Article 23 Of Constitution Of India.pptx

616 views 11 slides Apr 06, 2022
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 11
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11

About This Presentation

Article 23 of the Constitution amended in 2014 includes the following provisions: Traffic in human beings and begar and other similar forms of forced labour are prohibited and any contravention of this provision shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law.


Slide Content

ARTICLE 23 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA BY HARSH KUMAR

CONTEXT India as the world's largest democracy has also been a place of slavery and exploitation of children and adults. Prior to the enactment of the Indian Constitution, there were several forms of slavery, exploitation, and widespread practice in India. But with the passage of time and the adoption of the Constitution (Article 23 of the Constitution of India 1949) these practices were reduced to zero. But even after these laws and regulations, there were many unethical practices in human beings such as Rajasthan, in the northeastern provinces, in other parts of the UP, Bihar, and various other places where practices such as abstinence, human trafficking by forced labor , and so on. it happens and the public still keeps closing and watching all of this.

CONTEXT There are still many places where women are discriminated against because of their sexuality and other problems as in some areas they were not allowed to enter their churches but there is no established reason for this practice. There are many cases of human trafficking in the north-eastern provinces where the government is still in power. it cannot find the cause and cannot take concrete steps to stop those activities.

As per Article 23 Individual travel and hobo and other comparable forms of bound activity are prohibited and any opposition to this provision will be a legally binding offense. Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from enforcing compulsory aid for public purposes, and in violation of that provision the State shall not make any distinction on the basis of religion, race, rank or class, any of these. Features of Article 23: It protects both citizens and non-citizens against government and private individuals against exploitation. Article 35 authorizes Parliament to enact laws to punish acts prohibited under Article 23. It makes the world responsible for identifying and removing any such vicious acts.

Practices Prohibited By Article 23 Beggar: The word beggar comes from India. The beggar was a framework in which the government (in fact, the British Government) and Zamindars used to encourage people to move their products from one place to another. It means compulsory work without a installment. The beggar establishes 2 parts It is to motivate a person to do his will, too he is not paid for that work.

Practices Prohibited By Article 23 Population: This word means to sell and buy people from one person to another, sometimes from one country to another, as if it were their conversation. Although, slavery is not explicitly stated under Article 23 but is included in the definition of th Traffic to people. Pursuant to Article 23, Parliament passed the Violence Against Women and Girls' Sexual Offenses Act, 1956, to punish human trafficking.

Practices Prohibited By Article 23 Arrested Work / Compulsory Work: Here the job is not only because of his physical and mental strength but also because of his economic status we like to pay off his debts. In this way, he is forced to work and if at the time he is unable to pay his debts the employee sometimes gets twice as much without pay or passes on to the next generation. So from here the word Bonded Labor or forced labor.

Case Law Interpretations PEOPLE'S Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India The case involved forced labor. The law prohibits any form of forced labor whether due to mental, physical, or economic pressure. Also, no one will be compelled to do anything contrary to his will in any way, and doing so will incur severe penalties. Sanjit Roy v. State of Rajasthan In, the State used individuals to do certain work under the Hunger Relief Act. People were starving, so the State used them. In any case, these people were paid even less than the basic wages because cash was provided to help them accumulate poverty.

THANK YOU….