Assignment model problems

AnuragSrivastava11 3,447 views 49 slides Mar 09, 2019
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 49
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49

About This Presentation

solved example: assignment model of operations research


Slide Content

Assignment Model Problems

A fast food chain wants to build four stores. In the past, the chain has used six different construction companies and, having been satisfied with each, has invited each to bid on each job. The final bids (in thousands of rupees) are show in the following table. Since the fast food chain wants to have each of the new stores ready as quickly as possible, it will award at most one job to a construction company. What assignment results in minimum total cost to the fast food chain? Construction Companies 1 2 3 4 5 6 Store 1 85.3 88 87.5 82.4 89.1 86.7 Store 2 78.9 77.4 77.4 76.5 79.3 78.3 Store 3 82 81.3 82.4 80.6 83.5 81.7 Store 4 84.3 84.6 86.2 83.3 84.4 85.5

Balancing the assignment problem

Construction Companies 1 2 3 4 5 6 Store 1 85.3 88 87.5 82.4 89.1 86.7 Store 2 78.9 77.4 77.4 76.5 79.3 78.3 Store 3 82 81.3 82.4 80.6 83.5 81.7 Store 4 84.3 84.6 86.2 83.3 84.4 85.5 Dummy 1 Dummy 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 85.3 88 87.5 82.4 89.1 86.7 S2 78.9 77.4 77.4 76.5 79.3 78.3 S3 82 81.3 82.4 80.6 83.5 81.7 S4 84.3 84.6 86.2 83.3 84.4 85.5 D1 D2

Applying the Hungarian method

1 st Reduced Cost Matrix Subtracting the minimum element of each row from each element of that row

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 85.3–82.4 88–82.4 87.5–82.4 82.4–82.4 89.1–82.4 86.7–82.4 S2 78.9–76.5 77.4–76.5 77.4–76.5 76.5–76.5 79.3–76.5 78.3–76.5 S3 82–80.6 81.3–80.6 82.4–80.6 80.6–80.6 83.5–80.6 81.7–80.6 S4 84.3–83.3 84.6–83.3 86.2–83.3 83.3–83.3 84.4–83.3 85.5–83.3 D1 0–0 0–0 0–0 0–0 0–0 0–0 D2 0–0 0–0 0–0 0–0 0–0 0–0

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 2.9 5.6 5.1 6.7 4.3 S2 2.4 0.9 0.9 2.8 1.8 S3 1.4 0.7 1.8 2.9 1.1 S4 1 1.3 2.9 1.1 2.2 D1 D2

2 nd Reduced Cost Matrix Subtracting the minimum element of each column from each element of that column

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 2.9–0 5.6–0 5.1–0 0–0 6.7–0 4.3–0 S2 2.4–0 0.9–0 0.9–0 0–0 2.8–0 1.8–0 S3 1.4–0 0.7–0 1.8–0 0–0 2.9–0 1.1–0 S4 1–0 1.3–0 2.9–0 0–0 1.1–0 2.2–0 D1 0–0 0–0 0–0 0–0 0–0 0–0 D2 0–0 0–0 0–0 0–0 0–0 0–0

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 2.9 5.6 5.1 6.7 4.3 S2 2.4 0.9 0.9 2.8 1.8 S3 1.4 0.7 1.8 2.9 1.1 S4 1 1.3 2.9 1.1 2.2 D1 D2

Striking off all 0’s using minimum number of vertical/horizontal lines

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 2.9 5.6 5.1 6.7 4.3 S2 2.4 0.9 0.9 2.8 1.8 S3 1.4 0.7 1.8 2.9 1.1 S4 1 1.3 2.9 1.1 2.2 D1 D2

Subtracting the minimum uncut element from other uncut elements, and adding it to elements at the intersections Since minimum number of lines required is less than the number of rows/columns

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 2.9 –0.7 5.6 –0.7 5.1 –0.7 6.7 –0.7 4.3 –0.7 S2 2.4 –0.7 0.9 –0.7 0.9 –0.7 2.8 –0.7 1.8 –0.7 S3 1.4 –0.7 0.7 –0.7 1.8 –0.7 2.9 –0.7 1.1 –0.7 S4 1 –0.7 1.3 –0.7 2.9 –0.7 1.1 –0.7 2.2 –0.7 D1 0+0.7 D2 0+0.7

