2nd Upper Premolar Anatomy

AdamBilski2 602 views 34 slides Mar 21, 2019
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 34
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34

About This Presentation

Anatomy of the 2nd upper bicuspid (with my own sketches).


Slide Content

Second Upper Premolar Adam Bilski

Second Upper Premolar – notation : - Universal Numbering – 13 ( Left ), 4 (Right) FDI – 25 (L), 15 (R) Haderup’s - +5 (L), 5+ (R) Palmer/ Zsigmondy – 5 (L), 5 (R) Adam Maciej Bilski

Formation of the tooth : First evidence of calcification 2 – 2,25 yr Enamel completed 6-7 yr Eruption 10-12 yr ( also then – K9 and 1st) Root completed 12-14 yr Adam Maciej Bilski

v Adam Maciej Bilski

Adam Maciej Bilski

2nd upper premolar – blood supply : Adam Maciej Bilski

Trigeminal Nerve (V)  2nd Branch (V2) Adam Maciej Bilski

Second Upper Premolar – occlusion : Articulating with: 1st molar ( mesial half) 2nd premolar ( distal half) Adam Maciej Bilski

Their function is to masticate , and maintain the vertical dimention of occlusion (*OVD) . * Vertical Dimention of Occlusion - is a term used in dentistry to indicate the superior- inferior relationship of the  maxilla  and the  mandible   when the teeth are   occluded  in maximum intercuspation . *RVD – Rest Vertical Dimention * Adam Maciej Bilski

Aesthetics Adam Maciej Bilski

Adam Maciej Bilski

Left Upper 2nd Premolar ( buccal / facial aspect ): M D Cusp tip is less pointed , and towards mesial side Mesial slope is shorter than distal ( opposite to 1st premolar ) Buccal ridge is not as prominent as in maxillary 1st premolar Cervical line is less curvy than in 1st premolar Adam Maciej Bilski

10 specimens of 2nd upper premolars ( buccal aspect ): Trapezoid outline of the crown visible ( smallest line – cervical part of the tooth ) but it’s more oval than 1st M D Adam Maciej Bilski

Left Upper 2nd Premolar ( palatal / lingual aspect ): D M Lingual cusp the same height as buccal one Crown is 7,5 - 8,5 mm long Mesial slope shorter Adam Maciej Bilski

Left Upper 2nd Premolar ( mesial aspect ): P B Cusps at nearly the same level The occlusal table is narrow Crown is smooth and convex , but root has a deep developmental depression The contact point (with 1st premolar ) is occlusaly on the middle third and slightly to the buccal side Buccal cusp is slightly sharper than lingual Adam Maciej Bilski

10 specimens of 2nd upper premolars ( mesial aspect ): Adam Maciej Bilski

Left Upper 2nd Premolar ( distal aspect ): P B The surface is smooth and convex Distal marginal ridge is more cervical than mesial marginal ridge Contact point (with 1st molar ) is more cervically positioned and placed more bucally than on the mesial aspect ( still it’s on the middle third) Adam Maciej Bilski

Left Upper 2nd Premolar ( occlusal aspect ): B P M D The buccal cusp is less developed than the palatal one ( which differs it from the 1st premolar ) The amount of fissures is also higher , so higher probability of an additional buccal cusp The outline is rounded Tendency of radiating suplementary grooves from the central groove Central groove shorter than in 1st Adam Maciej Bilski

10 specimens of 2nd upper premolars ( occlusal aspect ): Adam Maciej Bilski

Root: Lenght of root – 13 - 14 mm ( longer then the 1st one’s ) Usually 1 ( very rarely 2 roots present ) In case of 2 the lingual is shorter and its apex is more blunt From lateral view – usually cervical part of root and crown is the thickest Often pointed distally at the apical part (not a rule though ) Adam Maciej Bilski

Root Canal: 21,5 mm Not well-defined border of pulp- root canal Pulp horns often visible Pulp cavity narrows usually at the apical half of the tooth Adam Maciej Bilski

Dentinal islands pulpal projections or fins are sometimes present at the level of the CEJ OR constrictions at the same level Adam Maciej Bilski

Adam Maciej Bilski

1 root canal from the pulp to apex Adam Maciej Bilski

1st Max. Premolar vs. 2nd Max. Premolar 1st 2nd Cusp tip pointed / sharp Cusp tip round Mesial slope longer Mesial slope shorter Cusp tip towards distal Cusp tip towards short Lingual cusp shorter ( about 1 mm) Cusps at about same level 2 roots 1 root ( sometimes biforcated ) 2 root canals 1 or 2 root canals Shorter on avarage Longer on avarage Adam Maciej Bilski

Pre-treatment radiograph : 32 year old male patient Pain There has to be endodontic treatment under the temporary restoration Adam Maciej Bilski

Post- treatment – 3 root canals visible , with 3 different foramina ( filled with gutta-percha points and root canal sealer )  Adam Maciej Bilski

2nd premolars were blocked and couldn’t erupt correctly they have to be removed Adam Maciej Bilski

1st PM 1st MO Adam Maciej Bilski

Adam Maciej Bilski

Adam Maciej Bilski

Adam Maciej Bilski

Nicely erupted Adam Maciej Bilski

Adam Bilski Adam Maciej Bilski