Cemented vs uncemented total hip arthroplasty

zahidaskar 1,459 views 32 slides Feb 23, 2020
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 32
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32

About This Presentation

Cemented vs uncemented THR


Slide Content

Cemented vs Uncemented
Total Hip Arthroplasty
ZAHID ASKAR
FCPS(ORTHO), FRCS (TR & ORTHO)
PROF. & CHAIR
DEPTTOF ORTHOPAEDICS& TRAUMA
KHYBER MEDICAL COLLEGE, PESHAWER

Introduction
•Start of Cemented Hips
•Cement Bone Disease
•Younger Patients, higher expectations
•Biologic Bond

Cheap
Forgiving
Even in osteoporotic bones
Longer Follow-up
Easier to revise
Biological
No interface between Implant
& Bone
Quicker
Extra Interface
Cementing Techniques
More time
Reaction to Cement
Expensive
Chances of Fracture
Not for every bone

•Are all cemented the same ?
•Are all uncemented the same ??
•Hybrid
•Reverse hybrid

•Loaded-taper’ or ‘force-closed’
fixation 0r Wedge shaped
prosthesis
•Composite-beam’or‘shaped-
closed’ fixation Medullary Canal
Filling Prosthesis

DOUBLE TAPER –EXETER , CPT
TRIPLE TAPER -MS30, C-STEM ,CPCS( S&N)

Advent of Uncemented THA –Role of
Cemented THA ??

•Which one is better ?
•Is there a clear answer ?
•Why ???

•Individual studies
•Conflicting evidence

•Effect of age ?
•One size fits All ??

•Registries –conclusive proof for it?
•PRIMARY OSTEOARHRITIS

•AOANJRR
•AJRR
•NJR
•THE SWEDISH HIP ARTHROPLASTY REGISTRY
•DANISH JOINT REGISTRY
•NARA
•NORWAY REGISTRY FOR JOINTS
•NEW ZEALAND JOINT REISTRY
•Review Articles

Age Distribution of Hip Arthroplasty Procedures,
2012-2018 (N=597,258)

Femoral Stem Fixation for Elective Primary Total Hip
Arthroplasty for Patients ≥65 Years of Age with Primary
Osteoarthritis and an Endpoint of Revision, 2012-2018

Femoral Stem Fixation for Elective Primary Total Hip
Arthroplasty for Males ≥65 Years of Age with Primary
Osteoarthritis and an Endpoint of Revision, 2012-2018

Femoral Stem Fixation for Elective Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty for
Females ≥65 Years of Age with Primary Osteoarthritis and an
Endpoint of Revision, 2012-2018

Cemented Fixation have better long term survivorship
Cemented fixation had better survival in older patients
Cementlessfixation had better survival in younger patients
Periprosthetic fractures were common in cementlessfixation

summary
•There seems to be shift towards uncemented THA especially in the
younger patients
•Cemented tends to do relatively better in older patient group
•Not all prosthesis are the same .
•Different Cemented /uncemented THA will have different results