Annotated Lecture 6 - Drug Design Optimizing Target Interactions.pptx

stouri14 126 views 93 slides Jun 07, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 93
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83
Slide 84
84
Slide 85
85
Slide 86
86
Slide 87
87
Slide 88
88
Slide 89
89
Slide 90
90
Slide 91
91
Slide 92
92
Slide 93
93

About This Presentation

This is a slide deck about drug design. This presentation was created during my pharmacology class and it was based on my Medicinal Chemistry by Graham Patrick 6th Edition. It is an adaptation and not a transcript of the textbook chapter 13.


Slide Content

DRUG DESIGN OPTIMIZING TARGET INTERACTIONS Patrick: An Introduction to Medicinal Chemistry 6e Chapter 13

DRUG DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Stages 1) Identify target disease 2) Identify drug target 3) Establish testing procedures 4) Find a lead compound 5) Structure Activity Relationships (SAR) 6) Identify a pharmacophore 7) Drug design- optimizing target interactions 8) Drug design - optimizing pharmacokinetic properties 9) Toxicological and safety tests 10) Chemical development and production 11) Patenting and regulatory affairs 12) Clinical trials

7. DRUG DESIGN - OPTIMIZING BINDING INTERACTIONS Aim - To optimize binding interactions with target To increase activity and reduce dose levels To increase selectivity and reduce side effects Strategies Vary alkyl substituents Vary aryl substituents Extension Chain extensions / contractions Ring expansions / contractions Ring variation Isosteres Simplification Rigidification Reasons

7.1 Vary Alkyl Substituents Rationale An alkyl group in the lead compound may interact with a hydrophobic region in the binding site Vary the length and/or bulk of the group to optimise interaction Van der Waals interactions Hydrophobic pocket

Rationale Varying the length and/or bulk of alkyl group may introduce selectivity between two different binding sites 7.1 Vary Alkyl Substituents Binding region for N Receptor 1 Receptor 2 Fit Fit No fit Fit Steric block Example Selectivity of adrenergic agents for b -adrenoceptors over a -adrenoceptors

7.1 Vary Alkyl Substituents Propranolol ( b -Blocker) Salbutamol ( Ventolin ) (Anti-asthmatic) Adrenaline

a - Adrenoceptor H-Bonding region H-Bonding region H-Bonding region Van der Waals bonding region Ionic bonding region

ADRENALINE a - Adrenoceptor

a - Adrenoceptor

b -Adrenoceptor ADRENALINE

SALBUTAMOL b -Adrenoceptor

a - Adrenoceptor SALBUTAMOL

a - Adrenoceptor SALBUTAMOL

7.1 Vary Alkyl Substituents Synthetic feasibility of analogues Feasible to replace alkyl substituents on heteroatoms with other alkyl substituents Difficult to modify alkyl substituents attached to the carbon skeleton of a lead compound. Total synthesis usually required to vary alkyl substituents that are attached to the carbon skeleton

7.1 Vary Alkyl Substituents Methods

7.1 Vary Alkyl Substituents Methods

7.2 Vary Aryl Substituents Vary substituents Vary substitution pattern Binding Region (H-Bond) Binding Region (for Y) para Substitution meta Substitution Weak H-Bond Strong H-Bond (increased activity)

7.2 Vary Aryl Substituents Anti-arrhythmic activity is best when the substituent is at the 7-position Vary substituents Vary substitution pattern Benzopyrans

7.2 Vary Aryl Substituents Notes Binding strength of NH 2 as HBD affected by relative position of NO 2 Stronger when NO 2 is at para position Amine N is a weak HBA due to effects shown Meta substitution: Inductive electron-withdrawing effect Para substitution: Electron-withdrawing effect due to resonance + inductive effects leading to a weaker base Vary substituents Vary substitution pattern

RECEPTOR Rationale To explore target binding site for further binding regions to achieve additional binding interactions 7.3 Extension - Extra Functional Groups Unused binding region DRUG RECEPTOR DRUG Extra functional group Binding regions Binding groups Drug Extension

Binding site Example ACE Inhibitors 7.3 Extension - Extra Functional Groups Hydrophobic pocket Vacant Hydrophobic pocket Binding site EXTENSION

Example Nerve agents and medicines 7.3 Extension - Extra Functional Groups Notes Extension - addition of quaternary nitrogen Extra ionic bonding interaction Increased selectivity for cholinergic receptor Mimics quaternary nitrogen of acetylcholine Sarin (nerve gas) Acetylcholine Ecothiopate (medicine)

