
necessity. They are an ethical imperative. Ignoring them leads to real human suffering and
the continued erosion of our planetary and social fabric. Embracing them is the difﬁcult,
messy, but only viable path toward building cities that are not just efﬁcient, or sustainable,
or smart, but are truly good - cities that know how to listen, how to care, and how to heal.

The Syntonious City
A Manifesto for Urban Aliveness
Endnote

The Syntonious City - A Manifesto for Urban Aliveness
We stand at the end of one age and the beginning of another. The twentieth-century city,
born of industry and shaped by the logic of the machine, has reached its logical
conclusion: a landscape of efﬁciency often devoid of soul, of connection often devoid of
warmth, of growth that too often undermines the very conditions for life. The air of
alienation is palpable. We feel it in the silent isolation of the crowd, the quiet grief for
paved-over earth, and the deep yearning for meaning amidst the glittering steel and
glass.
Our journey through these pages began with this diagnosis. But it does not end here. For
within this crisis lies the seed of a profound invitation - a call to participate in the great
turning, the metanoia, of urban life. This book has not been a prescription, but a
proposition; not a blueprint, but a bearing. It points toward a future where the city is not a
problem to be solved, but a living being to be nurtured - a dynamic, relational entity
continuously co-created by people and place. This is the vision of the Syntonious City: a
city that is wise, regenerative, and deeply resonant.
At the heart of this vision lies the sacred dialogue between the Spirit of Place and the
Soul of the City.
The Spirit of Place (Genius Loci) is the ancient, enduring character of the land itself. It is
the memory in the stone, the song of the river, the way the light falls on a particular corner
at a certain hour. It is the cumulative intelligence of the ecosystem - the native plants that
know how to thrive in the local climate, the geological formations that shape the ﬂow of
water and life. It is the deep, slow time of the bedrock and the cyclical time of the seasons.
This spirit is the foundational given, the unique and irreplaceable context into which we
build. The machine-city, in its hubris, sought to silence this spirit, to bulldoze, ﬁll, and pave
it into submission. The syntonious city begins with the humble, courageous act of listening
to it.
The Soul of the City is what emerges from the long, loving conversation between human
communities and the Spirit of Place. It is not imposed; it is cultivated. It is the collective
character, the shared stories, the struggles, the triumphs, and the aspirations that deﬁne a
community’s identity over time. It is the warmth of a neighbourhood pub, the vibrant
chaos of a street market, the quiet dignity of a historic library, the deﬁant joy of a
community garden. The soul is the human heart of the city, the layer of meaning and
memory that is woven into its physical fabric. It is dynamic, evolving, and fragile. A city
with a soul is a city that knows who it is and why it exists.
The syntonious city is the arena where this spirit and this soul are brought into harmonious
relationship. It is the practice of midwiﬁng the soul of the city into being by honouring the
spirit of the place. This is the ultimate purpose of urbanism. We do this not through grand,
controlling gestures, but through the mindful application of the principles we have
explored:
- We practice Syntonious Attunement to listen to the whispers of the land and the
dreams of the people.
Endnote

- We embrace Pluriversality to ensure the emerging soul is a chorus of many voices, not
a solo.
- We are guided by Ubuntu to ensure the process is one of mutual care, affirming that our
humanity is bound up with one another and with the place itself.
- We Craft Ma - the spatial, temporal, and social containers - that allow this dialogue to
unfold with grace and beauty.
- We use the Syntonious Calculus to ensure our every decision affirms life and fosters
resonance across all dimensions of being.
This is not a task for a select few. The era of the lone expert, the master planner working
from on high, is over. The syntonious city is a continuous, collective practice. It is a city that
is always tuning itself, much like a symphony orchestra, to the ever-changing key of life. It
requires all of us to pick up the tools of the weaver.
Therefore, we are called to become:
Stewards of the Spirit: Guardians who recognize that the land is not a resource but a
relative. We must learn its stories, protect its waterways, and champion its biodiversity.
Our first question must always be: "What does this place need to be whole?"
Facilitators of the Soul: Hosts who know that the best ideas emerge from the collective.
We must create the spaces - the living rooms, the town squares, the digital forums -
where the many worlds of the city can meet, conflict, and create together. Our work is
to foster the conversations that shape a shared destiny.
Citizen-Weavers: Artists of the everyday who understand that the urban fabric is made of
countless small choices. We weave with our actions: by shopping locally, by planting a
tree, by starting a block association, by creating art, by showing up for a public hearing,
by simply knowing our neighbours' names. Every act of connection is a stitch in the
great tapestry.
This work is a form of sacred activism. It is the fierce and tender determination to build a
world worthy of our love. It is the understanding that the city is not a noun, but a verb - a
continuous process of collective becoming.
The challenges are immense. The forces of extraction, short-termism, and division are
powerful. But the seeds of the syntonious future are already everywhere, sprouting in the
cracks of the old paradigm. You can see them in the farmer's market that revitalizes a
parking lot, in the citizens' assembly that tackles a tough issue, in the park that remembers
its history as a creek, in the policy that recognizes the rights of nature.
They are proof that another urban reality is not only possible - it is already being built by
those courageous enough to listen, to care, and to act.
So let us begin. Let us begin by listening to the story of our street. Let us begin by asking a
new question at our next meeting. Let us begin by imagining what our city could feel like
in seven generations.
The syntonious city awaits its weavers. It is the city of the possible, the city of the alive, the
city of the heart. It is the city that remembers it is part of nature, and that its ultimate
purpose is to nurture life in all its radiant, pluriversal, and miraculous wholeness.
Let us go forth and weave.

The city was a machine, a cold and grinding gear,
A script of steel and concrete, written out in fear.
A chorus of the lonely, a symphony of haste,
A world of many mirrors, but every face misplaced.
We thought we knew the answers, a blueprint we could roll,
A single, perfect future to save the struggling soul.
But futures built on old mistakes will only come undone,
A sterile, static masterpiece beneath a dying sun.
Then came a different whisper, a note upon the air,
A call to deep attention, a purpose to repair.
To listen for the rhythm, the beat below the street,
The song of place and people, a harmony so sweet.
The note became a chord now, a practice and an art,
To play the city's music with a compassionate heart.
It’s Syntony - the tuning to a more resonant key,
Where “you” and “me” can softly bloom into a “we”.
It’s honouring the Pluriverse, the many worlds that meet,
The different dreams and stories that make the city complete.
It’s finding strength in difference, in the voices, strange and deep,
A promise that we all belong, a vow we all will keep.
It’s crafting space for Ma to breathe, the pause between the notes,
The fertile void where wonder grows and healing gently floats.
It’s benches under oak trees, a quiet, sacred space,
Where time itself can slow its turn and grant the soul its grace.
It’s Ubuntu’s golden thread that weaves us into one,
The knowing that our being is found beneath the sun
Together. I am because we are. The ethic and the creed,
To fill a neighbour’s cup with hope and plant a generous seed.
So, take the thread, and find your place, upon the living loom,
There is no final finish line, no destination’s bloom.
There’s only ever weaving, with the courage to begin,
And the will to hold the tensions that we’ll never finally win.
The work is never over, the song is never done,
It’s a never-ending journey, beneath the moon and sun.
To tend and mend and listen, with a hand and ear so keen,
For the city is a verb, my friend - a living, growing green.
So, weave your little pattern into the grand design,
Your love is part of something that is endlessly divine.
The cloth is never finished, the tapestry unfolds,
A story that is waiting for the next brave hand it holds.
The Weaver's Song

The difference between Multicultural and Pluricultural
While the terms are sometimes used interchangeably, from the perspective of syntonious
urbanism, they represent fundamentally different paradigms.
The breakdown of the difference:
Multicultural Urbanism: The "Salad Bowl"
A multicultural approach focuses on the co-existence and recognition of distinct
cultural groups within a shared urban space. It is often characterized by:
Metaphor: The "Salad Bowl" or "Mosaic. Different elements are contained within one
bowl, but each retains its original, distinct form and identity.
Goal: Tolerance, representation, and celebration of diversity.
Method: Adding cultural elements to an existing urban fabric. This includes:
- Ethnic neighbourhoods (e.g., Chinatown, Little Italy).
- festivals and heritage months.
- Restaurants serving diverse cuisines.
- Public art representing different cultures.
Power Dynamic: Often operates within the established framework and rules of the
dominant culture. The city government or planning department "grants" space for or
"celebrates" other cultures. The underlying structure of the city (its laws, economic
models, planning standards) remains largely unchanged.
Potential Pitfall: Can sometimes lead to tokenism, superﬁciality, or the "ghettoization" of
cultures into designated zones. It risks treating culture as an aesthetic commodity to be
consumed rather than a living, evolving reality. Different cultures exist side-by-side but
may not deeply interact or transform one another and the city's core identity.
Pluriversal Urbanism (Pluriversality): The "Stew"
A pluriversal approach, as deﬁned by thinkers like Arturo Escobar and central to our
book, focuses on the co-creation and continuous negotiation between many worlds. It
is characterized by:
Metaphor: The "Stew." Different ingredients are added to the pot, and through a process
of cooking, they meld together to create an entirely new, shared ﬂavour, while each
ingredient still contributes its essence. The pot itself (the city) is transformed by what is
cooked inside it.
Goal: Fostering deep interaction, mutual transformation, and the creation of a new,
shared urban reality that is born from its many constituent parts.
Method: Designing the process and the container (Ma) for different knowledge systems
and ways of being to meet, conﬂict, and create something new together. This includes:
- Participatory Budgeting, where residents directly decide how to spend public funds.
- Co-design processes that treat community members as experts in their own lived
experience.
- Pluriversal Roundtables that give equal footing to an elder's story, an engineer's
data, and an artist's vision.
- Policies that are ﬂexible enough to accommodate different cultural norms (e.g.,
ﬂexible use of public space for different rituals).
Annex
Annex

Power Dynamic: Seeks to de-centre the dominant worldview. It challenges the idea that
there is one "universal" or "right" way to design a city (typically the Western, modernist
model). It acknowledges that different cultures have different valid ways of knowing,
designing, and dwelling.
Potential Challenge: This is messier, more complex, and can involve conflict. It requires
skilled facilitation and a willingness to relinquish control from a single authority.
Comparative Table: Multicultural vs. Pluriversal Urbanism
A Practical Example: A City Park Project
Multicultural Approach: The city builds a standard park and adds a "Multicultural
Corner" with a Chinese gazebo, a Somali-style shade structure, and a Māori carving. The
design, layout, and rules of the park (e.g., "No loud noises," "Keep off the grass") are
based on a single cultural standard.
Pluriversal Approach: The city facilitates a co-design process from the very beginning.
They ask: How do different cultures use outdoor space? For ceremony? For large family
gatherings? For quiet contemplation? For vibrant commerce? The resulting park might
have:
- A large, open, paved area for festivals and markets.
- A secluded, quiet garden.
- Movable furniture so people can configure their own spaces.
- Flexible rules negotiated by the community.
- The park itself is a unique creation that couldn't exist anywhere else, reflecting the
specific negotiation of the worlds present in that community.
In summary: Multiculturalism is about being next to each other. Pluriversality is about
being with and through each other, in a way that transforms all parties involved. Urban
Hub 51 argues that to achieve true Syntony, we must move from a multicultural to a
pluriversal paradigm.

