Aquaculture Growth Potential in the Philippines.pdf

Aquaculture growth potential in
the Philippines
WAPI factsheet to facilitate evidence-based policy-
making and sector management in aquaculture
March 2020

Preparation of this factsheet
•This factsheet provides data and information to facilitate the assessment of aquaculture growth potential in the
Philippines.This factsheet relies on official data and statistics readily available to the public. Some important dimensions
such as aquaculture’s contribution to GDP and employment are not evaluated due to the lack of data.
•Analyses in the factsheet are based on official data and statistics published by FAO and other international or national
organizations. The data and statistics, which were the most updated at the time when the factsheet was prepared, may
differ from data and statistics used in other WAPI factsheets because of different data sources or different versions of the
same datasets. They may not be consistent with data and statistics from other sources.
•The term “country” used in this factsheet includes non-sovereign territory. The designations employed and the
presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of
the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any
country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
•Unless noted otherwise, country grouping in this factsheet follows the United Nations M49 standard; under which the
Philippines belongs to South-eastern Asia.
•The preparation of the factsheet has benefited from tables and charts generated by various World Aquaculture
Performance Indicator (WAPI) modules. Most of these data analysis tools are for FAO internal use, yet some of them are
available for test use. Visit the WAPI webpage for more information about WAPI information and knowledge products.
•The factsheet was prepared by Junning Cai, Giulia Galli and Xiaowei Zhou at the FAO Headquarter (Rome) and benefited
from the support from the FAO Philippines (particularly Tamara PalisDuran) and the comments and suggestions
provided by multiple government agencies in the Philippines, including the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquaculture (special
thanks to Eduardo B. Gongona), the Fisheries Statistics Division (special thanks to ReineldaP. Adriano and Jordan John
Arnaez) and the National Economic and Development Authority (special thanks to Ernesto M. Pernia).
•The validity and relevance of the results depend on the quality (in terms of timeliness and accuracy) of the underlying
data and statistics used in the analyses –see some remarks on FAO aquaculture statistics in Slide 3. Errors could also
occur in the analyses despite our efforts to minimize them. Please let us know if you have any concern.
•Contact: Junning Cai (FAO Aquaculture Officer); [email protected]; [email protected].
2

Remarks on Philippines aquaculture statistical data
•The national aquaculture statistics system has been well in place for decades in the country, and the Philippines is among
the 25 countries/territories in Asiathat reported aquaculture production data to FAO in all the five years between 2013
and 2017. With the continuous technical backstopping support from the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources
(BFAR) at both national and sub-national levels, the aquaculture statistics system has been institutionally consolidated
under the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA).
•To further improve the national data system, a few issues need to be addressed.
•While common names are very helpful for data collection and compilation, a national standard list of produced
species with cross reference to the internationally established ASFIS listneed to be developed.
•The production data of some produced species are collected in aggregation, such as the mixture of groupers with
seabass, the mixture of native catfish with exotic/introduced catfish species and the mixture of Anguilla eels with
Asian swamp eel. To better reflect the sectoral development, there is a need to disaggregate them into smaller species
groups or, if possible, individual species.
•The coverage of national aquaculture statistics scheme is in need of expansion from grow-out production and culture
area (ha) and facilities to include seed production and destined uses (not only for grow-out production in aquaculture
facilities/site, but also in culture-based fisheries production).
•Some significant progress has been achieved in the development of indigenous or local species (such as loach in Ifgao
region), contributing to the livelihood development while conserving local tradition and environment, especially in
some remote areas or communities. Such indigenous/local species should be covered in the compilation of
aquaculture data/information.
•The Philippines is prone to some regularly occurring natural disasters like typhoon. Massive fish kills also occur,
especially in several deep volcanic lakes with large-scale cage culture. It would be desirable for the fisheries and
aquaculture statistics system to monitor the damages and losses caused by natural disasters and other types of
calamity.
•For further information and assistance, contact: Xiaowei Zhou (FAO Fishery Statistician); [email protected]
3

Species grouping
In this factsheet, “fish” is used as a general term for convenience. When it is necessary to
define the scope of a species group for a specific quantitative measure, the following
definitions are used:
•Aquatic products = Fish & seafood + Miscellaneous aquatic animal products + Aquatic
plants
•Fish & seafood = Finfish + Shellfish + Miscellaneous aquatic animals.
•Finfish = Marine fishes + Diadromous fishes + Freshwater fishes
•Shellfish = Crustaceans + Molluscs
•Molluscs = Shell molluscs (i.e. molluscs excluding cephalopods) + Cephalopods
4

Highlights (I)
•Geo-location, natural resources, population and income
According to the UN Geoscheme (M49 standard), the Philippines is a country in South-eastern Asia. In
2017, it was the 7
th
largest aquaculture country (in terms of production tonnage) in the world. In 2018,
it was the 13
th
country with the largest population (107 million; 1.4 percent of the world total). The
country’s population is expected to increase to 124 million in 2030 with more than half of the population
living in the urban areas. In 2018, Philippines’ per capita GDP (USD 3 103) was around 30 percent of
the world average. Philippines’ per capita measures of land area, inland water surface area, and
renewable freshwater resources was lower than the world average, yet its per capita measure of coastline
length was higher than the world average.
•Food security, nutrition and health
Philippines’ per capita total (i.e. animal and vegetal) protein intake (59.9 g/day) in 2013 was lower than
the world average (81.2 g/day). In the mid-2010s, the Philippines had higher prevalence of
undernourishment and higher prevalence of severe food insecurity compared to the world, Asia and
South-eastern Asia averages. Philippines’ 69.2 years of life expectancy at birth was lower than the world,
Asia and South-eastern Asia averages, and the life expectancy of its male population (65.9 years) is
lower than that of its female population (72.8 years).
•Contribution of fish to food and nutrition
The share of fish in Philippines’ animal protein intake declined from 48.2 percent in 1993 to 37.5
percent in 2013, which was still more than twice as high as the world average. In 2013, 91.7 percent of
Philippines’ food fish supply came from domestic production, and 86.6 percent of its food fish utilization
went to domestic consumption. The Philippines has been a net food fish exporting country (in terms of
live weight equivalent) during 1993–2013.
5

Highlights (II)
•Domestic fish market (fish consumption)
Total fish consumption in the Philippines increased between 1993 and 2009 (driven by both population
growth and an increase in per capita fish consumption) then declined between 2009 and 2013 (due to
declined per capita fish consumption). Philippines’ 30.1 kg per capita fish consumption in 2013, which
was higher than the world average (19.9 kg) yet lower than the South-eastern Asia average (35.5 kg),
comprised 90 percent of finfish and 10 percent of shellfish. The species composition was similar to
South-eastern Asia yet less balanced than the world pattern.
•Fish trade
Philippines’ fish export exceeded fish import by nearly USD 300 million in 2017, and its fish export price
was higher than its fish import price. In 2017, fish commodities accounted for 1.56 percent of
Philippines’ total export value and 0.58 percent of its total import value.
•Fish export
The 3.97 percent annual growth in Philippines’ fish export value between 2000 and 2017 was lower than the
South-eastern Asia average. The country’s fish export in 2017 (USD 884 million) was composed primarily of 65.9
percent of finfish and 31.9 percent of shellfish, including 46.33 percent of tunas/bonitos/billfishes, 15.84
percent of marine crabs and 13.48 percent of marine fishes not identified.
•Fish import
The 10.24 percent annual growth in Philippines’ fish import value between 2000 and 2017 was higher than the
South-eastern Asia average. The country’s fish import in 2017 (USD 585 million) was composed of 86.4 percent
of finfish (75.2 percent of marine fishes, 5.6 percent of freshwater fishes and 5.6 percent of diadromous fishes)
and 12.8 percent of shellfish (4.7 percent of crustaceans and 8.1 percent of molluscs). The top 3 imported fish
commodities of the Philippines in 2017 were frozen skipjack tuna (23.3 percent), frozen mackerels nei (22.9
percent) and frozen yellowfin tuna nei (14.3 percent).
6

Highlights (III)
•Total fishery production
Philippines’ total fishery production increased from 238 876 tonnes in 1950 to 5 050 190 tonnes in
2010 with aquaculture growth being the primary driving force since the 1990s; the production declined
to 4 127 777 tonnes in 2017 due primarily to the decline in capture fisheries.
•Capture fisheries production
Philippines’ capture fisheries production declined from 1 920 492 tonnes in 2000 to 1 889 990 tonnes in
2017 (the 4th largest in South-eastern Asia). The country’s capture fisheries was conducted primarily in
marine areas, whereas inland fisheries accounted for only 8.6 of its capture fisheries production in
2017. Marine fishes accounted for 84.9 percent of the country’s capture fisheries production in 2017,
including primarily miscellaneous pelagic fishes (27 percent), herrings/sardines/anchovies (20 percent),
tunas/bonitos/billfishes (20 percent) and miscellaneous coastal fishes (15 percent).
•Aquaculture production
Philippines’ aquaculture production doubled from 1 100 902 tonnes in 2000 to 2 237 787 tonnes in
2017 (the 3
rd
largest in South-eastern Asia and the 7
th
largest in the world); the 4.26 percent annual
growth rate during 2000–2017 was lower than that of South-eastern Asia. The country’s aquaculture
share in total fishery production increased from 36.4 percent in 2000 to 54.2 percent in 2017. Inland
and marine/coastal aquaculture accounted for, respectively, 14.1 percent and 85.9 percent of its
aquaculture production tonnage in 2017, which comprised primarily aquatic plants (63.2 percent),
diadromous fishes (18.4 percent), freshwater fishes (12.9 percent) and crustaceans (3.6 percent).
Milkfish, giant tiger prawn and Nile tilapia were its top 3 aquaculture species by value, accounting for,
respectively, 37 percent, 21 percent and 13 percent of Philippines’ aquaculture production value in
2017.
7

Highlights (IV)
•Outlook
Following its recent trend, aquaculture growth in the Philippines would be insufficient to meet the fish
demand of its growing population from 2017 to 2030 with a demand-supply gap of around half a million
tonnes. The gap would be more than 1 million tonnes if the Philippines would like to increase its per
capita fish consumption to the South-eastern Asia average. As opposed to its 0.79 percent annual
aquaculture growth during 2012-2017, aquaculture in the Philippines would need to grow 7.3 percent
during 2017–2030 in order to generate enough fish supply to satisfy the fish demand growth driven by
both population growth and an increase in its per capita fish demand to the South-eastern Asia average.
Philippines’ share in world aquaculture production 2017 was greater than its share in world land area,
world renewal water resources and world population. Its share in world inland aquaculture production
in 2017 was greater than its share in world inland water surface area, yet its share in world
marine/coastal aquaculture production in 2017 was less than its share in world coastline length.
8

Geo-location, natural resources,
population and income
9

Philippines (2017): ASouth-eastern Asian country ranked #7 in world aquaculture.
10
Country/area
Aquaculture production (2017)
Tonnes Share of world total (%)
World 111 946 623 100
1. China 64 358 481 57.49
2. Indonesia 15 896 100 14.20
3. India 6 182 000 5.52
4. Viet Nam 3 831 241 3.42
5. Bangladesh 2 333 352 2.08
6. Republic of Korea 2 306 280 2.06
7. Philippines 2 237 787 2.00
8. Egypt 1 451 841 1.30
9. Norway 1 308 634 1.17
10. Chile 1 219 747 1.09
Data sources: FAO Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through FishStatJ (March 2019).

