*HCAP: diagnosis made < 48h after
hospitalization with any of the following risk
factors:
(1)hospitalized in an acute care hospital for >
48h within 90d of the diagnosis;
(2) resided in a nursing home or long-term
care facility;
(3) received recent IV antibiotic therapy,
chemotherapy, or wound care within the 30d
preceding the current diagnosis; and
(4) attended a hospital or hemodialysis
clinic
HCAP
Infection of the lung parenchyma in a
person who is not hospitalized or living
in a long-term care facility for ≥ 2
weeks. This pneumonia develops in
the outpatient setting or within 48
hours of admission to a hospital.
Definition of CAP
Symptoms:
• Respiratory: Cough dry or productive,
mucopurulent sputum , sometimes
rusty, dyspnea, sometimes pleuritic
chest pain
• Non-respiratory: Fever, body aches,
altered mental state, vomiting or
diarrhea.
The clinical diagnosis of CAP
Signs:
Generally: Fever, sometimes
hypothermia, tachycardia, tachypnea.
Local: signs of consolidation
The clinical diagnosis of CAP
8
CAP – The Two Types of Presentations
Classical
•Sudden onset of CAP
•High fever, shaking chills
•Pleuritic chest pain, SOB
•Productive cough
•Rusty sputum, blood tinge
•Poor general condition
•High mortality up to 20% in
patients with bacteremia
•S.pneumoniae causative
•Gradual & insidious onset
•Low grade fever
•Dry cough, No blood tinge
•Good GC – Walking CAP
•Low mortality 1-2%; except
in cases of Legionellosis
•Mycoplasma, Chlamydiae,
Legionella, Ricketessiae,
Viruses are causative
Atypical
Sputum Gram stain:
is a rapid and inexpensive test that can
help a lot:
• Differentiate Gm –ve from Gm +ve
bacteria.
• Excess pus cells without organism
suspect atypical infection.
The Bacteriological Diagnosis of CAP
Cultures to identify the causative
organism:
Sputum cultures are not recommended in
cases of CAP except in certain occasions:
• Patients admitted in hospital or ICU.
• Patients who do not respond to
empirical antibiotic therapy.
• Suspection of resistant strains of
S.pneumoniae.
The Bacteriological Diagnosis of CAP
Blood Culture:
Recommended for all patients with
moderate and high severity CAP,
preferably before antibiotic therapy is
commenced.
Examination of sputum for
Mycobacterium TB
The Bacteriological Diagnosis of CAP
12
CAP – Pathogenesis
Inhalation
Aspiration
Hematogenous
14
PORT Scoring – PSI
Clinical Parameter Scoring
Age in years Example
For Men (Age in yrs) 50
For Women (Age -10) (50-10)
NH Resident 10 points
Co-morbid Illnesses
Neoplasia 30 points
Liver Disease 20 points
CHF 10 points
CVD 10 points
Renal Disease (CKD) 10 points
Clinical Parameter Scoring
Clinical Findings
Altered Sensorium 20 points
Respiratory Rate > 30 20 points
SBP < 90 mm 20 points
Temp < 35
0
C or > 40
0
C 15 points
Pulse > 125 per min 10 points
Investigation Findings
Arterial pH < 7.35 30 points
BUN > 30 20 points
Serum Na < 130 20 points
Hematocrit < 30% 10 points
Blood Glucose > 250 10 points
Pa O
2 10 points
X Ray e/o Pleural Effusion 10 points
Pneumonia Patient Outcomes
Research Team (PORT)
15
Classification of Severity - PORT
Predictors
Absent
Class
I
70
Class
II
71 – 90
Class
III
91 - 130
Class
IV
> 130
Class
V
16
CAP – Management based on PSI Score
PORT Class PSI Score Mortality % Treatment Strategy
Class I No RF 0.1 – 0.4 Out patient
Class II 70 0.6 – 0.7 Out patient
Class III 71 - 90 0.9 – 2.8 Brief hospitalization
Class IV 91 - 130 8.5 – 9.3 Inpatient
Class V > 130 27 – 31.1 IP - ICU
17
CURB 65 Rule – Management of CAP
CURB 65
Confusion
BUN > 30
RR > 30
BP SBP <90
DBP <60
Age > 65
CURB 0 or 1 Home Rx
CURB 2 Short Hosp
CURB 3 Medical Ward
