2016 Basic Motility Exam

3,715 views 85 slides Sep 13, 2016
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 85
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83
Slide 84
84
Slide 85
85

About This Presentation

PGH Basic Course Lecture 2016


Slide Content

Basic Motility Examination
Alvina Pauline D. Santiago, MD
Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus

Basic Course Lectures in Ophthalmology
Sentro Oftalmologico Jose Rizal
Philippine General Hospital 2016

Basic Strabismus Evaluation
• Chief complaint and History
• Vision assessment (with vision screening)
• Gross evaluation and slit lamp examination
• Refraction and need for cycloplegia
• Sensory & Motor examination (Motility
Examination)
• Dilated posterior pole evaluation

Sensory Testing
• Perform before any type of monocular occlusion
• e.g., visual acuity testing, cover tests
• Must wear correct prescription
• May need to correct deviation
• Prefer to do on a second visit

Sensory Testing
• Near stereoacuity
• Fly vectograph/ Titmus Fly Test
• Lang stereotest
• Random dot stereograms
• Distance stereoacuity
• Mentor BVAT
• AO vectograph
• Amblyoscope

Stereoacuity tests
• Horizontal disparity
• Stimulate non-corresponding points
• Image disparity measured in sec of arc
• 40-50 sec = central or bifoveal fixation
• 80-3000 sec = peripheral fusion

Titmus fly test
• Monocular cues
• Need polarized glasses
• Image displacement
may be detected by
alternate suppressors
• Turn book 90 degrees,
should be flat
From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

Lang Stereoacuity test
• Random dot stereogram
• No need for Polaroid
lenses
• Only for gross and low
grade stereopsis
From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

Random Dot Stereogram
• 2 plates of randomly
displayed dots, one plate
to each eye
• Shape of figure
displaced horizontally
relative to other plate
• No monocular cues
• Normal may fail
From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

Distance Stereotest
• Mentor BVAT System
• Very good test for
assessing control in
X(T)
From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management
From Rosenbaum & Santiago,
Clinical Strabismus Management

Red-Green Distance
Stereotest

Sensory Testing
• Worth 4 dot
• near: tests peripheral fusion
• distance: tests central fusion
• Retinal correspondence
• amblyoscope, Bagolini lenses
• 4 pd BO test: foveal suppression
• N: conjug sacc OU, slow recov in nonprism eye

Worth Dot Test
• 2 green lights
• 1 red light
• 1 white light
• Red-green glasses
• Usually red over right eye
• At 1/3 m:
• W4D separated by 6 degrees
• Tests peripheral fusion
• At 6 m:
• 1.25 degrees
• Tests central fusion

Worth Dot Test Results
http://image.slidesharecdn.com

Amblyoscope or Haploscope
From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

Amblyoscope
• Measures fusional vergence amplitudes
• Angle of deviation
• Area of suppression
• Retinal correspondence
• Torsion
• Instrument convergence

Motor Testing
• Ocular rotations
• Measuring the deviation
• Anomalous head posture

Ocular Rotations
• Duction: monocular
• Version: binocular
• Hering’s law
• Sherrington’s law
• Alert to pattern deviations: e.g., A, V
• Grading scheme:
• e.g., inferior oblique & superior oblique

Ocular Rotations
Cardinal gaze positions
RLR
LMR

RMR
LLR

RSR
LIO

RIR
LSO

RIO
LSR

RSO
LIR

Ocular Motility Evaluation
From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

Ocular Motility Evaluation
RLR
LMR

RMR
LLR

RSR
LIO

RIR
LSO

RIO
LSR

RSO
LIR

From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

(L) Inferior oblique dysfunction
+4 +1
-4 -1
From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

(R) Superior oblique dysfunction
+4 +1
-4 -1
From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

Motor Testing
• Light reflex tests
• Cover tests
• Other tests
• wear correction
• no prisms

Motor Testing: Light Reflex Tests
• Bruckner test
• Hirschberg light reflex
• Krimsky/modified Krimsky

Bruckner Test
® Ametropia
® Strabismus

From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

Hirschberg’s Corneal Light Reflex
• 3.5 mm pupil:
• 15 deg at pupil edge
• 30 deg between limbus
and edge of pupil
• 45 degrees at limbus

• Not a true linear relationship:
21 pd/mm decentration
From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

Krimsky vs Modified Krimsky
• in front of deviating
eye (modified
Krimsky)
• underestimates true
angle
• better at near
From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