Philippines (2018): Apopulated, lower-middle-income country accounting for 1.4 percent of world
population (the 2nd largest in South-eastern Asia) and 27.65 percent of world average GDP per capita.
11
Population and income status
Country/area
Population (2018)
1
GDP per capita (2018)
2
Million
Share of world total
(%)
Current USD
Ratio to world average
(%)
Brunei Darussalam 0.4 0.01 31 634 281.90
Cambodia 16.2 0.21 1 504 13.40
Indonesia 267.7 3.51 3 820 34.04
Lao People's Democratic Republic 7.1 0.09 2 566 22.87
Malaysia 31.5 0.41 11 373 101.35
Myanmar 53.7 0.70 1 279 11.39
Philippines 106.7 1.40 3 103 27.65
Singapore 5.8 0.08 63 246 563.60
Thailand 69.4 0.91 7 273 64.81
Timor-Leste 1.3 0.02 2 169 19.33
Viet Nam 95.5 1.25 2 525 22.50
South-eastern Asia 655 8.59 4 502 40.11
Developing regions 6 364 83.39 5 372 47.87
World 7 631 100.00 11 222 100.00
Data sources: 1. UN World Population Prospects (2019 Revision). 2. Total GDP from IMF World Economic Outlook Database (October, 2019) divided by population from UN World
Population Prospects (2019 Revision). N.a. = not available. Country grouping based on the UN Geoscheme (the M49 standard). https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/

Philippines (mid-2010): 0.22 percent of world land area (including inland water surface area);
0.23 percent of world inland water surface area; 4.5 percent of world coastline length; 0.88
percent of world total renewable water resources.
12
Data sources: 1. FAO. 2016. AQUASTAT Main Database –Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Website accessed on 16 May 2019. 2. FAOSTAT Land Cover database (updated June
2019; CCI_LC ). 3. The World Factbook, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), United States of America. Web accessed on 20 May 2019.Coastline length of world equal to the sum of coastline length of 265
countries and territories listed in the data source.
Notes: “Total country area” for 2013-2017; “Surface area of inland water bodies” for 2015; “Coastline length” for 2019; “Total renewable water resources” for 2013-2017.
Land and water resources
Country/area
Total country area
(excluding coastal waters)
1
Surface area of
inland waterbodies
2
Coastline length
3
Total renewable
water resources
1
km
2
Share of world
total (%)
km
2
Share of world
total (%)
km
Share of world
total (%)
Billion m
3
/year
Share of world
total (%)
Brunei Darussalam 5 770 0.00 82 0.00 161 0.02 8.5 0.02
Cambodia 181 040 0.13 4 078 0.12 443 0.06 476 0.87
Indonesia 1 913 580 1.43 38 599 1.12 54 716 6.79 2 019 3.69
Lao People's Democratic
Republic
236 800 0.18 2 216 0.07 0 - 334 0.61
Malaysia 330 340 0.25 5 061 0.15 4 675 0.58 580 1.06
Myanmar 676 590 0.50 10 044 0.29 1 930 0.24 1 168 2.13
Philippines 300 000 0.22 8 013 0.23 36 289 4.50 479 0.88
Singapore 719 0.00 48 0.00 193 0.02 0.6 0.001
Thailand 513 120 0.38 8 584 0.25 3 219 0.40 439 0.80
Timor-Leste 14 870 0.01 100 0.00 706 0.09 8.2 0.02
Viet Nam 331 230 0.25 7 307 0.21 3 444 0.43 884 1.62
South-eastern Asia 4 504 059 3.36 84 131 2.45 n.a. n.a. 6 396 11.68
Asia 31 978 947 23.85 760 126 22.13 n.a. n.a. 14 442 26.38
Developing regions 82 607 378 61.60 1 371 378 39.93 n.a. n.a. 39 730 72.58
World 134 108 230 100.00 3 434 349 100.00 805 942 100.00 54 737 100.00

13
1 428
1 353
327
268
212
209
196
161
146
127
126
109
107
98
96
1 464
1 504
350
299
263
224
263
179
143
121
141
145
124
121
104
China
India
United States of America
Indonesia
Pakistan
Brazil
Nigeria
Bangladesh
Russian Federation
Japan
Mexico
Ethiopia
Philippines
Egypt
Viet Nam
Million
Top 15 most populated countries, 2018
20182030
Philippines (2018):
•The 2
nd
most populated
country in South-eastern
Asia.
•The 13
th
most populated
country in the world.
Data source: United Nations World Population Prospects (2019 revision).
Note: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Population Module; see Template 1 in the WAPI prototype for examples (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).

Philippines from
2015 to 2030:
22 million more
people.
Urban ratio increased
from 46 percent to 51
percent.
Slightly increasing
female ratio towards
50 percent.
14
49.68 49.78 49.89 49.99
46.28 47.41 48.96 50.92
102
110
117
124
2015 2020 2025 2030
Philippines
Percentage of females (%) Percentage of urban population (%)Total population (million)
Data source: United Nations World Population Prospects (2019 revision) (https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Download/Standard/Population). United Nations World Urbanization Prospects
(2018 revision) (https://population.un.org/wup).
Note: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Population Module; see Template 1 in the WAPI prototype for examples (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).

Food security, nutrition
and health
15

Data source: FAOSTAT –Suite of Food Security Indicators (updated on 11 October, 2019) (www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FS).
Note: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Food Security Module; see Template 2 in the WAPI prototype for examples (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Philippines (mid-2010s):
12.9 percent of the population
(13.3 million people) subject to
severe food insecurity.
13.5 percent (13.9 million
people) undernourished.
6 percent of adults obese.
15.7 percent of reproductive-
age women anaemic.
16
Philippines, 12.9
Philippines, 13.5
Philippines, 6.0
Philippines, 15.7
South-eastern Asia, 4.6
South-eastern Asia, 9.6
South-eastern Asia, 6.7
South-eastern Asia, 28.3
Asia, 6.2
Asia, 11.5
Asia, 7.3
Asia, 36.6
World, 8.2
World, 10.7
World, 13.2
World, 32.8
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Prevalence of severe food
insecurity in the total
population (%; 2015-2017)
Prevalence of
undernourishment (%; 2015-
2017)
Prevalence of obesity in the
adult population (18 years
and older; %; 2016)
Prevalence of anaemia
among women of
reproductive age (15-49
years; %; 2016)
Food security and nutrition status in Philippines

Philippines (1993 versus
2013):
Per capita total protein intake
increased from 50.3 g/day to
59.9 g/day.
The share of animal protein in
total protein increased from
40.1 percent to 41.5 percent.
Yet the share of fish and seafood
declined from 19.3 percent to
15.5 percent.
17
Data source: FAOSTAT Food Balance Sheets (January 2018; www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBSH).
Note: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Consumption Module (WAPI-FISHCSP); see Figure 1.5 in WAPI-FISHCSP v.2018.1 for an example
(www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Vegetal
products
58.5%
Animal
products
41.5%
Cereals
46.5%
Pulses & oilcrops
2.2%
Vegetables
& fruits
7.0%
Other vegetal
products
2.7%
Meat
19.0%
Milk & eggs
4.6%
Fish & seafood
15.5%
Other animal products
2.3%
Philippines (2013)
Total protein
intake (2013):
59.9
g/capita/day
Vegetal
products
59.9%
Animal
products
40.1%
Cereals
45.3%
Pulses & oilcrops
3.0%
Vegetables
& fruits
8.3%Other vegetal
products
3.3%
Meat
14.1%
Milk & eggs
5.3%
Fish & seafood
19.3%
Other animal products
1.4%
Philippines (1993)
Total protein
intake (1993):
50.3
g/capita/day

Philippines’ total protein intake in 2013 was 59.9 g/day per capita, lower than the South-eastern Asia average
(67.5 g) and only 74percent of the world average (81.2 g); its animal protein was 41.5 percent of total protein,
higher than the world average (39.6 percent) and the South-eastern Asian average (36.1 percent); its fish
protein was 15.5 percent of total protein, slightly higher than the South-eastern Asian average (14.8 percent)
and much higher than the world average (6.5 percent).
18
Data source: FAOSTAT Food Balance Sheets (January 2018; www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBSH).
Note: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Consumption Module (WAPI-FISHCSP); see Figure 1.5 in WAPI-FISHCSP v.2018.1 for an example (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Vegetal
products
60.4%
Animal
products
39.6%
Cereals
39.1%
Pulses &
oilcrops
8.7%
Vegetables
& fruits
7.4%
Other vegetal
products
5.1%
Meat
17.9%
Milk & eggs
13.6%
Fish &
seafood
6.5%
Other animal products
1.6%
World (2013)
Total protein
intake (2013):
81.2
g/capita/day
Vegetal
products
58.5%
Animal
products
41.5%
Cereals
46.5%
Pulses & oilcrops
2.2%
Vegetables
& fruits
7.0%Other vegetal
products
2.7%
Meat
19.0%
Milk & eggs
4.6%
Fish & seafood
15.5%
Other animal products
2.3%
Philippines (2013)
Total protein
intake (2013):
59.9
g/capita/dayVegetal
products
63.9%
Animal
products
36.1%
Cereals
47.2%
Pulses &
oilcrops
7.8%
Vegetables
& fruits
5.5%
Other vegetal
products
3.4%
Meat
14.2%
Milk & eggs
5.4%
Fish & seafood
14.8%
Other animal products
1.8%
South-eastern Asia (2013)
Total protein
intake (2013):
67.5
g/capita/day

Philippines (2017):
Life expectancy at birth was
69.2 years, lower than the
South-eastern Asia average,
the Asia average, the
developing regions average,
and the world average.
Female population had a
higher life expectancy than
male population.
19
Data source: World Bank World Development Indicators (WDI), downloaded on 8 May 2019 (http://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/#archives); United Nations World Population Prospects
(2019 revision; https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Download/Standard/Population) used to calculate life expectancy at the regional level.
Note: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Human Health Module (including calculation of life expectancy at the regional/global level); see Template 3 in the WAPI prototype for examples
(www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Philippines, 69.2
Philippines, 72.8
Philippines, 65.9
South-eastern Asia, 71.2
South-eastern Asia, 74.2
South-eastern Asia, 68.4
Asia, 72.7
Asia, 74.7
Asia, 70.9
Developing regions, 70.8
Developing regions, 72.8
Developing regions, 68.9
World, 72.2
World, 74.4
World, 70.1
Life
expectancy at
birth, total
(years, 2017)
Life
expectancy at
birth, female
(years, 2017)
Life
expectancy at
birth, male
(years, 2017)
Life expectancy in the Philippines