From Multiculturalism to Pluriversality:
Beyond the Salad Bowl
In our pursuit of more inclusive cities, the ideal of "multiculturalism" has long been a
guiding star. It emerged as a necessary and progressive corrective to the homogenizing
force of modernist urbanism, which sought to erase difference in the name of efﬁciency
and order. However, to achieve true Urban Syntoniety, we must recognize that a
multicultural framework, while well-intentioned, is ultimately insufﬁcient. It is a step on the
path, but not the destination. The syntonious city requires a shift to a pluriversal approach.
The difference, while subtle in terminology, is profound in practice. It is the difference
between hosting difference and being transformed by it.
The Multicultural City: The Ethics of the Salad Bowl
The multicultural model is premised on the idea of the "salad bowl" or the "mosaic."
Distinct cultural groups exist within a single container - the city - each maintaining its
unique, bounded identity. The primary goal is tolerance, representation, and co-existence.
This approach manifests in urban practice through:
* Designated Zones: Ethnic enclaves like Chinatowns or Little Italies, which are often
celebrated for their cultural authenticity.
* Symbolic Additions: Public art, monuments, or named streets that acknowledge the
presence of different communities.
* Calendar-Based Celebrations: Cultural festivals and heritage months that offer
temporary, often spectacularized, glimpses into a culture.
The multicultural city says,” You are welcome here as you are." This is a vital statement of
respect. Yet, this model often operates within an unexamined framework. The underlying
urban operating system - the zoning codes, economic models, legal frameworks, and
public space designs - remains largely unchanged, reﬂecting the values and norms of the
dominant culture. The city provides a stage, but the script and the stage directions are
already written. Different cultures are invited to perform their identity, but they are rarely
invited to rewrite the script itself.
The Pluriversal City: The Alchemy of the Stew
The pluriversal model, in contrast, invokes the metaphor of the "stew." In a stew, diverse
ingredients are added to the pot, and through a slow, shared process of cooking, they
break down, blend, and create an entirely new, rich, and complex ﬂavour. Each ingredient
contributes its essence to the whole and is, in turn, transformed by it.
The goal of pluriversality is not just co-existence but co-creation. It is not about preserving
static cultural identities side-by-side, but about fostering the continuous negotiation
between different worlds - each with its own ways of knowing, being, and dwelling - to
generate a shared urban reality that is new and unique.
This approach manifests in urban practice through:
- Co-Design Processes: Projects like Copenhagen's Superkilen, where the design itself is
generated from the bottom up by the community's stories and objects, creating a new,
hybrid aesthetic that belongs to everyone and no one alone.
- Institutional Innovation: Participatory budgeting, citizens' assemblies, and community
land trusts that redistribute not just recognition, but actual decision-making power.

- Adaptable Infrastructure: Designing public space as a flexible container (Ma) that can
be configured and reconfigured for different uses - a quiet contemplative space at dawn,
a vibrant market at noon, a festival ground at night.
The pluriversal city says, "We are welcome here *to become what we might create
together*." It acknowledges that the city itself is a continuous, collective project with no
single author. It understands that true harmony is not a single note held by everyone, but
a complex chord, richer precisely because of its different, and sometimes dissonant,
notes.
A Practical Contrast: The Park Bench
Imagine a city building a new public park.
The Multicultural approach might install a bench with a plaque dedicating it to a
particular cultural group. It is a gesture of inclusion, but the bench itself is a standard city-
issue design.
The Pluriversal approach would bring together elders, teenagers, parents, and artists
from various communities to ask: What is sitting? What is rest? What does community look
like? The outcome might not be a standard bench at all. It might be a series of low walls
that double as seating, arranged in a circle for conversation. It might be a shaded
platform for shoes-off sitting. It might be movable chairs. The design emerges from the
negotiation of different needs and cultural practices, resulting in something that would
not have existed without that specific meeting of worlds.
Why the Shift is Essential for Syntony
The move from a multicultural to a pluriversal sensibility is fundamental to syntonious
urbanism because:
1. It Honors True Difference: Pluriversality moves beyond the surface-level symbols of
culture (food, dress, festivals) to engage with deep, often conflicting, *worldviews*. It
makes room for different conceptions of time, relationship, nature, and community.
2. It is Generative: Multiculturalism can often be static. Pluriversality is inherently
dynamic and creative, generating new cultural forms, architectural languages, and
social practices that could not have been predicted by a single perspective.
3. It Redistributes Power: Ultimately, multiculturalism often occurs within the existing
power structure. Pluriversality requires a radical decentralization of authority, inviting
the city's many worlds to shape the very frameworks that govern urban life.
The multicultural city connects us. The pluriversal city resonates with us, because its
harmony is born from the respectful and creative tuning of its many parts. It is the practice
of weaving a city where many worlds can not only fit but flourish together, creating a
collective song more beautiful than any single voice could sing alone.

Why Sociocracy Might Be Insufﬁcient
for the Pluriversal City
Sociocracy is a superb governance system for consent-based decision-making within
an organization or community that shares a common aim or identity. Its strengths are:
- Circles and Double-Links: Creates feedback loops and ensures information ﬂows
between domains.
- Consent Decision-Making: ("No argued objections") is efﬁcient and prevents one
person from blocking progress for the whole.
- Clear Roles and Accountabilities: Brings clarity and effectiveness.
The Limitation for Pluriversality: Sociocracy often assumes a uniﬁed operating culture.
The "objections" raised in a consent process are typically based on a shared
understanding of the organization's aim and logic. It is a system for making a single entity
more intelligent and adaptive.
Pluriversality, by contrast, is not about making one system smarter; it's about hosting a
negotiation between multiple, often incommensurable, systems of logic and value.
The "objection" from one world might not be a logical argument within the dominant
frame, but a fundamental statement of cultural or existential necessity from another frame.
- A Sociocratic circle might consent to a park design because no one has an argument
against it based on the shared goal of efﬁciency and aesthetics.
- A pluriversal process might not consent because an Elder from one community says,
"This design disturbs a sacred pathway we cannot see," and a parent from another says,
"Your notion of 'play' is not our notion of 'play'." These are not "argued objections"
within a single frame of logic; they are declarations from different worlds.
Sociocracy provides the mechanics for good governance, but pluriversality demands a
prior meta-framework for relationship and understanding that can handle profound
difference before a decision can even be brought to a vote.
The Best Management/Governance System for Pluriversality
There is no single, off-the-shelf "system." Instead, a pluriversal city requires an adaptive
ecosystem of governance practices built on a foundation of relationality. This
ecosystem would likely be a blend of several models:
1. The Foundational Bedrock: Ubuntu and Relationality
Before any system or process, the operating principle must be Ubuntu ("I am because we
are"). This is not a tool but a worldview that prioritizes mutual care and the recognition of
our shared humanity. It is the ethical container that holds everything else.
2. The Core Operating System: Adaptive Governance & Institutional Jiu-Jitsu
This approach, drawn from complexity theory and ecology, is built for managing systems
where there is no central controller, but multiple independent actors.
- Principle: Create "safe-to-fail" experiments (tactical urbanism prototypes) instead of
betting everything on a "fail-safe" master plan.
- How it works for Pluricultures: The city government's role shifts from "controller" to
"enabler." It sets broad, principled boundaries (e.g., "All projects must score a minimum
of 3 on the Syntonious Calculus ﬁlter for Ubuntu") and then provides resources for
communities to experiment within them. It uses "Institutional Jiu-Jitsu" - using the
system's own rules (e.g., public health mandates, economic development grants) to fund
and support pluriversal outcomes.

3. The Structural Framework: Hybridized Sociocracy with a Pluriversal Twist
Sociocracy's circle structure is still incredibly useful, but it must be adapted:
- Pluriversal Circles: Circles must be explicitly designed to be microcosms of the city's
diversity. Membership isn't just based on function (e.g., transportation circle) but on
identity and worldview (ensuring representation of different cultures, ages, income
levels, and non-human interests via guardians).
- From Consent to Shared Meaning: The goal of a decision-making round shifts from
mere "consent" to the deeper pursuit of "shared meaning" or "right relationship." This
requires the prior use of deep facilitation methods (e.g., Circle Practice, Dialogue) to
explore the values and needs behind positions before a proposal is even formulated.
4. The Essential Practice: Syntonious Facilitation
This is the most critical "technology" in the pluriversal system. The facilitator's role is to:
- Host the "Pluriversal Roundtable" as a long-term container for relationship-building,
not just a one-off meeting for decisions.
- Translate between worlds and help different knowledge systems (e.g., indigenous
wisdom, technical engineering data, lived experience of homelessness) understand each
other.
- Use conﬂict as a resource to generate more creative and inclusive solutions.
5. The Meta-Guardian: The Syntonious Calculus
This is the constitutional framework for all decisions. Any proposal, from any circle or
group, must be evaluated against the non-negotiable ﬁlters of Ubuntu, Resonance,
Pluriversality, Regeneration, etc. It is the ultimate tool for ensuring that the "negotiation
between worlds" leads to life-afﬁrming outcomes and doesn't simply reinforce the power
of the loudest or most dominant group.
What This Looks Like in Practice: A Proposed Structure
A pluriversal city might have a governance structure that looks like this:
- A Department of Attunement: A city department dedicated not to planning, but to
continuous listening (gathering Warm Data) using the Integral Framework. Its sole job is
to keep the city government connected to the lived experience of all its worlds.
- Permanent Citizen Assemblies: Statutory bodies of randomly selected citizens (a true
demographic microcosm) who are paid to deliberate on major city issues. They are
supported by Syntonious Facilitators and use the Syntonious Calculus to make
recommendations with real political weight.
- Community Guardians for Non-Human & Cultural Interests: Formal, perhaps even
legally recognized, roles for individuals or groups to serve as advocates for more-than-
human stakeholders (e.g., "Guardian of the River") and for speciﬁc cultural preservation.
-A Network of Pluriversal Circles: Hybrid Sociocratic circles formed around
neighbourhoods and key functions (mobility, housing, ecology), with membership rules
designed to mandate pluriversal representation.
In conclusion, the best "system" for pluricultures is not a single system at all. It is a
relational ecosystem that combines:
- The ethical foundation of Ubuntu,
- The strategic approach of Adaptive Governance,
- The useful mechanics of a hybridized Sociocracy,
- The essential skill of Syntonious Facilitation, and
- The guiding constitution of the Syntonious Calculus.

