Are We Closer to a Cure With Perioperative Immunotherapy in Resectable NSCLC? Latest Evidence, Current Conclusions, and Ongoing Questions in Clinical Care

PeerView 312 views 26 slides Sep 25, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 26
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26

About This Presentation

Chair Prof. Solange Peters, MD, PhD, discusses NSCLC in this CME activity titled “Are We Closer to a Cure With Perioperative Immunotherapy in Resectable NSCLC? Latest Evidence, Current Conclusions, and Ongoing Questions in Clinical Care.” For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, an...


Slide Content

Are We Closer to a Cure With Perioperative
Immunotherapy in Resectable NSCLC?

Latest Evidence, Current Conclusions, and
Ongoing Questions in Clinical Care

Prof. Solange Peters, MD, PhD
Chair and Professor, Medical Oncology
Full Professor
University Hospital of Lausanne

| Lausanne, Switzerland

Go online to access full CME information, including faculty disclosures.

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Our Goals for Today

Augment your knowledge of the latest data on
immunotherapy in resectable NSCLC

Improve your ability to interpret clinical evidence supporting
the use of different immunotherapy approaches to personalise
the management of resectable NSCLC.

Equip you with skills for devising individualised care plans
inclusive of immunotherapy to optimise outcomes for patients
with resectable NSCLC

Copyright © 2000-2

IMMUNOTHERAPY IN RESECTABLE NSCLC | OUTLINE

PART 1

PART 2

Shining a Light on the Clinical Data
Supporting the Use of Adjuvant,

Neoadjuvant, and Perioperative
Immunotherapy in Resectable NSCLC

Closer to a Cure or Added Clinical

Complexity? Making Sense of the

Innovations for Immunotherapy in
Resectable NSCLC

Copyright © 200

4, PeerView

Resectable L Cancer: Poor Prognosis’

= Stage IB: 71%
Stage IIA: 64%
~ Stage IIB: 55%

~~ Stage IIIA: 37%

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72
Time, mo

+ According lo St Eton a THM Staging of Lung Cancer. ,
Y GhanseyK etal u Tome Oncol 201211001121. PeerView

PeerView.com/AWU827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Local therapy Rav pee

Surgery .
e Radiation therapy
Systemic therapy ns .
Chemotherapy
Targeted therapy
Immunotherapy
PeerView

PeerView.com/AWU827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Adjuvant Neoadjuvant Perioperative

IMpower010 CheckMate -816 KEYNOTE-671
PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091 AEGEAN
Neotorch
CheckMate -77T
RATIONALE-315

ANVIL IMpower030
BR31
ALCHEMIST chemo-1O
MERMAID
PeerView

PeerView.com/AWU827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Overview of Key Immunotherapy Strategies and Trials

16 AEGEAN‘

Timing ‘Aguvant ‘Agjwvant Neoadjuvant. Peñoperaive Perioperative Perlperalve | Petioperalve Perioperative
Size 1.005 1,77 358 802 500 Tor 461 453
a Alezoizumab — Pembrolzumab — NvolumaD DumalumaD Topalmab — PembrolzumaD Niolmab Tiseizumab
Sri (Da) eo) Fon) (Pout) on) Fon) von) on)
cycles, N 15 8 3 15 "7 1 16 2
En en Resectable IB esectable ILE Resectabie ll Resectable IH Resectable ILIIIB/ Resectable INIA.
Ineiuson. Li he ie (24 em} (7th) (eth) by (sth) (8th) (8th) (em)
C4 em Gi) GA emana (7m) lobectomy
Stage Ban % 59/44 72128 36/64 am 20180 30/70 35165 41159
Primary endpoint DFS hierarchical, DES. OFS PCR, EFS pCR, EFS MPR, EFS EFS,OS EFS EFS, MPR
inPD-L1 260%
Platinum doublet patinum dout latinum-base latinum-based Cisplatin doublet latinum doubl latinum doublet
Chemotherapy Cispiain comer MI doublet Plalmumibased Platinumbased Cisplatin doublet Platnum doublet Platinum doublet
No EGFR,
EOFRALK ouced(is%) Indiens) NO | Nodocumenied wr incygeg (7%) no documented WT
mutation, WT Asia mutaton ae
1. Faipe € at al Lancet 2021:98:194-1957.2. Bhan Met al. Lancet One 2022.23274-120 2 Forde P la Eng J Mad 202236 1873-1096.
à Koymach Jet AAGR 2023 Abel TOS, 3 Lu Sta. ASCO 2023 Abstact 81,8 Vakalos Het al Eng! Jed 2023-80 40-202 en
7. Cancone Tet al ESMO 2029. Abstaci LBAT. 8. Yue Dei a ELGG 2028, abstract 1080 PeerView

PeerView.com/AWU827

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Understandi

Treatment Length and Median Follow-Up in Mo!

