Attention3.ppt best psychology notes for net and other competitive exams

notespsychology50 10 views 47 slides Oct 01, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 47
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47

About This Presentation

attention


Slide Content

Pay Attention!
Kimberley Clow
[email protected]
http://instruct.uwo.ca/psychology/130/

Outline
What is Attention?
Orienting
Cueing Attention
Visual Search
Selective Attention
Dichotic Listening Tasks
Bottleneck Theories
Divided Attention
Capacity Model
Automatic vs. Controlled Processing
Visual Neglect

What Is Attention?
Definition
Attention is the process by which the mind
chooses from among the various stimuli that
strike the senses at any given moment
•allows only some info to enter into consciousness
Related Concepts:
Alertness
Concentration
Selectivity
Control

Big Issues in Attention
Facts that drive attention
research
We are bombarded by more
information than we can attend to
•Selective Attention
•Divided Attention
•Automaticity
Some tasks can be performed
with little, if any, attention

Orienting
We don’t passively see or hear
We actively look and listen
Different ways to orient to a stimulus
Overt Orienting
Covert Orienting
Attentional Gaze
Attention can be drawn to a particular
location independent of where our
eyes are looking or our ears are
oriented

Cuing Attention
Give people a cue where a
target will appear in the
visual field
Manipulate the kind of cue
Valid Cue
Neutral Cue
Invalid Cue
How does cue affect
performance?

Results
Different kinds of
cues are possible
Voluntary Orienting
•Endogenous Cue
•Arrow
Automatic Orienting
•Exogenous Cue
•Flashing light

Find the T
R
R
R
R
T
R
R
R
R

Find the T
R
R
R
R
T
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R

Find the Blue Letter
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L

Find the Blue Letter
L
LL
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
LL
L
L
L
L LL
LL
L
L
L
L
L

Find the vertical T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T

Find the vertical T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T

Find the vertical T
R
R
R
R
T
R

Find the vertical T
T
T
R
T
T
R
R
R
T
T
T
R
R
T
R
R
T
R

Find the Blue L
L
L
L
L
L
T
T
T
T
T

Find the Blue L
T
LL
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
LL
L
L
L
L
L
L
LL
L
L
L
L
L
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
TT
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
L

What’s Going On?
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 10 20 30
Number of Items
RT
Conjunction
Feature

All Searches Are NOT Equal

A Is More Difficult Than B
A B

Why Is This Important?
Watch the Dial Watch for Light

Is There Trouble?

Dichotic Listening Task

Shadowing Results
Physical attributes of unattended channel
are detected
Male vs. female voice
Human vs. musical instruments
Semantic attributes of unattended
channel were missed
Don’t notice foreign language
Don’t notice repeated items

Filter Theory (Broadbent)

Cocktail Party Effect

Attenuation Model (Treisman)
Present a story in dichotic listening task
Story switches from attended ear to
unattended ear
Participant mistakenly shadows from attended
ear to unattended ear
Attended Ear: Unattended Ear:
She had peanut butter freaking laser beams
you keep using that word and jelly
sandwiches

Problems with Early Models
Memory for unattended channel may depend on
familiarity or importance
Cocktail party effect
There are effects of practice
There is implicit memory for the unattended
channel even when there isn’t explicit memory
Shock study
People can shadow meaningful message that
switch from ear to ear
Treisman
Memory for unattended channel affected by
similarity to attended channel

Context Effects
Attended ear:
“They were standing near the bank”
Unattended ear:
One of the following was presented
•“river”
•“money”
Participants interpreted “bank” as
a riverbank if they heard “river”
a financial bank if they heard “money”

Late Selection
(Deutsch & Deutsch)

Problems with Late Models
Even if pertinence is controlled for
We are more likely to notice effects in the
attended channel (87%)
We are less likely to notice effects in the
unattended channel (8%)
If selection is late
Why do we feel like we’re consciously
selecting early?
Neuro evidence
Enhanced neural processing at early stages

Recognition
Attenuation (Treisman):
Detection
Input
Recognition
Late Filtering (Deutsch & Deutsch):
Filter
Attenuator
DetectionInput
Filter
Recognition
Early Filtering (Broadbent):
Input
Detection

Bottleneck Theories
All information gets into sensory register
Somewhere along the way, information is
filtered or selected for attention
Early
•at perceptual level
Late
•at response level
Only selected information makes it into
awareness and long-term memory

Divided Attention
Dual task experiments
Get people to perform
multiple tasks and look at
the effects on performance
Often find that
performance suffers
•This breakdown of
performance when two tasks
are combined sheds light on
the limitations and nature of
the human information-
processing system

Dual Task Performance
Divided attention is difficult when:
Tasks are similar
Tasks are difficult
When both tasks require conscious attention
Divided attention is easier when:
Tasks are dissimilar
Tasks are simple
When at least one of the tasks does not
require conscious attention
Tasks are practiced

Capacity Theories
Tasks take mental effort
We have limited mental
effort to allocate to all
demands on our attention
Conscious control of
allocation
Some tasks require more
attention than others

Resource Allocation Model (Kahneman)
What Affects Allocation?
Resources
•Arousal
•Available Capacity
Other Effects
•Enduring Dispositions
•Momentary Intentions

Different Processes
Some tasks are easier to perform than
others and don’t seem to affect attention
Especially tasks that are well practiced
Other tasks are tedious and require our
conscious attention
Two types of processing:
Automatic or pre-attentive processing
Controlled or attentive processing

An Applied Example

Neely (1977)
Priming study, using a lexical decision task
4 primes
BIRD, BODY, BUILDING, XXX
Manipulated expectancies of the target
BIRD - types of birds
BODY - building parts
BUILDING - body parts
XXX - bird, body parts, and building parts equally
often
Short (e.g., 250ms) and long (e.g., 2,000ms) SOAs

Neely (1977) Results
BIRD (expect types of birds)
BIRD - robin
•facilitation for bird targets at short and long SOAs
BODY (expect building parts)
BODY - door
•facilitation for building targets at long SOAs, but
not at short SOAs
BODY - heart
•inhibition for body targets at long SOAs, but
facilitation at short SOAs

Automatic vs. Controlled
Automatic Processes
Fast and efficient
Unavailable to
consciousness
Unavoidable
Unintentional
Controlled Processes
Slow and less efficient
Available to
consciousness
Controllable
Intentional

When Attention Is Lost
Visual Neglect

Their Visual Experience
Writing
Reading

Bisect All the Lines…

Drawings