Anaesthesia for spine surgery

9,489 views 32 slides May 18, 2014
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 32
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32

About This Presentation

No description available for this slideshow.


Slide Content

ANAESTHESIA FOR SPINE
SURGERY
BASSEY, A. E.

OUTLINE
INTRODUCTION
BRIEF ANATOMY OF THE SPINE
INDICATIONS FOR SPINE SURGERY
TYPES OF PROCEDURES
PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION
PREMEDICATION
INDUCTION AND INTUBATION
POSITIONING
MONITORING
MAINTENANCE
TRANSFUSION MANAGEMENT
EMERGENCE AND EXTUBATION
POSTOP CARE
COMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSION

INTRODUCTION
SPINE SURGERIES ARE A WIDE VARIETY OF
PROCEDURES, THEY PRESENT DIVERSE
CHALLENGES TO THE ANAESTHETIST
4.6 MILLION INDIVIDUALS IN THE USA WILL
REQUIRE SPINE SURGERY IN THEIR LIFETIME
SKILFUL ANAESTHETIC MANAGEMENT IS
INDISPENSABLE TO OBTAINING BEST
OUTCOME

BRIEF ANATOMY OF THE SPINE

BRIEF ANATOMY OF THE SPINE

INDICATIONS FOR SPINE SURGERY
NEUROLOGIC DYSFUNCTION
(COMPRESSION)
STRUCTURAL INSTABILITY (ABNORMAL
DISPLACEMENT)
PATHOLOGIC LESIONS (TUMOUR,
INFECTION)
DEFORMITY (ABNORMAL ALIGNMENT)
PAIN(DISCOGENIC, FACETOGENIC etc)

INDICATIONS

INDICATIONS

INDICATIONS

TYPES OF PROCEDURES
OPEN SURGERY
MINIMAL ACCESS
THORACOSCOPIC APPROACH
LAPAROSCOPIC APPROACH

PROCEDURES

PROCEDURES

PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION
HISTORY
PATHOLOGY – SITE, NATURE
PROCEDURE – TYPE, DURATION, APPROACH
CO-MORBIDITIES – HTN, CCF, CAD, ASTHMA, RTI
DRUGS – ASPIRIN
COUNSELLING – COMPLICATIONS, INTRAOP TESTS
EXAM
AIRWAY – MOUTH OPENING, MALLAMPATI, NECK
ROM?, PREDICTORS OF DIFFICULT INTUBATION
PULMONARY – DYSPNOEA, INFECTION, ASTHMA
CVS – DYSFXN MAY BE DUE TO MEDICAL DX, HIGH
CERVICAL PATHOLOGY
NEUROLOGIC – FULL EXAM & DOCUMENT DEFICITS
MSS - SPINE

PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION
INVESTIGATIONS
FBC, EUCr, URINALYSIS, CLOTTING PROFILE
CVS – ECG, ECHO
PULMONARY – CXR, ABGs, SPIROMETRY (esp. in
elderly, deformities, one-lung ventilation)
C-SPINE PATHOLOGY – XRAY C-SPINE

PREMEDICATION
DEPENDENT ON CLINICAL STATUS
USE OF OPIOIDS IN PATIENTS AT RISK OF
PULMONARY DYSFUNCTION
HAEMODYNAMIC INSTABILITY

INDUCTION AND INTUBATION
INDUCTION
INTRAVENOUS OR INHALATIONAL?
PT’S CLINICAL CONDITION
AIRWAY
C-SPINE STABILITY
MUSCLE RELAXATION
CONSIDER INTRAOP MONITORING

INDUCTION AND INTUBATION
INTUBATION
AWAKE OR ASLEEP,BOTH SUITABLE. NO
EVIDENCE TO PROVE OTHERWISE. HOWEVER,
WHILE AWAKE – NEURO EXAM POSSIBLE
DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY: INTUBATION CAN BE
ACHIEVED WITHOUT ANY NECK MOVEMENT
(MANUAL IN-LINE STABILIZATION OR A HARD
COLLAR)
FIBER-OPTIC LARYNGOSCOPY: FIXED FLEXION
DEFORMITIES INVOLVING UPPER T-SPINE/C-
SPINE, PTS WEARING STABILIZATION DEVICES
SUCH AS HALO VESTS, LIMITED MOUTH
OPENING
CONSIDER USE OF WIRE-REINFORCED ETT TO
MINIMISE RISK OF KINKING
ENSURE PT’s C-SPINE IS STABLE BEFORE ETT

INDUCTION AND INTUBATION
METHODS C-SPINE
MOTION
INTUBATION
DIFFICULTY
TIME
REQUIRED
RIGID COLLAR NIL
INLINE
STABILIZATION
AXIAL
TRACTION
BLIND NASAL
INTUBATION
RETROGRADE
INTUBATION

POSITIONING – PRONE
COMMONEST POSITION FOR SPINE SURGERY
INDUCTION AND INTUBATION IN SUPINE POSITION
TURN PRONE AS A SINGLE UNIT REQUIRING AT
LEAST FOUR PEOPLE
NECK SHOULD BE IN NEUTRAL POSITION
HEAD MAY BE TURNED TO THE SIDE NOT
EXCEEDING THE PATIENTS NORMAL RANGE OF
MOTION OR FACE DOWN ON A CUSHIONED
HOLDER.
ARMS SHOULD BE AT THE SIDES IN A
COMFORTABLE POSITION WITH THE ELBOW
FLEXED (AVOIDING EXCESSIVE ABDUCTION AT THE
SHOULDER)
CHEST SHOULD REST ON PARALLEL ROLLS (FOAMS)
OR SPECIAL SUPPORTS (FRAME) TO FACILITATE
VENTILATION
CHECK ORAL ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE, OTHER
ATTACHMENTS
CHECK BREATH SOUNDS BILATERALLY

