Aortic stenosis

517 views 169 slides Apr 10, 2020
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 169
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83
Slide 84
84
Slide 85
85
Slide 86
86
Slide 87
87
Slide 88
88
Slide 89
89
Slide 90
90
Slide 91
91
Slide 92
92
Slide 93
93
Slide 94
94
Slide 95
95
Slide 96
96
Slide 97
97
Slide 98
98
Slide 99
99
Slide 100
100
Slide 101
101
Slide 102
102
Slide 103
103
Slide 104
104
Slide 105
105
Slide 106
106
Slide 107
107
Slide 108
108
Slide 109
109
Slide 110
110
Slide 111
111
Slide 112
112
Slide 113
113
Slide 114
114
Slide 115
115
Slide 116
116
Slide 117
117
Slide 118
118
Slide 119
119
Slide 120
120
Slide 121
121
Slide 122
122
Slide 123
123
Slide 124
124
Slide 125
125
Slide 126
126
Slide 127
127
Slide 128
128
Slide 129
129
Slide 130
130
Slide 131
131
Slide 132
132
Slide 133
133
Slide 134
134
Slide 135
135
Slide 136
136
Slide 137
137
Slide 138
138
Slide 139
139
Slide 140
140
Slide 141
141
Slide 142
142
Slide 143
143
Slide 144
144
Slide 145
145
Slide 146
146
Slide 147
147
Slide 148
148
Slide 149
149
Slide 150
150
Slide 151
151
Slide 152
152
Slide 153
153
Slide 154
154
Slide 155
155
Slide 156
156
Slide 157
157
Slide 158
158
Slide 159
159
Slide 160
160
Slide 161
161
Slide 162
162
Slide 163
163
Slide 164
164
Slide 165
165
Slide 166
166
Slide 167
167
Slide 168
168
Slide 169
169

About This Presentation

Aortic stenosis by Dr WALINJOM


Slide Content

Aortic Stenosis
Dr Walinjom Joshua.
Cardiology Resident
Supervisor
Dr Boombhi / Pr Kingue

PLAN
Introduction
Epidemiology
Anatomy
Cause / Pathophysiology
Clinical Presentation
Workup
Treatment
2

Introduction
Aortic stenosis (AS) is narrowing of the
aortic valve, obstructing blood flow from
the left ventricle to the ascending aorta
during systole.
3

Epidemiology
In recent population-based
echocardiographic studies, 1% to 2% of
persons age 65 or older and 12% of persons
75 or older had calcific aortic stenosis
4

Epidemiology
The rate of progression from aortic sclerosis
to stenosis is 1.8% to 1.9% per year.
Among those older than 75, 3.4% (95%
confidence interval [CI] 1.1% to 5.7%) have
severe AS
5

Epidemiology
The rate of progression from aortic sclerosis
to stenosis is 1.8% to 1.9% per year.
Among those older than 75, 3.4% (95%
confidence interval [CI] 1.1% to 5.7%) have
severe AS
6

Anatomy
7

Anatomy
8

Anatomy
9

Anatomy
10

Anatomy
11

Anatomy
12

Anatomy
13

Causes and Pathology
Valvular AS has three principal causes:
1.congenital bicuspid valve with superimposed
calcification,
2.calcification of a normal trileafletvalve, and
3.rheumatic disease
14

Causes and Pathology
Valvular AS has three principal causes:
1.congenital bicuspid valve with superimposed
calcification,
2.calcification of a normal trileafletvalve, and
3.rheumatic disease
15

Causes and Pathology
In addition,
congenital valve stenosis manifesting in
infancy or childhood
Rarely, AS is caused by severe
atherosclerosis of the aorta and aortic valve
this form of AS occurs most frequently in
patients with severe hypercholesterolemia and
is observed in children with homozygous type
II hyperlipoproteinemia 16

Causes and Pathology
Hypertension is a major cause of Aortic
stenosis
Hypertension has been shown to be
independently associated with degenerative
calcific aortic valve sclerosis and stenosis in
elderly population.
HTA -Wall shear stress –Aortic sclerosis –
valve calcification. 17

