ATTICO-ANTRAL CSOM

1,862 views 65 slides Oct 17, 2020
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 65
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65

About This Presentation

UNSAFE CSOM


Slide Content

1
Dr Harjitpal Singh
Assistant Professor(ENT),
Dr RKGMC, Hamirpur

CSOM
Longstandinginfectionofapartorwholeofthemiddle
earcleftcharacterizedbyeardischargeandpermanent
perforation
2

Developing countries: more
Both sexes
All age groups
Prevalence rate: 46 per thousands (rural), 16 per
thousands (urban)
3

4

It is also called unsafe or dangerous type of
CSOM, because dangerous intra-or-extracranial
complications can occur
In this the disease spreads to bony walls of
epitympanum, aditus, antrum and adjoining
mastoid cells.
Associated with cholesteotoma.
Risk of complications is higher
5

6

Cholesteatoma
Osteitis and granulation tissue
Osteitis involves outer attic wall, posterosuperior margin
of tympanic ring
Granulation tissue surrounds it may even fill the attic,
antrum, posterior tympanum, mastoid
Fleshy red polypus: meatus
7

Ossicular necrosis
Destruction may be limited to the long process of incus,
may also involves stapes superstucture, handle of malleus/
entire ossicular chain
Greater hearing loss
Cholesteatoma hearer
Cholesterol granuloma
Mass of granulation tissue with foreign body giant cells
surrounding the cholesterol crystals.
8

MISNOMER:
Neither it contains cholesterol crystals
Nor it is benign neoplasia to merit suffix “oma”
Various names have been given to it such as:
Cholesteatosis(Young)
Epidermosis(1961, Tumarkin)
Keratosis (1963, McGuckin)
Keratoma(1974, Schuknecht), which is thought to be
most appropriate.
9

Skin at a wrong place is the simplest definition
of cholesteatoma.
It may be defined as a cystic structure lined by
keratinized squamous epithelium resting on a
fibrous stroma
Consists of two parts
Matrix-Keratinizing squamous
epithelium resting on thin fibrous tissue
central white mass-keratin debris
produced by matrix
10

Macroscopically cholesteatoma looks like a soft
pultaceous mass resembling tooth paste
contained in a sac or cholesteatoma appears to be
a rounded pearly white mass often surrounded by
friable granulation tissue from infected bone
Microscopically cholesteatoma is a benign
keratinizing squamous cell cyst
Epithelial matrix of acquired cholesteatoma has
10 to 15 layers, while congenital cholesteatoma
has only 5 layers of matrix
11

Insimplerterms,cholesteatomaissquamous
epitheliuminanabnormalsiteinthemiddleear
whichpossessesboneerodingproperties.
Theboneerosionisduetotwothings
a) Pressure effects produced by bone
remodelling,
b)Enzymaticactivityatthemarginsofthe
cholesteatoma which greatly
increasesthespeedofboneerosion.
Thelevelsoftheseosteoclasticenzymesincreasein
thepresenceofbacterialinfection.
12

13

14

15

16

Congenital cell rests
Negative pressure.(Wittmaack’s theory)
Basal cells Hyperplasia(Ruedi’s theory)
Invasion.(Habermann’s theory)
Metaplasia.(Sade’s theory)
17

InvaginationofTMfromtheattic/posterosuperiorpartof
parstensaintheformofretractionpockets.
18

Basal cell hyperplasia
Proliferate-infection, lay down keratinizing squamous
epithelium (KSE)
19

Epithelialinvasion
Fromthemeatus/outerdrumsurface
Pre-existingperforation(marginal)-partoftheannulus
tympanicus-destroyed
20

Because of repeated infections, squamous metaplasia of
the low cuboidal epithelium of the middle ear occurs
This subsequently leads to development of cholesteatoma
This theory did not find much favor.
21

22
CONGENITAL
ACQUIRED
PRIMARY
SECONDARY

Embroyonic epidermal cell rests in the middle ear cleft/
temporal bone
Middle ear, petrous apex,cerebellopontine angle
Middle ear: white mass behind an intact tympanic
membrane -> conductive hearing loss
Discovered: routine exam/myringotomy
May spontaneously rupture-TM -> discharging ear
23

24

No h/o previous OM/ pre-existing perforation
Invagination of pars flaccida
Persistent negative pressure in the attic -> retraction
pocket which accumulates keratin debris.
Infected -> expand -> middle ear
Basal cell hyperplasia
Proliferation of the basal layers of PF induced by
subclinical childhood infection
Squamous metaplasia
Normal pavement epithelium of attic undergoes
metaplasia, keratinizing squamous epithelium
25

Already a pre-existing perforation in pars tensa
Associated with posterosuperior marginal perforation
Migration of squamous epithelium
KSE of EAC/ outer surface of TM migrates through the
perforation into the middle ear
Metaplasia: repeated infections of middle ear-preexisting
perforation
26

27

28

29

30
Invades surrounding
structures.
Bone destruction by
various enzymes.
Collagenases
Acid phosphatase
Proteolytic enzymes
Cause destruction of ear
ossicles, erosion of bony
labyrinth, canal of facial
nerve, sinus plate, tegmen
tympani.
Causes serious
complication.