Contribution of fish to
food and nutrition
20

Data source: FAOSTAT Food Balance Sheets (January 2018; www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBSH).
Note: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Consumption Module (WAPI-FISHCSP); see Figure 1.5 in WAPI-FISHCSP v.2018.1 for an example (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Philippines (2013): Fish contribution to animal protein intake in 2013 (37.5 percent)
was lower than the South-eastern Asia average (41 percent) but more than twice of the
world average (16.3 percent).
21
Meat
45.9%
Milk &
eggs
11.0%
Fish &
seafood
37.5%
Others
5.6%
Bovine
meat
6.2%
Pigmeat
22.3%
Mutton & goat
meat
1.0%
Poultry
meat
16.0%
Milk
5.9%
Eggs
5.1%
Finfish
34.2%
Shellfish
3.2%
Philippines (2013)
Animal protein
intake (2013):
24.9
g/capita/day
Meat
45.3%
Milk & eggs
34.3%
Fish &
seafood
16.3%
Others
4.2%
Bovine meat
11.0%
Pigmeat
14.5%
Mutton &
goat meat
2.2%
Poultry
meat
16.1%
Other meat
1.5%
Milk
25.6%
Eggs
8.7%
Finfish
13.7%
Shellfish
2.5%
World (2013)
Animal protein
intake (2013):
32.1
g/capita/day
Meat
39.2%
Milk & eggs
14.8%
Fish &
seafood
41.0%
Others
5.0%
Bovine
meat
6.1%
Pigmeat
15.5%
Mutton & goat
meat
0.7%
Poultry meat
16.7%
Milk
7.1%Eggs
7.7%
Finfish
37.1%
Shellfish
3.8%
South-eastern Asia (2013)
Animal protein
intake (2013):
24.4
g/capita/day

Philippines (2013): Animal protein intake lower than the world average; yet fish share in
animal protein intake higher than the world average.
Data source: FAOSTAT Food Balance Sheets (January 2018; www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS).
Note: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Consumption Module (WAPI-FISHCSP); see Figure 2.5a in WAPI-FISHCSP v.2018.1 for an example
(www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Philippines
South-
eastern Asia
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 20 40 60 80 100
Fish share in animal protein
(%)
Animal protein intake in 2013 (g/capita/day)
African countries
Countries in the Americas
Asian countries
European countries
Oceania countries
Bubblesize: population
Coordinate origin: world average
Contribution of fish to animal protein in the early 2010s
Country/area
Per capita protein intake in
2013 (g/capita/day)
Fish share (%)
Fish products
Animal
products
World 5.2 32.1 16.3
Developing regions 4.8 26.0 18.4
South-eastern Asia 10.0 24.4 41.0
Brunei Darussalam 12.1 53.0 22.8
Cambodia 13.1 19.1 68.7
Indonesia 9.3 17.7 52.7
Lao People's Democratic Republic 5.9 14.6 40.4
Malaysia 17.6 45.4 38.9
Myanmar 14.3 33.7 42.4
Philippines 9.3 24.9 37.5
Singapore n.a. n.a. n.a.
Thailand 8.5 24.9 34.2
Timor-Leste 1.7 17.8 9.5
Viet Nam 8.5 31.0 27.4
22

Philippines (1993 versus
2013):
Fish contribution to animal
protein intake declined from
48.2 percent to 37.5 percent
between 1993 and 2013.
23
Data source: FAOSTAT Food Balance Sheets (January 2018; www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBSH).
Note: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Consumption Module (WAPI-FISHCSP); see Figure 1.5 in WAPI-FISHCSP v.2018.1 for an example (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Meat
45.9%
Milk &
eggs
11.0%
Fish &
seafood
37.5%
Others
5.6%
Bovine
meat
6.2%
Pigmeat
22.3%
Mutton &
goat meat
1.0%
Poultry
meat
16.0%
Other meat
0.4%
Milk
5.9%
Eggs
5.1%
Finfish
34.2%
Shellfish
3.2%
Philippines (2013)
Animal protein
intake (2013):
24.9
g/capita/day
Meat
35.2%
Milk &
eggs
13.2%
Fish &
seafood
48.2%
Others
3.4%
Bovine
meat
4.6%
Pigmeat
20.0%
Mutton &
goat meat
0.9%
Poultry
meat
9.1%
Other meat
0.5%
Milk
7.9%
Eggs
5.3%
Finfish
40.7%
Shellfish
7.5%
Philippines (1993)
Animal protein
intake (1993):
20.1
g/capita/day

Philippines’ food balance sheet
for fish & seafood, 2013:
3 146 729 tonnes domestic fish
production –75 tonnes for non-food use
(~0 percent of production) =
3 146 654 tonnes domestic food fish
production (~100 percent of the total
food and non-food production).
3 146 654 tonnes domestic food fish
production (91.7 percent of food fish
supply) + 285 575 tonnes food fish
import (8.3 percent of food fish supply) =
3 432 229 tonnes food fish supply
available for utilization.
3 432 229 tonnes food fish utilization =
460 341 tonnes food fish export (13.4
percent of food fish utilization) +
2 971 888 tonnes (food) fish
consumption (86.6 percent of food fish
utilization).
24
Data source: FAOSTAT Food Balance Sheets (January 2018; www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS).
Note: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Consumption Module (WAPI-FISHCSP); see Figure 1.5 in WAPI-FISHCSP v.2018.1 for an example (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
3 146 729
75
285 575
460 341
2 971 888
Domestic productionDomestic production
for non-food uses
Food fish importFood fish export Domestic
consumption
TONNES
FISH & SEAFOOD SUPPLY AND UTILIZATION IN PHILIPPINES (2013)
Import
8.3%
Domestic
production
91.7%
Food fish supply (2013):
3 432 229 tonnes
Food
fish
100.0%
Domestic production (2013):
3 146 729 tonnes
Export
13.4%
Consumption
86.6%
Food fish utilization (2013):
3 432 229 tonnes

Philippines (1993–2013):
Food fish supply from domestic
sources increased from
2 228 428 tonnes in 1993 to
3 146 654 tonnes in 2013.
Net export increased from 62 814
tonnes to 174 766 tonnes.
Domestic consumption increased
from 2 165 615 tonnes to
2 971 888 tonnes.
The 1.6 percent annual growth
rate in total fish consumption
was lower than the 2 percent
population growth during the
period, resulting in a decline in
per capita fish consumption from
32.5 kg to 30.1 kg.
Data source: FAO Food Balance Sheets of fish and fishery products, 1961–2013, published through FishStatJ (November 2017; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Consumption Module (WAPI-FISHCSP); see Figure 5.2 in WAPI-FISHCSP v.2018.1 for an example (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Numbers may not add up exactly due to rounding.
25
2 165 615
2 971 888
62 814
174 766
32.5 30.3 30.1
2 228 428
3 146 654
Fish & seafood supply and utilization in Philippines (1993–2013)
Net export (export minus import) of food fish (live weight; tonne)
Total fish consumption (live weight; tonne)
Per capita fish consumption (live weight; kg)
Food fish supply from domestic sources (production plus stock
depletion minus non-food uses) (live weight; tonne)

Domestic fish market
(fish consumption)
26

Philippines (1993–2013):
Total fish consumption in the
Philippines increased between
1993 and 2009 (driven by
both population growth and
an increase in per capita fish
consumption).
The declined total fish
consumption, together with
the continuing growth in
population, resulted in the
decline of per capita fish
consumption from 36.1 kg to
30.1 kg.
27
Data sources: FAO Food Balance Sheets (FBS) of fish and fishery products, 1961–2013, published through FishStatJ (November 2017; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
United Nations World Population Prospects (2019 revision; https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Download/Standard/Population).
Note: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Consumption Module (WAPI-FISHCSP) (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Per capita consumption equal to total consumption (from FAO FBS) divided by population (from United Nations population prospect).
32.531.831.5
29.429.2
27.2
29.428.728.830.030.330.7
32.632.9
35.535.236.134.7
31.931.430.1
67 68 70 71 73 75 76 78
80
81 83 85 86 88 89 91 92 94 96 97 99
2 166 2 166
2 199
2 101
2 132
2 034
2 245 2 238
2 294
2 439
2 512
2 600
2 811
2 895
3 170 3 201
3 339
3 263
3 050 3 053
2 972
199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013
Philippines
Per capita fish consumption (kg)Population (million)Total fish consumption (thousand tonnes)

Philippines (1993–2013): Fish consumption declined between 1993 and 2013.
28
Data sources: FAO Food Balance Sheets (FBS) of fish and fishery products, 1961–2013, published through FishStatJ (November 2017; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
United Nations World Population Prospects (2019 revision (https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Download/Standard/Population).
Note: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Consumption Module (WAPI-FISHCSP); see Figure 3.3 in WAPI-FISHCSP v.2018.1 for an example (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Per capita fish consumption equal to total consumption (from FAO FBS) divided by population (from United Nations Population Prospect 2017).
Status and trend of per capita fish consumption
Country/area
Per capita fish consumption
(kg/year)
Annual
growth (%)
1993 2013
World 14.3 19.9 1.7
Developing regions 11.4 18.8 2.6
South-eastern Asia 23.3 35.5 2.1
Brunei Darussalam 35.6 48.5 1.6
Cambodia 7.4 41.7 9.0
Indonesia 16.3 31.6 3.4
Lao People's Democratic
Republic
6.8 22.5 6.2
Malaysia 50.3 59.7 0.9
Myanmar 14.9 62.4 7.4
Philippines 32.5 30.1 -0.4
Singapore 26.8 48.9 3.1
Thailand 27.8 26.5 -0.2
Timor-Leste n.a. 6.4 n.a.
Viet Nam 11.9 35.1 5.6
14.3
11.4
23.3
35.6
7.4
16.3
6.8
50.3
32.5
26.8
27.8
11.9
19.9
18.8
35.5
48.5
41.7
31.6
22.5
59.7
30.1
48.9
26.5
6.4
35.1
World
Developing regions
South-eastern Asia
Brunei Darussalam
Cambodia
Indonesia
Lao People's Democratic Republic
Malaysia
Philippines
Singapore
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Viet Nam
Per capita fish consumption (kg/year)
19932013

Philippines (1993 versus
2013):
Per capita fish & seafood
consumption declined from 32.52
kg in 1993 to 30.06 kg in 2013,
caused primarily by the decline in
marine fishes, whereas the
consumption of freshwater &
diadromous fishes increased.
In 2013, finfish accounted for 89.9
percent of fish consumption (63.1
percent from marine fishes and
26.8 percent from freshwater &
diadromous fishes); shellfish
accounted for only 10.1 percent (4
percent from crustaceans, 3.4
percent from shell molluscs and
2.6 percent from cephalopods).
29
Data source: FAOSTAT Food Balance Sheets (January 2018; www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS).
Note: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Consumption Module (WAPI-FISHCSP); see Figure 1.6 in WAPI-FISHCSP v.2018.1 for an example (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Numbers may not add up exactly due to rounding.
Finfish82.2%
Shellfish
17.8%
Marine fishes,
21.94 , 67.5%
Crustaceans,
2.22 , 6.8%
Shell
molluscs,
2.65 , 8.2%
Cephalopods,
0.92 , 2.8%
Philippines (1993)
Fish and
seafood
consumption
(1993): 32.52
kg/capita/yr
Finfish89.9%
Shellfish
10.1%
Marine fishes,
18.95 , 63.1%
Crustaceans,
1.21 , 4.0%
Shell molluscs,
1.03 , 3.4%
Cephalopods,
0.80 , 2.6%
Philippines (2013)
Fish and
seafood
consumption
(2013): 30.06
kg/capita/yr