Example Antagonists from agonists 7.3 Extension - Extra Functional Groups Adrenaline Histamine Propranolol ( b -Blocker) Cimetidine (Tagamet) (Anti-ulcer)

Rationale Useful if a chain is present connecting two binding groups Vary length of chain to optimize interactions 7.4 Chain Extension / Contraction RECEPTOR A B A B RECEPTOR Binding regions Binding groups A & B Weak interaction Strong interaction Chain extension

Example N - Phenethylmorphine 7.4 Chain Extension / Contraction Optimum chain length n = 2 Binding group Binding group

Rationale To improve overlap of binding groups with their binding regions 7.5 Ring Expansion / Contraction Hydrophobic regions R R R R Ring expansion Better overlap with hydrophobic interactions

Binding site Binding regions Binding site Example – Design of the ACE inhibitor cilazaprilat 7.5 Ring Expansion / Contraction Vary n to vary ring size Cilazaprilat Three interactions Increased binding Lead compound (I) Two interactions Carboxylate ion out of range

Rationale Replace aromatic/heterocyclic rings with other ring systems Often done for patent reasons 7.6 Ring Variations General structure for NSAIDS Core scaffold

Rationale 7.6 Ring Variations Example Structure I (Antifungal agent) UK-46245 Improved selectivity Ring variation Ring variation sometimes results in improved properties

Example - Nevirapine (antiviral agent) 7.6 Ring Variations Additional binding group Lead compound Nevirapine

Antagonist Example - Pronethalol ( b -blocker) 7.6 Ring Variations Agonist R = Me Adrenaline R = H Noradrenaline Pronethalol

Rationale for isosteres Replace a functional group with a group of same valency (isostere) e.g. OH replaced by SH, NH 2 , CH 3 e.g. O replaced by S, NH, CH 2 Leads to more controlled changes in steric/electronic properties May affect binding and / or stability 7.7 Isosteres and Bio-isosteres

Useful for SAR Notes Replacing OCH 2 with CH=CH, SCH 2 , CH 2 CH 2 eliminates activity Replacing OCH 2 with NHCH 2 retains activity Implies O involved in binding (HBA) 7.7 Isosteres and Bio-isosteres Propranolol ( b -blocker)

Rationale for bio- isosteres Replace a functional group with another group which retains the same biological activity Not necessarily the same valency 7.7 Isosteres and Bio-isosteres Example Antipsychotics Improved selectivity for D 3 receptor over D 2 receptor Pyrrole ring = bio- isostere for amide group Sultopride DU 122290

Rationale Lead compounds from natural sources are often complex and difficult to synthesise Simplifying the molecule makes the synthesis of analogues easier, quicker, and cheaper Simpler structures may fit the binding site easier and increase activity Simpler structures may be more selective and less toxic if excess functional groups are removed 7.8 Simplification

Methods Retain pharmacophore Remove unnecessary functional groups and rings 7.8 Simplification Remove excess functional groups

Excess functional groups Analgesic pharmacophore retained Analgesic pharmacophore Analgesic pharmacophore retained Excess ring 7.8 Simplification Example Notes Morphine, levorphanol and metazocine are all analgesics Analgesic pharmacophore is retained despite simplification Levorphanol Metazocine

Methods 7.8 Simplification Remove asymmetric centres Asymmetric centre Chiral drug Achiral drug Chiral drug Achiral drug

Methods 7.8 Simplification Notes Simplification does not mean ‘pruning groups’ off the lead compound Compounds usually made by total synthesis Simplify in stages to avoid oversimplification Pharmacophore GLIPINE

Example Important binding groups retained Unnecessary ester removed Complex ring system removed 7.8 Simplification Pharmacophore PROCAINE COCAINE

Example 7.8 Simplification Asperlicin (CCK antagonist) Possible lead for treating panic attacks Devazepide Excess rings removed Benzodiazepine Indole

Disadvantages Oversimplification may result in decreased activity and selectivity Simpler molecules have more conformations More likely to interact with more than one target binding site May result in increased side effects 7.8 Simplification

