Government issued 3 ordinances on 5th June, 2020, which refer to Essential Commodities Act, and two legal frameworks for agricultural marketing and contract farming. This is a analysis.
Size: 208.61 KB
Language: en
Added: Aug 15, 2020
Slides: 19 pages
Slide Content
Three Ordinances: TrishulEffect on
State Powers and Farmers
Dr. Narasimha Reddy Donthi
Public Policy Reviewer
Three Ordinances: 5 Three Ordinances: 5 Three Ordinances: 5 Three Ordinances: 5
ththth th
June, 2020 June, 2020 June, 2020 June, 2020
The Essential Commodities
(Amendment) Ordinance, 2020 The Farmers’ Produce Trade and The Farmers’ Produce Trade and
Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation)
Ordinance, 2020
Farmers (Empowerment and Protection)
Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm
Services Ordinance, 2020
Crops and Contracts
Sugarcane
•Contract
farming with
sugar factories
Potato
•Contract
farming with
PEPSICO India
Oil Palm
•Contract
farming with
processing units
sugar factories
•Pricing
•Delayed
Payments
PEPSICO India Holdings
•Pricing
•Violations
processing units
•Pricing
•Imports
•Delayed
Payments
TrishulEffect
Role and powers of State governments is
minimised, almost zero
State income becomes zero
APMCs role reduced
Impact on MSP, procurement and global trade
Impact on MSP, procurement and global trade
Facilitates investment by MNCs and foreign
investment in agriculture
Regulation of agricultural inputs becomes
‘centralised’
Enables growth of commodity monopolies
Constitution: source of power
T
empowers the Statesto enact
APMC Acts under some entries T
List II of Seventh Schedule
(State List),
T
Entry 14: ‘Agriculture …’,
T
Entry 26
: ‘Trade and
T
Central Government
T
List III of the Seventh
Schedule (Concurrent List)
T
Entry 33
which covers trade
and commerce and
production, supply and
distribution of foodstuffs,
T
Entry 26
: ‘Trade and
Commerce within the State
….’ T
Entry 28: ‘Markets and fairs’.
distribution of foodstuffs, including edible oilseeds and
oils raw cotton, raw jute etc.
T
Entry 42
in the Union List,
viz., ‘Interstate Trade and
Commerce’ also allows a role
for the union.
APMCs
T
2,477 principal regulated markets based on geograph y (the
APMCs)
T
4,843 sub-market yards regulated by the respective APMCs
T
27,924 rural periodical markets or haats(regulated and
unregulated)
T
APMC charges include Market Fee (1/2%,) VAT (5%),
T
APMC charges include Market Fee (1/2%,) VAT (5%), Driage(1%), RD Cess(5%), Comm. To society (2.5%,)
Admin. Charges (2.5%), Custody & Maintenance charge s+
Interest Charges (2.5%), Comm. To society (2.5%),
NirashritShulk(0.2%)
T
305 APMCs in Maharashtra are set to lose 30-40 perc ent
income (Rs.120-150 crores) from a annual turnover o f
Rs.48,000 crores
Issues: NAM vs. APMCs
Model APMC Act, 2003
Contract farming allowed
Direct sale allowed
Bihar in 2006 scrapped APMCs
Farmers have not benefitted
33 Recommendations of the State Ministers’ Committee on Agricultural Marketing Reforms
2013
Agricultural Marketing Reforms
2013
Reforms to Agriculture Markets
Promotion of Investment in Marketing Infrastructure Development
Rationalization of Market Fee/ Commission Charges
Contract Farming
Barrier Free Markets
Market Information System
Grading and Standardization
Other Recommendations
Institutional Impacts of Trishul–1/2
T
Institutions aimed at regulating the market conduct, structure
(a) Regulation of primary agricultural produce mark ets; and
(b) Legal and regulatory provisions relating to sto rage, transportation,
packaging, processing, buying/selling and quality s pecifications. The
specific institutions in this category are: State A gricultural Marketing Board specific institutions in this category are: State A gricultural Marketing Board (SAMB), State Department of Agricultural Marketing (SDAM),
Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC), Di rectorate of
Marketing and Inspection (DMI), Health Department, Civil Supplies
Departments of the Central and State Governments, e tc.
T
Institutions providing Physical infrastructure
:SAMB,
APMC, Public Works Department (PWD), Food Corporati on of India (FCI),
Central and State Warehousing Corporations and coop eratives.
Institutional Impacts of Trishul–2/2
T
Institutions involved in administered prices
: FCI,
National Agricultural Marketing Federation (NAFED),
Cotton Corporation of India (CCI), Jute Corporation of
India (JCI), Commission for Agricultural Costs and
Prices (CACP), State agencies, and Fair Price Shops
(FPS). (FPS).
T
Institutions entering the markets directly
: some of the
above plus commission agents, producers or consumer
cooperatives, FPOs and processors.
T
Institutions influencing foreign trade
: Agricultural and
Processed Food Export Development Agency
(APEDA), and some Commodity Boards