4. Routine clinical tests of hearing

krishnakoirala4 760 views 27 slides Jun 27, 2020
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 27
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27

About This Presentation

Routine clinical tests of hearing


Slide Content

Routine Clinical
Tests of Hearing
Dr. Krishna Koirala

•Assessment of Hearing is an integral part of ENT
examination
•Hearing tests can be divided into subjective and
objective tests
•Subjective tests like finger friction test , watch test
and voice test (whisper/conversation/ loud voice)
lack standardization and have become obsolete
•Although subjective, tuning fork tests are considered
standard tests of hearing evaluation in current clinical
practice

Aims of Clinical tests of Hearing
•Estimation of hearing threshold
•Confirm Hearing Loss
•Differentiate type of Hearing Loss (Conductive /
Sensorineural )
•Identification of non-organic hearing loss
(Malingerers)

Tuning Forks (Gardiner Brown)

Different Tuning Fork frequencies used
in ENT
•256, 512, 1024 Hz
•128 Hz produces more vibration sense
•>1024 Hzshort tone decay time

•512 Hz Tuning Fork is ideal in ENT
•No false vibration sensation
•Optimum tone decay time
•Lies in speech frequency range

Striking Surfaces
•Hard:Olecranon, radial styloid process, patella
•Soft:Thenar & hypothenar eminences,
•Thick rubber pad
•Tuning fork is allowed to fall by its own weight
•Impact area is between proximal two-thirds &
distal one-thirds of its prongs

Tuning fork Tests
•RoutineTests
•Rinne test
•Weber test
•Pomroy’s test (ABC )
•Schwabach’s test
•Others
•Bing test
•Gelle’s test
•Stenger’s test
•Chimani Moo’s test

Rinne Test
1) Duration comparison technique
Vibratingtuningforkplacedonpt'smastoidPatient
signalswhensoundceases→Movevibratingtuningfork
overopeningofearcanal(2cmaway&axisparallelto
it)→Patientindicatesifsoundisstillheard

2) Loudness comparison technique
Vibrating tuning fork placed on pt's mastoid
Pt signals if sound is heard→ Move vibrating
tuning fork immediately over opening of ear
canal→ If sound is heard→ patient asked to
tell which sound is louder?

Rinne Test

Results of Rinne Test
•A.C. > B.C. (positive test)
•Normal hearing or Sensorineural deafness
•B.C. > A.C. (negative test)
•Conductive deafness

Rinne Negative with different
frequency Tuning forks
•256 Hz15 -30 dB HL (Mild conductive Loss)
•512 Hz31 -45 dB HL ( Moderate conductive Loss)
•1024 Hz46 -60 dB HL (Severe conductive Loss)

Weber Test
Procedure:
Vibrating 256/ 512 Hz
tuning fork placed in
midline of pt’s skullat
forehead / vertex /
central incisor

Results of Weber test
•Sound heard equally (central) : Normal hearing or B/L
equal deafness
•Sound lateralizes to deafer ear : Conductive deafness
•Sound lateralizes to better hearing ear : Sensorineural
deafness

Why does Weber lateralize to deafer ear in
Conductive Hearing Loss ?
1.Lackofmaskingeffectofsurroundingnoiseon
tuningforksound,asairconductionisreducedin
conductivedeafness
2.Lackofdispersionofsoundenergyduetoossicular
break

Absolute Bone Conduction Test (ABC)
•Pt's B.C. is compared with normal examiner's B.C.
•Vibrating tuning fork placed on pt's mastoid with pt’s
E.A.C. occluded(to prevent A.C.)→ pt signals when
sound ceases→ vibrating tuning fork placed on
examiner's mastoid with examiner'sE.A.C. occluded

Results of Absolute Bone Conduction Test
•Pt stops hearing before examiner : Sensorineural
deafness
•Both hear for same duration : Normal hearing /
conductive deafness

Schwabach's Test
•Same as A.B.C. but E.A.C. is not occluded
•Pt stops hearing before examiner
•Sensorineural deafness
•Both hear for same duration
•Normal hearing
•Pt hears longer than examiner
•Conductive deafness

Schwabach Test

False Negative Rinne
•Etiology:Unilateralsevere/profoundsensorineural
deafness
•Detection:Rinnenegative(Noresponsenearthe
canal),Weberlateralizedtobetterhearingear
•Confirmation:A.B.C.reducedindeafear
•Correction:RepeatRinnetestwithmaskingofbetter
earwithBarany'snoisebox

Mechanism of false negative Rinne
In deaf ear, air conduction & bone conduction are
absent.Trans -cranial transmission of sound to
opposite cochleais perceived as ipsilateral bone
conduction. Reported as bone conduction > air
conduction in deaf ear (Rinne Negative)

Gelle Test
•Vibrating tuning fork placed on pt's mastoid &
examiner increases pt's E.A.C. pressure with
Siegel's speculum
•Softer sound
•Normal hearing or Sensorineural deafness
•No change in sound
•Conductive deafness

Bing Test
•Vibrating tuning fork placed on pt's mastoid &
examiner blocks pt's E.A.C.
•Louder sound: normal hearing or Sensorineural
deafness
•No change in sound:conductive deafness
Tags