Target binding site

Target binding site

Target binding site Rotatable bonds

Target binding site Rotatable bonds

Target binding site Rotatable bonds

Different binding site leading to side effects Rotatable bonds

Oversimplification of opioids 7.8 Simplification

MORPHINE SIMPLIFICATION C C C C C C O N

LEVORPHANOL SIMPLIFICATION C C C C C C O N

LEVORPHANOL SIMPLIFICATION C C C C C C O N

METAZOCINE SIMPLIFICATION C C C C C C O N

C C C C C C O N OVER SIMPLIFICATION

C C C C C C O N OVER SIMPLIFICATION TYRAMINE

C C C C C C O N OVER SIMPLIFICATION AMPHETAMINE

Note Endogenous lead compounds are often simple and flexible Fit several targets due to different active conformations Results in side effects 7.9 Rigidification Strategy Rigidify molecule to limit conformations - conformational restraint Increases activity - more chance of desired active conformation being present Increases selectivity - less chance of undesired active conformations Disadvantage Molecule is more complex and may be more difficult to synthesise Flexible chain Single bond rotation Different conformations + +

RECEPTOR 2 - O 2 C RECEPTOR 1 O 2 C - 7.9 Rigidification Bond rotation

Methods - Introduce rings Bonds within ring systems are locked and cannot rotate freely Test rigid structures to see which ones have retained active conformation 7.9 Rigidification Rotatable bonds Flexible messenger Fixed bonds Rigid messenger

7.9 Rigidification Methods - Introduce rings Bonds within ring systems are locked and cannot rotate freely Test rigid structures to see which ones have retained active conformation

7.9 Rigidification Rigidification Rotatable bonds Methods - Introduce rings Bonds within ring systems are locked and cannot rotate freely Test rigid structures to see which ones have retained active conformation

Rotatable bond

Rotatable bond Ring formation

Ring formation

Methods - Introduce rigid functional groups 7.9 Rigidification Flexible chain

Rigid Rigid Important binding groups Rigid Example – Platelet inhibitors 7.9 Rigidification Inhibits platelet aggregation Analogues Guanidine Flexible chain Diazepine ring system

Example - Combretastatin (anticancer agent) 7.9 Rigidification More active Less active Rotatable bond Combretastatin E -Isomer Z -Isomer Combretastatin A-4

Methods - Steric Blockers 7.9 Rigidification Flexible side chain Coplanarity allowed Steric block Introduce steric block Steric clash Introduce steric block Steric clash Orthogonal rings preferred Unfavourable conformation

Steric clash 7.9 Rigidification Increase in activity Active conformation retained Methods - Steric Blockers Example – Serotonin antagonists Introduce methyl group Orthogonal rings

Steric clash 7.9 Rigidification D 3 Antagonist Steric clash when rings coplanar Preferred conformation has rings orthogonal Structure II is inactive Implies active conformation has rings coplanar Methods - Steric Blockers Note Steric blocking may disallow an active conformation instead of favouring it Example – Dopamine antagonists Free rotation

N N CH 3 N H N O 7.9 Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification

7.9 Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification N N CH N H N O 3

7.9 Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification N N CH N H N O 3

7.9 Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification Planar conformation

7.9 Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification Orthogonal conformation

CYCLISATION 7.9 Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification Rigidify molecule by introducing an extra ring linking these positions

7.9 Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification CYCLISATION

7.9 Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification CYCLISATION Locked into planar conformation

STERIC HINDRANCE 7.9 Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification Introduce methyl substituent as conformational blocker

7.9 Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification STERIC HINDRANCE Introduce methyl substituent as conformational blocker

7.9 Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification STERIC HINDRANCE

7.9 Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification STERIC HINDRANCE

7.9 Rigidification Identification of an active conformation by rigidification STERIC HINDRANCE Locked into orthogonal conformation

7.10 Structure-based drug design Procedure Crystallise the target protein with a bound ligand Acquire the structure by X-ray crystallography Download to a computer for molecular modelling studies Identify the binding site Identify the binding interactions between ligand and target Identify vacant regions for extra binding interactions Remove the ligand from the binding site in silico ‘Fit’ analogues into the binding site in silico to test binding capability Identify the most promising analogues Synthesise and test for activity Crystallise a promising analogue with the target protein and repeat the process Strategy Carry out drug design based on the interactions between the lead compound and the target binding site

Ligand in binding site

The design of novel agents based on a knowledge of the target binding site 7.11 De Novo Drug Design Procedure Crystallise the target protein with a bound ligand Acquire the structure by X-ray crystallography Download to a computer for molecular modelling studies Identify the binding site Remove the ligand in silico Identify potential binding regions in the binding site Design a lead compound to interact with the binding site Synthesise the lead compound and test it for activity Crystallise the lead compound with the target protein and identify the actual binding interactions Optimise by structure-based drug design