Causes and Pathology
Rheumatoid involvement of the valve is a
rare cause of AS and results in nodular
thickening of the valve leaflets and
involvement of the proximal portion of the
aorta.
Ochronosis(accumulation of homogentisic
acid in connective tissues -Arthrits) with
alkaptonuria is another rare cause of AS.18

Causes and Pathology
19

Causes and Pathology
Rheumatoid involvement of the valve is a
rare cause of AS and results in nodular
thickening of the valve leaflets and
involvement of the proximal portion of the
aorta.
Ochronosis(accumulation of homogentisic
acid in connective tissues -Arthrits) with
alkaptonuria is another rare cause of AS.20

Causes and Pathology
Fixed obstruction to left ventricular (LV)
outflow also may occur above the valve
(supravalvular stenosis) or below the valve
(discrete subvalvular stenosis)
21

Causes and Pathology
Congenital Aortic Valve Disease
Congenital malformations of the aortic valve
may be unicuspid, bicuspid, or tricuspid, or the
anomaly may manifest as a dome-shaped
diaphragm.
22

Causes and Pathology
Dynamic subaortic obstruction may be caused
by hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
23

Causes and Pathology
Calcific Aortic Valve Disease
Calcific (formerly “senile” or “degenerative”) aortic
valve disease affecting a congenital bicuspid or
normal trileaflet valve is now the most common cause
of AS in adults.
24

Associations in Observational and Epidemiologic Studies of
Clinical Risk Factors and CalcificAorticValve Disease (CAVD)
25

Causes and Pathology
Calcific Aortic Valve Disease
Aorticsclerosis, identified by either
echocardiography or computed tomography
(CT), is the initial stage of calcific valve disease
and, even in the absence of valve obstruction
or known cardiovascular disease, is associated
with an increased risk of myocardial infarction
(MI) and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality
26

Causes and Pathology
Calcific Aortic Valve Disease
Aorticsclerosis, identified by either
echocardiography or computed tomography
(CT), is the initial stage of calcific valve disease
and, even in the absence of valve obstruction
or known cardiovascular disease, is associated
with an increased risk of myocardial infarction
(MI) and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality
27

Causes and Pathology
Calcific Aortic Valve Disease
Although calcific AS once was considered to
represent the result of years of normal
mechanical stress on an otherwise normal
valve (“wear and tear”), it is now clear that an
active biology underlies the initiation and
progression of calcificaorticvalve disease
28

Causes and Pathology
29

Causes and Pathology
Calcific Aortic Valve Disease
Although calcific AS once was considered to
represent the result of years of normal
mechanical stress on an otherwise normal
valve (“wear and tear”), it is now clear that an
active biology underlies the initiation and
progression of calcificaorticvalve disease
30

Causes and Pathology
Calcific Aortic Valve Disease
Normal valve leaflets are comprised of the
fibrosa (facing the aorta), ventricularis (facing
the ventricle), and spongiosa (located between
the fibrosa and ventricularis)
Valve interstitial cells(VICs) are the most
predominant cell type; endothelial and smooth
muscle cells are also present
31

Causes and Pathology
Calcific Aortic Valve Disease
Through a complex interplay of molecular
events, the pliable, flexible valve becomes stiff
and immobile, characterized grossly by fibrosis
and calcification.
The process is initiated by lipid infiltration and
oxidative stress, which attract and activate
inflammatory cells and promote the elaboration
of cytokines.
32

Causes and Pathology
Calcific Aortic Valve Disease
VICs undergo osteogenic reprogramming that
promotes the mineralization of the extracellular
matrix and the progression of fibrocalcific
remodeling of the valve.
33