This ecosystem is designed for one purpose: not to manage difference efﬁciently, but to
host difference creatively, allowing a city to become a continually evolving expression of
all the worlds within it.
The Map, The Weave
The multicultural city draws a map of separate parts,
Where each distinct community can practice its own arts.
It says, "You have your neighbourhood, your festival, your name,"
A gesture of acceptance in a unifying frame.
The streets may hold a hundred ﬂags, a tribute to the many,
A living, breathing census of a bright and proud miscellany.
But the underlying system, the rules by which it runs,
Remains a single standard for a billion distant suns.
It is a place of You and You, a side-by-side address,
A gentle, managed tolerance that carefully says "yes."
But the pluricultural city knows a different, deeper call,
It seeks to weave the many threads into a whole for all.
It asks not just, "What do you bring?" but "What shall we create?"
It understands that co-creation is a city's truest state.
It shares the very power to imagine and to build,
With ﬂexible, responsive forms that can be re-fulﬁlled.
It knows a bench is not a bench until the elders speak,
Until the children's laughter deﬁnes the joy we seek.
It is a place of We and Us, a shared and vibrant art,
A living, changing tapestry where all must play a part.
So multiculturalism is a necessary start,
A welcome on the threshold, an opening of the heart.
But pluriculturalism is the work that must come next,
A challenging, rewarding, and far more complex text.
It dares to change the structure, to rewrite the very code,
To share the pen of destiny and lighten every load.
For the city of the future, if it's resonant and wise,
Will be pluricultural - a shared and bold enterprise.

Urban Street ART Cape Town

BooksUrban Hub
Urban Hub Series
A series of books for the use of Integral theory or an Integral Meta-framework and
beyond in understanding cities and Urban Thriveability.
Although each can stand alone, taken together they give a more rounded
appreciation of how this broader views can help in the analysis and design of
thriveable urban environments.

Urban Hub Books Series

Urban Hub Books SeriesUrban Hub Books Series

Urban Hub Publishing – other books
Urban Hub Books Series

51
Exploring the edges
Urbanism & Syntoniety
Urban Hub
Paulvan Schaik
IntegralUrbanHub
Have you ever stood on a busy street corner and felt a profound sense
of isolation, even amidst the crowd? Our cities are in crisis. Built on the
twentieth-century paradigms of the machine and the computer, they
prioritize efficiency over life, extraction over care, and control over
connection. The result is a widespread urban dissonance: cities that
are connected yet isolating, sustainable yet soulless, smart yet
profoundly unwise.
Urban Hub 51: Urbanism & Syntoniety: Exploring the Edges offers a
radical and hopeful alternative. This is a guide to a new practice called
syntoniety - the art of tuning a city to the key of life. It begins with
listening to the Spirit of Place (Genius Loci), the unique song of the
land itself, and culminates in midwifing the Soul of the City into being -
that palpable sense of meaning, identity, and belonging that makes a
community feel alive. Drawing on principles like the resonant
alignment of Syntony, the respectful coexistence of Pluriversality, the
sacred space of Ma(間) , and the profound ethic of Ubuntu ("I am
because we are"), this book provides the tools to transform our urban
landscapes from machines of extraction into living, breathing
ecosystems. Join the movement to become a citizen-weaver and help
create cities that are not just smart and sustainable, but wise,
regenerative, and deeply resonant.
Integral Urban Hub

5
Urban Hub
1
Practical Steps for Facilitating Resonance in Your Place
Paul van Schaik
integralMENTORS
a meta-pragmatic approach
Thriveable Worldsa
The Weaver's Protocol
A Field Guide to
Syntonious Urbanism

This protocol booklet transforms the
book's philosophy into a grounded,
repeatable, and ethical practice,
empowering leaders at all levels to
become weavers of resonance.
Paulvan Schaik

Content

Contents
Subtitle: Practical Steps for Facilitating Resonance in Your Place
The Protocol: The Five Phases of Syntonious Weaving
Phase 1: PREPARE THE LOOM (The Inner Work & Power Analysis)
This phase is about the weaver preparing themselves and understanding the territory.
1.1. Centre Yourself in the Golden Thread:
1.2. Map the Terrain of Relationships & Power (Initial Scan):
1.3. Deﬁne the "Edge of Potential":

Phase 2: GATHER THE THREADS (Syntonious Attunement)
This phase is about deep listening to gather Warm Data.
2.1. Design a Pluriversal Listening Strategy:
2.2. Listen for What is Alive:
2.3. Synthesize the Warm Data:
Phase 3: SET THE WARP (Convening & Container Building)
This phase is about bringing people together in a well-held container (Ma).
3.1. Issue a Syntonious Invitation:
3.2. Co-create the Container:
3.3. Host the "Pluriversal Roundtable":
Phase 4: WEAVE THE CLOTH (Co-Creation & Decision-Making)
This phase is where ideas are generated, and decisions are made using the Syntonious
Calculus.
4.1. Frame the Challenge Syntoniously:
4.2. Ideate & Prototype:
4.3. Apply the Syntonious Calculus:
Phase 5: TEND THE TAPESTRY (Action, Adaptation & Stewardship)
The work does not end with a decision; it evolves.
5.1. Act & Observe (Syntonious Adjustment):
5.2. Adapt & Evolve (Syntonious Adaptation):
5.3. Practice Sacred Dissolution:
5.4. Celebrate & Ritualize:

Contents
Appendices & Worksheets
A. Quick Reference Glossary:
B. The Weaver's Checklist:
Your Guide to the Five Phases
The Initial Integral Scan
Synthesis Web
The Syntonious Calculus Canvas
C. Worksheets: Stories from the Field:
D. Resources for Practicing Weaving
E. Getting Unstuck: A trouble guide for the Weaver
F. Key Areas for Facilitation Guides
G. The Syntonious Technologist
Bibliography: Foundational Texts & Inspirations (A Starting list only)
Annex: The Syntonious Concepts: A Detailed Lexicon
How the Concepts align with and are informed by Asian & many Indigenous
Traditions

Workbook
The Weaver's Protocol:
A Field Guide to Syntonious Urbanism

The Weaver's Protocol:
A Field Guide to Syntonious Urbanism
Subtitle: Practical Steps for Facilitating Resonance in Your Place
Introduction: How to Use This Workbook
Welcome, Weaver. Are you a concerned neighbour? A community organizer? An artist? A
city official tired of the old ways? This protocol is for you. You are the weaver your city
needs. This book is not meant to be read from front to back in one sitting. It is a field
guide. It is a collection of processes, prompts, and tools. Use it actively. Write in it. Tear
pages out to take to meetings. Get it dirty. The goal is not perfection, but practice. The
path to a syntonious city is paved with small, courageous, iterative actions. This protocol is
your loom. Your community and your place are the threads. Let's begin weaving.
Core Metaphor: The Weaver at the Loom
The Loom: The process itself (The Weaver's Protocol). It provides the structure and
tension necessary to hold the work.
The Threads: The people, the stories, the history, the ecology, the Spirit of the Place.
These are the materials you are working with.
The Weaver: You. The facilitator, the host, the community member, the planner - anyone
willing to hold the process. Your role is not to be the expert with the answers, but the
host with the good questions.
The Golden Thread: The ethic that guides every action: "With the courage to listen, the
agility to adapt, and the will to act lightly and fiercely in service of life." This is your
touchstone.
The Protocol: The Five Phases of Syntonious Weaving
Phase 1: PREPARE THE LOOM (The Inner Work & Power Analysis)
Purpose: To ground yourself and understand the context, power dynamics, and potential
of the situation before engaging others.
1.1. Centre Yourself in the Golden Thread (10 min)
Why: You cannot hold space for others if you are not centred. This is the inner work of
the weaver.
How:
1. Pause. Find a quiet moment before any engagement.
2. Breathe. Take three deep breaths.
3. Reflect. Ask yourself these three questions and jot down your initial answers:
Courage: What am I most afraid of in this process? What will it take for me to truly
listen, especially to voices that challenge me?
Agility: What assumptions am I holding onto? Am I willing to let go of my
preconceived solution if a better one emerges from the group?
Will: What is the smallest, fiercest action I can take to serve the life of this place and
its people?
Worksheet Prompt: "My intention for this work is..."
1.2. Map the Terrain of Relationships & Power (The Initial Integral Scan)
Why: To see the whole system and identify key actors, tensions, and assets from the start.
This prevents blind spots.

How: Use the Integral City Scan (4 Quadrants) as a lens. Fill out this worksheet for your
project/place.
Key Power Analysis Question: Based on this map, who absolutely must be involved in
this process from the beginning? Who is missing from this picture?
1.3. Deﬁne the "Edge of Potential"
Why: To create a clear, compelling, and open-ended framing for the work that invites
collaboration instead of defensiveness.
How: Complete this sentence:
"We are working at the edge of [CURRENT CHALLENGE] to explore the potential for
[DESIRED OPPORTUNITY]."
Examples:
"...the edge of a dangerous, congested street to explore the potential for a vibrant,
safe community corridor."
"...the edge of a vacant, neglected lot to explore the potential for a regenerative
gathering space that nourishes people and ecology."
Phase 2: GATHER THE THREADS (Syntonious Attunement)
Purpose: To listen deeply to the Warm Data of the place - the stories, relationships, and
Spirit that cold data misses.
2.1. Choose Your Listening Methods (The Methods Menu)
Select at least two methods from different categories to ensure you gather pluriversal
insights.

2.2. The Key Attunement Questions
Take these questions with you into your listening sessions.
What is the story of this place?
What do you love here? What breaks your heart?
What is working? What is not?
If this place could speak, what would it say it needs?
What would a wildly successful future here feel like in 10 years?
2.3. Synthesize the Warm Data
Tool: The Synthesis Web
Draw a circle in the centre of a large page and write the name of your project/place in
it.
As you review your notes from listening, write key themes, quotes, and insights on sticky
notes.
Cluster these notes around the centre. Name the clusters (e.g., "Desire for Safety,"
"Connection to History," "Fear of Change," "Love of Trees").
The Final Question: Looking at this web, what is the central tension or potential trying to
emerge? What is the Spirit of this Place calling for?
Phase 3: SET THE WARP (Convening & Container Building)
Purpose: To bring people together in a space of psychological safety and shared purpose
(Social Ma).
3.1. Craft a Syntonious Invitation
A good invitation MUST include:
The "Edge of Potential" framing from Phase 1.
Acknowledgment of the different "worlds" involved.
A clear purpose for the gathering.
A promise of what will happen with the input received.
Practical details (time, place, accessibility info).
Example Phrasing: "You are invited because your unique perspective is essential to this
conversation. We will listen deeply to each other as we explore the potential for...”
3.2. Co-Create the Container: The Community Agreements
Do this at the very start of your first meeting. Don't impose rules; generate them
together.
Prompt: "What do we need to feel safe and productive together?"

