Acute pancreatitis ‫‬

2,332 views 138 slides Feb 13, 2017
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 138
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83
Slide 84
84
Slide 85
85
Slide 86
86
Slide 87
87
Slide 88
88
Slide 89
89
Slide 90
90
Slide 91
91
Slide 92
92
Slide 93
93
Slide 94
94
Slide 95
95
Slide 96
96
Slide 97
97
Slide 98
98
Slide 99
99
Slide 100
100
Slide 101
101
Slide 102
102
Slide 103
103
Slide 104
104
Slide 105
105
Slide 106
106
Slide 107
107
Slide 108
108
Slide 109
109
Slide 110
110
Slide 111
111
Slide 112
112
Slide 113
113
Slide 114
114
Slide 115
115
Slide 116
116
Slide 117
117
Slide 118
118
Slide 119
119
Slide 120
120
Slide 121
121
Slide 122
122
Slide 123
123
Slide 124
124
Slide 125
125
Slide 126
126
Slide 127
127
Slide 128
128
Slide 129
129
Slide 130
130
Slide 131
131
Slide 132
132
Slide 133
133
Slide 134
134
Slide 135
135
Slide 136
136
Slide 137
137
Slide 138
138

About This Presentation

Lectrure By:
DR.TARIK S. ALNOGOMI
ER Chief. EMERGENCY MEDICINE SPECIALIST
MEGAT GENERAL HOSPITAL


Slide Content

ACUTE PANCREATITIS DR.TARIK S. ALNOGOMI ER MEGAT GENERAL HOSPITAL

WHY PANCREATITIS…?

WHY PANCREATITIS…?

NOT UNCOMMON PATHOLOGY

SERIOUS CONDITION POTENTIALLY

ACUTE PANCREATITIS CAUSES BILIARY ALCOHOLIC IDIOPATHIC

OTHER UNUSUALL CAUSES HYPERLIPIDEMIA HYPERCALCEMIA CONGENITAL VIRAL DRUGS TRAUMATIC OTHER CAUSES

Trans-abdominal ultrasound should be performed in ALL patient with acute pancreatitis to assess gallstones as etiology of acute pancreatitis. In absence of gallstones or significant alcohol use, obtain serum triglycerides . If serum triglycerides > 1,000 mg/ dL , consider as etiology of acute pancreatitis. In patients > 40 years of age, consider pancreatic tumor in absence of other causes. In patients < 30 years of age and +FH of acute pancreatitis in absence of other causes, consider genetic testing for hereditary pancreatitis. Etiology

PATHOLOGY OSTRUCTION - SECREATION COMMON CHANNEL THEORY DUODENAL REFLUX INCREASED PANCREATIC DUCT PERMEABILITY . ENZYME AUTOACTIVATION

Acute Pancreatitis - Pathophysiology Premature Activation of Trypsin → Autodigestion of pancreatic tissue ACTIVATION OF INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE Inflammatory mediators Vasodilation SHOCK ARDS MODS ATN 10 Extravascular movement of serum albumin 3 rd spacing Panc. edema SHOCK

11

ACUTE OEDEMATOUS PANCREATITIS ACUTE PERSISTENT UNRESOLVING . ACUTE NECROTIZING , FULMINANT . RECURRENT ACUTE PANCREATITIS

ACUTE PANCREATITIS IN INFANTS AND CHILDRENS …???

PRESENTATION OF ACUTE PANCREATITIS ABDOMINAL PAIN NAUSEA VOMITING RETCHING HYPOTENTION

SIGNES OF ACUTE PANCREATITIS FINDING OF ABD. EXAMINATION CULLEN , S SIGNE GREY TURNER , S SIGNE later FINDING OF COMPLICATIONS

Pain, Oh the pain “Worse than childbirth” “Worse than being shot” Starts fast within 10-20min reaches peak Third fastest pain onset in GI after perf and SMA thromb Does not usually undulate (not colicy) Lasts days (if no underlying chronic damage) Longer than biliary colic which is hours Radiate to back in 50% Sometimes diagnosed at autopsy (painless) Almost always causes ER visit/admission Capsaicin, glutamate, vanilloid, ppar-gamma

ECG CHANGES ……???

Acute Pancreatitis 20 40 60 80 100 Presenting features Abdominal pain Nausea / vomiting Tachycardia Low grade fever Abdominal guarding Loss of bowel sounds Jaundice

80%

20%

UPPER ABDOMINAL PAIN CLINICAL PRESENTATION Tiger Land ....!! Lord .. Zakhary Cope

???????????????

DIAGNOSIS

SCIENTIFIC BASE !

CLINICAL SENCE

HISTORTY .. !!