Causes and Pathology
Calcific Aortic Valve Disease
34

Causes and Pathology
Calcific Aortic Valve Disease
Familial clustering of calcific AS also has been
described, suggesting a possible genetic
predisposition to valve calcification
Genetic polymorphisms have been linked to the
presence of calcific AS, including those
involving the vitamin D receptor, interleukin
(IL)-10 alleles, estrogen receptor, transforming
growth factor (TGF)-ß receptor, and the
apolipoprotein E4 allele
35

Causes and Pathology
Rheumatic Aortic Stenosis
Rheumatic AS results from adhesions and
fusions of the commissures and cusps and
vascularization of the leaflets of the valve ring,
leading to retraction and stiffening of the free
borders of the cusps.
Calcific nodules develop on both surfaces, and
the orifice is reduced to a small, round or
triangular opening.
36

Causes and Pathology
Rheumatic Aortic Stenosis
37

Causes and Pathology
Rheumatic Aortic Stenosis
Rheumatic AS results from adhesions and
fusions of the commissures and cusps and
vascularization of the leaflets of the valve ring,
leading to retraction and stiffening of the free
borders of the cusps.
Calcific nodules develop on both surfaces, and
the orifice is reduced to a small, round or
triangular opening.
38

Causes and Pathology
Rheumatic Aortic Stenosis
As a consequence, the rheumatic valve often is
regurgitant as well as stenotic. Patients with
rheumatic AS invariably have rheumatic
involvement of the mitral valve.
With the decline in rheumatic fever in
developed nations, rheumatic AS is decreasing
in frequency, although it continues to be a
major problem on a worldwide basis.
39

Age < 70 years
(n=324)
Age >70 years
(n=322)
1. Bicuspid AV(50%) Degenerative(48%)
(Hypertension)
2. Rheumatic(25%) Bicuspid(27%)
3. Degenerative(18%)Rheumatic(23%)
4. Unicommissural(3%)Hypoplastic(2%)
5. Hypoplastic(2%)
6. Indeterminate(2%)
Causes

Calcific Aortic
Stenosis
Nodularcalcificmassesonaortic
sideof cusps.
No commissuralfusion.
Freeedgesofcuspsarenot
involved.
Stellate-shaped systolicorifice.

Parasternal long
axis view showing
echogenic and
immobile aortic
valve.

Parasternalshort-axis
viewshowingcalcified
aorticvalveleaflets.
Immobilityofthecusps
resultsinonlyaslitlike
aorticvalveorificein
systole

Bicuspid Aortic
valve
Fusionofthe
rightandleft
coronarycusps(80%).
Fusionoftheright
andnon-coronary
cusps(20%).

Two cusps are seen in systole with only two
commissures framing an elliptical systolic
orifice.
Diastolic images may mimic a tricuspid valve
when a raphe is present.

Parasternal long-axis echo
may Showan asymmetric
closure linesystolic doming
Diastolicprolapse of the cusps
In children, valve may beStenoticwithout extensive
calcification.

In adults, stenosis typically is due to calcific
changes, which often obscures the number of
cusps, making determination of bicuspid vs.
tricuspid valve difficult.

Rheumatic Aortic
Stenosis
Characterized by
Commissural fusion
Triangular systolic orifice
thickening & calcification
Accompanied by rheumatic mitral valve
changes.

Parasternal short axis view showing
commissural fusion, leaflet thickening and
calcification, small triangular systolic orifice

Subvalvularaortic
stenosis
Thin discrete membrane consisting of
endocardial fold and fibrous tissue.
A fibromuscular ridge.
Diffuse tunnel-like narrowing of the LVOT.
Accessory or anomalous mitral valve tissue.

Supravalvular Aortic
stenosis
Type I -Thick, fibrous ring above the aortic valve
with less mobility and has the easily identifiable
'hourglass' appearance of the aorta.

Type II -Thin, discrete fibrous membrane
located above the aortic
valve.
The membrane usually mobile and may
demonstrate doming during systole.
Type III -Diffuse narrowing.