Data source: FAOSTAT Food Balance Sheets (January 2018; www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS).
Note: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Consumption Module (WAPI-FISHCSP); see Figure 1.6 in WAPI-FISHCSP v.2018.1 for an example (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Philippines (2013): Species composition in fish consumption in 2013 was similar to South-eastern
Asia’s, but much less balanced than the global pattern. Philippines’ 10.1 percent shellfish share in
fish consumption was much lower than the 25.2 percent world average.
30
Finfish89.9%
Shellfish
10.1%
Marine fishes,
18.95 , 63.1%
Crustaceans,
1.21 , 4.0%
Shell molluscs,
1.03 , 3.4%
Cephalopods,
0.80 , 2.6%
Philippines (2013)
Fish and
seafood
consumption
(2013): 30.06
kg/capita/
day
Finfish74.8%
Shellfish
25.2%
Marine fishes,
7.22 , 36.7%
Crustaceans,
1.85 , 9.4%
Shell molluscs,
2.57 , 13.1%
Cephalopods,
0.52 , 2.7%
World (2013)
Fish and
seafood
consumption
(2013): 19.87
kg/capita/
day
Finfish87.0%
Shellfish
13.0%
Marine fishes,
18.08 , 51.3%
Crustaceans,
2.58 , 7.3%
Shell molluscs,
1.03 , 2.9%
Cephalopods,
0.97 , 2.7%
South-eastern Asia (2013)
Fish and
seafood
consumption
(2013): 35.49
kg/capita/
day

Fish trade
31

Philippines (2005–2017): Status and trends of fish trade.
32
Data source: FAO. 2019. Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics. Global fisheries commodities production and trade 1976–2017 (FishStatJ)
(www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Trade Module; see Templates 45–47 in the WAPI prototype for examples (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Includes all aquatic commodities recorded in the data source. CIF = Cost, insurance and freight; FOB = Free on board.
-
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
0
200 000
400 000
600 000
800 000
1 000 000
1 200 000
1 400 000
2005200720092011201320152017
USD/kg
tonne or USD 1000
Exports of aquatic products
Export quantity (product weight; tonnes)
Export value (USD 1 000; FOB)
Export price (USD/kg; FOB)
-
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
0
200 000
400 000
600 000
800 000
1 000 000
1 200 000
1 400 000
2005200720092011201320152017
USD/kg
tonne or USD 1000
Imports of aquatic products
Import quantity (product weight; tonnes)
Import value (USD 1 000; CIF)
Import price (USD/kg; CIF)

Philippines (2005–2017): Fish export quantity less than fish import quantity for most of the
time (a pattern opposite to South-eastern Asia); fish export price greater than fish import price
(the same as the pattern in South-eastern Asia and developing regions in general).
33
Data source: FAO. 2019. Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics. Global fisheries commodities production and trade 1976–2017 (FishStatJ)
(www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Trade Module; see Templates45–47 in the WAPI prototype for examples
(www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).Includes all aquatic commodities recorded in the data source. CIF = Cost, insurance and freight; FOB = Free on
board.
-
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
0
100 000
200 000
300 000
400 000
500 000
2005200720092011201320152017
USD/kg
tonne
Philippines (aquatic products)
Export quantity (product weight; tonnes)
Import quantity (product weight; tonnes)
Export price (USD/kg; FOB)
Import price (USD/kg; CIF)
-
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
0
1 000 000
2 000 000
3 000 000
4 000 000
5 000 000
6 000 000
2005200720092011201320152017
USD/kg
tonne
South-eastern Asia (aquatic products)
Export quantity (product weight; tonnes)
Import quantity (product weight; tonnes)
Export price (USD/kg; FOB)
Import price (USD/kg; CIF)

Philippines (2005–2017):Large fish trade surplus (similar to South-eastern Asia or developing
regions in general); the trade surplus declined since 2013.
34
Data source: FAO. 2019. Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics. Global fisheries commodities production and trade 1976–2017 (FishStatJ)
(www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Trade Module; see Templates45–47 in the WAPI prototype for examples (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Includes all aquatic commodities recorded in the data source. CIF = Cost, insurance and freight; FOB = Free on board.
0
200 000
400 000
600 000
800 000
1 000 000
1 200 000
2005200720092011201320152017
USD 1000
Philippines (aquatic products trade
balance)
Export value (USD 1 000; FOB)
Import value (USD 1 000; CIF)
Trade balance (USD 1 000)
0
4 000 000
8 000 000
12 000 000
16 000 000
20 000 000
2005200720092011201320152017
USD 1000
South-eastern Asia (aquatic products trade
balance)
Export value (USD 1 000; FOB)
Import value (USD 1 000; CIF)
Trade balance (USD 1 000)

Philippines (2005–2017): Fish share in total export value of all commodities increased from 0.85
percent to 1.56 percent; fish share in import increased from 0.19 percent to 0.58 percent.
35
Data source: Data on aquatic products from FAO. 2019. Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics. Global fisheries commodities production and trade 1976–2017 (FishStatJ)
(www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en/). Data on all commodities from United Nations Comtrade Database (https://comtrade.un.org/data; accessed on 7 May 2019).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Trade Module; see Templates45-47 in the WAPI prototype for examples (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Aquatic products include all aquatic commodities recorded in the data source.
103 680 132 922
203 336 193 314
278 737
369 746
585 047
0.19
0.21
0.42
0.29
0.40
0.56
0.58
2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
Fish share in total import value
Aquatic products import value (USD 1 000)
Share of aquatic product in import value of all commodities (%)
380 094
499 539
585 044
711 155
1 185 788
805 286
883 537
0.85
0.94
1.48
1.36
2.06
1.34
1.56
2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
Fish share in total export value
Aquatic products export value (USD 1 000)
Share of aquatic product in export value of all commodities (%)

Fish export
36

37
Data source: FAO. 2019. Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics. Global fisheries commodities production and trade 1976–2017 (FishStatJ) (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Trade Module; see Templates45-47 in the WAPI prototype for examples (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Includes all aquatic commodities recorded in the data source.
Philippines,
USD 883 537 000, 3.97%
- 20
- 10
0
10
20
30
40
50
10 100 1 000 10 000 100 000 1 000 000 10 000 000 100 000 000
Annual growth of aquatic products exports value
from
2000 to 2017 (%)
Aquatic products exports value in 2017 (USD 1 000)
Philippines’ fish export growth from a global perspective (2000–2017)
African countriesCountries in the AmericasAsian countriesEuropean countriesOceania countries
Bubble: population
Philippines exported USD 884 million of aquatic products in 2017; the 3.97 percent annual
growth rate during 2000–2017 was lower than South-eastern Asia’s 5.45 percent.

Philippines (2000 versus
2017):
Aquatic commodities export
nearly doubled from USD 456
million to USD 884 million
with a significant change in
the species composition –the
share of crustaceans declined
from 37.3 percent to 24.4
percent, whereas the share of
marine fishes increased from
40.3 percent to 61.7 percent.
38
Data source: FAO. 2019. Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics. Global fisheries commodities production and trade 1976–2017 (FishStatJ) (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Trade Module; see Templates45-47 in the WAPI prototype for examples (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).Includes all aquatic
commodities recorded in the data source. Species groups less than 0.1 percent of the total value not labelled in the charts.
Finfish
65.9%
Shellfish
31.9%
Others
2.2%
Marine
fishes
61.7%
Freshwater
fishes
1.1%
Diadromous
fishes
3.2%
Crustaceans
24.4%
Molluscs
7.4%
Aquatic
plants
1.4%
Philippines (2017)
Export value
(2017):
883 537
thousand
USD
Finfish
40.3%
Shellfish
47.6%
Others
12.0%
Marine
fishes
40.3%
Crustaceans
37.3%
Molluscs
10.4%
Miscellaneous
aquatic animals
1.4%
Aquatic plants
10.2%
Philippines (2000)
Export value
(2000):
455 984
thousand
USD

Philippines (2017): The USD 884 million of total export of aquatic products in 2017 was composed of 65.9
percent of finfish and 31.9 percent of shellfish; marine fishes accounted for 61.7 percent of the total export,
greater than the South-eastern Asia and world averages.
39
Data source: FAO. 2019. Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics. Global fisheries commodities production and trade 1976–2017 (FishStatJ) (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Trade Module; see templates45-47 in the WAPI prototype for examples (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Includes all aquatic commodities recorded in the data source. Species groups less than 0.1 percent of the total value not labelled in the charts.
Finfish
65.9%
Shellfish
31.9%
Others
2.2%
Marine
fishes
61.7%
Freshwater
fishes
1.1%
Diadromous
fishes
3.2%
Crustaceans
24.4%
Molluscs
7.4%
Philippines (2017)
Export value
(2017):
883 537
thousand
USD
Finfish
63.8%
Shellfish
34.7%
Others
1.5%
Marine
fishes
41.8%
Freshwater
fishes
3.4%
Diadromous
fishes
18.6%
Crustaceans
23.9%
Molluscs
10.8%
World (2017)
Export value
(2017):
158 102 263
thousand
USD
Finfish
48.9%
Shellfish
49.7%
Others
1.4%
Marine
fishes
36.0%
Freshwater
fishes
10.8%
Diadromous fishes
2.1%
Crustaceans
41.2%
Molluscs
8.5%
South-eastern Asia (2017)
Export value
(2017):
21 723 764
thousand
USD

Philippines (2017): Major fish export commodities were primarily from capture fisheries
production.
40
Philippines aquatic products export in 2017
Top 10 export species groups in terms of quantity Top10 export speciesgroupsin terms of value
ISSCAAP groups
Product
weight
(tonnes)
Share of
Philippines's
total export
of all aquatic
commodities
(%)
Share of
world export
of the same
species
group(%)
ISSCAAP groups
FOB value
(USD 1 000)
Share of
Philippines's
total export
of all aquatic
commodities
(%)
Share of
world export
of the same
species
group (%)
1. Tunas, bonitos, billfishes 204 951 63.65 5.461. Tunas, bonitos, billfishes 409 372 46.33 2.92
2. Marine fishes not identified 41 007 12.74 0.472. Crabs, sea-spiders 139 945 15.84 3.25
3. Crabs, sea-spiders 17 995 5.59 4.573. Marine fishes not identified 119 107 13.48 0.60
4. Shrimps, prawns 9 366 2.91 0.294. Shrimps, prawns 63 647 7.20 0.23
5. Miscellaneous aquatic plants 9 121 2.83 2.045. Squids, cuttlefishes, octopuses 42 342 4.79 0.39
6. Squids, cuttlefishes, octopuses 9 016 2.80 0.406. River eels 25 915 2.93 2.11
7. River eels 8 055 2.50 8.747. Miscellaneous marine molluscs 17 250 1.95 2.05
8. Herrings, sardines, anchovies 7 260 2.25 0.238. Herrings, sardines, anchovies 15 337 1.74 0.35
9. Miscellaneous marine molluscs 4 693 1.46 3.389. Miscellaneous aquatic plants 12 263 1.39 1.46
10. Lobsters, spiny-rock lobsters 2 734 0.85 1.1810. Lobsters, spiny-rock lobsters 11 903 1.35 0.27
Others 7 791 2.42 Others 26 456 2.99
Aquatic products 321 989 100.00 0.80Aquatic products 883 537 100.00 0.56
Data source: FAO. 2019. Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics. Global fisheries commodities production and trade 1976–2017 (FishStatJ)
(www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Trade Module; see Templates45-47 in the WAPI prototype for examples (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Includes all aquatic commodities recorded in the data source. FOB = Free on board; ISSCAAP = International Standard Statistical Classification of Aquatic Animals and Plants.