Common Agreements:
Step Up, Step Back: Encourage those who talk a lot to make space, and those who
are quiet to step forward.
Listen to Understand: Seek the meaning behind the words, not just to craft your
reply.
Assume Good Intention: Start from the premise that everyone wants what's best for
the community.
Be Curious, Not Furious: Ask questions before making judgments.
3.3. Host the Pluriversal Roundtable: Facilitation Tips
Your primary tool is a question, not an answer.
Use a talking piece to ensure equitable speaking time.
Paraphrase what you hear to ensure understanding: "So what I'm hearing you say is..."
Surface tensions gently: "I'm hearing two different perspectives. Let's understand the
need behind each one."
Phase 4: WEAVE THE CLOTH (Co-Creation & Decision-Making)
Purpose: To generate ideas and make decisions aligned with syntonious values.

4.1. Frame the Challenge Syntoniously
Present back the Synthesis Web from Phase 2.3. Say: "Here is what we heard from all
of you. The themes that emerged were X, Y, and Z. Given this, how might we...?"
4.2. Ideate & Prototype
Prompt: "How might we address [Core Tension] in a way that honours [Key Value]?"
Encourage wild ideas. Use simple prototyping: sketches, models made from clay or
Lego, role-playing.
Think tactically: What is a small, cheap, quick experiment we could try to test this
idea? (A pop-up park? A temporary mural? A street closure for a day?).
4.3. Apply the Syntonious Calculus
This is your decision-making engine. Use this worksheet to evaluate the top ideas.

The idea with the strongest, most balanced score is your guide. Use low scores not to
kill ideas, but to improve them: "How might we adapt this idea to score higher on
Ubuntu?"
Phase 5: TEND THE TAPESTRY (Action, Adaptation & Stewardship)
Purpose: To implement, learn, adapt, and sustain the work overtime.
5.1. Act & Observe (Syntonious Adjustment)
Frame everything as an experiment. Start with a tactical prototype.
Set up feedback loops:
Cold Data: Count users, track speeds, monitor air quality.
Warm Data: Talk to people. "How does this feel?" Take photos. Observe body
language.
5.2. Adapt & Evolve (Syntonious Adaptation)
Hold a regular "Learning Review." Ask: "What worked? What didn't? What did we
learn? What should we change?"
Be willing to pivot. The goal is resonance, not sticking to a plan.
5.3. Practice Sacred Dissolution
The bravest act is to let go. Ask the hard question: "Is this project/policy still serving
the whole, or is it creating dissonance?"
If it's not working, have a ceremony to acknowledge its life, harvest its lessons, and
consciously end it. Make space for new life.
5.4. Celebrate & Ritualize
Mark moments of Syntonious Attainment! Have a potluck, tell stories, and thank
everyone involved.
Stewardship is ongoing. Assign roles for long-term care. This is how the community's
capacity grows.

Appendices& Worksheets
"With the courage to listen, the agility
to adapt, and the will to act lightly
and fiercely in service of life."

Appendix A: Quick Reference Glossary
This glossary defines the key terms and concepts that form the foundation of syntonious
urbanism. Keep it handy as a reference while you work.
Cold Data
Quantitative, objective metrics that describe what is happening (e.g., traffic volume,
energy consumption, demographic statistics). While useful, it often misses the qualitative,
relational context of why things happen or how they feel.
Dissonance
A state of being out of tune. In the urban context, it describes environments that are
functionally efficient but socially isolating, ecologically degrading, and devoid of
meaning. It is the result of machine-logic and linear time.
Edge of Potential
A framing technique used to define a project's scope. It acknowledges a current
challenge while focusing energy on a positive future possibility. Format: "We are working
at the edge of [CHALLENGE] to explore the potential for [OPPORTUNITY]."
Golden Thread, The
The core ethic that guides the syntonious weaver: "With the courage to listen, the agility to
adapt, and the will to act lightly and fiercely in service of life." A touchstone for checking
one's intention.
Ma (間)
A Japanese concept meaning the sacred, purposeful interval or pause between things. It
is not empty space, but engaged space that holds relationship and gives meaning to
form.
Spatial Ma: The in-between spaces that give a city life (e.g., a plaza, an alleyway, the
space under a tree).
Temporal Ma: Deliberate pauses in time that allow for reflection and connection (e.g., a
weekly street closure, a quiet hour, a seasonal festival).
Social Ma: The intentionally held container for dialogue that allows for genuine meeting
(e.g., community agreements, a circle of chairs).
Pluriversality
The commitment to honouring the many different, coexisting worlds, realities, and ways of
knowing within a single city. It rejects the idea of a single, universal blueprint for urban life
and instead seeks to design for creative negotiation and coexistence between different
cultures, ages, and species.
Spirit of Place (Genius Loci)
The unique, palpable character and personality of a location, formed by the interplay of
its geology, ecology, light, sound, history, and memory. It is the eternal song of the land
that syntonious practice seeks to listen to and honour.
Soul of the City
The dynamic, evolving identity and emotional landscape of a city, co-created by all its
inhabitants over time. It emerges from a healthy dialogue with the Spirit of Place. A city
has a soul when it feels alive, conscious, and resonant, with a heart and purpose greater
than the sum of its parts.

Syntonious Calculus
A values-based decision-making matrix that replaces traditional cost-beneﬁt analysis. It
evaluates proposals by scoring them (1-5) against core syntonious ﬁlters: Ubuntu,
Resonance, Pluriversality, Regeneration, Elegance (Ma), the Soul Filter, and the Seventh
Generation Principle.
Syntonious Facilitation
The core skill of the urban weaver. It is the art of hosting conversation and co-creation,
shifting the role from expert (who designs for people) to host (who designs process with
people).
Syntony
(from Greek syntonia, "agreement") The principle of resonant alignment. The process of
tuning a system to a common frequency. It seeks resonance - the feeling of being in sync -
over mere connection. A syntonious city is one that is in deep harmony with its people
and its place.
Syntoniety
The capacity of a city to tune itself to the key of life. It is the state of a city exhibiting
syntony: being wise, regenerative, and resonant.
Ubuntu
(From the Nguni Bantu phrase "Umuntu ngumuntu ngabantu," meaning "A person is a
person through other persons.") An African philosophy of interbeing. It posits that our
humanity is not an individual possession but is constituted through our relationships with
others. It is the ethical core of syntonious urbanism, guiding us from individualism to
communal thriving.
Warm Data
Contextual, relational information that describes the interrelationships and patterns within
a complex system. It reveals the why and how behind the what of Cold Data. It is gathered
through deep listening, stories, and qualitative methods like interviews and sensory walks.
Weaver
Your role. Anyone - planner, ofﬁcial, community activist, citizen - who steps into the
practice of syntonious urbanism. A weaver hosts processes, connects threads, and tends
the loom, understanding that the city is a collective, ongoing creation.

Appendix B: The Weaver's Checklist
Title: The Weaver's Checklist: Your Guide to the Five Phases
Subtitle: Remember your ethic: "With the courage to listen, the agility to adapt, and the
will to act lightly and fiercely in service of life."
Phase 1: PREPARE THE LOOM (Inner Work & Power Analysis)
- [ ] Centred Myself: Did I check my intention against the Golden Thread? (Courage,
Agility, Will)
- [ ] Mapped the Terrain: Did I complete an Initial Integral Scan (I, IT, WE, ITS) to identify
key actors, data, and tensions?
- [ ] Defined the Edge: Did I frame our work as: "We are at the edge of [CHALLENGE] to
explore the potential for [OPPORTUNITY]"?
Phase 2: GATHER THE THREADS (Syntonious Attunement)
- [ ] Chosen Methods: Did I select at least two methods from the Methods Menu (e.g.,
Interviews + Mapping Walk)?
- [ ] Listened Deeply: Did I ask open-ended questions focused on stories, values, and
dreams, not just problems?
- [ ] Synthesized Insights: Did I cluster findings into a Synthesis Web to identify key
themes and the central tension?
Phase 3: SET THE WARP (Convening & Container Building)
- [ ] Crafted the Invitation: Was it pluriversal, clear on purpose, and did it speak to the
heart?
- [ ] Co-Created the Container: Did we start the first meeting by setting community
agreements together?
- [ ] Held the Space: As facilitator, did I listen more than I spoke? Did I use a talking piece
and paraphrase to ensure understanding?
Phase 4: WEAVE THE CLOTH (Co-Creation & Decision-Making)
- [ ] Framed the Challenge: Did I present the Synthesis Web back to the group to start the
ideation?
- [ ] Generated Ideas: Did we encourage wild ideas and think about small, tactical
prototypes?
- [ ] Applied the Calculus: Did we score our top ideas against the Syntonious filters
(Ubuntu, Resonance, etc.) to guide our decision?
Phase 5: TEND THE TAPESTRY (Action, Adaptation & Stewardship)
- [ ] Acted & Observed: Did we frame our action as a "prototype" and set up simple
feedback loops (both Cold and Warm Data)?
- [ ] Adapted: Did we schedule a "Learning Review" to ask "What worked? What didn't?
What should we change?"
- [ ] Practiced Stewardship: Are we celebrating successes? Are we willing to practice
sacred dissolution if something is no longer serving the whole?

2. Worksheet: The Initial Integral Scan
Title: Phase 1: Initial Integral Scan
Instruction: Use this worksheet for your ﬁrst map of the situation. Jot down what
you know and what you feel. This is a living document - update it as you learn
more.
Power Analysis Follow-Up:
- Based on this scan, who has high power and high interest? Who must be
engaged?
- Who has high interest but low power? How can we ensure they are centred and
heard?
- Who is missing from this map entirely? (Consider non-human stakeholders: the
river, wildlife, etc.)