CURB 4 or 5 ICU care
19
CAP – Criteria for ICU Admission
Major criteria
Invasive mechanical ventilation required
Septic shock with the need of vasopressors
Minor criteria (least 3)
Confusion/disorientation
Blood urea nitrogen ≥ 20 mg%
Respiratory rate ≥ 30 / min;
Core temperature < 36ºC
Severe hypotension;
PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤ 250
Multi-lobar infiltrates
WBC < 4000 cells;
Platelets <100,000
The Radiological Diagnosis
of CAP
21
CAP – Value of Chest Radiograph
•Usually needed to establish diagnosis
•It is a prognostic indicator
•To rule out other disorders
•May help in etiological diagnosis
J Chr Dis 1984;37:215-25
22
Infiltrate Patterns and Pathogens
CXR Pattern Possible Pathogens
Lobar S.pneumo, Kleb, H. influ, Gram Neg
Patchy Atypicals, Viral, Legionella
Interstitial Viral, PCP, Legionella
Cavitatory Anerobes, Kleb, TB, S.aureus, Fungi
Large effusion Staph, Anaerobes, Klebsiella
23
Normal CXR & Pneumonic Consolidation
24
Lobar Pneumonia – S.pneumoniae
25
CXR – PA and Lateral Views
26
Lobar versus Segmental - Right Side
27
Lobar Pneumonia
28
Special forms of Consolidation
29
Round Pneumonic Consolidation
30
Special Forms of Pneumonia
31
Special Forms of Pneumonia
32
Complications of Pneumonia
33
Empyema
34
Mycoplasma Pneumonia
35
Mycoplasma Pneumonia
36
Chlamydia Trachomatis
37
Rare Types of Pneumonia
S Curve of Golden
When there is a mass
adjacent to a fissure, the
fissure takes the shape
of an "S". The proximal
convexity is due to a mass,
and the distal concavity is
due to atelectasis. Note the
shape of the transverse
fissure.
This example represents a
RUL mass with atelectasis
THE BAT VIEW
Chest wall
Pleural line
THE BAT VIEW
Chest wall
Pleural line
41
Pneumonia
Posterior intercostal scan shows a hypoechoic
consolidated area that contains multiple
echogenic lines that represent an air
bronchogram.
Post-stenotic pneumonia
Posterior intercostal scan shows a hypoechoic
consolidated area that contains anechoic,
branched tubular structures in the bronchial tree
(fluid bronchogram).
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography
of pneumonia
A: Baseline scan shows
a hypoechoic
consolidated area
B: Seven seconds after
iv bolus of contrast
agent, the lesion shows
marked and
homogeneous
enhancement
C: The lesion remains
substantially unmodified
after 90 s.
The Treatment of CAP
ANTIMICROBIAL DRUGS
MECHANISMS OF ACTION OF
ANTIBACTERIAL DRUGS
Mechanism of action
include:
Inhibition of cell
wall synthesis
Inhibition of protein
synthesis
Inhibition of nucleic
acid synthesis
Inhibition of
metabolic pathways
Interference with
cell membrane
integrity
EFFECTS OF
COMBINATIONS OF DRUGS
Sometimes the chemotherapeutic effects of
two drugs given simultaneously is greater than
the effect of either given alone.
This is called synergism. For example,
penicillin and streptomycin in the treatment
of bacterial endocarditis. Damage to
bacterial cell walls by penicillin makes it
easier for streptomycin to enter.
EFFECTS OF
COMBINATIONS OF DRUGS
Other combinations of drugs can be
antagonistic.
For example, the simultaneous use of penicillin
and tetracycline is often less effective than
when wither drugs is used alone. By stopping
the growth of the bacteria, the
bacteriostatic drug tetracycline interferes
with the action of penicillin, which requires
bacterial growth.
EFFECTS OF
COMBINATIONS OF DRUGS
Combinations of antimicrobial drugs should
be used only for:
1.To prevent or minimize the emergence of
resistant strains.
2.To take advantage of the synergistic effect.
3.To lessen the toxicity of individual drugs.