Data source: FAO. 2019. Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics. Global fisheries commodities production and trade 1976–2017 (FishStatJ) (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Trade Module; see Templates45-47 in the WAPI Prototype for examples (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Includes all aquatic commodities recorded in the data source. Nei = not elsewhere included.
173 185
24 824
13 969
12 859
9 118
8 001
7 415
7 147
6 782
5 898
52 791
1. Tunas prepared or preserved, not minced, in airtight containers
2. Yellowfin tuna, frozen, nei
3. Crabs, not frozen
4. Fish live, nei
5. Other seaweeds and aquatic plants and products thereof
6. Eels and elvers live
7. Shrimps and prawns, frozen, nei
8. Marine fish, fresh or chilled, nei
9. Sardines, sardinellas, brisling or sprats, prep. or pres., not minced, nei
10. Ornamental saltwater fish
Other species
tonnes
Philippines' top-10 fish export products (2017; in terms of quantity)
53.8%
7.7%
4.3%
4.0%
2.8%
2.5%
2.3%
2.2%
2.1%1.8%
16.4%
Philippines (2017): Top 10 commodities in fish export (in terms of quantity).
41

Philippines (2017): Top 10 commodities in fish export (in terms of value).
Data source: FAO. 2019. Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics. Global fisheries commodities production and trade 1976–2017 (FishStatJ)
(www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Trade Module; see Templates45-47 in the WAPI prototype for examples (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Includes all aquatic commodities recorded in the data source. Nei = not elsewhere included.
286 269
95 721
77 684
60 527
56 157
49 041
25 818
24 680
24 434
16 769
166 437
1. Tunas prepared or preserved, not minced, in airtight containers
2. Yellowfin tuna, frozen, nei
3. Crab meat nei, prepared or preserved
4. Crabs, not frozen
5. Shrimps and prawns, frozen, nei
6. Fish live, nei
7. Eels and elvers live
8. Octopus, frozen
9. Fish fillets, frozen, nei
10. Yellowfin tuna, fresh or chilled
Other species
thousand USD
Philippines' top-10 fish export products (2017; in terms of value)
32%
11%
9%7%
6%
5%
3%
3%
3%
2%
19%
42

Fish import
43

Data source: FAO. 2019. Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics. Global fisheries commodities production and trade 1976–2017 (FishStatJ) (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Note: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Trade Module; see Templates45-47 in the WAPI prototype for examples (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Includes all aquatic commodities recorded in the data source.
Philippines,
USD 585 047 000, 10.24%
- 10
0
10
20
30
40
1 000 10 000 100 000 1 000 000 10 000 000 100 000 000
Annual growth of aquatic products imports value from
2000 to 2017 (%)
Aquatic products imports value in 2017 (USD 1 000)
Philippines’ fish import growth from a global perspective (2000–2017)
African countriesCountries in the AmericasAsian countriesEuropean countriesOceania countries
Bubble: population
Philippines (2000–2017): Fish import in 2017 totaled USD 585 million; the 10.24 percent
annual growth rate (2000–2017) was higher than that of South-eastern Asia(9.13 percent).
44

Philippines (2000 versus
2017):
Aquatic commodities import
increased from USD 116
million in 2000 to USD 585
million in 2017 with
increased species
diversification in both finfish
and shellfish.
45
Data source: FAO. 2019. Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics. Global fisheries commodities production and trade 1976–2017 (FishStatJ) (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Note: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Trade Module; see Templates45-47 in the WAPI prototype for examples (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Includes all aquatic commodities recorded in the data source. Species groups less than 0.1 percent of the total value not labelled in the charts.
Finfish
86.4%
Shellfish
12.8%
Others
0.8%
Marine fishes
75.2%
Freshwater
fishes
5.6%
Diadromous
fishes
5.6%
Crustaceans
4.7%
Molluscs
8.1%
Philippines (2017)
Import value
(2017):
585 047
thousand
USD
Marine fishes
83.0%
Diadromous
fishes
1.2%
Molluscs
13.6%
Philippines (2000)
Import value
(2000):
111 596
thousand
USD

Philippines (2017): The USD 585 million aquatic commodities import in 2017 was composed of
86.4 percent finfish, 12.8 percent shellfish and 0.8 percent other species (mostly aquatic plants); the
species composition was less diverse than South-eastern Asia and world averages.
46
Data source: FAO. 2019. Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics. Global fisheries commodities production and trade 1976–2017 (FishStatJ) (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Trade Module; see Templates45-47 in the WAPI prototype for examples (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Includes all aquatic commodities recorded in the data source. Species groups less than 0.1 percent of the total value not labelled in the charts.
Finfish
86.4%
Shellfish
12.8%
Marine fishes
75.2%
Freshwater
fishes
5.6%
Diadromous
fishes
5.6%
Crustaceans
4.7%
Molluscs
8.1%
Aquatic plants
0.7%
Philippines (2017)
Import value
(2017):
585 047
thousand
USD Finfish
66.9%
Shellfish
31.3%
Others
1.8%
Marine
fishes
45.0%
Freshwater
fishes
3.0%
Diadromous
fishes
18.9%
Crustaceans
21.5%
Molluscs
9.8%
Aquatic plants
1.0%
World (2017)
Import value
(2017):
148 605 591
thousand
USD
Finfish
70.9%
Shellfish
26.8%
Others
2.3%
Marine
fishes
58.5%
Freshwater
fishes
2.7%
Diadromous
fishes
9.8%
Crustaceans
14.9%
Molluscs
11.8%
Aquatic plants
1.6%
South-eastern Asia (2017)
Import value
(2017):
8 595 052
thousand
USD

Philippines (2017): Tunas/bonitos/billfishes and miscellaneous pelagic fishes were the two
largest species groups accounting for around two thirds of the fish import quantity or value.
Philippines aquatic product import in 2017
Top10 import species groups in terms of quantity Top10 import species groups in terms of value
ISSCAAP groups
Product
weight
(tonnes)
Share of
Philippines's
total import
of aquatic
products (%)
Share of
world import
of the same
species
group (%)
ISSCAAP groups
CIF value
(USD 1 000)
Share of
Philippines's
total import
of aquatic
products (%)
Share of
world import
of the same
species
group (%)
1. Miscellaneous pelagic fishes 181 213 36.72 4.611. Tunas, bonitos, billfishes 235 436 40.24 1.68
2. Tunas, bonitos, billfishes 145 548 29.49 3.882. Miscellaneous pelagic fishes 135 266 23.12 2.43
3. Marine fishes not identified 71 032 14.39 0.813. Marine fishes not identified 53 231 9.10 0.27
4. Squids, cuttlefishes, octopuses 33 897 6.87 1.494. Squids, cuttlefishes, octopuses 44 642 7.63 0.41
5. Miscellaneous freshwater fishes 22 061 4.47 2.075. Salmons, trouts, smelts 32 687 5.59 0.12
6. Salmons, trouts, smelts 13 101 2.65 0.376. Miscellaneous freshwater fishes 32 258 5.51 0.93
7. Flounders, halibuts, soles 8 846 1.79 1.167. Shrimps, prawns 24 232 4.14 0.09
8. Herrings, sardines, anchovies 8 422 1.71 0.278. Herrings, sardines, anchovies 8 078 1.38 0.19
9. Shrimps, prawns 3 825 0.78 0.129. Flounders, halibuts, soles 6 116 1.05 0.20
10. Miscellaneous aquatic plants 2 789 0.57 0.6210. Miscellaneous aquatic plants 4 120 0.70 0.49
Others 2 801 0.57 Others 8 981 1.54
Aquatic products 493 535 100.00 1.23Aquatic products 585 047 100.00 0.37
Data source: FAO. 2019. Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics. Global fisheries commodities production and trade 1976–2017 (FishStatJ) (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Trade Module; see Templates45-47 in the WAPI prototype for examples (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Includes all aquatic commodities recorded in the data source. CIF = Cost, insurance and freight; ISSCAAP = International Standard Statistical Classification of Aquatic Animals and Plants.
47

Philippines (2017): Top 10 commodities in fish import (in terms of quantity).
Data source: FAO. 2019. Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics. Global fisheries commodities production and trade 1976–2017 (FishStatJ)
(www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Trade Module; see Templates45-47 in the WAPI prototype for examples (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Includes all aquatic commodities recorded in the data source. The acronym nei refers to not elsewhere included.
179 663
93 572
44 713
39 853
33 582
21 683
16 197
8 803
8 214
7 931
39 324
1. Mackerels nei, frozen
2. Skipjack tuna, frozen
3. Yellowfin tuna, frozen, nei
4. Fishmeals, nei
5. Cephalopods nei, frozen
6. Catfish fillets, frozen
7. Fish meat, whether or not minced, frozen, nei
8. Flatfish nei, frozen
9. Pacific salmons, frozen, nei
10. Sardines, sardinellas, brisling or sprats, frozen
Other species
tonnes
Philippines' top-10 fish import products (2017; in terms of quantity)
36.4%
19.0%
9.1%
8.1%
6.8%
4.4%
3.3%
1.8%1.7%
1.6%
8.0%
48

Philippines (2017): Top 10 commodities in fish import (in terms of value).
Data source: FAO. 2019. Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics. Global fisheries commodities production and trade 1976–2017 (FishStatJ)
(www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Fish Trade Module; see Templates45-47 in the WAPI Prototype for examples (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Includes all aquatic commodities recorded in the data source. Nei = not elsewhere included.
136 165
133 703
83 849
43 885
31 499
21 684
17 269
13 561
12 808
6 188
84 436
1. Skipjack tuna, frozen
2. Mackerels nei, frozen
3. Yellowfin tuna, frozen, nei
4. Cephalopods nei, frozen
5. Catfish fillets, frozen
6. Fishmeals, nei
7. Pacific salmons, frozen, nei
8. Fish meat, whether or not minced, frozen, nei
9. Atlantic salmon and Danube salmon, frozen
10. Sardines, sardinellas, brisling or sprats, frozen
Other species
thousand USD
Philippines' top-10 fish import products (2017; in terms of value)
23.3%
22.9%
14.3%
7.5%
5.4%
3.7%
3.0%
2.3%
2.2%
1.1%
14.4%
49

Total fishery production
50

Philippines (1950–2017): Total fishery production increased from 238 876 tonnes in 1950 to 5 050 190 tonnes in 2010
with aquaculture growth being the primary driving force since the 1990s; the production declined to 4 127 777 tonnes
in 2017 due primarily to the decline in capture fisheries.
51
Data source: FAO Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through FishStatJ (March 2019; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Total Fishery Production Module; see Figure 5.1 in the FAO WAPI Aquaculture Production Module (WAPI-AQPRN v.2018.1) for a similar example
(www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en). Production covers all species measured in tonnage.
1950, 238 876
2010, 5 050 190
2017, 4 127 777
Tonnes
Status and trend of aquaculture and fisheries production in the Philippines (1950-2017)
Capture (Philippines) Aquaculture (Philippines) Total (Philippines)

Philippines (2000 versus
2017):
Total fishery production
increased slightly from 3
million tonnes to 4.1 million
tonnes.
The shares of freshwater
fishes, diadromous fishes and
aquatic plants increased,
whereas those of marine
fishes, crustaceans and
molluscs declined.
Finfish
58.3%
Shellfish
7.3%
Other
species
34.4% Marine
fishes
38.9%
Freshwater
fishes
9.2%
Diadromous
fishes
10.2%
Crustaceans
3.7%
Molluscs
3.6%
Aquatic
plants
34.3%
Philippines (2017)
Total fishery
production
(2017):
4 127 777
tonnesFinfish
66.5%
Shellfish
9.9%
Other
species
23.5%
Marine
fishes
54.1%
Freshwater
fishes
5.4%
Diadromous
fishes
7.1%
Crustaceans
4.3%
Molluscs
5.7%
Aquatic
plants
23.4%
Philippines (2000)
Total fishery
production
(2000):
3 021 394
tonnes
52
Data source: FAO Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through FishStatJ (March 2019; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Total Fishery Production Module; see Figure 1.5 in the FAO WAPI Aquaculture Production Module (WAPI-AQPRN v.2018.1) for a similar example
(www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en). Production covers all species measured in tonnage. Species accounting for less than 0.1 percent of total production not labelled in the charts.