Pathophysiology
Valve Obstruction
In adults with calcific AS, a significant burden
of leaflet disease is present before obstruction
to outflow develops.
However, once even mild obstruction is
present, hemodynamic progression occurs in
almost all patients, with the interval from mild
to severe obstruction ranging from less than 5
to more than 10 years
55

Pathophysiology
Valve Obstruction
56

Pathophysiology
Valve Obstruction
In adults with calcific AS, a significant burden
of leaflet disease is present before obstruction
to outflow develops.
However, once even mild obstruction is
present, hemodynamic progression occurs in
almost all patients, with the interval from mild
to severe obstruction ranging from less than 5
to more than 10 years
57

Pathophysiology
Valve Obstruction
Stages of ValvularAortic Stenosis(AS)
From Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, etal
58

Pathophysiology
Valve Obstruction
Stages of ValvularAortic Stenosis(AS)
From Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, etal
59

Pathophysiology
Valve Obstruction
Stages of ValvularAortic Stenosis(AS)
From Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, etal
60

Pathophysiology
Valve Obstruction
Stages of ValvularAortic Stenosis(AS)
From Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, etal
61

Pathophysiology
Valve Obstruction
Stages of ValvularAortic Stenosis(AS)
From Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, etal
62

Pathophysiology
Valve Obstruction
The degree ofstenosisassociated with
symptom onset varies among patients,
however, and no single number defines severe
or critical AS in an individual patient.
63

Pathophysiology
Hypertrophic Myocardial Remodeling
Maintenance of cardiac output in the face of an
obstructedaorticvalve imposes a chronic
increase in LV pressure
In response, the ventricle typically undergoes
hypertrophic remodeling characterized by
myocyte hypertrophy and increased wall
thickness
64

Pathophysiology
Hypertrophic Myocardial Remodeling
65

Pathophysiology
Hypertrophic Myocardial Remodeling
Based on LaPlace law, LV remodeling reduces
wall stress (afterload) and is considered one of
the important compensatory mechanisms to
maintain LV ejection performance, which is
directly affected by afterload
66

Pathophysiology
Hypertrophic Myocardial Remodeling
increased LV hypertrophic remodeling is
associated with more severe ventricular
dysfunction and heart failure (HF) symptoms,
as well as higher mortality
hypertrophic remodeling in patients with AS is
determined by several factors other than the
severity of valve obstruction, including sex,
genetics, vascular load, and metabolic
abnormalities
67

Pathophysiology
Hypertrophic Myocardial Remodeling
increased LV hypertrophic remodeling is
associated with more severe ventricular
dysfunction and heart failure (HF) symptoms,
as well as higher mortality
hypertrophic remodeling in patients with AS is
determined by several factors other than the
severity of valve obstruction, including sex,
genetics, vascular load, and metabolic
abnormalities
68

Pathophysiology
Left Ventricular Diastolic Function
Hypertrophic remodeling also impairs diastolic
myocardial relaxation and increases stiffness
Higher cardiomyocyte stiffness, increased
myocardial fibrosis, advanced-glycation end
products, and metabolic abnormalities each
contribute to increased chamber stiffness and
higher end-diastolic pressures.
69

Pathophysiology
Left Ventricular Diastolic Function
Hypertrophic remodeling also impairs diastolic
myocardial relaxation and increases stiffness
Higher cardiomyocyte stiffness, increased
myocardial fibrosis, advanced-glycation end
products, and metabolic abnormalities each
contribute to increased chamber stiffness and
higher end-diastolic pressures.
70

Pathophysiology
Left Ventricular Diastolic Function
Atrial contraction plays a particularly important
role in filling of the left ventricle in AS because
it increases LV end-diastolic pressure without
causing a concomitant elevation of mean left
atrial pressure.
71

Pathophysiology
Left Ventricular Diastolic Function
This “booster pump” function of the left atrium
prevents the pulmonary venous and capillary
pressures from rising to levels that would
produce pulmonary congestion, while
maintaining LV end-diastolic pressure at the
elevated level necessary for effective
contraction of the hypertrophied left ventricle.
72