The Ideal Drug*
1.Selective toxicity: against target pathogen but
not against host
LD
50 (high) vs. MIC and/or MBC (low)
2.Bactericidal vs. bacteriostatic
3.Favorable pharmacokinetics: reach target site
in body with effective concentration
4.Spectrum of activity: broad vs. narrow
5.Lack of “side effects”
Therapeutic index: effective to toxic dose ratio
6.Little resistance development
Resistance
Physiological Mechanisms
4. Altered target
RIF – altered RNA polymerase (mutants)
NAL – altered DNA gyrase
STR – altered ribosomal proteins
ERY – methylation of 23S rRNA
5. Synthesis of resistant pathway
TMP
r
plasmid has gene for DHF reductase;
insensitive to TMP
(cont’d)
REVIEW
Empirical Treatment is the
recommended strategy in
treatment of CAP and
shouldn’t be delayed.
59
CAP – Special Features – Pathogen wise
Typical – S.pneumoniae, H.influenza, M.catarrhalis
Blood tinged sputum - Pneumococcal, Klebsiella, Legionella
H.influenzae
CAP has associated of pleural effusion:S.Pneumoniae –
commonest – penicillin resistance problem
S.aureus, K.pneumoniae, P.aeruginosa
S.aureus causes CAP in post-viral influenza; Serious CAP
K.pneumoniae primarily in patients of chronic alcoholism
P.Aeruginosa causes CAP in pts with CSLD or CF, Nosocom
Aspiration CAP only is caused by multiple pathogens
Extra pulmonary manifestations only in Atypical CAP
Outpatient treatment:
Oral Respiratory Fluroquinolones
OR Oral B-Lactam/ B-Lactamase + Oral
New Macrolide
OR IM 3rd Generation Cefalosporines +
New Macrolide
Recommendations for the Empirical Treatment:
In-patient treatment: Non-ICU:
Intravenous ( IV )Respiratory fluoro-
quinolone
OR IV B-Lactam/ B-Lactamase + IV New
Macrolide
OR IV 3rd Generation Cephalosporin + IV
New Macrolide
Recommendations for the Empirical Treatment:
In-patient treatment: ICU:
No Monotherapy.
IV Respiratory fluoroquinolone + 3rd or
4th generation cephalosporin
OR IV Imipenem + IV New Macrolide
Recommendations for the Empirical Treatment:
Special entities in ICU:
Aspiration:
As Before + i.v. Clindamycin OR Metronidazole
Risk of Pseudomonas Infection:
Antipseudomonal beta-lactam (3rd or 4th generation
cephalosporin OR Piperacillin-tazobactam OR
carbapenem) Plus (aminoglycoside OR
antipseudomonal fluoroquinolone)
For community -acquired methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus infection (MRSA):
Add Teicoplanin OR linezolid Alternative: Vancomycin
(considering its renal side effects)
Recommendations for the Empirical Treatment:
64
Duration of Therapy
•Minimum of 5 days
•Afebrile for at least 48 to 72 h
•Longer duration of therapy
If initial therapy was not active against the identified
pathogen or complicated by extra pulmonary infection
65
Strategies for Prevention of CAP
•Cessation smoking
•Influenza Vaccine It offers 90% protection and
reduces mortality by 80%
•Pneumococcal Vaccine (Pneumonia shot)
It protects against 23 types of Pneumococci
70% of us have Pneumococci in our RT
It is not 100% protective but reduces mortality
Age 19-64 with co morbidity of high for pneumonia
Above 65 all must get it even without high risk
•Starting first dose of antibiotic within 4 h & O
2 status
66
Switch to Oral Therapy
Four criteria
Improvement in cough, dyspnea & clinical signs
Afebrile on two occasions 8 h apart
WBC decreasing towards normal
Functioning GI tract with adequate oral intake
If overall clinical picture is otherwise favorable,
hemodynamically stable; can switch to oral
therapy while still febrile.
67
Management of Poor Responders
Consider non-infectious illnesses
Consider less common pathogens
Consider serologic testing
Broaden antibiotic therapy
Consider bronchoscopy
68
CAP – Complications
Hypotension and septic shock
3-5% Pleural effusion; Clear fluid + pus cells
1% Empyema thoracis pus in the pleural space
Lung abscess – destruction of lung - CSLD
Single (aspiration) anaerobes, Pseudomonas
Multiple (metastatic) Staphylococcus aureus
Septicemia – Brain abscess, Liver Abscess
Multiple Pyemic Abscesses
69
CAP – So How Best to Win the War?