Philippines (2017): Finfish accounted for 58.3 percent of total fishery production (including primarily
38.9 percent of marine fishes); shellfish accounted for 7.3 percent (evenly contributed by crustaceans
and molluscs); the share of aquatic plants (34.3 percent) was larger than the South-eastern Asia and
world averages.
53
Finfish
64.4%
Shellfish
19.0%
Other
species
16.7%
Marine
fishes
33.8%
Freshwater
fishes
26.9%
Diadromous
fishes
3.7%
Crustaceans
7.4%
Molluscs
11.5%
Miscellaneous
aquatic animals
0.7%
Aquatic plants
16.0%
World (2017)
Total fishery
production
(2017):
205 580 364
tonnes
Data source: FAO Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through FishStatJ (March 2019; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Total Fishery Production Module; see Figure 1.5 in the FAO WAPI Aquaculture Production Module (WAPI-AQPRN v.2018.1) for a similar example
(www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en). Production covers all species measured in tonnage. Species accounting for less than 0.1 percent of total production not labelled in the charts.
Finfish
58.3%
Shellfish
7.3%
Other
species
34.4% Marine
fishes
38.9%
Freshwater
fishes
9.2%
Diadromous
fishes
10.2%
Crustaceans
3.7%
Molluscs
3.6%
Aquatic
plants
34.3%
Philippines (2017)
Total fishery
production
(2017):
4 127 777
tonnes
Finfish
60.9%
Shellfish
11.9%
Other
species
27.2%
Marine
fishes
30.9%
Freshwater
fishes
25.5%
Diadromous
fishes
4.5%
Crustaceans
8.2%
Molluscs
3.7%
Aquatic plants
26.9%
South-eastern Asia (2017)
Total fishery
production
(2017):
42 396 554
tonnes

Capture fisheries production
54

Philippines (2000 versus
2017):
The Philippines was the 4
th
largest capture fisheries
country in South-eastern
Asia in 2017.
Its capture fisheries
production declined slightly
from 1 920 492 tonnes in
2000 to 1 889 990 tonnes in
2017.
55
2 487
284 368
4 158 535
29 250
1 293 325
1 093 200
1 920 492
5 371
2 997 124
3 621
1 629 612
11 865
649 518
6 736 280
70 900
1 474 349
2 150 400
1 889 990
1 110
1 479 367
3 200
3 277 574
Brunei Darussalam
Cambodia
Indonesia
Lao People's Democratic Republic
Malaysia
Myanmar
Philippines
Singapore
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Viet Nam
tonnes
Capture fisheries production in South-eastern Asia
20002017
Data source: FAO Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through FishStatJ (March 2019; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Capture Fisheries Production Module; see Figure 3.3 in the FAO WAPI Aquaculture Production Module (WAPI-AQPRN v.2018.1) for a similar example
(www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en). Production covers all species measured in tonnage.

Data source: FAO Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through FishStatJ (March 2019; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Capture Fisheries Production Module; see Figure 1.5 in the FAO WAPI Aquaculture Production Module (WAPI-AQPRN v.2018.1) for a similar example
(www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en). Production covers all species measured in tonnage. Marine areas including coastal areas.
Philippines (2000 versus
2017):
Capture fisheries production
was dominated by marine
fisheries, yet the share of
inland fisheries increased from
7.9 percent to 8.6 percent.
56
Marine areas
92.1%
Inland
waters
7.9%
Marine fishes
84.9%
Crustaceans
4.0%
Molluscs
2.9%
Molluscs
4.5%
Freshwater
fishes
3.0%
Philippines (2000)
Capture
production
(2000):
1 920 492
tonnes
Marine areas
91.4%
Inland
waters
8.6%
Marine fishes
84.7%
Crustaceans
3.4%
Molluscs
2.9%
Molluscs
2.8%
Freshwater
fishes
4.9%
Philippines (2017)
Capture
production
(2017):
1 889 990
tonnes

Philippines (2017): Inland fisheries accounted for 8.6 percent of the capture fisheries production;
the share was lower than the South-eastern Asia and world averages.
Marine areas
87.3%
Inland
waters
12.7%
Diadromous
fishes
1.6%
Marine fishes
70.8%
Crustaceans
6.7%
Molluscs
6.4%
Aquatic plants
1.2%
Freshwater
fishes
11.3%
World (2017)
Capture
production
(2017):
93 633 741
tonnes
Data source: FAO Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through FishStatJ (March 2019; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Capture Fisheries Production Module; see Figure 1.5 in the FAO WAPI Aquaculture Production Module (WAPI-AQPRN v.2018.1) for a similar example
(www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en). Production covers all species measured in tonnage. Marine areas including coastal areas.
Marine areas
91.4%
Inland
waters
8.6%
Marine fishes
84.7%
Crustaceans
3.4%
Molluscs
2.9%
Molluscs
2.8%
Freshwater
fishes
4.9%
Philippines (2017)
Capture
production
(2017):
1 889 990
tonnes
Marine areas
86.1%
Inland
waters
13.9%
Diadromous
fishes
0.8%
Marine fishes
71.9%
Crustaceans
7.4%
Molluscs
5.2%
Freshwater
fishes
13.0%
South-eastern Asia (2017)
Capture
production
(2017):
17 744 553
tonnes
57

Philippines (2000 versus
2017):
Marine fishes dominated
capture fisheries production
with a slightly declining share
(from 85.1 percent to 84.9
percent).
The share of freshwater fishes
increased from 3 percent to
4.9 percent.
Data source: FAO Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through FishStatJ (March 2019; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Capture Fisheries Production Module; see Figure 1.5 in the FAO WAPI Aquaculture Production Module (WAPI-AQPRN v.2018.1) for a similar example
(www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en). Production covers all species measured in tonnage.
Finfish
90.4%
Shellfish
9.4%
Marine fishes
84.9%
Freshwater
fishes
4.9%
Diadromous
fishes
0.5%
Crustaceans
3.7%
Molluscs
5.7%
Philippines (2017)
Capture
production
(2017):
1 889 990
tonnes
Finfish
88.2%
Shellfish
11.6%
Marine fishes
85.1%
Freshwater
fishes
3.0%
Crustaceans
4.2%
Molluscs
7.3%
Philippines (2000)
Capture
production
(2000):
1 920 492
tonnes
58

Philippines (2017): Capture fisheries production in 2017 was composed of 90.4 percent finfish
(84.9 percent marine fishes and 4.9 percent freshwater fishes) and 9.4 percent shellfish (3.7
percent crustaceans and 5.7 percent molluscs); the species composition was less diverse than
that of South-eastern Asia and the world.
59
Finfish
84%
Shellfish
14%
Other
species
2%
Marine fishes
70.9%
Freshwater
fishes
11.3%
Diadromous
fishes
2.1%
Crustaceans
7.3%
Molluscs
6.8%
Aquatic plants
1.2%
World (2017)
Capture
production
(2017):
93 633 741
tonnes
Data source: FAO Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through FishStatJ (March 2019; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Capture Fisheries Production Module; see Figure 1.5 in the FAO WAPI Aquaculture Production Module (WAPI-AQPRN v.2018.1) for a similar example
(www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en). Production covers all species measured in tonnage.
Finfish
85.7%
Shellfish
13.4%
Other
species
0.8%
Marine fishes
71.9%
Freshwater
fishes
13.0%
Diadromous
fishes
0.9%
Crustaceans
7.7%
Molluscs
5.7%
Miscellaneous
aquatic animals
0.5%
South-eastern Asia (2017)
Capture
production
(2017):
17 744 553
tonnes
Finfish
90.4%
Shellfish
9.4%
Marine fishes
84.9%
Freshwater
fishes
4.9%
Diadromous
fishes
0.5% Crustaceans
3.7%
Molluscs
5.7%
Philippines (2017)
Capture
production
(2017):
1 889 990
tonnes

Philippines (2017): Top 10 ISSCAAP groups in capture fisheries production in terms of quantity.
Data source: FAO Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through FishStatJ (March 2019; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Capture Fisheries Production Module; see Figure 1.2 in the FAO WAPI Aquaculture Production Module (WAPI-AQPRN v.2018.1) for a similar example
(www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en). ISSCAAP = International Standard Statistical Classification of Aquatic Animals and Plants; more information about ISSCAAP groups can be found at
www.fao.org/tempref/FI/DOCUMENT/cwp/handbook/annex/AnnexS2listISSCAAP2000.pdf.
509 278
382 353
378 756
297 239
55 062
52 344
43 240
34 160
33 680
33 358
70 520
1. Miscellaneous pelagic fishes
2. Herrings, sardines, anchovies
3. Tunas, bonitos, billfishes
4. Miscellaneous coastal fishes
5. Squids, cuttlefishes, octopuses
6. Freshwater molluscs
7. Tilapias and other cichlids
8. Shrimps, prawns
9. Miscellaneous freshwater fishes
10. Crabs, sea-spiders
Others
tonnes
Top-10 ISSCAAP groups in Philippines' capture fisheries production quantity (2017)
26.9%
20.2%
20.0%
15.7%
2.9%
2.8%
2.3%1.8%1.8%
1.8%
3.7%
60

Philippines (2017): Top 10 ASFIS species items in capture fisheries production in terms of quantity.
325 419
188 408
122 075
111 086
109 203
83 873
61 193
53 374
52 344
50 174
732 841
1. Sardinellas nei
2. Scads nei
3. Frigate and bullet tunas
4. Skipjack tuna
5. Bigeye scad
6. Yellowfin tuna
7. Indian mackerel
8. Carangids nei
9. Freshwater molluscs nei
10. Stolephorus anchovies nei
Other species
tonnes
Top-10 ASFIS species items in Philippines' capture production quantity (2017)
17.2%
10.0%
6.5%
5.9%
5.8%
4.4%3.2%
2.8%
2.8%
2.7%
38.8%
Data source: FAO Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through FishStatJ (March 2019; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Capture Fisheries Production Module; see Figure 1.2 in the FAO WAPI Aquaculture Production Module (WAPI-AQPRN v.2018.1) for a similar example
(www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en). ASFIS = Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Information System; more information about ASFIS species items can be found at www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en.
Nei = not elsewhere included.
61

Aquaculture production
62

63
Data source: FAO Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through FishStatJ (March 2019; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Aquaculture Production Module (WAPI-AQPRN); see Figure 2.1 in WAPI-AQPRN v.2018.1 for a similar example (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Production covers all species measured in tonnage.
Philippines,
2 237 787 tonnes, 4.26%
- 20
- 10
0
10
20
30
40
50
1 10 100 1 000 10 000 100 000 1 000 000 10 000 000 100 000 000
Annual growth rate of
aquaculture production
quantity
from
2000 to 2017 (%)
Aquaculture production in 2017 (tonnes)
Philippines’ aquaculture production growth from a global perspective (2000-2017)
African countriesCountries in the AmericasAsian countriesEuropean countriesOceania countries
Bubble size: population
Philippines (2000–2017): Aquaculture production grew 4.26 percent an year to 2.24 million tonnes in 2017;
the 4.26 percent annual growth rate was lower than the 11.85 percent annual growth in South-eastern Asia.