3. Worksheet: The Synthesis Web
Title: Phase 2: Synthesis Web
Instruction: After gathering stories and data, use this web to ﬁnd patterns. Write
the project name or central question in the centre. Write key themes, quotes, and
insights on the lines. Cluster related ideas together and name the clusters.
(A large circle is drawn in the centre of the page, with multiple lines/spokes
radiating outwards, each with plenty of writing space. The centre circle is labelled
"Project: _________________")
Questions to ask after populating the web:
What is the strongest theme or cluster?
What is the most surprising insight?
What is the central tension or key opportunity trying to emerge from this web?
What one thing does this place seem to need most?
Project

4. Worksheet:
The Syntonious Calculus Canvas
Title: Phase 4: Syntonious Calculus Canvas
Instruction: Use this canvas to evaluate proposed ideas or projects. Score each
filter from 1 (low alignment) to 5 (high alignment). The goal is not a perfect score,
but to reveal strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement.
Name of Proposal/Idea: _________________________________________
Interpretation & Next Steps:
High Total, Balanced Scores (25+): A strong, syntonious idea. How can we
move it forward?
High Total, Unbalanced (e.g., low Ubuntu): A risky idea. How can we redesign
it to address the low-scoring filter?
Low Total Score: A dissonant idea. Does it need a radical rethink, or should it be
discarded?
Final Decision:
________________________________________________________________
Reasoning:
___________________________________________________________________

Appendix C: Stories from the Field
This appendix provides real-world glimpses of the Weaver's Protocol in action. Each story
illustrates how the principles from the main book were applied, showing both the
successful outcomes and the crucial lessons learned.
Story 1: Superkilen (Denmark) – Attuning to a Pluriversal Community
The Challenge: Designing a public park in a neighbourhood of intense social and ethnic
diversity (residents from 60+ countries) without imposing a single, homogenizing design.
The Phase in Action: Phase 2 (GATHER THE THREADS)
The Story: Instead of starting with design concepts, the team began with deep listening.
They acted as relational researchers, using methods from the Methods Menu like one-
on-one interviews and community workshops. They asked Phase 2's key questions:
"What object from your culture tells a story? What do you love? What do you miss?"
This wasn't about gathering opinions on park benches; it was about gathering stories.
The iconic red bench was inspired by a sketch from a Somali woman. The entire park
became a collection of these stories, literally built from Warm Data.
The Takeaway: The design didn't come from a top-down vision but emerged from the
Synthesis Web of community narratives. This is Attunement leading to authentic
Pluriversality.
Story 2: Trinity River (Dallas) – Preparing the Loom with Deep Time
The Challenge: Re-developing a ﬂoodplain historically seen as a "problem" to be
controlled with concrete channels.
The Phase in Action: Phase 1 (PREPARE THE LOOM) & Phase 2 (GATHER THE THREADS)
The Story: An indigenous-led approach reframed the entire project. Their Initial Integral
Scan (Phase 1) included non-human stakeholders: the river itself, the riparian ecology,
and ancestral wildlife paths. Their Attunement (Phase 2) involved "listening to the land"
by studying its natural tendencies and "listening to deep history" by incorporating the
knowledge of the Caddo, Wichita, and Comanche nations. This shifted the goal from
controlling the river to learning from it.
The Takeaway: The most important part of Preparing the Loom is ensuring your "map of
the terrain" includes all stakeholders, especially the more-than-human world and deep
time (the 7th Generation Principle).
Story 3: PARK(ing) Day & Times Square (Global/NYC) –
Weaving with Tactical Prototypes
The Challenge: Reclaiming public space from cars in the face of bureaucratic inertia and
the assumption that streets are primarily for vehicle movement.
The Phase in Action: Phase 4 (WEAVE THE CLOTH) & Phase 5 (TEND THE TAPESTRY)
The Story: These interventions are the ultimate expression of Syntonious Adjustment. They
started not with massive budgets and ﬁnal plans, but with cheap, quick prototypes
(Phase 4):
A parking spot became a park for a day ($40 for the meter).
Times Square was transformed with trafﬁc cones and $1.6M in movable chairs (a "beta
test").

These actions created Temporal Ma - a pause in the city's normal logic. The city then
Acted & Observed (Phase 5), gathering irrefutable Warm Data (the palpable joy of
people) and Cold Data (improved traffic flow, fewer accidents). This data then justified
permanent change (Syntonious Adaptation).
The Takeaway: You don't need permission to start. A small, light, fierce action can
generate the proof of concept needed to change the system. Weave first, then Tend and
Adapt.
Story 4: Ciclovía (Bogotá) – The Ultimate Temporal Ma
The Challenge: Addressing issues of public health, social isolation, and inequality in a
vast, congested megacity.
The Phase in Action: Phase 3 (SET THE WARP) & Phase 5 (TEND THE TAPESTRY)
The Story: Every Sunday, Bogotá doesn't just host an event; it co-creates a massive social
container (Social Ma). The event itself is an invitation to a different way of being. The
closed streets set the Warp - the physical structure that allows a new pattern to be
woven. Within this container, a powerful culture of Ubuntu emerges naturally: people
share space, make eye contact, and experience a profound sense of collective well-
being. The city must continually Tend the Tapestry, defending this space from
automotive interests and adapting the event as it grows.
The Takeaway: Large-scale change is possible by first creating a powerful, well-held
container. Ritual and repetition (Temporal Ma) can reprogram a city's culture, building the
collective muscle for syntony one Sunday at a time.
Story 5: A Cautionary Tale – The High Cost of Skipping the
Protocol
The Challenge: The proposed Amazon HQ2 in Long Island City, NYC.
The Phase Violated: All of Them.
The Story: This project is a textbook example of what happens when you ignore the
Weaver's Protocol. There was no Attunement (Phase 2) - deals were made in secret, with
zero community engagement. There was no Container Building (Phase 3) - the
announcement was a fait accompli, creating immediate conflict and distrust. The
Syntonious Calculus (Phase 4) was replaced by a narrow economic calculus (jobs +
investment = good), which would have failed on Ubuntu (shattering community),
Pluriversality (imposing a monolithic culture), and Wealth Democracy (concentrating
wealth). The project was ultimately cancelled due to massive public backlash.
The Takeaway: Ignoring this process isn't just a philosophical misstep; it's a strategic
failure that destroys trust, wastes resources, and ultimately prevents good things from
happening. The protocol is not a luxury; it is a necessity for durable, resilient change.
This workbook provides the structured "how-to" that complements the philosophical
"why" of the main book, empowering readers to immediately begin the work of weaving
syntony into their own communities.

Appendix D:
Resources for the Practicing Weaver
This appendix provides a curated list of tools, organizations, and further reading to
support your practice of syntonious urbanism. The digital world offers powerful ways to
facilitate the work, while these organizations and guides provide proven methodologies
to draw upon.
Disclaimer: URLs and online resources change frequently. We recommend searching for
these names directly if a link is broken.
Digital Tools for the Syntonious Weaver.
Speciﬁc Applications:
- Real-Time Feedback Platforms: Mention simple tools (like interactive polling apps)
that can be used during community meetings to gauge agreement or gather quick
feedback on ideas, making the "Set the Warp" phase more dynamic and inclusive for
large groups.
- Collaborative Digital Whiteboards: Reinforce the use of platforms like Miro or Mural
as essential for building the Synthesis Web and applying the Syntonious Calculus
collaboratively, especially in hybrid or fully remote engagements.
Digital Tools for Facilitation & Collaboration
These platforms are excellent for conducting Integral Scans and building Synthesis Webs
digitally, especially when working with distributed or hybrid teams.
Miro (`miro.com`): An inﬁnite online whiteboard designed for visual collaboration.
Perfect for hosting digital workshops, creating afﬁnity diagrams for your Synthesis
Web, and using pre-made templates for brainstorming and strategy.
Mural (`mural.co`): Another powerful digital workspace for visual collaboration. Excellent
for facilitating meetings and workshops remotely, with tools for voting, timing
activities, and grouping ideas.
Organizations Leading the Way
These groups have pioneered the practical, on-the-ground work of community-led
change and participatory design. Their websites are treasure troves of free resources, case
studies, and tools.
The Asset-Based Community Development (ABCD) Institute (`abcd.institute`):
- Focuses on identifying and mobilizing a community's existing strengths (its "assets")
rather than focusing on its needs. Their principles are fundamental to Syntonious
Attunement.
Participatory City (`participatorycity.org`):
- An ambitious practice focused on building "everyday participation" through tangible
projects and infrastructure. A living example of building a new operating system for
cities.
The Consensus Building Institute (CBI) (`cbuilding.org`):
- A pioneer in the ﬁeld of conﬂict resolution and collaborative decision-making. Their
resources on managing multi-stakeholder negotiations are invaluable for Syntonious
Facilitation and working with conﬂict as a resource.

Project for Public Spaces (PPS) (`pps.org`):
- The leading organization behind the placemaking movement. Their website offers
essential tools, articles, and case studies on how to create vibrant public spaces that
people love.
Readings on Key Facilitation Methods
The workbook references several key methodologies for hosting the Pluriversal
Roundtable. These resources provide the deeper "how-to" for implementing them
effectively.
The World Café
- The World Café Community Foundation (`theworldcafe.com`). Their website offers a
free, comprehensive Hosting Guide that covers the core principles and step-by-step
process for hosting conversations that matter.
Open Space Technology
Open Space World (`openspaceworld.org`). A community resource that provides a
clear explanation of the four principles and one law, along with tips for facilitators.
- Brief Overview: The core book is Open Space Technology: A User's Guide by Harrison
Owen.
Circle Practice
- The Circle Way (`thecircleway.net`). A website dedicated to the practice of sitting in a
circle for conversation. It outlines the components and intentions needed to create a
container for truthful speaking and attentive listening.
General Facilitation
- Schwarz, Roger. The Skilled Facilitator. This book is a classic text for anyone serious
about the craft of facilitation, offering powerful frameworks for guiding groups
effectively.
Crucial Caveat: The "Syntonious Technology" Principle
A syntonious city uses technology to foster connection, not replace it. AI must be a
tool for deepening empathy and understanding, not for automating control. The
goal is not a city that is smart because of its technology, but a city that is wise
because of how its people use that technology to serve life.
By integrating technology in this way, we position it as a powerful ally in the great work of
weaving syntony, while remaining true to the book's core critique of the sterile,
controlling "smart city" model. It becomes a thread in the loom, not the weaver.

Appendix E: Getting Unstuck:
A Troubleshooting Guide for the Weaver
Why it's needed: Even with a perfect guide, things go wrong. This
empowers the weaver to be agile.
Problem: "A dominant voice is controlling the conversation."
Phase: 3 (Set the Warp) / 4 (Weave the Cloth)
Solution: "Return to your community agreements. Use a talking piece. As facilitator, use
the 'Step Up, Step Back' prompt directly: 'I want to make sure we're hearing from
everyone. Let's have a round where we hear from those who haven't had a chance to speak
yet.’
Problem: "We’re holding meetings, but it’s the same few people showing up. We’re
not reaching the wider community."
Phase: 2 (Gather the Threads) / 3 (Set the Warp)
- Why It's Critical: This is a failure of Pluriversality. If only the "usual suspects" are
involved, your Synthesis Web will be incomplete, and your solutions will likely miss the
mark or create unintended harm.
Solutions:
1. Re-evaluate Your Invitation (Phase 3): Did you only use email? Go to where people
are. Post ﬂyers in laundromats, community centres, and places of worship. Ask a
respected community leader to personally invite others.
2. Offer Something Different: Provide childcare, a meal, or transit vouchers. Make it
easier and more appealing to attend.
3. Go to Them (Phase 2): Don't wait for them to come to you. Conduct "attunement
interviews" on their turf - in a park, a local café, or on their doorstep.
Problem: "The conversation is stuck in complaints and problems. We can’t get to a
vision for the future."
Phase: 2 (Gather the Threads) / 4 (Weave the Cloth)
- Why It's Critical: While acknowledging problems is important, dwelling there creates a
energy of powerlessness. Syntonious urbanism is fuelled by potential and aliveness.
Solutions:
1. Reframe Your Questions (Phase 2): Shift from "What's wrong here?" to "What do you
love about this place and want to protect?" or "If this were the best place imaginable,
what would it feel like to walk through it?"
2. Use Appreciative Inquiry: Ask people to tell a story about a time when this place felt
alive, joyful, and working perfectly. Analyse what made that moment work.
3. Introduce a "Dreamlining" Exercise (Phase 4): Ask people to project themselves 10
years into the future and write a postcard home describing how wonderful the place
has become. This bypasses current constraints and unlocks creativity.
Problem: "We have lots of ideas, but they all seem too big, expensive, or require
permission we don’t have. People are getting discouraged."
Phase: 4 (Weave the Cloth)
- Why It's Critical: This is a failure to embrace Syntonious Adjustment and Temporal Ma.
Grandiose plans lead to paralysis. Small actions build momentum.
Solutions:
1. The "Lighter, Quicker, Cheaper" Challenge: Take the big idea and ask the group:
"What is the absolute smallest, cheapest, fastest thing we could do next week to test a

