abnormal labour

11,112 views 42 slides Dec 12, 2016
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 42
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42

About This Presentation

Obstetrics


Slide Content

Abnormal labour

Dr: Hayder Al-Shammaa

types

| :- Malposition and Mal-presentation of the
head ( occipito-posterior, face presentation
‚brow presentation)

Il:- Breech presentation
IIl:- Shoulder presentation( Transverse lie)

Risks of abnormal labour

Abnormal labour carries increased risks to the
mother and the fetus more than normal labour
, specially if the labour is attended by an
inexperienced personel

© @ NO O1 À D

Maternal risks of abnormal labour

prolonged labour

Infection

Obstructed labour
Anesthesia

Traumatic delivery
Hemorrhage

DVT

Pressure necrosis and fistula
death

9 O1 BB WN =

Fetal risks

Cord prolaps

. Hypoxia

. Infection (chorio-amnionitis, pneumonia)
. Traumatic injuries

. Meconium aspiration (pneumonitis)

. death

Malposition & mal-presentation of the
fetal head
1) Occipito-posterior position
2) Face presentation
3) Brow presentation

Labour in occipito-posterior position

The denominator is the occiput

The occiput occupy the posterior part of the
female pelvis ie. occiput near the sacrum

Occipito-posterior

Causes of O. P.

Anthropoid pelvis favor direct 0.9 position
Android pelvis favor oblique o.p. position
Anteriorly situated placenta

gross pendulous abdomen

Congenital malformations

Abnormal extensor tone
Polyhydramnious

Prematurity

Multiple pregnancy

ak WD =

Diagnosis of occipito posterior

By abdominal exam.
Flat lower abdomen below the umbilicus

. easy to feel Fetal limbs anteriorly
. difficult to feel the Fetal back

. Head not engaged

. Fetal heart at the flanks

B © D =

a

Diagnosis of occipito posterior

By pelvic exam.
High presenting part
Bulging sausage shaped membranes
Or early rupture of membranes (cx.lessthan 3cm)
Easy to feel the anterior fontanel behind the pubic
symphysis
Difficult to feel the posterior fontanel near the sacrum
ear directed posteriorly (in excessive caput & edema)

Mechanism of labour in O.P.

Engagement in ROP (ROP 3times than LOP)
Engaging diameter is suboccipito-frontal 10.5
cm if the head well flexed .

Or occipito-frontal 11.5 cm if the head deflexed
(both larger than normal OA suboccipito-
bregmatic 9.5 cm)

This gives an oval shaped presenting part not
fit well on the cx. Of larger dimentions

Mechanism of labour in O.P.

Internal rotation:- if the head well flexed the
occiput will touch the pelvic floor first and
rotated anteriorly 3/8' of acircle 135 and
become occipito-anterior and the mechanism
then continue as in OA. But it takes longer time
to rotate

This occurs in 70% of cases

Mechanism of labour in O.P.

If the head is deflexed :- the sinciput touches the pelvic
floor first so rotates anteriorly and the occiput rotates
posteriorly through 1/8" of acircle (45 ) short rptation
giving direct occipitoposterior

The mechanism differs , descent continues and the head
delivers by acombination of flexion first, followed by
extention

The emerging diameter is occipito-frontal of 11.5 cm
causing great distension at the vulva and perineum and
perineal tears may occur unless episiotomy performed
Occurs in 10% of cases

Mechanism of labour in O.P.

Arrest of rotation at lateral position (right
occipito-lateral or left occipito-lateral)

No mechanism of labour

Deep transverse arrest

Need assist ed delivery

Occurs in 20% of cases

o

ONOORWP

Features of labour in O.P.

Sow progress (slow cx. dilatation, descent,
rotation)

. Backache is more

. Incoordinate uterine contraction
. Early rupture of membranes

. Higher chance for cord prolaps

Higher chance for infection

. Higher chance for perineal laceration
. Excessive moulding of the head may cause

tentorrial tear

Treatment of O.P.

Before the onset of labour , no attempt for correction

During first stage of labour

1.

2.

3.
4.

Correction of malposition cannot be done

Observation of uterine contraction, cx dilatation, descent,and
use partogram

Continuous fetal heart monitoring

Due to increased risk for operative delivery and anesthesia ,
give nothing by mouth, only occasional sips of water

Maintain maternal hydration by iv fluid

Oxytocin infusion is often indicated to correct incoordinate
uterine contractions

Treatment of O.P.

Cesarean section is indicated in first stage in
the following conditions

1. Failure to progress in spite of good uterine
contractions for 3 hours

2. Fetal distress
3. Maternal distress

Treatment of O.P.

Treatment in second stage

Mistaken diagnosis of 2" stage is not
uncommon, the patient have urge to
pushdown before full dilatation (pressure
effect of the large occiput on the pelvic plexus
p/v exam is essential to confirm the diagnosis

Rx of 2" stage continue

p/v to assess degree of deflexion
Determine excessive molding
Determine caput succidanium

If detect that , spontaneous labour is unlikeley
to occur

Pain relieve is essential in O.P.
Epidural analgesia , pethidine

Need assisted delivery
Fetal distress

Maternal distress
Failure to progress
Deep transverse arrest

Assisted delivery

Oxytocin

Manual rotation with or without forceps
extraction

Forceps rotation (Kielland forceps)
Vacuum extractor

Cesarean section

Manual rotation

Correction of malposition by manipulation with
the hand under epidural anesthesia
Disadvantage need anesthesia, hand take
additional space , may cause trauma, pulling is
not feasible

Kielland forceps rotation
Same disadvantages but ,can pull the head

Vacuum extraction ( Vantouse , Kiwi)
Advantages

Applied without anesthesia, not take extra space,
easy to use minimal skills

Face presentation

The head is fully extended

1/300 deliveries

Causes : same as O.P.

The denominator is the mentum (chin)

Mento-posterior no mechanism of labour the
chest try to enter the pelvis at the same time
with the head (sternobregmatic 16- 18cm)

Mechanism of labour in mento anterior

Engagement in mentolateral ML or RMA

Engaging diameter is the submento bregmatic 9.5
cm

Descent occurs slowly

Rotation occur late in 2™ stage

Engagement occur at +2 or +3 station

Delay in 2™ stage due to oblique line of thrust from
the back to the head

The face deliver by flexion
Emerging diameter is the submentovertical cm

Diagnosis of face presentation

Abdominal findings:- Longitudinal lie, cephalic ,
a groove can be felt between the head and
back , the head is high

p/v feel the chin, mouth, jaws, nose, orbital
ridge

management

Exclude CPD, hypertension , placenta previa,
other risk factors , estimated fetal wt 3.5kg

If any of the above cesarean section safer
Manage as in case of O.P.

Brow presentation

1/1000

Incomplete extension

It is usually atransient presentation , either change
to vertex or to face

Causes as face

Diagnosis

On abdominal exam as in face but the groove is less
prominent

p/v :- feel ant. Fontanel, orbital ridge, roote of the
nose, eyes, but not the chin

Mechanism of labour in brow

No mechanism of labour . The engaging
diameter isthe mentovertical 14 cm so
cesarean section is indicated in persistent brow

Thank you
Tags