Pathophysiology
Left Ventricular Diastolic Function
Loss of appropriately timed, vigorous atrial
contraction, as occurs in atrial fibrillation (AF)
or atrioventricular dissociation, may result in
rapid clinical deterioration in patients with
severe AS.
73

Pathophysiology
Left Ventricular Diastolic Function
After surgical relief of AS, diastolic dysfunction
may revert toward normal with regression of
hypertrophy, but some degree of long-term
diastolic dysfunction typically persists.
74

Pathophysiology
Left Ventricular SystolicFunction
Left ventricular systolic function, as measured
by the ejection fraction (EF), remains normal
until late in the disease process in most
patients with AS.
Nonetheless, more subtle systolic dysfunction
can be detected as reduced longitudinal
systolic strain before a reduction in the EF
75

Pathophysiology
Left Ventricular Systolic Function
The development and severity of systolic
dysfunction is the result ;
the severity of valve obstruction,
metabolic abnormalities,
vascular load,
inadequate hypertrophy (given the
inverse correlation between wall stress and
systolic performance),
maladaptive hypertrophy (resulting in
impaired contractility),
ischemia, and fibrosis.
76

Pathophysiology
Myocardial Fibrosis
Cardiac fibrosis is an emerging risk factor for
adverse clinical outcomes in patients with AS
As a part of the hypertrophic remodeling
process, diffuse and replacement myocardial
fibrosis (not fibrosis from prior MI) may
develop.
77

Pathophysiology
Left Ventricular SystolicFunction
Importantly, patients with severe fibrosis,
despite a normal EF, are more likely to have
worse preoperative HF symptoms and less
likely to experience improvement in symptoms
midterm after valve replacement, compared to
those with no or minimal fibrosis before valve
replacement
78

Pathophysiology
Pulmonary and Systemic Vasculature
The hypertrophied and pressure overloaded left
ventricle transmits increased pressure to the
pulmonary vasculature, which leads to
pulmonary hypertension in many patients with
AS, becoming severe in 15% to 20%.
pulmonary hypertension is associated with
increased postoperative mortality
79

Pathophysiology
Pulmonary and Systemic Vasculature
The hypertrophied and pressure overloaded left
ventricle transmits increased pressure to the
pulmonary vasculature, which leads to
pulmonary hypertension in many patients with
AS, becoming severe in 15% to 20%.
pulmonary hypertension is associated with
increased postoperative mortality
80

Pathophysiology
Myocardial Ischemia
In patients with AS, the hypertrophied left
ventricle, increased systolic pressure, and
prolongation of ejection all elevate myocardial
oxygen (O2) consumption.
81

Pathophysiology
Myocardial Ischemia
At the same time, even in the absence of
epicardial coronary disease, decreased
myocardial capillary density in the
hypertrophied ventricle, increased LV end-
diastolic pressure, and a shortened diastole all
serve to decrease the coronary perfusion
pressure gradient and myocardial blood flow.
82

Pathophysiology
Myocardial Ischemia
Together, this creates an imbalance between
myocardial O2 supply and demand, with the
ischemia most pronounced in the
sub-endocardium.
83

Pathophysiology
Myocardial Ischemia
Exercise or other states of increased O2
demand may exacerbate this imbalance and
cause angina indistinguishable from that
caused by epicardial coronary obstruction.
84

Clinical Presentation
Symptoms
The cardinal manifestations of acquired AS are
exertional dyspnea,
angina, syncope, and
ultimately HF.
85

Clinical Presentation
Symptoms
Symptoms typically begin at age 50 to 70 years
with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis and
in those older than 70 with calcific stenosis of a
trileaflet valve,
although even in this age group approximately
40% of patients with AS have a congenital
bicuspid valve
86

Clinical Presentation
Symptoms
The most common clinical presentation in
patients with a known diagnosis of AS who are
followed prospectively is a gradual decrease in
exercise tolerance, fatigue, or dyspnea on
exertion
87