piece of this idea?" (e.g., a pop-up park in one parking space instead of a full park
redesign).
2. Focus on Actionable Authority: Ask: "What is within our direct power to change right
now without asking for permission?" (e.g., organizing a potluck, painting a mural on
a permitted wall, creating a community newsletter).
Problem: "A major conflict has emerged between two groups with completely
different views. The meeting became heated."
Phase: 3 (Set the Warp) / 4 (Weave the Cloth)
Why It's Critical: Conflict is not a sign of failure but a sign that different worlds
(Pluriversality) are meeting. Your role is to host it productively.
Solutions:
1. Pause and Return to Agreements (Phase 3): "I want to pause for a moment and return
to our community agreement to 'Listen to Understand.' Let's make sure we're
hearing the need behind each position."
2. Surface the Interests: Facilitate a move from positions ("I want a skate park!" / "I want
a quiet garden!") to underlying interests ("Teens need a challenging, social place to
belong." / "Seniors need a peaceful place for rest and connection.").
3. Find the Shared Value: Often, interests point to a shared value. Point it out: "It sounds
like both groups are deeply valuing a sense of belonging and safety in this park. How
can we design a space that provides both energetic and peaceful belonging?"
Problem: "We made a plan, but nothing is happening. There's no momentum or
ownership to move it forward."
Phase: 5 (Tend the Tapestry)
Why It's Critical: This indicates a flaw in Phases 3 & 4 - the group may not have
achieved true co-creation and collective ownership.
Solutions:
1. Reconvene for a "Learning Review": Call a meeting not to complain, but to diagnose.
Ask: "What's getting in the way of us moving forward? Is it resources? clarity?
permissions?"
2. Break it Down & Assign Champions: Large plans need owners. Break the plan into
tiny, actionable next steps and ask for volunteers to "champion" each one. People
support what they help create.
3. Celebrate a "Smallest Step": Identify the very first, smallest step and take it together.
The act of doing something, however small, rebuilds momentum and proves
progress is possible.

Appendix F:
Key Areas for Facilitation Guides
1. How to Facilitate a "More-Than-Human Council"
Location: Phase 2: Gather the Threads (under Attunement Methods)
Why it's needed: This is a profound but unfamiliar practice. Without guidance, it could
feel like strange role-play instead of a deep methodological shift in perspective.
Sample Outline:
1. Set the Sacred Container: Begin by acknowledging the land and the intention to
listen to non-human voices.
2. Assign & Prepare "Guardians": Identify participants to speak on behalf of entities like
"The River," "The Soil," "The Old Oak Tree," or "The Salmon." Give them a moment of
quiet to reflect: "What is the experience of this being? What does it need to thrive?"
3. Pose the Questions: The facilitator asks questions directly to the empty
chairs/guardians.
"What is your experience of life in this place?"
"What are your needs for health and regeneration?"
"What would you ask of us humans in this project?"
4. Debrief the Experience: After the council, ask human participants: "What was that
like? What surprised you? What insights will we carry forward?"
2. How to Facilitate a "Synthesis Web" Session
Location: Phase 2: Gather the Threads
Why it's needed: Moving from a mass of qualitative data (stories, quotes, notes) to
coherent themes is a specific skill. This prevents the synthesis from being hijacked by
the loudest voice or the facilitator's own bias.
Sample Outline:
1. Download Everything: Have participants write key quotes, insights, and observations
from the Attunement phase on sticky notes (one idea per note).
2. Silent Clustering: Stick all notes on a wall. In silence, everyone moves around,
grouping notes that feel related. No talking prevents groupthink.
3. Name the Themes: Once clusters are stable, as a group, generate a name for each
cluster that captures its essence (e.g., "Desire for Safe Social Spaces," "Grief Over
Lost Nature").
4. Identify the Central Insight: Discuss the relationships between the themes. Ask:
"Looking at this web, what is the central story or tension trying to emerge here?"
3. How to Facilitate a "Prototyping" or "Ideation" Session
Location: Phase 4: Weave the Cloth
Why it's needed: People often jump to the first obvious solution or get stuck in "that
won't work" mode. A guided process unlocks creativity and emphasizes "learning by
doing."
Sample Outline:
1. Frame the "How Might We..." Challenge: Based on your Synthesis Web, create a
clear, inspiring question. "How Might We create a space that offers both lively social
connection and peaceful contemplation?"
2. Rapid, Divergent Ideation: Set a timer (5-7 minutes). Everyone sketches or writes as
many wild ideas as possible. No criticism allowed.
3. Share Back & Build: Each person shares their favourite idea. Others can only ask
clarifying questions or offer "Yes, and..." additions to build on the idea.
4. Converge on a Prototype: Vote on which idea(s) to prototype. Shift the question from
"Is this the final answer?" to "What is the smallest, cheapest, fastest way to test a
piece of this idea in the real world?"

4. How to Facilitate a "Learning Review"
Location: Phase 5: Tend the Tapestry
Why it's needed: Without a structured process, post-project reviews can become blame
sessions or shallow "that was nice" conversations. This ensures honest, productive
learning.
Sample Outline:
1. Revisit the Goals: Brieﬂy restate what you hoped to learn or achieve with the
prototype or action.
2. Gather Data: Use a simple framework to structure the conversation:
What worked? (Celebrate successes and strengths)
What didn't? (Not as failure, but as data)
What did we learn? (The key insights about our community and the idea)
What should we do next? (Adapt, abandon, or scale the idea?)
3. Decide Next Steps: Make a clear decision based on the learning. This could be a
Syntonious Adaptation (let's change X and try again) or Sacred Dissolution (this isn't
working; let's stop and free up resources).
5. How to Co-Create Community Agreements
Location: Phase 3: Set the Warp
Why it's needed: Simply reading a list of rules is ineffective. A guided process of
creating them together ensures shared ownership and commitment.
Sample Outline:
1. Brainstorm Individually: Ask: "What do you need to feel safe and productive in this
conversation?" (1 minute of silent writing).
2. Share in Pairs: Discuss your ideas with one other person and combine them.
3. Cluster as a Group: Share out from the pairs and cluster similar ideas on a board
(e.g., all ideas about "listening" go together).
4. Draft the Agreements: As a group, wordsmith the clusters into 4-5 clear, positive
statements (e.g., "Listen to understand" vs. "Don't interrupt").
5. Check for Consensus: "Can we all live with and uphold these agreements?"

Appendix G:
The Syntonious Technologist
A Weaver's Guide to Wise Tools
Introduction: Technology is not neutral. It is shaped by the values of its creators and, in
turn, shapes our behaviour and relationships. In a syntonious city, technology's role is not
to optimize and control, but to deepen attunement, facilitate connection, and steward
resources. This appendix offers a framework for choosing and using tools wisely,
ensuring they serve the Golden Thread.
The Syntonious Technology Principle
Before using any tool, ask this filter question:
"Does this technology help us listen more deeply, connect more authentically, and
act more regeneratively, or does it distance us from each other and the living
world?"
If the answer isn't a clear "yes" to the first part, don't use it.
A. Digital Tools for the Five Phases
Here are specific ways to use existing, accessible technology to enhance your weaving
practice.
Phase 1 & 2: Prepare the Loom & Gather the Threads (Attunement)
Tool: Digital Whiteboards (Miro, Mural, Jamboard)
Syntonious Use:
- Creating a Digital Integral Scan: Create a frame for each quadrant (I, IT, WE, ITS) and
have team members add sticky notes remotely. This builds a shared, evolving map of
the terrain.
- Building a Shared Synthesis Web: After interviews and walks, upload photos, audio
clips, and notes. Use the digital whiteboard to cluster insights and identify themes
collaboratively, even if your team is distributed.
Weaver's Tip: Use these tools for *synthesis*, not just presentation. The process of
moving sticky notes together digitally can be a powerful form of collective sense-making.
Phase 3: Set the Warp (Convening)
Tool: Simple Polling & Feedback Apps (Mentimeter, Slido)
Syntonious Use:
- Checking the Container: Start a meeting with an anonymous poll: "On a scale of 1-5,
how safe do you feel to speak openly today?" This provides instant Warm Data on the
group's social field.
- Gathering Quick Feedback: Use word clouds to see what themes are emerging from
a discussion, or to prioritize ideas before diving deeper.
Weaver's Tip: This should augment conversation, not replace it. Use the data as a
discussion starter: I see 'safety' is the biggest word in our cloud. What would make this
space feel safer for everyone?"
Phase 4: Weave the Cloth (Co-Creation & Decision-Making)
Tool: Generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT, Midjourney) as a "Collaborative Imagination Engine"
Syntonious Use:
- Rapid Scenario Building: Prompt: "Generate five different descriptions for what a
vacant lot could become if it prioritized community care, ecological regeneration, and

child-friendly play." Use the outputs not as answers, but as catalysts for the group's own
creativity.
- Visualizing Ideas: Use AI image generators to create simple visuals from community
descriptions. Prompt: "An inviting public square in a diverse neighbourhood, with
spaces for quiet conversation, a food market, and children playing. Watercolour style."
This helps make abstract ideas tangible.
Weaver's Warning: AI is a mirror, not an oracle. It reﬂects biases in its training data.
Always hold its suggestions up to the Syntonious Calculus. The ﬁnal decision and
design must come from human hearts and hands.
Phase 5: Tend the Tapestry (Stewardship)
Tool: Simple Sensor Kits & Data Dashboards
Syntonious Use:
- Gathering Ecological Feedback: Use low-cost air quality, sound, or pedestrian
counters to monitor the impact of a project. Did the new park reduce noise pollution?
Improve air quality?
- Creating a Community Feedback Loop: Set up a simple public dashboard showing
this data. This creates transparency and allows the community to see the tangible
results of their work, fostering a sense of shared stewardship.
Weaver's Tip: Combine this Cold Data with Warm Data. The sensor says foot trafﬁc
increased by 20%; follow up with "How does the street feel different to you now?"
B. A Simple Guide: How to Evaluate a Tech Proposal with the Syntonious Calculus
Use this checklist when someone proposes a new "smart" solution for your city or
neighbourhood.