31
AEROBES
Ps.aeruginosa.
B.proteus.
E.coli.
Staph.aureus.
ANAEROBES
Bacteroides.
Streptococci.

32
DISCHARGE:
Scanty
Purulent
Foul-smelling
Blood-stained
Continuous
not associated with
URTI.
Mostly conductive
May be sensorineural.
Sometimes normal as
cholesteotoma bridges
gap caused by destroyed
ossicles (Cholesteotoma
hearer)
HEARING LOSS:

PERFORATION:Attic or postero-
superior.
DISCHARGE:Purulent, foul-smelling,
blood-stained.
CHOLESTEOTOMA.
RETRATION POCKETS.
TUNING FORK TESTS:Show
conductive or sensorineural hearing loss.
33

34

35

GRADE I:Normal position of TM.
GRADE II:TM touches long process of incus.
GRADE III:TM touches promontory.
GRADE IV:TM adheres to promontory.
36

37

38

GRADE I:Minimal retraction.
GRADE II:Pars flaccida in contact with neck of
malleus.
GRADE III:Limited outer attic wall erosion.
GRADE IV:Severe outer attic wall erosion.
39

40

41

42

C/Sofeardischarge.
Tuningforktest
Audiogram
X-raymastoids&CTtemporal.Attic
andantrumdestructioncausedby
cholesteatomabestseenlateralinCT.
43

45

46
X-RAY MASTOID
Cholesteatoma
Large antrum
Post-op cavity
Eosinophilic granuloma
TB mastoiditis
D/D OF MASTOID
CAVITY

Pain.
Vertigo.
Persistent headache.
Facial weakness.
Listless child refuses to feed.
Fever, nausea, vomiting.
Irritability and neck stiffness.
Diplopia.
Ataxia.
Abscess round the ear.
50

51
EXTRA-CRANIAL
Mastoiditis.
Abscesses.
Petrositis.
Facial paralysis.
Labyrinthitis.
INTRA-CRANIAL
Extradural abscess.
Subdural abscess.
Brain abscess.
Meningitis.
Lateral sinus
thrombophlebitis.
Otitic hydrocephalus.

SURGICAL
CANAL WALL UP
CANAL WALL DOWN
RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
Myringoplasty/ tympanoplasty
Primary surgery/ 2nd stage procedure
CONSERVATIVE
52

53
CANAL WALL
DOWN
PROCEDURES.
Atticotomy.
Radical
Mastoidectomy.
Modified Radical
Mastoidectomy.
CANAL WALL UP
PROCEDURES.
Cortical
Mastoidectomy.
Combined
Approach
Tympanoplasty.

A canal wall down procedure performed
to remove all or part of outer attic wall
and adjacent deep posterior meatal wall
to expose the attic and when necessary
the aditus and antrum in order to gain
access to these sites and their contents
and/or remove disease limited to these
sites.
54

A canal wall down procedure in which
we remove all disease from mastoid and
middle ear by lowering bridge making it
a single cavity, remove all ossicles except
foot-plate of stapes, remove remains of
tympanic membrane, obliterate the
eustachian tube, and exteriorized this
cavity to EAM by doing meatoplasty.
55

A canal wall down procedure in which
we remove disease from mastoid and
middle ear by lowering bridge making it
a single cavity, remove only diseased
ossicles, donot remove remains of
tympanic membrane, donot obliterate the
eustachian tube, and exteriorized this
cavity to EAM by doing meatoplasty.
56

57

A canal wall up procedure performed
to remove disease from mastoid antrum
and air cell system and aditus &
antrum, with preservation of an intact
posterior bony external auditory canal
wall, without disturbing the existing
middle ear contents.
58

59

Operation performed to remove disease
from middle ear and mastoid by way of
a)Mastoid.
b)Posterior Tympanotomy.
c)Transcanal route.
followed by reconstruction of middle
ear transformer mechanism.
60

An operation performed to eradicate
disease in the middle ear and to
reconstruct the hearing mechanism,
without mastoid surgery, with or without
tympanic membrane grafting.
61

Cholesteatoma is small, easily accesible to suction
clearance under microscope
Elderly >65 years old
Unfit for GA/ refused
Polyps,granulation tissue: cup forceps/ cauterized by
chemical agents (silver nitrate/ trichloroacetic acid)
Aural toilet, dry ear precautions
62

63

64

THANKS
65
Tags