Philippines (2000 versus
2017):
The 3
rd
largest aquaculture
country in South-eastern Asia.
Aquaculture production
doubled from 1.1 million
tonnes in 2000 to 2.2 million
tonnes in 2017
64
Data source: FAO Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through FishStatJ (March 2019; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Aquaculture Production Module (WAPI-AQPRN); see Figure 3.3 in WAPI-AQPRN v.2018.1 for a similar example (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Production covers all species measured in tonnage.
113
14 430
993 727
42 066
167 898
98 912
1 100 902
5 112
738 155
0
513 517
1 632
207 500
15 896 100
104 000
427 516
1 048 863
2 237 787
5 891
889 891
1 580
3 831 241
Brunei Darussalam
Cambodia
Indonesia
Lao People's Democratic Republic
Malaysia
Myanmar
Philippines
Singapore
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Viet Nam
Tonnes
Aquaculture production in South-eastern Asia
20002017

Philippines (2000–2017): Aquaculture’s share in total fishery production increased from 36.4 percent
in 2000 to 54.2 percent in 2017.
65
Data source: FAO Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through FishStatJ (March 2019; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Note: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Aquaculture Production Module (WAPI-AQPRN); see Figure 5.1 in WAPI-AQPRN v.2018.1 for a similar example (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Production covers all species measured in tonnage.
1,1011,220
1,338
1,449
1,717
1,896
2,092
2,215
2,408
2,477
2,546
2,608
2,542
2,373
2,3382,348
2,201
2,238
1 920
1 962
2 038
2 157
2 205
2 262
2 299
2 461
2 493 2 515
2 504
2 222 2 208 2 203
2 250
2 155
2 028
1 890
36.4
38.3
39.640.2
43.8
45.6
47.647.4
49.149.6
50.4
54.053.5
51.9
51.0
52.152.0
54.2
200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017
Philippines: aquaculture's share in total fishery production
Aquaculture production (thousand tonnes) Capture fisheries production (thousand tonnes) Share of aquaculture in total fish production (%)

Philippines (quantity; 2000
versus 2017):
Marine aquaculture accounted
for nearly 90 percent of
aquaculture production
quantity, which reflected
mostly the share of aquatic
plants.
66
Data source: FAO Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through FishStatJ (March 2019; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Aquaculture Production Module (WAPI-AQPRN); see Figure 1.5 in WAPI-AQPRN v.2018.1 for a similar example (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Production covers all species measured in tonnage. Species group less than 0.1 percent of total production may not be labelled.
Marine areas
85.9%
Inland
waters
14.1%
Freshwater
fishes
0.8%
Diadromous
fishes
16.3%
Crustaceans
3.6%
Molluscs1.9%
Aquatic plants
63.2%
Diadromous
fishes
2.1%
Freshwater
fishes
12.0%
Philippines (2017)
Aquaculture
production
(2017):
2 237 787
tonnes
Marine areas
89.8%
Inland
waters
10.2%
Freshwater
fishes
0.7%
Diadromous
fishes
17.8%
Crustaceans
4.3%
Molluscs2.8%
Aquatic plants
64.2%
Diadromous
fishes
1.3%
Freshwater
fishes
8.9%
Philippines (2000)
Aquaculture
production
(2000):
1 100 902
tonnes

Philippines (2017; volume
versus value):
Inland aquaculture accounted
for 14.1 percent of Philippines’
aquaculture production in
terms of volume and 23.3
percent in terms of value.
Aquatic plants accounted for
63.2 percent of production
volume yet 8.2 percent of
production value.
67
Data source: FAO Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through FishStatJ (March 2019; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Aquaculture Production Module (WAPI-AQPRN); see Figure 1.5 in WAPI-AQPRN v.2018.1 for a similar example (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Production covers all species measured in tonnage. Species group less than 0.1 percent of total production may not be labelled.
Marine areas
85.9%
Inland
waters
14.1%
Freshwater
fishes
0.8%
Diadromous
fishes
16.3%
Crustaceans
3.6%
Molluscs1.9%
Aquatic plants
63.2%
Diadromous
fishes
2.1%
Freshwater
fishes
12.0%
Philippines (2017, quantity)
Aquaculture
production
volume (2017):
2 237 787
tonnes
Marine areas
76.7%
Inland waters
23.3%
Freshwater
fishes
1.2%
Diadromous
fishes
34.0%
Marine fishes
0.2%
Crustaceans
32.4%
Molluscs
0.6%
Aquatic
plants
8.2%
Diadromous
fishes
3.4%
Freshwater
fishes
20.0%
Philippines (2017, value)
Aquaculture
production
value (2017):
1 998 5000
thousand USD

Philippines (2017): Inland aquaculture accounted for 14.1 percent of Philippines’ aquaculture
production quantity in 2017; the share was lower than he South-eastern Asia and world averages.
68
Marine
areas
56%
Inland
waters
44%
Diadromous
fishes
4.0%
Marine
fishes
2.5%
Crustaceans
4.7%
Molluscs
15.3%
Aquatic plants
28.4%
Crustaceans
2.8%
Diadromous
fishes
1.1%
Freshwater
fishes
39.4%
World (2017)
Aquaculture
production
(2017):
111 946 623
tonnes
Data source: FAO Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through FishStatJ (March 2019; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Aquaculture Production Module (WAPI-AQPRN); see Figure 1.5 in WAPI-AQPRN v.2018.1 for a similar example (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Production covers all species measured in tonnage. Species group less than 0.1 percent of total production may not be labelled.
Marine areas
85.9%
Inland
waters
14.1%
Freshwater
fishes
0.8%
Diadromous
fishes
16.3%
Crustaceans
3.6%
Molluscs
1.9%
Aquatic plants
63.2%
Diadromous
fishes
2.1%
Freshwater
fishes
12.0%
Philippines (2017)
Aquaculture
production
(2017):
2 237 787
tonnes
Marine
areas
66.9%
Inland
waters
33.1%
Freshwater
fishes
2.3%
Diadromous
fishes
6.6%
Marine fishes
1.4%
Crustaceans
8.2%
Molluscs
2.2%
Aquatic plants
46.2%
Crustaceans
0.4%
Diadromous
fishes
0.4%
Freshwater
fishes
32.3%
South-eastern Asia (2017)
Aquaculture
production
(2017):
24 652 001
tonnes

Philippines (2000 versus
2017):
Aquaculture production
increased from 1.1 million
tonnes to 2.24 million tonnes
with a relatively stable species
composition.
69
Data source: FAO Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through FishStatJ (March 2019; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Aquaculture Production Module (WAPI-AQPRN); see Figure 1.5 in WAPI-AQPRN v.2018.1 for a similar example (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Production covers all species measured in tonnage. Species group less than 0.1 percent of total production may not be labelled.
Finfish
31.3%
Shellfish
5.5%
Other
species
63.2%
Freshwater
fishes
12.9%
Diadromous
fishes
18.4%
Crustaceans
3.6%
Molluscs
1.9%
Aquatic
plants
63.2%
Philippines (2017)
Aquaculture
production
(2017):
2 237 787
tonnes
Finfish
28.7%
Shellfish
7.1%
Other
species
64.2%
Freshwater
fishes
9.6%
Diadromous
fishes
19.1%
Crustaceans
4.3%
Molluscs
2.8%
Aquatic
plants
64.2%
Philippines (2000)
Aquaculture
production
(2000):
1 100 902
tonnes

Philippines (2017): The 12.9 percent share of freshwater fishes in aquaculture production was lower
than the South-eastern Asia and world averages, whereas the 18.4 percent share of diadromous fishes
was higher than the South-eastern Asia and world averages.
70
Finfish
47.7%
Shellfish
23.1%
Other
species
29.2%
Marine fishes
2.8%
Freshwater
fishes
39.9%
Diadromous
fishes
5.0%
Crustaceans
7.5%
Molluscs
15.5%
Aquatic
plants
28.4%
World (2017)
Aquaculture
production
(2017):
111 946 623
tonnes
Data source: FAO Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through FishStatJ (March 2019; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Aquaculture Production Module (WAPI-AQPRN); see Figure 1.5 in WAPI-AQPRN v.2018.1 for a similar example (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Production covers all species measured in tonnage. Species group less than 0.1 percent of total production may not be labelled.
Finfish
31.3%
Shellfish
5.5%
Other
species
63.2%
Freshwater
fishes
12.9%
Diadromous
fishes
18.4%
Crustaceans
3.6%
Molluscs
1.9%
Aquatic
plants
63.2%
Philippines (2017)
Aquaculture
production
(2017):
2 237 787
tonnes
Finfish
43.0%
Shellfish
10.8%
Other
species
46.2%
Marine fishes
1.4%
Freshwater
fishes
34.5%
Diadromous
fishes
7.1%Crustaceans
8.6%
Molluscs
2.2%
Aquatic
plants
46.2%
South-eastern Asia (2017)
Aquaculture
production
(2017):
24 652 001
tonnes

Aquaculture production in thePhilippinesby species groups Year 2017 (in terms of quantity)
WAPI species groups ISSCAAPdivision
Number of
species in the
group farmed by
the country
The country’s
production quantity
of each species
group
(live weight; tonnes)
Share of the
country’s
production quantity
of all species (%)
Share of world
production of the
same species
group (%)
1. Red seaweeds (ISSCAAP group) Aquatic plants 3 1 414 366 63.20 8.20
2. Milkfish (Chanidae) Diadromous fishes 1 411 103 18.37 23.78
3. Tilapias and other cichlids (ISSCAAP group)Freshwater fishes 2 267 735 11.96 4.55
4. Marine shrimps and prawns (ISSCAAP group)Crustaceans 4 62 421 2.79 1.13
5. Oysters (ISSCAAP group) Molluscs 1 22 944 1.03 0.40
6. Mussels (ISSCAAP group) Molluscs 1 19 209 0.86 0.89
7. Crabs, sea-spiders (marine) (ISSCAAP group)Crustaceans 1 18 100 0.81 4.50
8. Carps, barbels and other cyprinids (ISSCAAP group)Freshwater fishes 1 14 589 0.65 0.05
9. Catfishes (Siluriformes) Freshwater fishes 1 4 147 0.19 0.08
10. Green seaweeds (ISSCAAP group) Aquatic plants 1 955 0.04 4.55
Other species 11 2 217 0.10 n.a.
Aquatic products 27 2 237 787 100.00 2.00
Data source: FAO Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through FishStatJ (March 2019; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en). Notes: Constructed by the FAO
WAPI Aquaculture Production Module (WAPI-AQPRN); see Figure 1.5 in WAPI-AQPRN v.2018.1 for a similar example (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en). ISSCAAP (International Standard Statistical
Classification of Aquatic Animals and Plants) grouping can be found at www.fao.org/tempref/FI/DOCUMENT/cwp/handbook/annex/AnnexS2listISSCAAP2000.pdf. The taxonomic scope of WAPI species groups
indicated in bracket. More information about the WAPI species grouping can be found at http://www.fao.org/3/ca5187en/ca5187en.pdf.
Philippines(2017): top 10 species groups in terms of quantity
71