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 2.2 4.9 4.4 6 3.6 S2 1 .7 0.2 0.2 2.1 1.1 S3 0.7 1.1 2.2 0.4 S4 0.3 0.6 2.2 0.4 1.5 D1 0.7 D2 0.7

Striking off all 0’s using minimum number of vertical/horizontal lines

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 2.2 4.9 4.4 6 3.6 S2 1 .7 0.2 0.2 2.1 1.1 S3 0.7 1.1 2.2 0.4 S4 0.3 0.6 2.2 0.4 1.5 D1 0.7 D2 0.7

Subtracting the minimum uncut element from other uncut elements, and adding it to elements at the intersections Since minimum number of lines required is less than the number of rows/columns

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 2.2–0.2 4.9–0.2 4.4–0.2 6–0.2 3.6–0.2 S2 1 .7 –0.2 0.2–0.2 0.2–0.2 2.1–0.2 1.1–0.2 S3 0.7 1.1 0+0.2 2.2 0.4 S4 0.3 –0.2 0.6 –0.2 2.2–0.2 0.4 –0.2 1.5–0.2 D1 0.7+0.2 D2 0.7+0.2

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 2 4.7 4.2 5.8 3.4 S2 1 .5 1.9 0.9 S3 0.7 1.1 0.2 2.2 0.4 S4 0.1 0.4 2 0.2 1.3 D1 0.9 D2 0.9

Striking off all 0’s using minimum number of vertical/horizontal lines

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 2 4.7 4.2 5.8 3.4 S2 1 .5 1.9 0.9 S3 0.7 1.1 0.2 2.2 0.4 S4 0.1 0.4 2 0.2 1.3 D1 0.9 D2 0.9

Subtracting the minimum uncut element from other uncut elements, and adding it to elements at the intersections Since minimum number of lines required is less than the number of rows/columns

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 2 4.7 4.2 5.8 3.4 S2 1 .5 1.9 0.9 S3 0.7 1.1 0.2 2.2 0.4 S4 0.1 0.4 2 0.2 1.3 D1 0.9 D2 0.9

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 2–0.1 4.7–0.1 4.2–0.1 5.8–0.1 3.4–0.1 S2 1 .5 0+0.1 1.9 0.9 S3 0.7 1.1 0.2 +0.1 2.2 0.4 S4 0.1 –0.1 0.4 –0.1 2–0.1 0.2–0.1 1.3–0.1 D1 0.9 +0.1 D2 0.9 +0.1

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 1.9 4.6 4.1 5.7 3.3 S2 1 .5 0.1 1.9 0.9 S3 0.7 1.1 0.3 2.2 0.4 S4 0.3 1.9 0.1 1.1 D1 1 D2 1

Striking off all 0’s using minimum number of vertical/horizontal lines

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 1.9 4.6 4.1 5.7 3.3 S2 1 .5 0.1 1.9 0.9 S3 0.7 1.1 0.3 2.2 0.4 S4 0.3 1.9 0.1 1.1 D1 1 D2 1

Making assignments Since minimum number of lines required is equal to the number of rows/columns

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 1.9 4.6 4.1 5.7 3.3 S2 1 .5 0.1 1.9 0.9 S3 0.7 1.1 0.3 2.2 0.4 S4 0.3 1.9 0.1 1.1 D1 1 D2 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 1.9 4.6 4.1 5.7 3.3 S2 1 .5 0.1 1.9 0.9 S3 0.7 1.1 0.3 2.2 0.4 S4 0.3 1.9 0.1 1.1 D1 1 D2 1 ×

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 1.9 4.6 4.1 5.7 3.3 S2 1 .5 0.1 1.9 0.9 S3 0.7 1.1 0.3 2.2 0.4 S4 0.3 1.9 0.1 1.1 D1 1 D2 1 ×

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 1.9 4.6 4.1 5.7 3.3 S2 1 .5 0.1 1.9 0.9 S3 0.7 1.1 0.3 2.2 0.4 S4 0.3 1.9 0.1 1.1 D1 1 D2 1 × × × ×

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 1.9 4.6 4.1 5.7 3.3 S2 1 .5 0.1 1.9 0.9 S3 0.7 1.1 0.3 2.2 0.4 S4 0.3 1.9 0.1 1.1 D1 1 D2 1 × × × ×

