WILSON CYCLE
reasons. First, critical geologic evidence may be
destroyed during plate evolution; also, there is no
oceanic magnetic anomaly record for pre-Meso-
zoic cycles. Second, evolution of plate margins
interacting with fragments of continents and
microcontinents produces exceedingly complex
geometries and timing that, although perhaps
present in the rock record, may be too intricate
to solve. Third, second-order effects at consum-
of the tectonic and volcanic
processes attendant
with the consuming plate margin. If the uncou-
pling takes place
at a considerable distance ocean-
ward from the continental margin, an island arc
like
Japan forms. Consumption of the oceanic
lithosphere requires a change in the plate geom-
etry and eventual consumption of the
accreting
plate margin (Fig. 1F). During this time the
op-
posing continental shelf may continue to enlarge,
as an Atlantic-type half-ocean. As the ocean con-
tinues to contract, the opposing continental mar-
gin eventually arrives into the regime of the con-
suming place margin and becomes involved in the
evolving Andean-type orogen. This is the early
stage of continent-continent collision. Because of
buoyancy constraints of the continental litho-
sphere, plate consumption ceases in the later
stages of continent-continent collision. The litho
sphere slab detaches beneath the growing Hima
layan-type orogen, and the final stage of the Wil-
son cycle orogenic evolution wanes, with the fully
evolved mountain belt remaining as a suture be-
tween the newly joined continental masses. A
model of orogenic evolution based on the Wilson
cycle and lithosphere plate tectonics was proposed
by Dewey and Bird (1970). A later episode of con-
lithosphere mantleto form such a margin constitute tinental drift may separate the suture. As pointed
ing plate margins, such as body forces, may be
important but produce effects that are indistin-
guishable from effects directly related to relative
plate displacements (see Dewey, 1975a). Also, as
pointed out by Wilson (1966), paleomagnetic data
for Paleozoic and older rocks are likely to remain
of little use in
quantitative reconstructions of con-
tinent positions.
Figure 1 is a schematic illustration of the basic
concept of the Wilson cycle in the framework of
lithosphere plate evolution; it is adapted from Bird
and Dewey (1970, Fig. 9). Figure 1A
represents
the beginning of the Wilson cycle, the initial rup-
ture of a continent and formation of an accreting
plate margin. The tectonic framework of litho-
sphere rupture has been recently discussed by Tur-
cotte et al.(1977). Themechanisms of thesub-
a significant andunsolved problem of mantle dy-
namics and petrogenetic process (see Ringwood,
1975). It is known, however, that the rigid lith0-
out by Wilson (1966), this accounts for the
pres-
ent separation of the Appalachian/Caledonian
Orogenic Belt about the north Atlantic Ocean.
sphere overlies a weaker, partly melted zone of
the asthenosphere, the so-called low velocity zone
(LVZ, Fig. 1B). As continent separation proceeds,
a
rift valley (Fig. 1B) and small ocean (Fig. 1C)
evolve, constituting the early ocean-opening stages
of the Wilson cycle. The African Rift and Red Sea
are good examples. As drift of the newly sepa-
rated continents continues by the symmetric ac-
JOHN M. BIRD
References
Bird,
J.
M., and Dewey,
J. F., 1970, Lithosphere plate
continental margin tectonics and the evolution of the
Appalachian orogen, Geol. Soc. America Bull. 81,
1031-1060.
cretion of new lithosphere about the plate margin,
continental shelves of continent-derived sediment
accumulate at the ocean-continent interfaces. A
fully developed ocean (Fig. 1D), with a central
ridge along the plate margin and evolved conti-
nental shelves, is called an Atlantic-type ocean.
By observation
of trenches, their associated
seismicity, and reconstructions of oceanic mag-
netic anomaly patterns about them, it is known
that oceanic lithosphere uncouples and descends
into the mesosphere. Lithosphere behaves as a
rigid body and accretion and consumption of
lithosphere proceeds on a global net balance; on
any great circle the amount of new lithosphere
generated at accreting plate margins is consumed
at consuming plate margins. Figure 1E illustrates
a simple accreting-consuming plate margin ocean,
the initial stages of ocean closing in the Wilson
cycle. The result of the uncoupling adjacent to the
continental margin is the conversion of that mar-
gin to an Andean-type orogen, as a consequence
Bullard, E.; Everett,
J. E.; and Smith, A. G., 1965, The
fit of the continents around the Atlantic, Royal Soc.
London Philos. Trans. 258A, 41-51.
Dewey, J. F., 1969, Evolution of the Appalachian/
Caledonian orogen,Nature222, 124-129.
Dewey,J. F., 1975a, Finite plate evolution implications
for the evolution of transforms, triple junctions, and
orogenic belts, Am. Jour. Sci. 275A, 260-284.
Dewey, J. F., 1975b, The Wilson Cycle, Geol. Soc.
America Abs. with Programs (1), 48-49.
Dewey, J. F., and Bird, J. M., 1970, Mountain belts and
the new global tectonics, Jour. Geophys. Research 75,
2625-2647.
Ringwood,A. E., 1975, Composition and Petrolog)y of
the Earth's Mantle. New York: McGraw-Hill, 618p.
Turcotte, D. L.; Ahern, J. D.; and Bird, J. M., 1977,
The state of stress at continental margins, Tectono-
physics.
Vine, F. J., and Matthews, D. H., 1963, Magnetic
anomalies over oceanic ridges, Nature 199, 947-949.
Wilson, J. T., 1966, Did the Atlantic close and then re-
open? Nature 211, 676-681.
838