Ac joint dislocation.pptx

AbdulMateenButt2 130 views 35 slides Apr 05, 2023
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 35
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35

About This Presentation

a slight presentation for students and resident , a quick review for management and planning.


Slide Content

Acromio -clavicular joint dislocation Dr mateen Qaiser butt Resident orthopedic surgery Aziz Bhatti shahed teaching hospital

Anatomy

Physical exam AC joint tenderness Abnormal contour of the shoulder as compared to the opposite. Obriens test Cross body adduction test

Imaging Bilateral ap views of the AC joint

Axillary lateral view

Stryker Notch View A variant of an AC joint injury involves a fracture of the coracoid process. This injury should be suspected when there is an AC joint dislocation on the AP projection but the coracoclavicular distance is normal, or equal to that on the opposite, uninvolved side. A Stryker notch view, taken appropriately, puts the coracoid in profile and is the best view for evaluating this injury. Technique for taking the Stryker notch view to show fractures of the base of the coracoid. The patient is supine with a cassette placed posterior to the shoulder. The humerus is flexed approximately 120 degrees so the patient's hand can be placed on top of the head. The x-ray beam is directed 10 degrees superior

Stryker notch view

Zanca view

weighted stress views usually no longer used may help differentiate Type II from Type III A 10–15-pound weight is attached to the wrist of the affected side and an AP view can be taken .

Rockwood Classification

Type 3 The key to the diagnosis of a type III injury is that the defect can be reduced with upward pressure under the elbow

type 4

Type 4 The clavicle usually is displaced so severely posteriorly that it becomes “buttonholedâ € through the trapezius muscle and tents the posterior skin .

Type 5

Type 5 The distal clavicle is subcutaneous and cannot be manually reduced. Occasionally, there is so much inferior displacement of the upper extremity that the patient will develop symptoms of traction on the brachial plexus. The clavicle appears to be grossly displaced superiorly away from the acromion .However, x-rays reveal that the clavicle on the injured side is actually at approximately the same level as the clavicle on the normal side, and the scapula is displaced inferiorly

Type 6

Treatment

Non operative brief sling immobilization, rest, ice, physical therapy indications type I and II type III in most individuals ,good results when clavicle displaced < 2cm.

Rehabilitation early shoulder range of motion regain functional motion by 6 weeks return to normal activity at 12 weeks consider corticosteroid injections

Operative treatment Indications Acute type 4 , 5 and 6 injuries acute type III injuries in laborers, elite athletes, patients with cosmetic concerns chronic type III injuries that failed non-op treatment however, new studies have shown no difference in outcomes in types III injuries treated surgically after 6 weeks non-op treatment versus immediate surgery

Techniques Two types ligament reconstruction with soft tissue graft Fixation methods

ligament reconstruction with soft tissue graft Modified weaver dunn Autograft Allograft Modified weaver dunn CC ligament reconstruction with coracoacromial (CA) ligament cons coracoacromial ligament only 20% as strong as normal CC ligament lack of internal fixation risks failure of soft tissue repair

autograft palmaris longus semitendinosus allograft tibialis anterior technique figure-of-eight passage of graft, looping around coracoid and fixation through clavicular tunnels reinforce with internal fixation pros graft reconstruction more closely recreates strength of native CC ligament cons standard risks of allograft use or autograft harvest lack of internal fixation risks failure of soft tissue repair

Fixation methods suture hook plate CC screw (Bosworth) cortical flip button ( e.g Dog Bone)(+/- arthroscopic assistance) K-wire

ORIF with CC screw fixation (Bosworth screw

pros rigid internal fixation cons danger of screw being too long and damage to critical structure below coracoid routine screw removal at 8-12 weeks is advised to prevent screw breakage due to normal motion between clavicle and scapula complications hardware irritation at level of screw purchase in coracoid hardware failure at level of screw purchase in coracoid

ORIF with CC suture fixation pros no risk of hardware failure or migration cons suture not as strong as screw fixation requires careful suture passage inferior to coracoid due to proximity of crucial neurovascular structures complications suture erosion causing distal third clavicle fracture

ORIF with AC hook plate fixation

pros rigid fixation cons may require second surgery for plate removal if symptomatic complications acromial erosion hook pullout

ORIF with AC pin fixation (Phemister Technique)

technique smooth wire or pin fixation directly across AC joint cons hardware irritation complications high incidence of pin migration generally not performed due to high complication rates

Complications Residual pain at AC joint 30-50% AC arthritis more common with surgical management than with nonoperative treatment Hardware failure CC screw breakage/pullout Coracoid fracture can occur with coracoid tunnel drilling

thankyou