Data source: FAO Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through FishStatJ (March 2019; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en). Notes: Constructed by the FAO
WAPI Aquaculture Production Module (WAPI-AQPRN); see Figure 1.5 in WAPI-AQPRN v.2018.1 for a similar example (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en). ISSCAAP (International Standard
Statistical Classification of Aquatic Animals and Plants) grouping can be found at www.fao.org/tempref/FI/DOCUMENT/cwp/handbook/annex/AnnexS2listISSCAAP2000.pdf. The taxonomic scope of WAPI species
groups indicated in bracket. More information about the WAPI species grouping can be found at http://www.fao.org/3/ca5187en/ca5187en.pdf.
Philippines(2017): top 10 species groups in terms of value
72
Aquaculture production in the Philippines by species groups Year 2017 (in terms of value)
WAPI species groups ISSCAAPdivision
Number of
species in the
group farmed by
the country
The country’s
production value of
each species group
(farmgate;
USD 1 000)
Share of the
country’s
production value of
all species (%)
Share of world
production of the
same species
group (%)
1. Milkfish (Chanidae) Diadromous fishes 1 746 470 37.35 30.74
2. Marine shrimps and prawns (ISSCAAP
group)
Crustaceans 4 501 887 25.11 1.47
3. Tilapias and other cichlids (ISSCAAP group)Freshwater fishes 2 406 051 20.32 3.68
4. Red seaweeds (ISSCAAP group) Aquatic plants 3 164 006 8.21 3.11
5. Crabs, sea-spiders (marine) (ISSCAAP
group)
Crustaceans 1 144 163 7.21 5.75
6. Catfishes (Siluriformes) Freshwater fishes 1 8 862 0.44 0.08
7. Carps, barbels and other cyprinids
(ISSCAAP group)
Freshwater fishes 1 7 120 0.36 0.01
8. Mussels (ISSCAAP group) Molluscs 1 6 860 0.34 0.16
9. Oysters (ISSCAAP group) Molluscs 1 5 144 0.26 0.08
10. Marine perch-like fishes (Percoidea,
marine)
Marine fishes 2 2 986 0.15 0.06
Others 10 4 952 0.25 n.a.
Aquatic products 27 1 998 500 100.00 0.80

Philippines (2017): Top 10 farmed ASFIS species items by quantity
73
1 330 290
411 103
166 607
101 128
83 877
46 068
22 944
19 209
18 100
14 589
23 872
1. Elkhorn sea moss
2. Milkfish
3. Nile tilapia
4. Tilapias nei
5. Spiny eucheuma
6. Giant tiger prawn
7. Slipper cupped oyster
8. Green mussel
9. Indo-Pacific swamp crab
10. Cyprinids nei
Other species
tonnes
Top-10 ASFIS species items in Philippines' aquaculture production quantity (2017)
59.4%18.4%
7.4%
4.5%
3.7%
2.1%
1.0%
0.9%
0.8%
0.7%
1.1%
Data source: FAO Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through FishStatJ (March 2019; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Aquaculture Production Module (WAPI-AQPRN); see Figure 1.2 in WAPI-AQPRN v.2018.1 for a similar example (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Species item less than 1 percent of total production may not be labelled in the pie chart. ASFIS = Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Information System; more information about ASFIS species items can be
found at www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en. Nei = not elsewhere included.

Philippines (2017): Top 10 farmed ASFIS species items by value
74
Data source: FAO Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through FishStatJ (March 2019; www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en).
Notes: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Aquaculture Production Module (WAPI-AQPRN); see Figure 1.2 in WAPI-AQPRN v.2018.1 for a similar example (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
Species item less than 1 percent of total production may not be labelled in the pie chart. ASFIS = Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Information System; more information about ASFIS species items can be
found at www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en. Nei = not elsewhere included.
746 470
425 728
253 491
159 412
152 561
144 163
66 248
8 862
7 120
6 860
27 586
1. Milkfish
2. Giant tiger prawn
3. Nile tilapia
4. Elkhorn sea moss
5. Tilapias nei
6. Indo-Pacific swamp crab
7. Whiteleg shrimp
8. Torpedo-shaped catfishes nei
9. Cyprinids nei
10. Green mussel
Other species
thousand USD
Top-10 ASFIS species items in Philippines' aquaculture production value (2017)
37.4%
21.3%
12.7%
8.0%
7.6%
7.2%
3.3%
1.4%

Outlook
75

Philippines’ population is
expected to reach 144
million in 2050, with more
than half (61.8 percent)
living in urban areas,
increased from 45.3 percent
in 2010.
Data sources: United Nations World Population Prospects (2019 revision; https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Download/Standard/Population). United Nations World Urbanization Prospects (2018 revision;
https://population.un.org/wup).
Note: Constructed by the FAO WAPI Population Module; see Template 1 in the WAPI prototype for examples (www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
49.6 49.8 50.0 50.2 50.3
45.3 47.4
50.9
56.0
61.8
94
110
124
136
144
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Philippines
Percentage of females (%) Percentage of urban population (%)
Total population (million)
76

Philippines (2018-2024):
GDP per capita expected to
increase from USD 3 103 to
USD 4 749 with 7.35 percent
annual growth, higher than
5.78 percent annual growth in
South-eastern Asia.
77
Data sources: IMF World Economic Outlook (WEO) database (October 2019; https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2019/01/weodata/download.aspx).
United Nations World Population Prospects (2019 revision; https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Download/Standard/Population) used to calculate GDP indicators at the regional level.
Note: Constructed by the FAO WAPI GDP Module (including calculation of GDP indicators at the regional/global level); see Template 4 in the WAPI prototype for examples
(www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/wapi/en).
3 103
3 300
3 500
3 739
4 047
4 384
4 749
4 502
4 705
4 965
5 265
5 588
5 936
6 306
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
GDP per capita (current USD)
Philippines South-eastern Asia

Philippines (2017–2030): Aquaculture growth potential from the demand-side perspective
•Giventhe30.06kgbaselinepercapitafish&seafoodconsumption,3718112tonnesoffish&seafoodwillbeneededtosatisfythedemandofPhilippines’124million
populationin2030,whichis556824tonneshigherthanthe3161288tonnesofbaselinefish&seafooddemand.
•Philippines’farmedfish&seafoodproductionincreasedfrom790894tonnesin2012to822466tonnesin2017.Followingthelinear5-yeartrendduring2012-2017,
farmedfish&seafoodproductioninthePhilippineswouldreach841517tonnesin2030,whichis19051tonneshigherthanthebaselinelevelin2017.
•The19051tonnesofextrafish&seafoodsupplygeneratedbythetrendaquaculturegrowth,evenifentirelydirectedtothedomesticmarket,wouldbeinsufficientto
coverthe556824tonnesofextrafish&seafooddemanddrivenbypopulationgrowthwithashortage(i.e.negativesupply-demandgap)of537773tonnes.
•IfthePhilippineswouldliketoincreaseitspercapitafish&seafoodconsumptionin2030to35.49kg(i.e.thebaselinelevelforSouth-easternAsia),thentheshortage
wouldbe1210195tonnes.
•Asopposedtoits0.79percentannualaquaculturegrowthduring2012-2017,aquacultureinthePhilippineswouldneedtogrow7.3percentduring2017–2030inorder
togenerateenoughfish&seafoodsupplytosatisfythefish&seafooddemandgrowthdrivenbybothpopulationgrowthandanincreaseinitspercapitafish&
seafooddemandtotheSouth-easternAsiaaverage,assumingthatallthefish&seafoodsupplygrowthisdirectedtothedomesticmarket.
78
Philippines: Fish & seafood Baseline (2017)
Projection to 2030
Population growth only
Population growth + higher per
capita fish demand
Year 2030
2030 compared
to the baseline
Year 2030
2030 compared
to the baseline
1. Per capita fish demand (kg/capita/year) 30.06 30.06 - 35.49 5.44
2. Population (thousand) 105 173 123 698 18 525 123 698 18 525
3. Total fish demand (tonnes) 3 161 288 3 718 112 556 824 4 390 534 1 229 246
4. Fish supply from aquaculture (tonnes) 822 466 841 517 19 051 841 517 19 051
5. Supply-demand gap (tonnes) -537 773 -1 210 195
Notes: Fish & seafood includesfinfish, crustaceans, molluscs and miscellaneous aquatic animals. 1. The 2013 level of per capita fish consumption in the Philippines
(30.06 kg) and South-eastern Asia (35.49 kg) treated as the baseline and the higher benchmark, respectively. 2. Population data from UN World Population Prospects
(2019 revision). 3. Equal to (1) x (2). 4. Aquaculture production in 2017 from FAO Global Fishery and Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through
FishStatJ (March 2019); projection of aquaculture production in 2030 based on the 5-year linear trend of aquaculture production during 2012-2017. 5. Equal to (4) -(3).

Philippines: Aquaculture growth potential from the supply-side perspective
•Philippines’ share in world aquaculture production in
2017 (2percent):
•Greater than its share of world total land
(including inland water surface) area (0.22
percent).
•Greater than its share of total world renewable
water resources (0.88 percent).
•Greater thanits share in world population (1.40
percent).
•Philippines’ share in world inland aquaculture
production in 2017 (0.64 percent)：
•Greaterthan its share of world total inland
water surface area (0.23 percent).
•Philippines’ share in world marine (including coastal)
aquaculture production in 2017 (3.08 percent):
•Less than its share of world total coastline
length (4.5 percent).
Philippines (2017) Share of world total (%)
Total country area (excluding coastal waters)¹0.22
Surface area of inland water bodies² 0.23
Coastline length³ 4.50
Total renewable water resources¹ 0.88
Population⁴ 1.40
All species
Excluding
aquatic
plants
Aquaculture production (all areas)⁵ 2.00 1.03
Aquaculture production (inland waters)⁵0.64 0.64
Aquaculture production (marine areas)⁵ 3.08 1.66
Data sources: 1. FAO. 2016. AQUASTAT Main Database –Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Website accessed on 16 May 2019. 2.
FAOSTAT Land Cover database (updated June 2019; CCI_LC). 3. The World
Factbook, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), United States of America. Website
accessed on 20 May 2019; coastline length of world equal to the sum of coastline
length of 265 countries and territories listed in the data source. 4. United Nations
World Population Prospects (2019 revision). 5. FAO Global Fishery and
Aquaculture Production Statistics v2019.1.0, published through FishStatJ (March
2019).
79

Aquaculture Growth Potential in the Philippines.pdf

About This Presentation

Slide Content

Tags

Categories

Download

Quick Actions

Statistics

Related Slideshows

Aquaculture Growth Potential in the Philippines.pdf

About This Presentation

Slide Content

Slide 1

Slide 2

Slide 3

Slide 4

Slide 5

Slide 6

Slide 7

Slide 8

Slide 9

Slide 10

Slide 11

Slide 12

Slide 13

Slide 14

Slide 15

Slide 16

Slide 17

Slide 18

Slide 19

Slide 20

Slide 21

Slide 22

Slide 23

Slide 24

Slide 25

Slide 26

Slide 27

Slide 28

Slide 29

Slide 30

Slide 31

Slide 32

Slide 33

Slide 34

Slide 35

Slide 36

Slide 37

Slide 38

Slide 39

Slide 40

Slide 41

Slide 42

Slide 43

Slide 44

Slide 45

Slide 46

Slide 47

Slide 48

Slide 49

Slide 50

Slide 51

Slide 52

Slide 53

Slide 54

Slide 55

Slide 56

Slide 57

Slide 58

Slide 59

Slide 60

Slide 61

Slide 62

Slide 63

Slide 64

Slide 65

Slide 66

Slide 67

Slide 68

Slide 69

Slide 70

Slide 71

Slide 72

Slide 73

Slide 74

Slide 75

Slide 76

Slide 77

7-10. STP + Branding and Product & Services Strategies.pptx