cancer de endometrio que no es endometroide manejo

FernandoGonzlezPerug 14 views 32 slides Aug 01, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 32
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32

About This Presentation

ca endometrio


Slide Content

ENDOMETRIAL CANCER Nomonde Mbatani

Ca Endometrium Most common female genital tract cancer – Developed areas South African females, 7 th most common cancer (1:163) according to SA National Cancer Registry

The good news Prognosis excellent

Ca endometrium Type 1 Type 2 Obese , hyperlipidaemic . Peri - menopausal woman Mature woman Hyper -estrogenism Atrophic endometrium Precursor - Atypical hyperplasia (EIN) Serous Intra-epithelial Carcinoma-SIC/ EGD ) Low grade. Less invasive at time of surgery High Grade (UPSC, Clear cell, MMMT ? Grade 3 ) Favourable prognosis Poor prognosis Highly sensitive to progestagens No response to progestagens In 80% cases EC In 15 -20% EC

Prognostic factors Uterine factors Histological type: Endometrioid , Clear cell, UPSC Histological grade: 1, 2 or 3 (Grigsby, Portec ) LVSI Cervix involvement DNA ploidy – Flow Cytometry Depth of myometrial invasion Extra –uterine factors : More to do with stage! ROLE OF PATHOLOGIST CRUCIAL!

Endometrial Cancer Profile The woman with endometrial cancer: Morphological , medical challenge . Pre –operative workup . Anaesthetic assessment ICU bookings

Pre-operative Assessment Bloods : FBC, U&E, HIV, δGT , ALP Ultra sound : Liver, lymphadenopathy Depth of myometrial invasion – Role of MRI Histological review!

Surgery TAH and BSO – Open / Laparoscopic – Curative for most women (75% - confined to uterus) Laparoscopy: Conversion to open surgery is higher Peritoneal washings – No longer part of staging Cuff of vagina – No evidence

Parametrial involvement Not part of FIGO staging Some data – associated with poorer prognosis Radical Hysterectomy - ? Survival benefit Small study/ retrospective series Survival in those who were offered radical hysterectomy. Selection bias! Parametrial involvement :Associated with increased surgical stage Still do simple Hysterectomy

Type 2 Cancers Additional pelvic / para -aortic lymph node dissection (FIGO Staging) Omentectomy : Serous and MMT. Peritoneal spread - ?Benefit

Lymphadenectomy Role Hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo -oophorectomy is the standard surgery followed by RT depending on risk factors Establish extra uterine disease – Stage 3 c(1) or 3c(11) What is the extent? Only pelvic nodes done up to common iliacs – Criticism! FIGO Groin nodes? – No!

Is there a survival benefit in LND?

A study in Treatment of Endometrial Cancer (ASTEC Study) NO!

S urvival E ffect of P ara A ortic L ymphadenectomy ( SEPAL study ) Yes! Intermediate / high risk groups Improved patient survival (OS) in combined LND group (and chemotherapy, independently).p=0049 The higher you go, ……

SEPAL

S E P A L Study design

GSH Protocol TAH and BSO – For low risk patients (Stage 1) Stage 1a and Grade 1/ 2 and less than 50% invasion Low risk of recurrence (5%) No survival benefit Intermediate risk: Grade 1/ 2 with more than 50% mm involvement Grade 3 or type 2 cancers Cervical involvement If nodes negative: Vault Brachy only vs WPRT, fewer complications for the patient. About 75% patients saved from WPRT

Intermediate risk: G. Thomas Grade 2 Stage 1b / Grade 3 WPRT vs Vault Brachytherapy – No survival advantage, Does not lead to better cure Pelvic recurrences: curable with radiotherapy risks:benefit . First do no harm! Keep as Plan B. Especially in patients under age 60yrs with no LVSI – GOG and Portec seem to suggest!

Challenges Stage 111 and 1V disease Stage 1V: Adequate cyto reduction – microscopic disease – determinant of survival Other determinants : Age less than 58yrs, good performance status (Bristow) Recurrent disease – Role of surgery

Chemotherapy for EC Advanced / recurrent endometrial cancer setting Hormonal therapy – hormone receptor positive tumours (low grade) - (11 to 25% response rates) Medroxy - Progesterone, lower doses as effective - Down regulation of receptors Aromatase inhibitors / SERMS- little data Combinations: Doxorubicin and Cisplatinum Addition of Paclitaxel Toxic regimes : already elderly/ medically unwell patients

Targeted therapies

Cell growth regulation Proto- oncogenes – Encourage cell growth and inhibit cell death. Mutation – Oncogenes leading to accelerated and disorderly cell growth. Dominant genes Tumour suppressor genes / anti- oncogenes – prevent cell growth and encourage apoptosis: regulate transcription, DNA repair and cell to cell communication.

TKR TKR TKR +P P AKT Intracellular events Proliferation Metastasis New vessel formation Decreased apoptosis KRAS RAF PI3K PIP2 PIP3 Cell Membrane Key Hormone ligand Growth factor ligand Prostaglandin  PTEN   ✚ ✚ TKR extracellular domain TKR intracellular domain  +P -P FOXO1 mTor MAPK Type One endometrial cancers

Molecular targets Grouping of cancers looking at prognosis What causes diseases What might be manipulated to alter risk / cure disease Design therapeutics

Targeted treatments (the future) Molecular profiling Targets cancer pathways Prevention of cancer

TKR TKR TKR P P AKT mTor Intracellular : Proliferation Metastasis New vessel formation Decreased apoptosis BRAF MAPK PI3K PIP2 PIP3 Cell Membrane Key Hormone ligand Growth factor ligand Prostaglandin  Bevacizumab – VEGF Lenvatinib Vemurafenib Evorelimus
Tags