PROPER EXAMINATION

INVESTIGATIONS

DIFFERANTIOAL DIAGNOSIS ? REFERED PAIN FROM THE CHEST ABDOMINAL CAUSES

INFERIOR MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER

UPPER INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION

MESENTERIC VASCULAR OCCLUSION

acute cholecystitis

Surgical Abdomen .. !!!

جل من لايسهو ... جل من لايخطئ

LAPORATORY INVESTIGATION CBC UREA CREATININE RBS SERUM ELECTROLYTES LFT SERUM AMYLASE

AMYLASE

IS THERE OTHER CAUSES FOR ELEVATED SERUM AMYLASE….?

OTHER INVESTIGATIONS URINARY AMYLASE : CREATININE CLEARANCE RATIO. TIMED URINARY AMYLASE OUTPUT AMYLASE CLEARANCE STUDIES SERM LIPASE IN NECROTISING PANCREATITIS COMPLEMENT C3 AND C4 (INCREASE) ALPHA2 MACROGLOBULIN (DECRAESES) ALPHA2 PROTEASES (DECREASES)

Acute Pancreatitis: Time course of enzyme elevations Hours after onset Fold increase over normal 6 12 24 48 72 96 2 4 6 8 10 12 Lipase Amylase Amylase half life 10 hrs

TO WHAT LEVEL IS DIAGNOSTIC….?

Serum A mylase (25-125 U/L)  >200 U/L for 24-72 hours starts to rise 2-6 hr after onset of pain Peaks @ 24 hours Return to normal @ 72 hr Serum Lipase (3-19 U/ dL ) used with amylase; rises later than amylase (48 hours) return to normal 5-7 days  WBC’s  glucose  lipids  calcium  magnesium

Blood tests Amylase and lipase Plasma level peak within 24 hours t 1/2 of amylase << lipase Sensitivity Specificity Amylase 67-100 85-98 Lipase 82-100 86-100 Gut 1997,41:431-35; Br J Surg 1998,84:1665-69.

IN ACUTE PANCREATITIS IS SERUM AMYLASE ALWAYS HIGHT……???

CXR ABDOMINAL XRS ERECT SUPINE

ABDOMINAL ULTRASOUND WHAT IS THE ROLE OF ABD US IN ACUTE PANCREATITIS ……?? DIAGNOSTIC …..!!? FOLLOW UP …!!?

ABDOMINAL CT SCAN DIAGNOSTIC …!!? FOLLOW UP…!!? WHAT TYPE …!!?

CT Scan Normal Homogeneous enhancement of the whole pancreas Abnormal Non-visualization of a part of the pancreas Sensitivity of 90-95% Specificity – 100%

CT scan Not necessary for the diagnosis Diagnostic doubt Atypical presentations Asymptomatic hyperamylasaemia or hyperlipasemia Gastroenterol Clin N Am 1990;19:811-42

Recommendation A dynamic CT scan should be performed in all (predicted) severe cases between 3 and 10 days after admission (Evidence grade B)

http://dbwmpns0f8ewg.cloudfront.net/images/a_panc/ct_apanc.jpg

Magnetic Resonance Cholangio-Pancreatography ( MRCP) Sensitivity of > 90%

Endoscopy Ultrasound (EUS) EUS Sensitivity of > 95% Specificity of > 95-100%

IPMN

Clinical indices of severity RANSON APACHE ATLANTA Balthazar score BISAP Glasgow Delta HCT and/or Delta BUN

Multiple Factors Scoring System Ranson Separate for alcohol and gallstone etiology Score > 3 = severe acute pancreatitis Glasgow valid in all types of pancreatitis Both of these systems require 48 hours from the admission for full assessment Can J Gastroent 2003 325-328

Ranson At presentation Age >55 White blood cell count >16 Blood glucose >200 mg/ dL LDH >350 U/L AST >250 U/L At 48 hours Hematocrit Fall by ≥10% BUN Increase by ≥5 mg/ dL despite fluids Serum calcium <8 mg/ dL pO2 <60 mmHg Base deficit >4 MEq /L Fluid sequestation >6 L 1-2 criteria - > <1% mortal 3-5 cirteria - > 15% mortal 6-8 criteria- > 60% mortal 9-11 -> >75% mortal .