LIGHT REFLEX, COVER TESTS
(Courtesy of R. Pena, MD)
MODIFIED KRIMSKY

Motor Testing: Cover Tests
• Primary gaze
• Right and left gaze
• Up and down gaze
• Right and left head tilt
• Oblique gazes, occasionally

• Near: primary and down gaze

Cover Tests
• Requirements:
• Appropriate correction
• Know if correction has no prisms or with prisms
• Accommodative target
• Distance:
• 6 m: 1/6 D of accommodation
•  (approximates infinity)
• > 6 m: X(T)

The Ideal Target
• Above threshold
• e.g. Snellen acuity 20/20
• present 20/50 to 20/70

The Ideal Target
• With sufficient detail and contour
• Should sustain interest

Toys as Targets
• One toy one look
• With detail
• May be coupled with a
light
• Sounds for tracking but
not vision testing

The Ideal Target
• Maximum plus, least minus correction
• Allows minimal accommodation at 6 m
• Accommodation exerted only 1/6 Diopter,
considered zero for strabismus measurement
purposes

Factors Affecting Measurement
• Prism placement:
• plastic prisms: frontal
plane
• glass prisms: prentice
position
• Stacking prisms
• Splitting prisms
From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

Factors Affecting
Measurement
• Method of testing:
• Light reflex:
• Bruckner
• Hirschberg
• Krimsky/modified
Krimsky
• Different cover tests
• Cover Test
• Alternate Cover Test
From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

Factors Affecting Measurement
• Patient factors:
• Accommodation and AC/A ratio
• Axial length and globe size
• Amblyopia and eccentric fixation
• Refractive error and induced prisms

Cover Tests

Cover Uncover Test
• Must be performed before alternate cover test
• Cover test: tropia
• Uncover test: phoria
• also for fixation preference

Alternate Prism Cover Test
• Prisms before deviated eye
• primary vs. secondary deviation
• Unless strabismic eye is preferred for fixation
• Evaluates total deviation: manifest (tropic) and
latent (phoric)

ALTERNATE PRISM & COVER TEST
Gold standard for
measuring deviation
LIGHT REFLEX, COVER TESTS
(Courtesy of R. Pena, MD)

Simultaneous Prism Cover Test
• Tropia under binocular conditions
• Monofixation syndrome
• Estimate angle of deviation
• Present prism and cover simultaneously
• Absence of movement in tropic eye means correcting
prisms are accurate

SIMULTANEOUS PRISM & COVER TEST
Used for monofixation
LIGHT REFLEX, COVER TESTS
(Courtesy of R. Pena, MD)

Prism Under Cover Test
• For Dissociated Vertical Deviation
• Evaluate one eye at a time
• Prism and cover presented to the same eye
• Separate true hypertropia by using BU prism
neutralization in other eye

Dissociated Vertical Deviation
Courtesy of N. Paderna, MD

PRISM UNDER COVER TEST
Used for DISSOCIATED
VERTICAL DEVIATION (DVD)
LIGHT REFLEX, COVER TESTS
(Courtesy of R. Pena, MD)

Techniques in Finding
Strabismus
• Bruckner test
• Spielmann
translucent occluder
From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

Other Tests
• Red glass test
• Maddox rod
• horizontal, vertical
• torsional
• Parks 3-step test for isolated cyclovertical muscle
palsy
• 3rd step is Bielschowsky maneuver

(L) Superior oblique palsy

Parks 3-step Test
Left Hypertropia
• I. Of 8 cyclovertical
muscles: 4
• LSO, LIR, RSR, RIO
• II. Of 4 cyclovertical
muscles: 2
• increase on R gaze: LSO,
RSR
• III. Of 2 cyclovertical
muscles: 1
• increase of L tilt: LSO

Torsion Evaluation
• Funduscopy
• Fundus photography
• Blind spot mapping
• Red-Green Hess/Lee Screen
• Double Maddox Rods
• Oblique (& Vertical) muscle dysfunction

Normal Optic Nerve Head-
Fovea Angle Relationship
From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

Direct Ophthalmoscope View:
Fundus Torsion
Excyclorotation Incyclorotation
From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

Indirect Ophthalmoscope View:
Fundus Torsion
Excyclorotation Incyclorotation

Inferior Oblique Overaction
PREOP POSTOP
From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

Torsion Test: Double Maddox
From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

Tests of Muscle Function
• Forced duction test
• Force generation test
• Saccadic velocity analysis
• EMG
• Dynamic MRI

Indications
• Incomitant deviation
• Limited ocular rotation
• Distinguish between restriction and paresis/palsy
• Distinguish between paresis and palsy