Clinical Presentation
Symptoms
The mechanism of exertional dyspnea may be
LV diastolic dysfunction, with an excessive rise
in end-diastolic pressure leading to pulmonary
congestion
Alternatively, exertional symptoms may be a
result of the limited ability to increase cardiac
output with exercise.
88

Clinical Presentation
Symptoms
More severe exertional dyspnea, with
orthopnea,
paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, and
pulmonary edema,
reflects various degrees of pulmonary venous
hypertension
intervention typically is undertaken before this
disease stage.
89

Clinical Presentation
Symptoms
Angina is a frequent symptom of patients with
severe AS and usually resembles the angina
observed in patients with coronary artery
disease (CAD) in that it is usually precipitated
by exertion and relieved by rest
90

Clinical Presentation
Symptoms
In patients with CAD, angina is caused by a
combination of epicardial coronary artery
obstruction and the O
2imbalance characteristic
of AS.
Very rarely, angina results from calcific emboli
to the coronary vascular bed.
91

Clinical Presentation
Symptoms
Syncopemost often is caused by the reduced
cerebral perfusion that occurs during exertion
when arterial pressure declines because of
systemic vasodilation and an inadequate
increase in cardiac output related to
valvularstenosis.
92

Clinical Presentation
Symptoms
Syncopemost often is caused by the reduced
cerebral perfusion that occurs during exertion
when arterial pressure declines because of
systemic vasodilation and an inadequate
increase in cardiac output related to
valvularstenosis.
93

Clinical Presentation
Symptoms
Syncopealso has been attributed to
malfunction of the baroreceptor mechanism in
severe AS, as well as to a vasodepressor
response to a greatly elevated LV systolic
pressure during exercise
Exertional hypotension also may be manifested
as “graying-out spells” or dizziness on effort
94

Clinical Presentation
Symptoms
Syncopeat rest may be caused by transient
AF with loss of the atrial contribution to LV
filling, which causes a precipitous decline in
cardiac output, or to transient atrioventricular
(AV) block caused by extension of the
calcification of the valve into the conduction
system.
95

Clinical Presentation
Symptoms
Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding may develop in
patients with severe AS, often associated with
angiodysplasia (most frequently of the right
colon) or other vascular malformations
This complication arises from shear stress–
induced platelet aggregation with a reduction
in high-molecular-weight multimers of von
Willebrand factor and increases in proteolytic
subunit fragments
96

Clinical Presentation
Symptoms
Infective endocarditis has been documented
in patients withaorticvalve disease,
particularly in younger patients with a
bicuspid valve.
Cerebral emboli resulting in stroke or
transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) may be
caused by microthrombi on thickened
bicuspid valves.
97

Clinical Presentation
Symptoms
Calcific AS rarely may cause embolization of
calcium to various organs, including the
heart, kidneys, and brain.
98

Clinical Presentation
Physical Examination
The key features of the physical examination in
patients with AS are
palpation of the carotid upstroke,
evaluation of the systolic murmur,
assessment of splitting of the second heart
sound (S2),
signs of HF
99

Clinical Presentation
Physical Examination
The carotid upstroke directly reflects the
arterial pressure waveform. The expected finding
with severe AS is a
slow-rising, late-peaking, low-amplitude carotid
pulse, theparvusand tarduscarotid impulse.
When present, this finding is specific for severe
AS.
100

Clinical Presentation
Physical Examination
Also with severe AS, radiation of the murmur to
the carotid arteries may result in a palpablethrill
or carotid shudder.
101

Clinical Presentation
Physical Examination
Auscultation
The ejection systolic murmur of AS typically is
late-peaking and heard best at the base of the
heart, with radiation to the carotids.
Cessation of the murmur before A
2is helpful in
differentiation from a pansystolic mitral murmur.
102

Clinical Presentation
Physical Examination
Auscultation
In patients with calcifiedaorticvalves, the
systolic murmur is loudest at the base of the
heart,
but high-frequency components may radiate
to the apex—the so-calledGallavardin
phenomenon,in which the murmur may be so
prominent that it is mistaken for the murmur of
mitral regurgitation (MR)
103