APACHE II A cute P hysiology and C hronic H ealth E valuation as good as the Ranson or Glasgow at 24 and 48 hours of the admission APACHE II score > 8 = Severe acute pancreatitis Cumbersome to use if one does not use a pc or palm - where the formula is easily downloaded Br J Surg 1997,84:1665-69

APACHE II Temp high or low MAP high or low HR high or low (HR 60 gets 2pts!) Na high or low K high or low Creat elev Age over 44 APACHE-O BMI>25 1 pt BMI>30 2pts WBC high or low Glasgow coma (low) pH or HCo3 High or low PaO2 Nonsurgical and emergency surgery More points Score <8 Mortal <4% Score >8 8-18%

Grading of pancreatitis ( Balthazar score ) A: normal pancreas: 0 B: enlargement of pancreas: 1 C: inflammatory changes in pancreas and peripancreatic fat: 2 D: ill-defined single peripancreatic fluid collection : 3 E: two or more poorly defined peripancreatic fluid collections: 4 Pancreatic necrosis  none: 0 ≤30%: 2 >30-50%: 4 >50%: 6 The maximum score that can be obtained is 10. Treatment and prognosis The CTSI is the sum of the scores obtained with the Balthazar score   and those obtained with the evaluation of pancreatic necrosis: 0-3: mild acute pancreatitis 4-6: moderate acute pancreatitis 7-10: severe acute pancreatitis

Desirable features of Markers of Severity Accuracy - High S ensitivity Predictability within 24 hours of admission Easy to use

BISAP SIRS T >38.5°C or <35.0°C, HR>90, RR >20 or PaCO 2 <32 mm Hg WBC >12,000, <4000 or >10 percent immature (band) forms BUN>25 Age>60 Pleural effusion Altered mental status ( glasgow CS < 15) 0-2 pts: <2% mortal 3-5pts: 22% mortal

ATLANTA (1992) Mild vs severe (necrosis or organ failure) APACHE≥8 or RANSON≥3 Organ failure Systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg Pulmonary insufficiency PaO2 ≤ 60 mmHg Renal failure Creatinine ≥2 mg/dl after rehydration Gastrointestinal bleeding 500 ml in 24 h DIC: Platelets ≤100 fibrinogen <1·0 g/l and fibrin-split products >80 μ g/l Calcium ≤7·5 mg/dl

ATLANTA REVISED (2008) Early severity->organs fail Late severity->Structural (necrosis), esp infect PERSISTANT ORGAN FAILURE (>48 hrs) NEW DEFs of Radiographic/structural features of severity

Current Recommendations Mild to moderate Ranson < 3 APACHE II < 8 Severe Ranson >3 APACHE II >10 Organ failure Pancreatic necrosis

If a multiple factor scoring system is to be used, the best choice at present appears to be APACHE II calculated at 24 hours - Evidence category A

Is It Possible to Predict Severity Early in Acute Pancreatitis? Good clinical judgment Specificity - 80% Sensitivity - 40% Scoring Specificity – 60% Sensitivity – 95%

CRP is currently the gold standard Amylase and lipase of no value High likelihood that IL-6/ TAP will replace the CRP Recommendations

Advantage Used to monitor the clinical course of the disease Disadvantage Not always present on admission Lack specificity C-reactive protein (CRP)

C-reactive protein (CRP) Gold standard for the prediction of the necrotizing course of the disease Accuracy of 86% Readily available

C-reactive protein (CRP) Acute phase reactant Synthesized by the hepatocytes Synthesis is induced by the release of interleukin 1 and 6 Peak in serum is three days after the onset of pain Most popular single test severity marker used today Isenmann et al Pancreas 1993;8:358-61

Management of Acute Pancreatitis

Treatment Of Acute Pancreatitis UNCOMPLICATED PANCREATITIS …. MEDICAL SELF LIMITED IN MOST CASES AIM FLUIDS AND ELECTROLYTES PANCREATIC SECRETION

KEEP PATIENT …… NPO UNTILL WHEN …??? NASOGASTRIC SUCTION ……..??? AGGRESSIVE FLUIDS REPLACEMNT MANGEMENT OF HYPO. K ,Ca ,CL,Mg . OXYGEN

WHAT IS ABOUT…??

ANTICHOLINERGICS…..??? ANTIACIDES ……. ???

GLUCAGON ……??? SOMATOSTATIN .. ?? TRACYLOL ……. ???

ANTIBIOTICS …..????

Antibiotics Sepsis Accounts for > 80% of deaths Intestinal flora Gram negative bacteria Mechanism – translocation of the bacteria across the gut wall

Antibiotics - Rationale Early (1 week) Sterile necrosis Massive inflammatory response – multi-system organ failure (SIRS) Late – Infected necrosis

Why the controversy ? Early trials in 1970’s did not show the benefit of antibiotics Antibiotics that did not penetrated the pancreatic tissue

Evidence 8 clinical trials Five of these trials showed a significant reduction in the incidence of pancreatic infections 1 trial showed a significant reduction in mortality Limitations Small sample size None were double blinded randomized placebo controlled trials

Antibiotics ? Increased risk of fungal infections Associate with mortality as high as 85%

