Acute pancreatitis

3,883 views 55 slides Oct 13, 2014
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 55
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55

About This Presentation

Acute Pancreatitis Management


Slide Content

Gallstones continue to be the most common
cause of acute pancreatitis

in most series
Alcohol is the second most common cause

"GET SMASH'D"
Gallstones,
Ethanol,
Trauma,
Steroids,
Mumps,
Autoimmune,
Scorpion bites,
Hyperlipidemia,
Drugs(azathioprine, diuretics)

Abdominal pain
Nausea and vomiting
signs may vary from mild

tenderness to
generalised peritonitis.
Grey-Turner's

sign
Cullen's sign

MOF- Respiratory,cardiovascular failure
&acute

renal failure.
Metabolic
(hypocalcaemia,hypomagnesaemia,

hyperglycaemia)
Haematological (DIC)
Fever - systemic inflammation, or acute

cholangitis, due to

bacterial infection-LATE

a recognised entity
occurs

in cases of shock of unknown origin,
during the postoperative

period,
in renal transplant
peritoneal dialysis patients,

and in diabetic ketoacidosis.

Typical clinical features
+ a high plasma concentration

of pancreatic
enzymes
serum amylase concentrations

decline quickly
over two to three days
Relate it to onset of abdominal pain

several non-pancreatic diseases (visceral
perforation,

small bowel obstruction and
ischaemia, leaking aortic aneurysm,

ectopic
pregnancy),
tumours also secrete amylase

superior sensitivity and specificity
preferable to serum amylase for the

diagnosis of acute pancreatitis

History
physical examination,
liver function

tests,
and biliary ultrasonography will indicate the
correct

cause in most cases.
If not, follow-up investigations,

should
include fasting plasma lipids

and calcium, viral
antibody titres, and repeat biliary
ultrasonography.

detect free air in the abdomen,
colon cut-off sign, a sentinel loop, or an ileus.
calcifications within the pancreas - chronic
pancreatitis.

Plain radiographs clues
alternative abdominal emergency,
detect and stage complications of

acute
severe pancreatitis, especially pancreatic
necrosis

pancreatic necrosis cannot be appreciated
until

at least three days after the onset of
symptoms.
Patients with

persisting organ failure,
signs of sepsis,
clinical deterioration

occurring after an initial
improvement
Follow-up scans

also provide prognostic information based on
the following grading scale developed by
Balthazar:
A - Normal
B - Enlargement
C - Peripancreatic inflammation
D - Single fluid collection
E - Multiple fluid collections

The chances of infection and death are
virtually nil in grades A and B
steadily increase in grades C through E.
Patients with grade E pancreatitis have a 50%
chance of developing an infection and a 15%
chance of dying.

only be used in the following situations:
severe acute pancreatitis secondary to stones
biliary pancreatitis - worsening jaundice and
clinical deterioration despite maximal supportive
therapy.
with sphincterotomy and stone extraction, may
reduce the length of hospital stay, the
complication rate, and, possibly, the mortality
rate.
in the setting of suspected SOD (sphincter of
oddi dysfunction)

PRSS1 genetic testing

is recommended in symptomatic
patients with any of the following

features
n
Recurrent attacks of acute

pancreatitis for which no cause
has been found
Idiopathic chronic

pancreatitis
A family history of pancreatitis in a first or

second degree
relative
Unexplained pancreatitis occurring in

a child

Supplemental oxygen

adequate fluid resuscitation
A urinary catheter
Central venous monitoring
All patients with severe acute pancreatitis
should be managed

in a high dependency unit or
intensive therapy unit.

opiate analgesia.
A nasogastric tube is not useful routinely

but
may be helpful if protracted vomiting occurs in
the presence

of a radiologically demonstrated
ileus.

All patients with severe acute pancreatitis
should be managed in a high dependency
unit or intensive therapy unit with full
monitoring and systems support
(recommendation grade B).

no proven therapy for the treatment of acute
pancreatitis.

Patients with alcohol-induced pancreatitis
may need alcohol-withdrawal prophylaxis.
Lorazepam, thiamine, folic acid, and multi-
vitamins are generally used in this group of
patients.

imaging of the common bile duct is required.
If the presence of stones in the common bile duct
is confirmed, a cholecystectomy with common
bile duct exploration (either surgical or
postoperatively with endoscopic retrograde
cholangiopancreatography [ERCP]) should be
performed during the same hospitalisation in
mild to moderate disease soon after the attack
resolves.
A longer delay, even of a few weeks, is associated
with a high recurrence (80%) of acute pancreatitis
and re-admission

If the pancreatitis is severe, some allow a few
months for the inflammation to completely
resolve before performing a cholecystectomy

In patients who are not candidates for surgery
because of comorbidities with a high American
Association of Anesthesiology (ASA) index,
sepsis, or severe disease,
ERCP must be considered.
Urgent ERCP is indicated in patients with biliary
sepsis and obstructive jaundice that show no
improvement in 48 hours after the onset of the
attack.
ERCP is a diagnostic and therapeutic
intervention