Early antibiotic administration within 4-6 hours
Empiric antibiotic Rx. as per guidelines (IDSA / ATS)
PORT – PSI scoring and Classification of cases
Early hospitalization in Class IV and V
Change Abx. as per pathogen & sensitivity pattern
Decrease smoking cessation - advice / counseling
Arterial oxygenation assessment in the first 24 h
Blood culture collection in the first 24 h prior to Abx.
Pneumococcal & Influenza vaccination; Smoking
cessation
Broncho-Vaxom is an extract of
different bacterial species frequently
responsible of respiratory infections.
It stimulates the immune system in
order to increase the body’s natural
defences against a wide spectrum of
respiratory pathogens.
BRONCHO-VAXOM
Broncho-Vaxom ® prevents and/or reduces the severity of acute attacks of chronic bronchitis and recurrent infections of the respiratory tract, in particular sinusitis, rhinopharyngitis and middle ear infection, in adults and children.
Broncho-Vaxom prevents and/or
reduces the severity of acute attacks
of chronic bronchitis and recurrent
infections of the respiratory tract, in
particular sinusitis, rhinopharyngitis
and middle ear infection, in adults and
children.
BRONCHO-VAXOM
Broncho-Vaxom ® prevents and/or reduces the severity of acute attacks of chronic bronchitis and recurrent infections of the respiratory tract, in particular sinusitis, rhinopharyngitis and middle ear infection, in adults and children.
Immunostimulating agent
In animals, an increased resistance
towards experimental infections, a
stimulation of macrophages and B
lymphocytes as well as an increase in
immunoglobulins secreted by the
respiratory mucosal cells have been
reported.
BRONCHO-VAXOM
Broncho-Vaxom ® prevents and/or reduces the severity of acute attacks of chronic bronchitis and recurrent infections of the respiratory tract, in particular sinusitis, rhinopharyngitis and middle ear infection, in adults and children.
Immunostimulating agent
In humans, an increase in the rate of
circulating T lymphocytes, in salivary IgA,
in the non-specific response to polyclonal
mitogens and in the mixed lymphocyte
reaction have been observed.
BRONCHO-VAXOM
Broncho-Vaxom ® prevents and/or reduces the severity of acute attacks of chronic bronchitis and recurrent infections of the respiratory tract, in particular sinusitis, rhinopharyngitis and middle ear infection, in adults and children.
Safety
Extensive toxicity studies have not
revealed any toxic effect.
Effects on ability to drive and use
machines:
Broncho-Vaxom is presumed to be safe
and unlikely to produce an effect.
BRONCHO-VAXOM
Broncho-Vaxom ® prevents and/or reduces the severity of acute attacks of chronic bronchitis and recurrent infections of the respiratory tract, in particular sinusitis, rhinopharyngitis and middle ear infection, in adults and children.
Safety
Reproduction studies in animals have not
demonstrated any risk to the fetus, but
controlled studies in pregnant women are
not available. As regards breast-feeding,
no specific studies have been performed
and no data have been reported up to
now.
BRONCHO-VAXOM
Broncho-Vaxom ® prevents and/or reduces the severity of acute attacks of chronic bronchitis and recurrent infections of the respiratory tract, in particular sinusitis, rhinopharyngitis and middle ear infection, in adults and children.
Side effects
The overall incidence of adverse effects in clinical
trials lies between 3 and 4%. Gastrointestinal troubles
(nausea, abdominal pain, vomiting), dermatologic
reactions (rash, urticaria), and respiratory disorders
(coughing, dyspnea, asthma), as well as generalized
problems (fever, fatigue, allergic reactions) are the
most frequent complaints reported.
BRONCHO-VAXOM
Broncho-Vaxom ® prevents and/or reduces the severity of acute attacks of chronic bronchitis and recurrent infections of the respiratory tract, in particular sinusitis, rhinopharyngitis and middle ear infection, in adults and children.
Interaction
No drug interaction is known up to now..
BRONCHO-VAXOM
Broncho-Vaxom ® prevents and/or reduces the severity of acute attacks of chronic bronchitis and recurrent infections of the respiratory tract, in particular sinusitis, rhinopharyngitis and middle ear infection, in adults and children.