Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (CS-AAPT).ppt

LUISANTONIONAVARROAL 34 views 26 slides Jun 18, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 26
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26

About This Presentation

ANALISIS DE PATRONES DE MANCHAS DE SANGRE


Slide Content

Modern Application for
Introductory Physics:
Bloodstain Pattern Analysis
John Eric Goff
Lynchburg College

New Field of Interest:
Forensic Science
•Television shows and movies influence student
interests.
•Forensic Sciencecourses, minors, and majors are
springing up around the country. (New course here
at LC!)
•Watch for some very BADscience on TV and in
movies!

Forensic Science is
VERY Interdisciplinary!!!
•Biology
•Chemistry
•Physics
•Mathematics
•Law
•Psychology
•Sociology
•Biochemistry
•Biophysics
•Physical Chemistry
•Environmental Science
•Handwriting
•Medicine
•Hobbies???

I got help with
this talk!
http://www.bloodspatter.com/
(The tutorial is great! However,
beware of some poor physics in a
few places!)

Bloodstain Patterns
•Physical Evidence
•Usually Found at Violent Crime Scenes
•Gives Clues as to WHAT Happened
•May Suggest Sequence of Events
•Analysis MUST be placed in context of
all aspects of crime scene investigation
in order to reconstruct (possible)
criminal events.

Different Types of
Bloodstain Patterns
•Passive Bloodstains (drops, pools, etc.)
•Transfer Bloodstains (wipe a weapon,
etc.)
•Active (or “Projected”) Bloodstains
(bullets, stepping in blood, etc.)

Active (or “Projected”)
Bloodstains
Rule of Thumb: As impact angle goes down,
bloodstain shape becomes more elongated.

Active (or “Projected”)
Bloodstains
Impact Spatter –Blood source is
“smacked” in some way and drops fly
off in various directions.
Divide category further by blood’s
impact speed.

Low Velocity
•velocity ≤ 5 ft/s
•stain size is (relatively) large: diameter ≥ 4mm
•examples: blood drops into blood and footstep
spatters

Medium Velocity
•5 ft/s ≤velocity ≤ 25 ft/s
•stain size : 1 mm ≤ diameter ≤ 4mm
•examples: blood flicked off finger and blunt
object used on victim

High Velocity
•velocity ≥ 100 ft/s (68 mph)
•stain size (relatively small): diameter ≤ 1mm
•examples: gunshots and propellers

Time for Physics!
Big Forensic Science Question: “From
where did the blood come???”

tail points in
direction of
travel
one exception!

sin θ= W / L
W
L
What does W = L mean?
sin θ= 1 → θ= 90
Drop is a circle!

Real World!
What if blood drop is not a pretty oval?!?
Do the best you can!!!

Physics and Math
•Work backwards from blood spatter to
determine “launch position” of blood.
•BE AWAREof all approximations that
are used in analysis! (This is a great
example for teaching students about
approximations in physics.)

Look for Convergence!

Real Crime Scene

Get Computer Help
(Software is available!)
Notice the “top view”!

Big Problem!!!
Neither blood nor anything else
travels unaided in a straight line
through the air!

Example
•Consider “medium velocity” blood drop
of diameter 3 mm “launched” at a
position 1 m off the ground.
•Numbers: v = 20 ft/s (6 m/s) & θ= -10
θ= -10
v = 20 ft/s
parallel to ground
1 m
ground

What about gravity???

What about gravity???
What about air resistance???
(Drop’s speed and size are
needed. Tough to know!)

Moral of the Story
Calculation using “straight-line”
trajectory (no gravity and no air
resistance) predicts a “launch” point
higherthan actual point.
“Straight-line” trajectory is reasonable
for high “launch” velocities and/or stain
and “launch” points “close” together.
(The idea is to keep the flight time as
short as possible.)
More accuracy requires a better model
and more specialized work.

Forensic Science Literature
The Directional Analysis of Bloodstain
Patterns: Theory and Experimental
Validationby A. L. Carter
“Therefore, the best one can do here is to
estimate an upper limit for the height of the
source.” (p. 181)
Can. Soc. Forens. Sci. J. Vol. 34. No. 4 (2001) pp. 173-189