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 1.9 4.6 4.1 5.7 3.3 S2 1 .5 0.1 1.9 0.9 S3 0.7 1.1 0.3 2.2 0.4 S4 0.3 1.9 0.1 1.1 D1 1 D2 1 × × × × × ×

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 1.9 4.6 4.1 5.7 3.3 S2 1 .5 0.1 1.9 0.9 S3 0.7 1.1 0.3 2.2 0.4 S4 0.3 1.9 0.1 1.1 D1 1 D2 1 × × × × × ×

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 1.9 4.6 4.1 5.7 3.3 S2 1 .5 0.1 1.9 0.9 S3 0.7 1.1 0.3 2.2 0.4 S4 0.3 1.9 0.1 1.1 D1 1 D2 1 × × × × × × × ×

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 1.9 4.6 4.1 5.7 3.3 S2 1 .5 0.1 1.9 0.9 S3 0.7 1.1 0.3 2.2 0.4 S4 0.3 1.9 0.1 1.1 D1 1 D2 1 × × × × × × × ×

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 1.9 4.6 4.1 5.7 3.3 S2 1 .5 0.1 1.9 0.9 S3 0.7 1.1 0.3 2.2 0.4 S4 0.3 1.9 0.1 1.1 D1 1 D2 1 × × × × × × × × × ×

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 1.9 4.6 4.1 5.7 3.3 S2 1 .5 0.1 1.9 0.9 S3 0.7 1.1 0.3 2.2 0.4 S4 0.3 1.9 0.1 1.1 D1 1 D2 1 × × × × × × × × × ×

Computing total cost

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 1.9 4.6 4.1 5.7 3.3 S2 1 .5 0.1 1.9 0.9 S3 0.7 1.1 0.3 2.2 0.4 S4 0.3 1.9 0.1 1.1 D1 1 D2 1 × × × × × × × × × × 1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 85.3 88 87.5 82.4 89.1 86.7 S2 78.9 77.4 77.4 76.5 79.3 78.3 S3 82 81.3 82.4 80.6 83.5 81.7 S4 84.3 84.6 86.2 83.3 84.4 85.5 D1 D2

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 1.9 4.6 4.1 5.7 3.3 S2 1 .5 0.1 1.9 0.9 S3 0.7 1.1 0.3 2.2 0.4 S4 0.3 1.9 0.1 1.1 D1 1 D2 1 × × × × × × × × × × 1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 85.3 88 87.5 82.4 89.1 86.7 S2 78.9 77.4 77.4 76.5 79.3 78.3 S3 82 81.3 82.4 80.6 83.5 81.7 S4 84.3 84.6 86.2 83.3 84.4 85.5 D1 D2

1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 85.3 88 87.5 82.4 89.1 86.7 S2 78.9 77.4 77.4 76.5 79.3 78.3 S3 82 81.3 82.4 80.6 83.5 81.7 S4 84.3 84.6 86.2 83.3 84.4 85.5 D1 D2 Optimum Assignment and Total Cost Construction Company Store Cost 1 4 Rs.84300 2 3 Rs.81300 3 2 Rs.77400 4 1 Rs.82400 5 - - 6 - - Total Cost Rs.325400

Ans : Optimum Assignment & Total Cost Construction Company Store Cost 1 4 Rs.84300 2 3 Rs.81300 3 2 Rs.77400 4 1 Rs.82400 5 - - 6 - - Total Cost Rs.325400

A firm wants to purchase three different types of equipment and five manufacturers have come forward to supply these machines. However, the firm’s policy is not to accept more than one machine from any of the manufacturers. The data relating to the price (in lakhs of rupees) quoted by the different manufacturers are given below. Determine how best the firm can purchase the three machines. Machines 1 2 3 Manufacturers A 2.99 3.11 2.68 B 2.78 2.87 2.57 C 2.92 3.05 2.80 D 2.82 3.10 2.74 E 3.11 2.90 2.64

A management consulting firm has a backlog of 4 contracts. Work on these contracts must be started immediately. 3 project leaders are available for assignment to the contracts. Because of varying work experience of the project leaders the profit of the consulting firm would vary based on the assignments as shown below. The unassigned contract can be completed by subcontracting it to an outside consultant. The profit from the subcontract is zero. Determine the assignment of project leaders to the contracts so as to maximise profits. Contracts 1 2 3 4 Project Leaders A 13 10 9 11 B 15 17 13 20 C 6 8 11 7
Tags