If mild to moderate pancreatitis is found,
cholecystectomy with intra-operative
cholangiogram should be performed but the
pancreas should be left alone.
For severe pancreatitis, the lesser sac should
be opened and the pancreas fully inspected.
Some surgeons place drains and irrigating
catheter around the pancreas.

during the same hospital admission,
unless a clear plan has been made for
definitive treatment within the next two
weeks (recommendation grade C).
should be delayed in patients with severe
acute pancreatitis until signs of lung injury
and systemic disturbance have resolved.

infected necrosis

-high mortality rate (40%).
diagnosed either by the presence of gas
within the pancreatic collection
or by fine needle aspiration

All patients with persistent symptoms and >
30% pancreatic necrosis,
and those with smaller areas of necrosis and
clinical suspicion of sepsis,
should undergo image guided fine needle
aspiration to obtain material for culture 7–14
days after the onset of pancreatitis
(recommendation grade B).

sterile necrosis - managed conservatively.
infected necrosis

-radiological or surgical
intervention.

Some trials show benefit, others do not.
 At present there is no consensus on this
issue. If antibiotic prophylaxis is used, it
should be given for a maximum of 14 days

rationale -mortality for infected pancreatic

necrosis is higher than that for sterile
necrosis.

No conclusive evidence to support the use of
enteral nutrition in all patients with severe
acute pancreatitis.
enteral route is preferred if that can be
tolerated (recommendation grade A).
nasogastric route effective in 80% of cases
(recommendation grade B).

The use of enteral feeding may be limited by
ileus. If this persists for more than five days,
parenteral nutrition will be required.

clinical impression of severity,
obesity, or APACHE II>8 in the first 24 hours
of admission, and
C reactive protein >150 mg/l,
Glasgow score 3 or more,
or persisting organ failure after 48 hours in
hospital (recommendation grade B).

The definitions of severity, as proposed in the
Atlanta criteria, should be used.
organ failure present within the first week,
which resolves within 48 hours, should not be
considered an indicator of a severe attack
(recommendation grade B).

Bradley reported the criteria for severe acute pancreatitis
developed at the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis
held in Atlanta, Georgia.
Criteria for severe acute pancreatitis - one or more
of the following:
(1) Ranson score on admission >= 3 (or during
the first 48 hours)
(2) APACHE II score >= 8 at any time during
course
(3) presence of one or more organ failures
(4) presence of one or more local complications

Scoring systems increase accuracy of
prognosis.
Use of the Glasgow Prognostic
Score/Ranson's Criteria/Acute Physiology and
Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II)
score can indicate prognosis, particularly if
combined with measurement of CRP >150
mg/L.

Ranson criteria for pancreatitis at
admission LEGAL:
Leukocytes > 15 x109/l
Enzyme AST > 250
units/l
Glucose > 10mmol/l
Age > 55
LDH > 600 units/l

Ranson criteria for pancreatitis: initial 48
hours "C & HOBBS" (Calvin and Hobbes):
Calcium < 2mmol/l
Hct drop > 10%
Oxygen < 8 kpa
BUN > 1mmol/l
Base deficit > 4mmol/l
Sequestration of fluid > 6L

NUMBER OF POSITIVE CRITERIA
0-2 <5% mortality
3-4 20% mortality
5-6 40% mortality
7-8 100% mortality

uses age, and 7 laboratory values collected
during the first 48 hours following admission,
to predict severe pancreatitis.
It is applicable to both biliary and alcoholic
pancreatitis.
The score can range from 0 to 8. If the score is
>2, the likelihood of severe pancreatitis is
high. If the score is <3, severe pancreatitis is
unlikely.

Age >55 years
WBC >15 x 10
9
/L
Urea >16 mmol/L
Glucose >10 mmol/L
pO
2
<8 kPa (60 mm Hg)
Albumin <32 g/L
Calcium <2 mmol/L
LDH >600 units/L
AST/ALT >200 units

The majority of patients with acute pancreatitis will
improve within 3 to 7 days of conservative
management.
The cause should be identified,
a plan to prevent recurrence should be initiated
before the patient is discharged.
In gallstone pancreatitis, a cholecystectomy should be
considered before discharge in mild cases and a few
months after the discharge date in patients with
severe symptoms.
In patients who are not candidates for surgery,
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
(ERCP) must be considered.

include:
(1) pancreatic necrosis
(2) pancreatic abscess
(3) pancreatic pseudocyst

Organ failures include:
(1) shock (systolic blood pressure less than 90
mm Hg)
(2) pulmonary insufficiency (PaO2 <= 60 mm Hg
on room air)
(3) renal failure (serum creatinine > 2 mg/dL after
fluid replacement)
(4) gastrointestinal bleeding, with > 500 mL
estimated loss within 24 hours
(5) DIC (thrombocytopenia and
hypofibrinogenemia and fibrin split products)
(6) severe hypocalemia (<= 7.5 mg/dL)

Thanks !