BIN Treatment length

Median follow-up

IMpower010"
KEYNOTE-091?
CheckMate -816°
AEGEAN*
Neotorch
KEYNOTE-67 1°

CheckMate -77T*

o 6 12 18 24 30 36 42
1. Felipe E et al. Lancet 2021/398-1344-1357. 2. O'Bien Met al Lancet One 2022/23-1274-1288, 3. Forde Petal N Engl Med, 2022:388-1973-1986,

à Heymach et a ARCR 2023, Abort CTO, § LS tl, ASCO 2023 Abstract 501.6, Maui Mei. N Engl Mod. 2029300491508 rn
7 Spier Jed al ESMO 2025. Abstract LBASO.. Cascone Tet al ESMO 2022 Abst LAT PeerView

PeerView.com/AWU827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Understanding Evidence: Pathologic Response Results!

60
3 vs 4 cycles
50 i
æ 40 pCR
e 30 248 Pathologic Complete Response
8 » 172 181 (No Viable Tumour at Resection)
10
o
CheckMate -816 AEGEAN Neotorch KEYNOTE-671 CheckMate -77T
60
gp = MPR
eo Major Pathologic Response
a 3 (10% Viable Tumour at Resection)
= >
10
o
CheckMate -816 AEGEAN Neotorch KEYNOTE-671 CheckMate -77T
1. Forde Pata. N Engl Mad. 202:9861979-1965. 2, Heyrach Jet al AACR 2023, Abstract CTOOS, 9. LUS et al ASCO 2023, Abstract 8501.

4 Watetee Metal Eng! Med, 2029-00 491-803 6. Spent Jet aL ESMO 2022, Abstract LAS. 6. Cascone Tetal ESMO 2023. Abstact LEA PeerView

PeerView.com/AWU827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Understanding Evidence: 2-Year EFS/DFS Results!”

506 Adjuvant Neoadjuvant Perioperative

$0] HR=081

y HR=0.76 HR=068 | HR=068 HR=0.40 HR=0.58 HR = 0.58
x 70
6 © 63.6 Sr, 65 633 ol 624
L 60 59
f=} 1524
ya 50
Ds 47 26.1
ti [40.6
= 40
8

S 2

10

o

IMpower010 KEYNOTE-091 CheckMate -816 AEGEAN Neotorch KEYNOTE-671 CheckMate -77T

A Fle E tal Lance 2021308134437 2 On Mall ane! Ost 222231274125 3 Fara Pata ELOO 202 Ase 64
"Jet al AACR 2023, Abstract CTOOS. 5. Lu S et al ASCO 2023 Abstract 8501. 6 Viakeite Het al. N Eng! Med. 2023389:491:503,
7 cone Toa. ESMO 202, Austral OA

PeerView

PeerView.com/AWU827 Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

Understanding Evidence: 3-Year OS Results!

Adjuvant Neoadjuvant Perioperative
100 HR = 0.42 HR = 0.62 HR = 0.72
89.1 (95% CI: 0.23-0.78) (99.34% Cl: 0.36-1.05) (95% Cl: 0.56-0.93)
90 P= 012 P= 005
775 78
80 71
x 70 64 64
g 60
2 50
E
> 40
e 30
20
10
0
IMpower010? CheckMate -816 KEYNOTE-671

Stage IIA PO-L1 TC 50%, exclucing patent wih known EGFRUALK atea.
1.Felp E et al Ann Oncol, 2023:34507-919. 2 Forde Petal. ELOC 2023, Abstract 840, 3. Spice Jet al, ESMO 2023. Abstract LBASS.

PeerView.com/AWU827

PeerView

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Resolving Controversies
Neoadjuvant/Perioperative Chemo-IO by Stage?!

Stage
Forde 2022% Stage 65 62 aa 087 (048: +56)
Waous2023 Stage! se m LR 059 (040; 0.08}
Heymach 2023 ‘Stage Il 104 110 —- 0.76 [0.43; 1.34]
Cascone 2029 Stage! E a 081 1046: 143
Random effects model an = 071 (0.55:032)

Hatwpenety 0%, 7 = € 0.1, p= 0.88

significar son

: Foro 2022 Stage m 1 - 054 10.37,0301
it Vitae 20208 Sage ar zus - 057 (0.44:0741
Vikoloo 2023 Stgo 62 ss = 057 (0.26: 0.90}
Hoymach 20230 Stag il m 165 = 057 (0.39:0.83)
Heymacn 20230 Stage ill a 30 - 080 (0.52; 1.32]
Prvenc 2023 Stage ll Ed 2 —— 047 125;000
ites) Saga 202 2 039 (0.27:0.571
Cascone 2023 Stage il 16 19 en 051 1036:0721
Random ects model me 107 . 054 1048;052}

Hetwogmaiy: F 20% P20, p07

st
oz os 1 2 5
Faros Gena Fever Chen

1. Sonn etal. JAMA One 2024.10-521-653. PeerView

PeerView.com/AWU827 Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

Resolving Controversies:

Neoadjuvant/Perioperative Chemo-IO for OS?!

