Coin Based Water Dispenser Fully automated Uses Arduino, IR sensor and Coin sesor . Detects coin and presence of cup Senses water level in cup Efficient Water saving
Sources of Information Customer survey Brainstorming Internet www.nevonprojects.com nesdlabs.wordpress.com Books Dieter GE, Schmidt LC - 2012, Engineering Design
Other concepts Wall mounted Direct piping water dispenser
Concept Drawings Coin based Wall mounted Direct piping water dispenser
TRIZ Problem Identification: If the coin based water dispenser is made on a larger scale Transportation of a big machine is difficult More time required to fill the glass Formulation Insufficient energy generated by ordinary components and large machinery prohibit the production of coin based water dispenser on a larger scale
TECHNICAL CONTRADICTION Weight of non-moving object Force Pressure Temperature Durability Power Accuracy of measurement Complexity of the device Harmful factors acting on the object Convenience of use PRINCIPLES Principle 1 – Segmentation Principle 7 – Nesting Principle 14 - Spheriodality -Curvature Principle 15 - Dynamicity Principle 16 - Partial Actions Principle 17 - Another dimension Principle 18 - Mechanical Vibrations Principle 23 - Feedback Principle 30 - Flexible films or thin membranes Principle 31 - Use of porous materials Principle 40 - Composite Structures
Adaptation Principle 1 – Segmentation - There should be assembling/disassembling characteristics. - The parts should be assembles at the targeted area Principle 18 – Mechanical Vibrations - To make full use of all the power - Increases Durability
Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
Average Value of Cons. = λ = 6.626 n=6. RI = 1.25 ( From table 7.11) Consistency Index: 4 Consistency Ratio : CR= CI/RI = 0.1252/1.25 CR=0.100 Consistent Results
Selection of the concept Best Concept: Wall Mounted Water Dispenser
Parametric Design
Product Architecture
Configuration Design
Tolerance and Surface Finishing Most of the components are manufactured using the process : 1. milling 2. turning Both of these processes are expected to provide smooth surface finish and assure accuracy in the tolerance results. Surface roughness: 𝟑𝟎 𝝁 in. tolerance range: 0.002 in. for finish mill, 0.0005 in. for finish turn/finish grind Generally, finish machining process provide tolerance of ±0.003 - ±0.001 in. The value of tolerance also has an influence on the processing costs. The chosen value for tolerance is ±0.002 in. and therefore the increase in cost percentage is 135 %