Aural atresia

SurbhiNarayan2 998 views 39 slides Aug 11, 2019
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 39
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39

About This Presentation

1 in 10,000 birth
Unilateral atresia is 7 times of bilateral
10 percent syndromes associated


Slide Content

aural ATRESIA Dr surbhi Patna medical college

1 in 10,000 birth Unilateral atresia is 7 times of bilateral 10 percent syndromes associated

history Recognised over 70years Surgical techiques late 50s NAGER advocated taloring of surgical techniques

Group 1- normal or stenotic canal hypoplastic tympanic cleft end aural approach Group 2- fistulous track Complete atresia Bony atresia Opening of antrum

Group 3- complete atresia Non pneumatised fenestration

Based on severity SCHIKNECHT divided aural atresia into 3 groups fenestration canalplasty type 3 tplasty

belluci Seperated middle ear malformations minor-normal canal and tm Stapes fixation,absence of ossicles and oval window Single crus major-aural atresia,absent canal and tm Some degree of malformation

JAHRSDOERFER Ant approach in 1978 This is STANDARD APPROACH

Atretic bone drilled away Ossicles freed Temporalis fascia used as onlay graft Split thickness skin graft meatoplasty

With few modification this technique is used Gives improved result Without opening mastoid Fewer complications

Surgery for u/l vs b/l Unilateral-sorting of high risk on hrct indicating low likelyhood of success Defined as post op srt less than equal to 30dBhl Criteria lenient in b/l cases Marginal candidate operated atleast one ear

Avoided in- No aeration Facial nerve at risk Low lying tegmen

Grading system 7-8 out of 10

Other criteria Audiometry imaging

Other options For b/l cases baha for over 6yrs For those undergone surgery-conventional behind the ear or in the ear

Options for microtia repair Porous polyethylene Autologus rib graft Silicone prosthesis Porus polyethylene implant ie medpor used in grade 3 microtia repair

Small suction drains 3 months later-lobule 3 rd stage-post auricular sulcus 4 th stage-atresia repair and tragus

Advantage of rib graft microtia-no concern for regection

Who should be operated first Recently undertaken- atresia before medpor Decreases risk of exposure or extrusion A recent report-result of aresia surgery before medpor comparable to atresia surgery after rib graft

timing b/l atresia BAHA is used soon after birth No amplification required in u/l For rib graft delayed upto 6-7yrs For grade 2 , 3 microtia can be done at 5 Medpor at 3yrs

Surgical techniques

Bone is removed 360degree around Ossicular chain mobility Any malformation Fascia grafting Bone in the periphery is drilled For fascia which is placed in ossicular mass Skin graft harvested

Has thicker and thinner border Thinner kept at level of ear drum Thicker sutured at meatus Skin graft is notched at medial end

For successful hearing-thin TM AND SKIN GRAFT Silastic is placed over new tm meatoplasty

Post op care Discharged on oral antibiotics Seen after 1 week where suture and packing removed Second visit-1 month later Canal is debrided Audiogram no restriction after 1 month

complications Meatal canal stenosis Snhl Facial nerve injury

conclusion While Technically challenging, surgery can be successful With pre op careful patient selection Meticulous surgery Restoring of hearing is one of the most rewarding.

Thank you