Clinical Presentation
Physical Examination
Auscultation
In general, a louder and later-peaking murmur
indicates more severestenosis.
However, although a systolic murmur of grade 3
intensity or greater is relatively specific for severe
AS, this finding is insensitive, and many patients
with severe AS have only a grade 2 murmur
104

Clinical Presentation
Physical Examination
Auscultation
When the left ventricle fails and stroke volume
falls, the systolic murmur of AS becomes softer;
rarely, it disappears altogether.
105

Clinical Presentation
Physical Examination
Auscultation
With severe AS, S
2may be single because
calcification and immobility of theaorticvalve
make A
2inaudible, (2) closure of the pulmonic
valve (P
2) is buried in the
prolongedaorticejection murmur, or (3)
prolongation of LV systole makes A
2coincide with
P
2.
-Paradoxical splitting is also seen
106

Clinical Presentation
Dynamic Auscultation
Auscultation
The intensity of the systolic murmur varies from
beat to beat when the duration of diastolic filling
varies, as in AF or after a premature contraction.
This characteristic is helpful in differentiating AS
from MR, in which the murmur usually is
unaffected.
107

Clinical Presentation
Dynamic Auscultation
Auscultation
The murmur of valvular AS is augmented by
squatting, which increases stroke volume. It is
reduced in intensity during the strain of the
Valsalva maneuver and on standing, both of
which reduce transvalvular flow.
108

Diagnostic Testing
109

Diagnostic Testing
Echocardiography.
110

Echocardiography.
1. valve calcification.
111

Echocardiography.
2. LVOT diameter
112

Echocardiography.
2. LVOT diameter
113

Echocardiography.
3. Measure ascending aorta
114

Echocardiography.
3. Measure ascending aorta
115
1= 34mm +/-0.3
2= 29mm +/-0.3
3= 30mm +/-0.3

Echocardiography.
3. Measure ascending aorta
116

Echocardiography.
3. Aortic orifice planimetry
117

Echocardiography.
3. Analyse en doppler pulse
118

Echocardiography.
3. PW doppler
119

Echocardiography.
3. CW doppler
120

Echocardiography.
3. CW doppler
121

Echocardiography.
3. contiuity equation
122

Echocardiography.
In AF
123

Echocardiography.
In AF
124

Echocardiography.
Velocity ratio
125

Echocardiography.
Aortic Valve resistance
126

Echocardiography.
TEE
127

Echocardiography.
TEE
128

Echocardiography.
Stress Echo
129

Echocardiography.
Dilation of ascending aorta , LA
130

Echocardiography.
Dilation of ascending aorta , LA
131

Echocardiography.
Severity of AS
132

Echocardiography.
Low gradient AS with normal EF
133

Echocardiography.
Low gradient AS with Reduced EF
134

Echocardiography.
Dobutamine Echo
135

Echocardiography.
Dobutamine Echo
136

Exercise Stress Testing
Exercise testing may be helpful in apparently
asymptomatic patients to unmask symptoms or
demonstrate limited exercise capacity or an
abnormal BP response.
Exercise stress testing should be absolutely
avoided in symptomatic patients
137

Cardiac Computed Tomography
CT is also a routine part of the preprocedural
evaluation of patients having AVR, principally to
look for a porcelain aorta, as well as determine
appropriate valve sizing and assess aortic and
peripheral vascular anatomy when a
transcatheter approach is considered.
138

Cardiac Computed Tomography
CT is also a routine part of the preprocedural
evaluation of patients having AVR, principally to
look for a porcelain aorta, as well as determine
appropriate valve sizing and assess aortic and
peripheral vascular anatomy when a
transcatheter approach is considered.
139

Cardiac Computed Tomography
CT is useful for evaluating aortic dilation in
patients with evidence or suspicion of aortic
root disease on echocardiography or chest
radiography, particularly those with a bicuspid
valve
140