Final Word: The most syntonious technology is often the simplest. Never underestimate
the power of a circle of chairs, a shared meal, or a walking conversation. Use technology
to enhance these human moments, never to replace them.

Bibliography: Foundational Texts &
Inspirations (short)
Urban Hub 51 stands on the shoulders of pioneering thinkers and practitioners who have
challenged the status quo and offered new ways of seeing and shaping our world. This
curated list provides a pathway for deeper exploration into the ideas that form the
foundation of syntonious urbanism.
I. The Critique: Dismantling the Machine-City Paradigm
Jacobs, Jane. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random House, 1961.
Whyte, William H. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Project for Public Spaces,
1980.
Illich, Ivan. Tools for Conviviality. Harper & Row, 1973.
Mumford, Lewis. The City in History: Its Origins, Its Transformations, and Its Prospects.
Harcourt, Brace & World, 1961.
Scott, James C. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human
Condition Have Failed. Yale University Press, 1998.
Sennett, Richard. The Fall of Public Man. Knopf, 1977.
Sorkin, Michael (Ed.). Variations on a Theme Park: The New American City and the End
of Public Space. Hill and Wang, 1992.
II. New Paradigms: Living Systems, Complexity, and Relationality
Bateson, Gregory. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. University of Chicago Press, 1972.
Bateson, Nora. Warm Data. International Bateson Institute, 2017.
Capra, Fritjof, and Luisi, Pier Luigi. The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision.
Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Laszlo, Ervin.The Systems View of the World: A Holistic Vision for Our Time. Hampton
Press, 1996.
Laszlo, Ervin.Science and the Akashic Field: An Integral Theory of Everything. Inner
Traditions, 2004.
Meadows, Donella H. Thinking in Systems: A Primer. Chelsea Green Publishing, 2008.
Wheatley, Margaret J. Leadership and the New Science: Discovering Order in a
Chaotic World. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2006.
Wilber, Ken. A Theory of Everything: An Integral Vision for Business, Politics, Science
and Spirituality. Shambhala, 2000.
III. Pluriversality, Decolonizing Design & Beyond Multiculturalism
Alexander, Christopher. The Timeless Way of Building. Oxford University Press, 1979.
Cronon, William (Ed.). Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature. W.
W. Norton & Company, 1996.
Escobar, Arturo. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and
the Making of Worlds. Duke University Press, 2018.
Mbembe, Achille. Necropolitics. Duke University Press, 2019
Mignolo, Walter D. The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial
Options. Duke University Press, 2011.
Roy, Ananya. Poverty Capital: Microﬁnance and the Making of Development.
Routledge, 2010.
Simone, AbdouMaliq. Improvised Lives: Rhythms of Endurance in an Urban South.
Polity Press, 2018.
Tuck, Eve, and Yang, K. Wayne. "Decolonization is not a metaphor." Decolonization:
Indigeneity, Education & Society, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2012, pp. 1-40.

IV. Ubuntu, Ethics, and the More-Than-Human World
Haraway, Donna. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke
University Press, 2016.
Kimmerer, Robin Wall. Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientiﬁc
Knowledge, and the Teachings of Plants. Milkweed Editions, 2013.
Mbiti, John S. African Religions & Philosophy. Heinemann, 1969.
Tutu, Desmond. No Future Without Forgiveness. Image, 1999.
Vaughan-Lee, Llewellyn (Ed.). Spiritual Ecology: The Cry of the Earth. The Golden Suﬁ
Centre, 2013.
Whyte, Kyle Powys, et al. "Indigenous Climate Change Studies: Indigenizing Futures,
Decolonizing the Anthropocene." English Language Notes, Vol. 55, No. 1–2, 2017.
V. Syntony, Ma, and Temporal Awareness
Bachelard, Gaston. The Poetics of Space. Beacon Press, 1994.
Pallasmaa, Juhani. The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses. John Wiley &
Sons, 2005.
Suzuki, D.T. Zen and Japanese Culture. Princeton University Press, 1959.
Tuan, Yi-Fu. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. University of Minnesota
Press, 1977.
Wood, David. Deep Time, Dark Times: On Being Geologically Human. Fordham
University Press, 2019.
VI. Practical Tools & Actionable Frameworks
Arnstein, Sherry R. "A Ladder of Citizen Participation," Journal of the American
Planning Association, Vol. 35, No. 4, 1969, pp. 216-224.
Block, Peter. Community: The Structure of Belonging. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2008.
Brown, Juanita, and Isaacs, David. The World Café: Shaping Our Futures Through
Conversations That Matter. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2005.
Owen, Harrison. Open Space Technology: A User's Guide. Berrett-Koehler Publishers,
2008.
Project for Public Spaces (PPS). How to Turn a Place Around. Project for Public Spaces,
2000.
Schwartz, Roger. The Skilled Facilitator: A Comprehensive Resource for Consultants,
Facilitators, Coaches, and Trainers. Jossey-Bass, 2017.
Transition Network. The Transition Handbook: From Oil Dependency to Local
Resilience. Chelsea Green Publishing, 2008.
VII. Syntonious Economics & Governance
Bollier, David, and Helfrich, Silke (Eds.). Patterns of Commoning. The Commons
Strategy Group, 2015.
Kelly, Marjorie. The Wealth of the Commons: A World Beyond Market and State.
Levellers Press, 2012.
Mazzucato, Mariana. The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global
Economy. PublicAffairs, 2018.
Ostrom, Elinor. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective
Action. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Raworth, Kate. Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century
Economist. Chelsea Green Publishing, 2017.
Rushkoff, Douglas. Team Human. W. W. Norton & Company, 2019.

VIII. Technology, AI, and Humane Digital Futures
Crawford, Kate. Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial
Intelligence. Yale University Press, 2021.
Greenfield, Adam. Radical Technologies: The Design of Everyday Life. Verso, 2017.
Iliadis, Andrew, and Russo, Federica (Eds.). The Philosophy of Data Science. Springer,
2023.
O'Neil, Cathy. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and
Threatens Democracy. Crown Publishing Group, 2016.
Townsend, Anthony M. Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New
Utopia. W. W. Norton & Company, 2013.
Zuboff, Shoshana. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at
the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs, 2019.
IX. Evolutionary Systems & Societal Learning
Laszlo, Alexander, and Krippner, Stanley."Systems Theories: Their Origins,
Foundations, and Development." InAdvances in Psychology. J. Scott Jordan (Ed.).
Elsevier Science, 1998
Laszlo, Alexander."Evolutionary Leadership: A Framework for the Transformation of
Social Systems."World Futures: The Journal of New Paradigm Research, 2021.

Annex: The Syntonious Concepts:
A Detailed Lexicon
I. Foundational Concepts
1. Syntony: The foundational state of being "on the same wavelength." It is a condition of
resonant alignment where different entities, though distinct, vibrate in a congruent or
complementary manner, allowing for effective communication and coordination without
requiring sameness. It implies a shared frequency or mutual tuning.
- Role: The ideal state or goal of the entire framework.
- Nuance: Not uniformity, but harmonious differentiation.
2. Syntonious Alignment: The structural and intentional process of designing the
conditions for syntony. It involves creating frameworks, protocols, and physical or social
structures that enable different elements (worldviews, systems, people) to operate
synergistically without demanding assimilation.
- Role: The architecture or blueprint. It sets the stage for interaction.
- Nuance: It is proactive and design-oriented, focused on creating the potential for
resonance.
3. Syntonious Attunement: The dynamic, relational practice of maintaining resonant
connection. It is the embodied, moment-to-month skill of perceiving Warm Data
(contextual, relational information) and finely tuning one’s presence and actions to foster
and sustain syntony. It is empathy, presence, and adaptive responsiveness in action.
- Role: The active performance or dance. It is the continuous practice that brings the
design to life.
- Nuance: It is reactive, responsive, and requires deep listening and humility.
4. Syntonious Attainment: The moment of arrival or successful reaching of a state of
syntony. It is the experience of resonance itself, a fleeting or sustained feeling of harmony,
flow, and deep connection.
- Role: The experiential reward. The feeling of "getting it right."
- Nuance: It is an internal or relational state, not an external output. It is the "aha"
moment of harmony.
5. Syntonious Achievement: The successful realization of a shared, external goal or
tangible outcome that has been reached -because of- syntonious processes. The
achievement itself carries the qualities of resilience, elegance, and integrity due to how it
was accomplished.
- Role: The tangible result or fruit of the labour.
- Nuance: Distinguished from Attainment by its externality and measurability (e.g., a
built park, a signed treaty, a healed community).
6. Syntoniousness: The measurable capacity or potential of a person, group, or system
to be syntonious. It is the cultivated skill, the "muscle" for resonant relationship, built
through practice.
- Role: The foundational ingredient. The raw material or developed skill that makes the
practice possible.
- Nuance: It is a virtue that can be grown, like wisdom or empathy.
II. Nuanced Applications & Practices
7. Syntonious Adjustment: A minor, fine-tuning action taken in response to immediate
feedback. It is a micro-level application of Attunement, a small correction to maintain
resonance without altering the fundamental structure or goal.

- Role: The micro-practice of continuous improvement.
- Nuance: The difference between a one-time ﬁx and constant, attentive care
. 8. Syntonious Adaptation: A signiﬁcant shift in strategy, form, or function in response to
changing conditions. It is a macro-level application of Attunement that may require
altering the initial Alignment to maintain the overall intention. It is a responsive evolution
of the structure itself.
- Role: The strategic pivot for long-term resilience.
- Nuance: The difference between tuning the existing system (Adjustment) and
evolving the system itself (Adaptation).
9. Syntonious Facilitation: The practical skill and role of intentionally hosting the
processes of Alignment and Attunement within a group. A facilitator is the "weaver" who
holds the space (Ma), asks the questions that reveal Warm Data, and guides the group
through Generative Friction Protocols.
- Role: The agency of enactment. The person or role that actively weaves.
- Nuance: A distinct skillset focused on process rather than content.
10. Syntonious Evolution: The long-term, emergent transformation of the entire system—
its goals, its identity, and its potential—as a result of sustained practice of Attunement,
Adaptation, and Alignment. It is not a directed action but an organic outcome.
- Role: The ultimate transformation. The change in the nature of the system.
- Nuance: The difference between -doing- things better (Achievement) and -
becoming- better at the core of one's being (Evolution).
11. Syntonious Stewardship: The ethical stance and practiced responsibility that
emerges from a state of syntony. It is the active, caring guardianship of the resonant
relationships within a system. It moves beyond mere achievement or maintenance into a
sacred duty to protect the conditions for harmony.
- Role: The ethical imperative and long-term commitment.
- Nuance: The "why" behind the "how." The moral core of the practice.
12. Syntoniety: The -state- or -quality- of being in syntony. It is the lived experience of
resonant harmony itself. If Syntoniousness is the capacity, and Attainment is the moment,
Syntoniety is the enduring condition that arises from sustained practice.
- Role: The name for the desired outcome or sustained state of being.
- Nuance: A noun that describes a ﬂourishing, resonant system.
13. Syntonious Calculus: The practical, often intuitive, process of making decisions and
trade-offs within a syntonious framework. It is the art of weighing options through a
values-based assessment of what action will best protect or enhance the overall
resonance and health of the system (its Syntoniety).
- Role: The decision-making engine for Stewardship.
- Nuance: Prioritizes Warm Data (relational health) over Cold Data (abstract metrics).
14. Syntonious Invitation: The art and practice of issuing a call that inspires engagement
from diverse worldviews without coercion or assimilation. It is the crafting of a "container
of potential" that is compelling enough to draw people in but open enough for them to
enter on their own terms.
- Role: The initial spark. How to begin the process.
- Nuance: Focuses on attraction and inspiration rather than persuasion or mandate.

