Asthma Diagnosis and Monitoring | Jindal Chest Clinic

JindalChestClinic 43 views 21 slides Jun 20, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 21
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21

About This Presentation

Presentation by Dr. S.K Jindal on "Asthma Diagnosis and Monitoring" including breath analysis, causes of wheezing, severity assessment, etc. For more information, please contact us: : 9779030507.


Slide Content

Dr. S. K. Jindal
www.jindalchest.com

Key Issues
•Underdiagnosis/Misdiagnosisand?Overdiagnosis
•Establishingdiagnosis:criteria
•Severityassessment/Classification
•Monitoring

Establishing Diagnosis
A.Clinicalfeatures
B.Demonstrationofairwayobstruction
C.VariabilityandreversibilityofA.O.
D.Excludingothercausesofwheezing/airwayobstruction
E.Establishinghypersensitivity
F.Assessmentofreversibility
G.Demonstrationofinflammation

Clinical Features
•Symptoms Episodic
Cough, breathlessness
Wheezing, chest ‘congestion’
‘heaviness’
Expectoration Nil to profuse
Frothy to purulent
•Signs Hyperinflated chest
Rhonchi, crackles
•General systemic

Airway Obstruction
•Physicalexamination
Wheezing,prolongedexpiration
•Measuringforcedexpiratorytime
•Chestroentgenography
•PEFmeasurement
•Spirometry:↓FEV
1,FEV
1/VC
•Airwayresistance

Establishing variability / reversibility
•Historyofparoxysmalsymptoms,variablephysicalfindings
•Exacerbationsonexerciseandothertriggerexposures
•Bronchoreversibilitytest
>15%increaseinFEV
1&/orFVCafterS(200mg)
•Bronchialhyperresponsiveness
–Airwayinflammation

0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 0.20.40.60.81
1 - Specificity
Sensitivity Utility of amplitude % mean as a discriminator of asthma
A
B
C
Cut-offs
A = 12.5
B = 16.5
C = 20.0
Aggarwal et al, J Asthma 2002

Excluding other causes
of wheezing / A.O.
•Sputumexamination
•Chestroentgenography
PlainCXR
CTScanning
•Bronchoscopicexamination
•Others: Upperairwayexam
Spirometry

All that wheezes is
“Not Asthma”
and
All asthma
does not wheeze

Establishing hypersensitivity
•Historyofotherallergies:pastorpresent
•Familyhistoryofatopy
•Blood/sputumeosinophilia
•Hypersentivityskintests
•Bronchialhyperresponsiveness
•SerumIgEestimation

Demonstration of Inflammation
1.Clinicalfeatures
2.Markersofinflammation
•Direct Bronchialbiopsy
•Indirect BHR
Inducedsputum
Breathanalysis

Clinical Uses of Markers
•Differentialdiagnosis
•Diseaseseverity
•Treatmentresponse
•Researchuses
•Studyofkinetics

Breath analysis
1.ExhaledNO
2.Volatilegases
CO,Ethane,Pentane
3.Endogenoussubstances
InflammatoryMediators
Cytokines
Oxidants

Severity Assessment
•Symptoms:Respirdistress
Workperformance
Mentation
•Physicalexam: Indices
Pulse,R.R.,BP
Breathsounds
Paradox(etc.)
•PEFandFEV
1
•Bloodgasmeasurement

Monitoring
•Symptomrelief/recurrence
•Acuteepisodes
•Treatmentresponse
•Drugsideeffects
•Diseasechronicity/irreversibility

Diurnal PEF variability
Mathematical expressions
•Amplitudepercentmean
•Standarddeviationpercentmean
•Amplitudepercentmaximum
•Amplitudepercentminimum
•Lowestpercentpersonalbest
•Lowestpercentpredicted
•Maximum/minimumpercent
•Amplitudepercentmesor

1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0 4 8 12 16 20 24
Time of day (in hours)
Peak expiratory flow (L/s) 36%
50%
A hypothetical PEF rhythm in asthma
(Jindal et al, J Asthma 2002)

0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
0 20 40 60 80 100
VAS (mm)
PEF ( % predicted) 0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 20 40 60 80 100
VAS (mm)
FEV1 (% predicted) Visual Analogue Scale
Gupta et al, IJCDAS 2000
R = –0.5255, p <0.01
R = –0.4609, p <0.01

Conclusions
•PEFvariabilityisausefulmarkerofasthmainepidemiologicalstudies
anddaytodaymanagement
•Poorsensitivityinclinicaldiagnosis,populationscreening,assessment
ofseverity