POSITIONING

ORGAN/SYSTEM COMPLICATION COMMENTS
AIRWAY ETT
KINKING/DISLODGEMENT
VIGILANCE,
REINFORCED ETT
NECK CERVICAL ROTATION-
COMPROMISED BLD TO
BRAIN
PROPER
POSITIONING
EYES CORNEAL ABRASION, POVL EYES TAPED SHUT.
AVOID EYE
COMPRESSION,
HYPOTENSN
ABDOMEN COMPRESSION-
HYPOVENTILATION, BLD
LOSS
USE SOFT
SUPPORTS
UPPER LIMBS U NERVE COMPRESSION
LOWER LIMBS DVT, FOOT DROP
PRESSURE SORE FOREHEAD, NOSE, EAR
DETACHED
MONITORS

POSITIONING
SITTING POSITION : GOOD DRAINAGE,
CLEAR FIELD BUT RISK OFAIR EMBOLISM

MONITORING
STANDARD
VITALS, ECG, SpO2, CAPNOMETRY, BLOOD
LOSS, URINE OUTPUT
SPECIFIC
SSEP
MEP
EMG
WAKE-UP TEST
MULTIMODAL

MAINTENANCE
MAINTAIN A STABLE ANESTHETIC DEPTH
POSITIONING OF PATIENT, CHECK AIRWAYS
AVOID SUDDEN CHANGES IN ANESTHETIC
DEPTH OR BP
MAINTAIN A CONSTANT DEPTH OF NMB
MAINTENANCE OPTIONS
0.5 MAC ISOFLURANE / HALOTHANE
CONTINUOUS INFUSION OF PROPOFOL
CONTINUOUS REMIFENTANYL OR BOLUS OPIOIDS
DESFLURANE-REMIFENTANYL
CONTROLLED HYPOTENSIVE ANAESTHESIA

TRANSFUSION MANAGEMENT
SIGNIFICANT BLOOD LOSS MAY OCCUR
EBL IN AP DEFORMITY CORRECTION IS 3 –
5L
TECHNIQUES TO REDUCE NEED FOR
HOMOLOGOUS BLOOD TRANSFUSION
PREOPERATIVE AUTOLOGOUS DONATION
INTRAOPERATIVE BLOOD SALVAGE
HYPOTENSIVE ANAESTHESIA
ANTIFIBRINOLYTIC THERAPY

EMERGENCE AND EXTUBATION
PATIENT MADE SUPINE
THOROUGH ENDOTRACHEAL AND ORAL
SUCTION
OXYGENATED WITH 100% OXYGEN
REVERSAL AGENTS – IV NEOSTIGMINE +
ATROPINE
LEAVE ETT INSITU TILL PT IS
FULLY AWAKE
OBEYS COMMANDS
ABLE TO PROTECT HIS AIRWAY
SOME MAY REQUIRE ICU CARE POST OP

POSTOPERATIVE CARE
MOST SPINE SURGERY IS PAINFUL
INTRAOP, INSTILL LA + OPIOIDS INTO
EPIDURAL SPACE BEFORE CLOSURE
POST OP PCA + ORAL/RECTAL ANALGESICS
ARE BENEFICIAL

POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS
EARLY
HYPOVOLAEMIA
NEUROLOGIC DEFICIT
DURAL TEAR WITH CSF LEAKAGE
ATELECTASIS
PARALYTIC ILEUS
URINE RETENTION
DVT
LATE
INFECTION
DEHISCENCE
SPINAL INSTABILITY
IMPLANT FAILURE
EPIDURAL FIBROSIS

CONCLUSION
PATIENT UNDERGOING SPINE SURGERY
PRESENT DIVERSE CHALLENGE TO THE
ANESTHETIST.
OPTIMAL MANAGEMENT DEPENDS ON THE
ANESTHESIOLOGIST UNDERSTANDING
THE PATHOLOGIC PROCESS AND THE
RISKS AND DEMANDS OF THE OPERATIVE
PROCEDURE.

THANK YOU

REFERENCES
URBAN, M K. ANAESTHESIA FOR ORTHOPAEDIC
SURGERY IN MILLER’S ANAESTHESIA (7
TH
ED)
(CH. 70). ELSEVIER
www.theiaforum.org
Regan JJ, Yuan H, McAfee PC: Laparoscopic fusion of
the lumbar Spine: minimally invasive spine surgery.
A prospective multicentre study evaluating open and
laparoscopic lumbar fusion. Spine 24:402-411, 1999.
Chiu JC, Clifford TJ, Green span M, Richley
RC,Lohman G,Sison RB : Percutaneous
microdecompressive endoscopic cervical discectomy
with laser thermodiskoplasty Mt Sinai J Med 67: 278-
282,2000.
Rosenthal D, Dickman CA: Thoracoscopic
microsurgical excision of herniated thoracic discs J
Neurosurg 89: 224-235, 2000.

REFERENCES
Zeidman, S., Ducker, T. & Raycroft, J.. Trends and
complications in cervical spine surgery: 1989-1993.
Journal of Spinal Disorders, 10(6), 523-526, 1997.
McNeill, T, & Andersson, G. (1997). Complications of
degenerative lumbar spine surgery. In Bridwell, K. &
DeWald, R. (Eds), The textbook of spinal surgery.
(2nd Ed.) (pp 1669-1678) Philadelphia: Lippincott-
Raven Publishers.
Shu-Hong Chang, Neil R. Miller. The Incidence of
Vision Loss due to Perioperative Ischemic Optic
Neuropathy Associated With Spine Surgery: The
Johns Hopkins Hospital Experience. Spine. ; 30 (11):
1299-1302, 2005. ©2005 Lippincott Williams &
Wilkins.
Tags