Cardiac Catheterization
Cardiac catheterization is now recommended
only when noninvasive tests are inconclusive,
when clinical and echocardiographic findings
are discrepant, and for coronary angiography
before surgical intervention
141

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
Imaging
CMR is useful for assessing LV volume,
function, and mass, especially in settings where
this information cannot be obtained readily
from echocardiography
142

Positron Emission Tomography
(PET) identifies active tissue calcification and
predicts change in aortic valve calcification on
follow-up CT 1 to 2 years later
143

Positron Emission Tomography
144

Treatment
145

Treatment
1. Medical Management
Medical therapy has not been shown to affect
disease progression in patients with AS
treatment of hypertension
Angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors
or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may
preferentially considered.
146

Treatment
Medical Management
heart failure -diuretics.
phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition -improve
pulmonary and systemic hemodynamics
147

Treatment
Surgical Management
148

Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty
In selected cases, it might be reasonable as a
bridge to definitive treatment with AVR in
unstable patients or as a palliative procedure in
patients who are not candidates for AVR.
149

AorticValve Replacement
AVR is recommended for adults with
symptomatic severe AS, even if symptoms are
mild
150

151

Surgical Aortic Valve
Replacement
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)
National Database Committee reported an
overall operative mortality rate of 3.2% in
67,292 patients undergoing isolated AVR and
5.6% in 66,074 patients undergoing AVR and
CABG
152

Transcatheter Aortic Valve
Replacement
In patients deemed high risk for surgery, TAVR
was shown to be noninferior and perhaps
superior to SAVR.
153

Indications of TAVI
154

Indications of TAVI
155

Contraindications of TAVI
156

157

Indications
for
surgery
159

Disease Course
Asymptomatic Patients
Generally, repeat imaging is performed every
6 to 12 months for severe AS,
every 1 to 2 years for moderate AS, and
every 3 to 5 years for mild AS,
unless a change in signs or symptoms prompts
repeat imaging sooner
160

Disease Course
Asymptomatic Patients
Generally, repeat imaging is performed every
6 to 12 months for severe AS,
every 1 to 2 years for moderate AS, and
every 3 to 5 years for mild AS,
unless a change in signs or symptoms prompts
repeat imaging sooner
161

Disease Course
Asymptomatic Patients
Of patients with mild valve thickening but no
obstruction to outflow (e.g., aortic sclerosis),
16% will have valve obstruction at 1 year of
follow-up, but only 2.5% will develop severe
valve obstruction at an average of 8 years
after the diagnosis of aortic sclerosis.
162

Disease Course
Asymptomatic Patients
Of patients with mild valve thickening but no
obstruction to outflow (e.g., aortic sclerosis),
16% will have valve obstruction at 1 year of
follow-up, but only 2.5% will develop severe
valve obstruction at an average of 8 years
after the diagnosis of aortic sclerosis.
163

Disease Course
Asymptomatic Patients
Survival free of symptoms is 84% at 2 years
when aortic velocity is less than 3m/sec,
compared with only 21% when velocity is
greater than 4m/sec
164

Disease Course
Asymptomatic Patients
exercise testing and serum B-type natriuretic
peptide (BNP) levels have been evaluated as
measures of disease progression and predictors
of symptom onset.
165

Disease Course
Symptomatic Patients
Once even mild symptoms are present, survival
is poor unless outflow obstruction is relieved.
average survival without AVR is only 1 to
3 years after symptom onset
166

Disease Course
Symptomatic Patients
Among symptomatic patients with severe AS,
the outlook is poorest when the left ventricle
has failed and the cardiac output and
transvalvular gradient are both low.
The risk of sudden death is high with
symptomatic severe AS, so these patients
should be promptly referred for AVR.
167

Disease Course
Symptomatic Patients
Among symptomatic patients with severe AS,
the outlook is poorest when the left ventricle
has failed and the cardiac output and
transvalvular gradient are both low.
The risk of sudden death is high with
symptomatic severe AS, so these patients
should be promptly referred for AVR.
168

169
Tags