AMELOBLASTOMA. (Dr MANOJ KUMAR)

416 views 75 slides Mar 19, 2022
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 75
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75

About This Presentation

ODONTOGENIC TUMOURS-AMELOBLASTOMA


Slide Content

ODONTOGENIC TUMORS
-AMELOBLASTOMA -
Dr.MANOJ KUMAR

INTRODUCTION
The permutation of
different cells of
different origin makes
odontogenic tumors a
highly complicated
group of lesions

EPITHELIAL ODONTOGENIC TUMORS
1. Minimal inductive change in CT
Ameloblastoma.
CEOT (Pindborg’s)
AOT
2.Extensive inductive changes in connective tissue
Ameloblastic fibroma
Ameloblastic fibro-odontoma
Odoto-Ameloblastoma
Odontoma –Complex
Compound

MESODERMAL ODONTOGENIC TUMOURS
Central odontogenic fibroma
Odontogenic myxoma
Cementoma –
•Periapical cemental dysplasia
•Cementifying fibroma
•Benign cementoblastoma
Dentinoma

Malignant odontogenic tumors
–Odontogenic carcinoma
•Primary intraosseous carcinoma
•Malignant Ameloblastoma
–Odontogenic Sarcoma
•Ameloblastic Fibrosarcoma
•Ameloblastic Odontosarcoma

AMELOBLASTOMA

WHO (1992)
“Is a true neoplasm of enamel organ like
tissue which does not undergo
differentiation to the point of enamel
formation”

Robinson described it as
A tumour that is usually unicentric,
nonfunctional intermittent in growth
anatomically benign clinically persistent

Synonyms :
Admantinoma
Multilocular cyst
Admantoblastoma
Eve’s Diesease

History :
•CUZACK (1827)-First Recognized
•FALKSON (1879)–Description
•MALASSEZ (1885)–Admantinoma
•IVY &CHURCHILL (1934)–Ameloblastoma
•Unicystic ameloblastoma –Robinson and
Martinez in 1977

ORIGIN
•Cell rests of enamel organ
–Dental lamina remnants
–Hertwig’s sheath
–Rests of malassez
•Epithelium of Odontogenic cysts (Dentigerous cyst &
Odontomas)
•Disturbances in developing enamel organ.
•Heterotropic epithelium in other parts of the body,
especially the Pituitary Gland.
•Basal cells of oral epithelium.

extra osseous
•Dental lamina
ameloblast
•Oral epithelium

Incidence
1% of oral tumors
18-20% of odontogenic
tumors

Clinical features
20-50 years
Number of cases reported in
children
Youngest reported one month old
Oldest 98 yrs

Frequent in
mandible than
maxilla
3:1

Signs & symptoms
Asymptomatic
Asymmetry
Slow growing –non
tender
Later stages pain

Secondary infection
Ulceration
Egg shell crackling
Extra osseous Small nodule

Classification
Robinson and Martinez 1977
Anatomic site
1.Central /intraosseous
i.Multicystic/Conventional
ii.Unicystic
iii.solid
2.Peripheral/ extra osseous

Radiological features
•Numerous well defined radioluscency of varying
diameter
•Honey comb
•Soap bubbleappearance
•Unicystic radiolucent lesion indistinguishable
with cysts

Ameloblastoma
With in medullary cavity
Scalloping of inner cortex
Pressure erosion
Shell remains

C T SCAN

When maxillary sinus involved
Cloudiness of sinus
Destruction of wall
Unicystic in maxilla

Histopathology
•Follicular
•Plexiform
•Acanthomatous
•Granular cell
•Desmoplastic
•Basal cell type

Follicular

Plexiform

Acanthomatous

Granular cell

Desmoplastic

Basal cell

Unicystic ameloblastoma
Ackerman in 1988
1.Type-I Luminal(consisted of unilocular cystic lesions lined by
epithelium exhibiting features of ameloblastoma).
1.Type-II Intra luminal(showed epithelial nodules arising from
the cystic lining and projecting into the cyst lumen. These
nodules comprised epithelium with a plexiform or follicular
pattern resembling that seen in intraosseous ameloblastoma.).
1.Type-III Mural ameloblastoma(characterized by the presence of
invasive islands of ameloblastomatous epithelium in the
connective tissue wall of the cyst, and these islands may or may
not be connected to the cyst lining)

Mural Ameloblastoma

Peripheral ameloblastoma
•Peripheral ameloblastoma (PA) is a rare odontogenic tumor that
accounts for 1% for all ameloblastomas.
•Kurifirst reported PA in 1911
•In 1959, Stanley and Kroghdefined the clinical and histopathologic
characteristics.
•The strict definition of PA according to Buchner and Scuibba(1987)
excludes lesions in extragingival locations.

The etiology of PA is unclear. The tumor can derive from the extraosseous
epithelial remnants of the dental lamina or from the basal cell layer of the
oral mucosa, which is believed to have odontogenic potential

•The differential diagnosis usually includes
–Pyogenic granuloma, peripheral
–Giant cell granuloma,
–Peripheral odontogenic fibroma,
–Peripheral ossifying fibroma,
–Papilloma,
–Epulis.
•Only four cases of malignant PA have been
reported to date.