Passive Forced Duction
• Some indications:
• Trauma
• Endocrine
• Postoperative restriction of
motility
• Longstanding deviation with
secondary contracture
• Congenital restrictions
• Brown
• Duane
• Transposition procedures
• Orbital diseases
• Tumors
• Inflammation

Advantages
• Help in deciding between treatment options
• Monitor improvement of paretic mm

Tests of Muscle Function
• Paresis vs. restriction
• Forced duction test
• Force generation test
• Saccadic velocity analysis
• Differential intraocular pressure

EMG: Electromyography
• Limitations:
• may record activity even if muscle still
paretic
• response suppressed by GA
• still used in some cases of Duane syndrome
and Botulinum injection

Passive Forced Duction
• Children > 7 yrs, adults
• Topical anesthetic
• Cover one eye: ensures
fixation
• Look as far as possible in
the direction of limited
ocular rotation
• Provide fixation target
• Watch out for “falling
off” of eye

Passive Forced Duction
“Can the forceps rotate the eye further
than the patient can using maximal
innervation in that gaze field?”
• Grasp limbus opposite the side of limited gaze
• Tenon’s and conj fused in one layer
• limits stretching/tearing of conj
• provides firm grasp

Passive Forced Duction
• Follow natural arc of globe
• For rectus muscles
• Slight proptosis
• No retroplacement
• Vertical rectus: 23 deg abduction
• Results:
• cannot move globe further: restriction
• can move globe further: paresis

® For Oblique Muscles:
® Retroplace globe
® Follow oblique muscle path
® Guyton’s Oblique Traction Test
® “Stress Test” for obliques
® Retroplace globe
® Torsional movement
Passive Forced Duction

Oblique traction testing
From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

Oblique traction testing
From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

Oblique traction testing
From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

Intraoperative Forced Duction Testing
• Perform routinely to feel “normal”
• Perform esp after resections
• may be ortho in primary
• overcorrection in certain gazes
• Perform after transpositions
• Intraoperative adjustable suture
• Perform after removing suspected restrictions

Forced Duction Results
• Absolute restriction
• Graves, Brown
• Uniform restriction
• Scar tissue, muscle contracture
• Leash phenomenon
• Scar tissue, long standing contracture
• Duane syndrome

Pitfalls: Forced Duction
• Patient apprehension
• Errors in technique
• “Falling off”
• Failure to proptose or retropulse globe
• Succinylcholine (Anectine)
• Posterior restrictions
• Co-contractions
• Co-existing paresis and restriction

Active Force Generation
• Apply a counteracting
force
• Using the same grasp
on limbus
• Countertraction to feel
resistance
• WOF: corneal abrasion,
conj heme

Active Force Generation
• Differential IOP
• Paresis vs. palsy
• Combined paresis and restriction

Results: Force Generation
• No force generated: Palsy
• Weak force generated: Paresis
• Strong force generated: Restriction
• Common pitfall: mild paresis
• Correlate with saccadic velocity analysis

FDT, FGT, Diagnosis
DIAGNOSIS FDT FGT
Mech restriction restricted normal
Muscle palsy free absent
Paresis & restriction restricted weak

Saccadic Velocity Analysis
• Study eye movement velocity
• muscle activity
• return of muscle function
• EOG : problem when testing vertical saccades
• Infrared
• Scleral search coil

Office Saccadic Velocity
• Look at 2 separate targets
• At least 20 deg movt sufficient
• Compare
• briskness of agonist and antagonist
• with fellow eye
• Bring the eye where muscle has
• maximum function
• full unrestricted motion
From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

Pitfalls: Saccadic Velocity
• Errors in technique
• failure to bring eye
where muscle is still
functioning
• Pharmacologic
• Fatigue
• Time of day
From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

Clinical Applications: SV
• Paralytic Strabismus
• Restrictive
• Lost or slipped muscles
• Neurologic Disorders
• MG: normal then weakens; use with Tensilon
• PEO: general slowing
• INO: slowed adduction; normal abduction

Slowed Saccadic Velocities
• LR palsy abduction
• SO palsy downgaze
• Moebius horizontal
• Myasthenia normal then slows
• Slipped/Lost reduced 20-50%

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
• Cross-sectional area
• Applications:
• EOM palsy
• EOM heterotopy
• Severed/extirpated muscles
• Entrapment
• Mass

Normal coronal section
From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

From Rosenbaum & Santiago, Clinical Strabismus Management

Laser vision ;-)
No more than a pinhole effect!