BSED MATH 8 Jamon.pdf Quantifiers Negation

MelecinthJamon 5 views 15 slides Jun 11, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 15
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15

About This Presentation

Quantifiers


Slide Content

88BSED MATHBSED MATH

LOGIC AND INCIDENCELOGIC AND INCIDENCE
GEOMETRYGEOMETRY
NEGATION ANDNEGATION AND
QUANTIFIERSQUANTIFIERS

LEARNING OBJECTIVESLEARNING OBJECTIVES
At the end of the lesson , learners will be able to:
K- Define negation as a logical operation that reverses the
truth value of a statement.
S- Apply the rules og negation to manipulate and transform
mathematical statements and expressions
A- Appreciate the significance of negation and quantifiers
in formal mathematical reasoning and proof-writing.

First, some remarks on notation. If S is any
statement, we will
denote the negation or contrary of S by ~S.
For example, if S is the
statement "p is even," then ~S is the statement
"p is not even" or "p is odd.”
NEGATION

LOGIC RULE
The statement "~(~S)" means the same as "S."
We followed this rule when we negated the statement
“ 2 is irrational” by writing the contrary as “ 2
is rational” instead of “ 2 is not irrational.”

NEGATIONNEGATION

QUANTIFIERSQUANTIFIERS
We wish to prove H => C, and we assume, on the
contrary, H does not imply C, i.e., that H holds
and at the same time ~C holds. We write this
symbolically as H & ~C, where
& is the abbreviation for "and." A statement
involving the connective
"and" is called a conjunction. Thus:

QUANTIFIERSQUANTIFIERS
LOGIC RULE 4.
The statement "~[H => C] " means the same as "H &
~C.”
LOGIC RULE 5.
The statement "-[S1 & S2]" means the same as
“[~S1 or ~S2].”

Finally let us be more precise about what is an absurd statement. It
is the conjunction of a statement S with the negation of S, i.e., "S &
~S." A statement of this type is called a contradiction. A system of
axioms from which no contradiction can be deduced is called consistent.
QUANTIFIERSQUANTIFIERS

QUANTIFIERSQUANTIFIERS

QUANTIFIERSQUANTIFIERS
It must be emphasized that a statement beginning with "For
every . . ." does not imply the existence of anything.

QUANTIFIERSQUANTIFIERS

QUANTIFIERSQUANTIFIERS

QUANTIFIERSQUANTIFIERS

THANK YOU!THANK YOU!
Tags