Alexandria_Classrooms_of_the_Futureb.ppt

bishtmayank293 4 views 32 slides May 01, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 32
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32

About This Presentation

Shows the future classrooms


Slide Content

LCSC Technology Conference
Jeanne Reed & Don Clausen
3/16/10

Program started three years ago with six
high school teachers via a competitive grant
program.
Teachers received an initial 32 hours of
staff development training over the course
of a year.
The program has expanded in four phases
to 44 teachers in grades seven through 12.
Upon completion of first 16 hours of
training, teachers received their equipment.

Rationale (Urgency)
Pedagogy
Electronic Applications
Hardware

http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=254&Itemid=119

Creativity and Innovation
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving
Communications and Collaboration
Information Literacy **
Media Literacy **
ICT Literacy **
Life and Career Skills **
http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=254&Itemid=119

Creativity and Innovation
Communications and Collaboration
Research and Information Fluency
Critical Thinking, Problem Solving and
Decision Making
Digital Citizenship
Technology Operations and Concepts
http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/NETS/ForStudents/2007Standards/NETS_for_Students_2007.htm

Entry Level
Adoption Level
Adaptation Level
Appropriation Level
Invention Level
http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/00
00019b/80/19/e7/b3.pdf

Entry Level:
Teachers typically learn the
fundamental aspects of using new
technology, including the basics of
configuring hardware and software.

Adoption Level:
Teachers concern themselves with
ways to use the technology to support
traditional instruction.

Adaptation Level:
Teachers integrate technology into
existing classroom activities. The
emphasis is productivity. Students use
word processors, databases, and some
graphics programs to create familiar
products of instruction.

Appropriation:
Teachers begin to develop new approaches to
teaching and learning that make the most of
the technology available to them. A teacher's
mastery and skill level has developed to allow
the creation of new learning activities not
possible without the technology.

Innovation:
Teachers no longer try to adapt instruction to
technology but adjust their fundamental
perceptions of instruction. Teachers who
reach this stage reflect on the actual craft of
teaching, and their fundamental teaching
approach may shift. (Dwyer, Ringstaff, and
Sandholtz, 1991)

http://www.comicstriparchive.com/Zits/

Creating
Evaluating
Analyzing
Applying
Understanding
Remembering
http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Bloom%27s_Taxonomy

Identifying similarities and differences
Summarizing and note taking
Reinforcing effort and providing recognition
Homework and practice
Nonlinguistic representations
Cooperative learning
Setting goals and providing feedback
Generating and testing hypotheses
Cues, questions, and advanced organizers
http://www.middleweb.com/MWLresources/marzchat1.html

Linguistic intelligence
Logical-mathematical intelligence
Musical intelligence
Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence
Spatial intelligence
Interpersonal intelligence
Intrapersonal intelligence
http://www.businessballs.com/howardgardnermultipleintelligences.htm

Identify Desired Results
◦“What do we want students to know?”
Determine Acceptable Evidence
◦“How will we know when they know?”
Plan Learning Experiences and Instruction
◦“How will they learn?”
http://iearn.org/civics/may2003workshop/Understanding%20by%20Design%20Teaching%20Ellen%20Meier%20CTSC.pdf
©1998 Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe

http://kmhs.typepad.com/rigor_relevance/2009/10/index.html
Dr. Mimi Dyer

http://wwwstatic.kern.org/gems/cue/Lemke.pdf

Cornell Note Template
WebQuests (Word and PowerPoint)
Note Cards
Graphic Organizers (SmartArt)
KWHL Form
Inverted T Chart
Community Clips
Tables in Word
Everything in Excel

NGS Simulation
Intel(Student)
WebQuests
Wordle
Garrison Site
California Learning Resource Network

Moodle
Ning In Education
Schoolwires

Coaching Availability
Classroom Visits with Follow Up Discussion
Research Support
Equipment and Application Troubleshooting

The Competition
◦Mninfinity
◦IQ Academy
◦Charter Factor
◦ATC
◦Post Secondary

On November 17, 2009, twenty-one
Classroom of the Future teachers
completed an open-ended response
survey indicating what they like most
and least about the Classroom of the
Future program.

“It has been awesome to get
students on computers and
connect real life applications
to class material.”

“Students have improved their
ability to interact with both the
spoken word and written word. I
am moving out of the front of the
classroom to helping students be
the active participates in their
learning.”

“[What Ilike best is] my ability to
reflect and rethink my practice in
the classroom. My lessons have
been richer by integrating online
digital content.”

“Being able to empower
students with technology tools
that give them options to
explore the world, communicate
with the world, and discover
their own interests and
passions.”

http://www.wordle.net/
Tags