All patients

Forde 2022 All patients
Wakelee 2023 All patients
Provencio 2023 All patients
Lu 2023 Alpatients

Random effects model
Heterogeneity: 1? = 0%, Y = <0.1, p = 067

1. Soon et al. JAMA Oncol 202410821853

PeerView.com/AWU827

179
397
57

179
400

29
202
810

0.2

ited

0.5

1

0.57 (0.38; 0.87]
0.72 (0.56; 0.93]

HTA

2 5

Favors Chemo-IO Favors Chemo

PeerView

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Resolving Controversies

Neoadjuvant/Perioperative Chemo-IO by PD-L1?!

1. Sonn et al. JAMA Oncol 2026:10:621-635

PeerView.com/AWU827

POL «1%
Forde 2022

Maroc 2023
Heymach 2029
20%

Cascone 2028
Random eects model

Hotoogenaty PU, 1 = 404, p=091

POL 140%
"aia 2029,
Hormach 2028

lw 20%

‘cascone 2023
Random ects model

Hera at 3% Pe <O1,p 2018

POL wor
Forde 2022.

waive 2023
eymach 202

Lu 2028

Cascone 2020
Random eects model

Hogar 32% > 04,9 =021

Pots <i
pour ais
Pots at,
POL ets,
Pou etm,

Pou 140%
PO: 140%
POL 149%
POL 140%

POL: 0%
POL: or
POL: sor
POL: o
POL: aso

7
138
122

we
195

»
132
6
45
a

181
125

ns

m

m 004 fast: 1321
975 9:56:10
076 Bm
059 1053:1 001
073 1047: 1.161
074 1052:039)


=
o
— 058 10301121
- (082 1030.09)
E 070 10.49; 1.05)
—— 031 10:18:09]
076 10.46:1.251
- 0.56 42:07]
=
ni

028 1.10:0.611
048 1033:0711
060 1035:1.011
031 1015:082
. 026 10:12:05
- 040 1028056)

oz os 1 2 8
Foros Crore iO Faves Chemo

reerview

Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

Incorporating Immunotherapy Into Treatment Plans in Resectable
NSCLC: What We Need to Know and Do

@ Select appropriate patients

@ Determine sequence of therapies
© Appropriate pre- and intraoperative nodal staging
© Understand the evidence

© Plan for potential technical challenges

PeerView

PeerView.com/AWU827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Patient Selection Considerations

Staging

Physiologic Evaluation
Biomarker testing

CT

BEI PFTs
EBUS/med Cardiac eval
Brain MRI Exercise testing

Frailty assessment

PeerView

PeerView.com/AWU827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

IMMUNOTHERAPY IN RESECTABLE NSCLC | OUTLINE

PART 1

PART 2

Shining a Light on the Clinical Data
Supporting the Use of Adjuvant,

Neoadjuvant, and Perioperative
Immunotherapy in Resectable NSCLC

Closer to a Cure or Added Clinical
Complexity? Making Sense of the
Innovations for Immunotherapy in

Resectable NSCLC

‘© 2000-2024, PeerView

allenging Clinical Questions

PeerView

PeerView.com/AWU827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Challenging Clinical Ques:

How do we decide between
neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and perioperative strategies?

PeerView

/AWUB27 Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

Challenging Clinical Que:

Is there a preferred platinum-based chemotherapy agent |
that should be used as part of perioperative therapy?

PeerView

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

How can we balance improved clinical efficacy while |
avoiding overtreatment and increased toxicity?
|

PeerView

Copyright © 2000-2024, Peerview

allenging Clinical Questions

PeerView

PeerView.com/AWU827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

allenging Clinical Questions

PeerView

PeerView.com/AWU827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Challenging Clinical Ques:

| Is there an optimum or minimum treatment duration in the
| adjuvant setting that we should utilise?

PeerView

VAWU827 Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Challenging Clinical Ques’

How does utilising perioperative immunotherapy approaches
impact long-term management of patients?

PeerView

Copyright © 2000-2024, PeerView

Conclusions & Key Takeaways

Copyright © 2000-2024,