Pitutary ameloblastoma
•Craniopharyngioma
•Rathke’s pouch tumor

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
–Multilocular cyst
Dentigerous cyst
Odontogenic kerato cyst
–Giant cell granuloma, cherubism
–Brown’s tumor
–Central hemangioma
–Odontogenic myxoma

Treatment
–Behavior and potential of tumor
–Growth characteristics
–Anatomic site
–Clinical extent
–Size of tumor
–Histologic pattern

Less than complete
excision is equivalent to
planned recurrence

General principles

1.Definitive & offer best cure
2.Curettage and enucleation –recurrence
3.Curettage condemned
4.Cancellous bone –readily infiltrated
resorbed by tumor
5.Dense cortical bone -temporary barriers

A safe margin of uninvolved bone is 2 cm for
solid and multicystic lesion
1-1.5 for unicystic and peripheral lesions
Resorption of cortical bone –periosteum
involved –surrounding soft tissue and muscle
Post treatment follow up 15-20 yrs

Specific principles

Intra osseous solid / multi cystic
ameloblastoma
Excision of lesion
Enbloc resection --without continuity
defect
Enbloc resection–with continuity
defect

Inferior alveolar nerve if in lesion-sacrificed
Nerve grafting best to perform at time of
resection
Resection should be exterior to tumor
involving plane

A thin inferior border preserved may fracture-
reconstruction plate
<1 cm not practical
Resection with sharp cutting instrument
Grinding with bur –not allow histologic
evaluation at tumor bone interface

Confirmed by frozen section
Immediate reconstruction
Delayed reconstruction

•Autogenous free bone graft
•Allogenic bone with reconstruction plate
•Platelet rich plasma mixed into a cortical/
cancellous bone graft
•If sufficient soft tissue not available -
vascularized composite pedicle graft
•Delayed reconstruction : reconstruction plate to
maintain resection space

An anatomic classification of maxillary ameloblastoma as
an aid to surgical treatment
I T Jackson and P P Callan
J Cranio Maxillofac Surg 1996;24; 230
Group Itumors confined to maxilla with out involving orbital floor
-Partial maxillectomy
Group IItumor involving orbital floor not the periorbital tissue
-total maxillectomy
Group IIItumor involving orbital contents
-total maxillectomy with orbital excentration
Group IVtumor involving skull base
-total maxillectomy with orbital excentration and anterior
skull base resection

Unicystic ameloblastoma
Initial diagnosis
Dentigerous cyst or OKC
Enucleation or marsupialization?
Careful assessment
Biopsy may not confirm
Physical basis cleavage plane
Microscopic section R without CD or
R with CD

Peripheral ameloblastoma
Enmass excision
With overlying mucosa periosteum
alveolar bone and adjacent teeth
1-1.5 resection margin

Cautery
Chemical agents
Electro cautery
Cryotherapy

Carnoy’ solution
•Culter & Zollinger1933 described as a
sclerozing agent for the treatment of cysts and
fistulae, and remains in use today as a fixative
Composition
i.Glacial acetic acid
ii.Absolute alcohol
iii.Chloroform
iv.Ferric chloride
•Depth of penetration 1.5-1.8 mm

Unicystic ameloblastoma –use of Carnoy’s
solution after enucleation
P K Lee N Samman
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 33 ; 263-7

Cryotherapy
Adjunct to curettage
Devitalize the tissue with liquid nitrogen
Depth 1.5 cm
Jaw can be frozen the entire thickness
Complication sequestration and pathologic
fracture
Transient anesthesia

Management of mandibular ameloblastoma
treatment algorithm
Daniel E Sampson, M. Anthony Pogrel
J Oral Maxfac Surg 57; 1074-77 :1999
•Curettage recurrence
•Curettage with cryotherapy
•Confined to bone respond well to cryotherapy
•Soft tissue extension –necrosis
•Pathologic fracture –secondary to necrosis and
demineralization of bone
•Immediate bone grafting

Radiotherapy
Inoperable cases
Invasion into cranium
Primarily intraosseous-resistant
Extra osseous ameloblastoma -reduced
Possible osteoradionecrosis
Cause of metastasis

MALIGNANT BEHAVIOUR AND META STASIS
•Malignant ameloblastomais a histologically well-
differentiated, benign appearing ameloblastoma with
metastatic disease histologically identical to the primary
tumor.
•Ameloblastic carcinomais an ameloblastoma with
histological malignant transformation in the primary
lesion with or without metastatic disease.

•Metastases from malignant ameloblastomas have been
reported in the
–lung (75%),
–cervical lymph nodes (15%),
–spine (15%), and,
–less frequently, in the liver, skull, diaphragm, and brain.
•Markedly aggressive clinical course
•Quiescent chronicity
•After irradiation

Pulmonary metastasis of ameloblastoma
James M Henderson, J R Sonnet
J. Oral Surg Oral Path Oral Med Oral Radiol Endod;88 ;170-6:1999
•41 cases metastatic to lung has been reported
•Inadequate and inappropriate treatment –recurrence
increased risk of metastasis
•Route aspiration of tumor particles/ hematogenous
spread

Rational approach to diagnosis and treatment of
ameloblastoma and OKC
Karen A O M Chapelle, Paul J W Stoclinge
British J Oral Maxfac Surg 42; 381-390 :2004

ameloblastoma

Ameloblastoma in children
R A Ord, R H Blanchaert Et Al
J Oral Maxfac Surg 60; 762-70 : 2002
Differ
Higher % unicystic and fast growing
Mural invasion
More aggressive surgery necessary

In discussion
Arie Shteyer suggest
1.Precise differential diagnosis
2.Conservative approach
Decompression-Iodoform gauze
soaked in whiteheads varnish
3.Long term follow up
4.recurrence extensive surgery

Conclusion
•Careful examination
•Appropriate treatment
•Complete cure
•Reconstruction
•Follow up

THANK YOU
Tags