15. Syntonious Dissolution: The conscious, graceful process of deconstructing or letting
go of structures, agreements, or attachments that no longer serve the resonance of the
whole. It is the necessary counterpart to Alignment.
- Role: The practice of graceful endings and release.
- Nuance: acknowledges that not all structures should last forever; making space is a
creative act.
16. Syntonious Integration (Shadow Work): The practice of acknowledging, welcoming,
and learning from the failures, conflicts, and "discordant" parts of oneself or a system. It is
the active process of using friction and breakdown as the primary source of wisdom and
growth.
- Role: The mechanism for learning from failure.
- Nuance: moves beyond managing conflict to actively mining it for transformative
insights.
III. Guiding Meta-Concepts
17. Ma (間): The sacred space, pause, or interval that gives relationships meaning and
room to breathe. It is the negative space, temporal, spatial, and relational, that is not
empty but full of potential. It is the container that holds tension without breaking it.
- Role: The essential container for all syntonious practice.
- Nuance: The silence between the notes that makes the music.
18. The Golden Thread: The ethic of love that guides the weave. It is defined as the
courage to listen beyond borders, the agility to shift without breaking, the humility to
stand beside truths not one’s own, and the will to act, lightly and fiercely, in the temporary
alignments that save.
- Role: The moral and ethical compass.
- Nuance: The animating spirit that ensures the practice is rooted in care, not just
technique.
19. The Edge of Chaos: The theoretical space between rigid order and chaotic
dissolution where complex adaptive systems are most alive, creative, and resilient. It is the
zone of maximum complexity and possibility.
- Role: The context and location for syntonious practice.
- Nuance: This is where the weaving must happen; stability is found in dynamic flow,
not in rigid control.
This lexicon provides a complete language for designing, practicing, and sustaining the
delicate, powerful art of weaving a pluriverse.

How the concepts align with and are
informed by these wisdom traditions
The entire syntonious framework, while named with Greek-derived terms, does
not represent a new Western invention. Rather, it acts as a conceptual bridge a
meta-language that helps describe, honour, and connect principles that are
already deeply embedded and lived within Indigenous, Asian, and African
worldviews. Its power comes from its resonance with these ancient systems of
knowledge.
I. Resonance with Core Concepts:
Syntony / Attunement / Ma (間) - resonate deeply with:
East Asian Philosophies (Taoism, Zen Buddhism): The concept of Wu Wei (effortless
action), of aligning with the Tao (the Way), is the essence of syntonious attunement.
Ma (間) - is a direct import from Japanese aesthetics, meaning the sacred space between
things that gives them meaning.
Indigenous Worldviews: The practice of deep listening to the land, to ancestors, and to
more-than-human beings is a foundational form of attunement. The Apache Nant'n (wise
words and actions that create harmony) and many African relational philosophies like -
Ubuntu ("I am because we are") are lived expressions of syntony.
Hindu/Buddhist Thought: The idea of prana or qi (life force) and the practice of aligning
with it through yoga or meditation is a form of personal and cosmological attunement.
Syntonious Stewardship - is a direct correlate of:
Kaitiakitanga (Māori): The concept of guardianship, of intergenerational responsibility
for the land and sea.
Tlalocan (Nahua) & other land ethics: The view that humans are part of a cosmic ecology
and have a sacred duty to maintain balance, not dominate.
Aboriginal Custodianship: The belief that humans belong to the land and are
responsible for its care through ritual, story, and practice.
Syntonious Calculus (Prioritizing Warm Data) - is the standard operating system of:
Indigenous Knowledge Systems: Decision-making has always been based on relational,
contextual, and intergenerational data (Warm Data). A decision is judged not by its proﬁt
margin but by its impact on the web of relationships seven generations into the future.
Ubuntu & Related African Philosophies: The focus is on what action will best build and
sustain the community's vitality and dignity.
Generative Friction & Sacred Irreconciliation - are formalized practices found in:
- Talking Circles & Council Processes (Many Indigenous Nations): Ritualized structures for
allowing conﬂict to be expressed respectfully and transformed into wisdom.
- The African concept of "Indaba"- (a Zulu and Xhosa term for a gathering for purposeful
discussion).
- The Jewish tradition of "Talmudic debate"- (arguing for and against a concept to reveal
deeper truth).
II. Resonance with Nuanced Applications:
Syntonious Invitation - mirrors the respectful protocols for engagement found in many
traditions, such as seeking permission from elders or from the land itself before beginning
a project.

Syntonious Dissolution - reﬂects a non-attachment to form that is central to Buddhist
philosophy (Anicca) and the understanding in many Indigenous cultures that all things
have a life cycle and must be released back to the earth.
Syntonious Integration (Shadow Work) is inherent in practices that honour ancestors and
acknowledge historical trauma, understanding that wholeness comes from integrating the
past, not ignoring it.
III. The Golden Thread: A Universal Ethic-
The - Golden Thread of love as the courage to listen, the agility to shift, and the will to act
for the whole, is perhaps the most universal element. It is the practical essence of:
- Karuna (Compassion) in Buddhism.
- Agápē (selﬂess love) in Christian thought.
- The relational care mandated by Ubuntu.
- The reciprocity (Ayni) of Andean cosmology.
Crucial Nuance: Difference in Foundation:
It is vital to acknowledge a key difference:
- In many Western contexts, these principles are, consciously designed practices or tools,
to solve a problem (the metacrisis).
- In the wisdom traditions they resonate with, these principles are, the fabric of reality
itself. They are not tools; they are descriptions of how the universe already is and how
humans are meant to participate within it.
The syntonious framework, therefore, does not claim to own these ideas. Instead, it
validates them, by providing a modern, interdisciplinary language that demonstrates their
critical relevance and practical application for contemporary global challenges. It argues
that these aren't "alternative" worldviews; they are essential wisdom that the dominant
paradigm has forgotten and now desperately needs to relearn.
In this way, the framework acts less as an invention and more as a translator and weaver,
helping to hold a space where these diverse, ancient streams of knowledge can be seen,
respected, and integrated into the urgent work of our time.
A translator and weaver of the pluriverse:
This framing captures the deepest purpose and humility of the entire syntonious
endeavour. It is not:
- a uniﬁer - that seeks to merge all threads into one.
- a colonizer - that imposes a single language of understanding.
- a judge - that ranks worldviews on a scale of development.
It is, instead:
A Translator: It listens deeply to the unique grammar, syntax, and poetry of different
worldviews—be they scientiﬁc, Indigenous, spiritual, or artistic—and ﬁnds resonant points
of connection. It helps "Soul of the Community" speak to "Spirit of Place," and both to
speak to the language of governance and design. It makes different forms of wisdom
intelligible to one another without reducing any to mere metaphor.
A Weaver: It takes the translated threads - each with its own strength, colour, and texture
and, with the skill of Syntonious Facilitation and the patience afforded by Ma, creates a

tapestry of Coordination Without Consensus. The threads are not blended; they are
arranged in a relationship of mutual support and beauty, where the integrity of each is
essential to the strength of the whole.
This work is guided by the Golden Thread of love (the ethical commitment) and is
performed at the - Edge of Chaos - (the creative threshold where new patterns emerge).
This is not about building a new meta-system to rule them all. It is
about, tending the relational space between existing worlds, so they
can collaborate, co-exist, and co-create a more resilient and beautiful
whole a pluriverse

51
The Weaver's Protocol
Urbanism & Syntoniety
Urban Hub
Paulvan Schaik
UH 51a The Weaver's Protocol
Stop Wishing for Change. Start Weaving It.
You've felt the disconnect in our modern cities and longed for a more
human, joyful, and alive urban life. But how do you actually make that
happen? This field guide is your answer.
The Weaver's Protocol is the essential, hands-on companion to Urban
Hub 51. This is not a book to simply read - it's a book to use. Inside,
you'll find a revolutionary but practical five-phase process to facilitate
real change in your community, from a single street to an entire
neighbourhood. With step-by-step guides, printable worksheets, and
real-world stories, this workbook equips you with the tools to listen
deeply, host transformative conversations, and make decisions that
foster belonging and beauty. Transform your idealism into action. Pick
up your pen, grab your colleagues and neighbours, and begin the
radical work of weaving a more resonant world. Your city is waiting.
IntegralUrbanHub
a

Urban Hub51:Urbanism & Syntoniety - ExploringTheEdges

About This Presentation

Slide Content

Tags

Categories

Download

Quick Actions

Statistics

Related Slideshows

Urban Hub51:Urbanism &amp; Syntoniety - ExploringTheEdges

About This Presentation

Slide Content

Slide 1

Slide 2

Slide 3

Slide 4

Slide 5

Slide 6

Slide 7

Slide 8

Slide 9

Slide 10

Slide 11

Slide 12

Slide 13

Slide 14

Slide 15

Slide 16

Slide 17

Slide 18

Slide 19

Slide 20

Slide 21

Slide 22

Slide 23

Slide 24

Slide 25

Slide 26

Slide 27

Slide 28

Slide 29

Slide 30

Slide 31

Slide 32

Slide 33

Slide 34

Slide 35

Slide 36

Slide 38

Slide 39

Slide 40

Slide 41

Slide 43

Slide 44

Slide 45

Slide 46

Slide 47

Slide 48

Slide 49

Slide 50

Slide 51

Slide 52

Slide 53

Slide 54

Slide 55

Slide 56

Slide 57

Slide 58

Slide 59

Slide 60

Slide 62

Slide 63

Slide 64

Slide 65

Slide 66

Slide 67

Slide 68

Slide 69

Slide 70

Slide 71

Slide 72

Slide 73

Slide 74

Slide 75

Slide 76

Slide 77

Slide 78

Slide 79

Slide 80

Urban Hub51:Urbanism & Syntoniety - ExploringTheEdges