Recommendations Prophylactic antibacterial treatment is strongly recommended in severe pancreatitis (Evidence B) No evidence when to start prophylactic treatment or how long to continue therapy Appropriate antibiotics are those that are active against in particular gram-negative organisms Commence as early as possible after the identification of a severe attack

Therapy Treatment Antifungal therapy – definite role

Fungal Infection Antibiotics predispose to candida infection of the pancreatic tissue which increases the mortality substantially

Fungal infection 92 patients with infected pancreatic necrosis 22 patients (24%) with Candida infection Patients with Candida infections Suffered higher mortality (64% vs. 19%, p=.0001) More systemic complications Were given preoperative antibiotics for a longer period (19 vs 6 days; p=.0001) World J. Surg. 25,372-76

Fungal Infection Candida Torulopsis Commensal organism found in human gastrointestinal tract Incidence 10-40%

KEEP PATIENT …… NPO UNTILL WHEN …??? NASOGASTRIC SUCTION ……..??? AGGRESSIVE FLUIDS REPLACEMNT MANGEMENT OF HYPO. K ,Ca ,CL,Mg . OXYGEN

Evolution in Nutrition Fasting TPN is better Early jejunal feeding is safe Early jejunal feeding is superior Gastric feeding is as good as jejunal feeding

Current Recommendations Jejunal feeding should be started within 48 hours The optimal feeding formulae is unknown Ensure the jejunal placement of the tube Monitor for Hypertryglyceridemia/ hyperglycemia TPN in patients who do not tolerate enteral feeding

IPMN

ERCP AND ES INDICATION ....? WHEN …..?

LOCAL … GENERAL … COMPLICATIONS OF ACUTE PANCREATITIS

LOCAL COMPLICATIONS PANCREATIC EXTRAPANCREATIC

PANCREATIC PANCRATIC NECROSIS PANCREATIC INFECTION PANNCREATIC ABSCESS PANCREATIC FISTULA PANCREATIC ASCITES PSUDOCYST

EXTRAPANCREATIC INTRABDOMINAL HAEMORRHAGE GASTROINTESTINAL HAEMORRHAGE PORTAL VEIN THROMBOSIS BILIARY OBSTRUCTION DUODENAL OBSTRUCTION

Acute Pancreatitis Complications Pulmonary Cardiovascular Coagulation Renal l Immunological Pleural Effusion (enzyme induced Inflammation of Diaphragm) Atelectasis Abdominal distention &  diaphragmatic movement 3 rd spacing BP, HR Vasoconstriction d/t SNS activation Trypsin activates both clotting & lysing factors  DIC & PE Hypovolemia GFR Renal perfusion Clots in renal circulation ATN ARF GI motility bacteria outside GI Pancreatic abscess Necrosis infection 120

Markers of Inflammation TNF-alpha Major role in mediating inflammatory response Conflicting reports as a predictor of severity Interleukin-6 and 8. Principal cytokine mediator Measured in serum and urine Discriminate severe from mild cases on day 1

GENERAL COMPLICATIONS RESPIRATORY INSUFFICIENCY ADRS RENAL FAILURE DEPRESSED MYOCARDIAL FUNCTION ( MULTIPLE ORGAN FAILURE )

MECHANISMS OF GENERAL COMPLICATION PANCREATIC INFECTION COLON …..??? RLEASE OF ACTIVE INFLAMATORY MEDIATORS

INDICATION OF LAPAROTOMY…??

ACCEPTED INDICATIONS DIAGNOSIS IN DOUBT PERSISTENT BILIARY PANCREATITIS INFECTIVE PANCREATIC NECROSIS PANCREATIC ABSCESS

CONTROVERSIAL INDICATIONS > 50% STERILE PANCREATIC NECROSIS STABLE BUT PERSISTENT DISEASE DETERIORATION IN CLINICAL COURSE ORGAN SYSTEMIC FAILURE

WHAT IS THE OPERATION..?

UNDER SURGICAL OR MEDICAL !!??

!!! ! ! ! ! ?

Yours .... you..! YOU ..!! Me ..?? Your Case ... !!

RESPOSIBILITY RESPONSIBILITY ... !! RESPOSIBILITY D RESPONSIBILITY RESPONSIBILITY ... !! RESPONSIBILITY ... !! RESPONSIBILITY ... !!

PROGNOSIS RANSON,S CRITERIA APACHE II SCORING SYSTEM GLASCO CRITERIA < 3 RANSONS ,S CR. MORTALITY RATE 0.9 % . 3-4 ….19 % …..5-6 50% ….. > 6 ….90 %

It Is Nice To Be Important ..... But It Is More Important To Be Nice Mahatma ... Said Fazli Amin

THANK YOU !!!
Tags