Congenital melanocytic nevi when to worry & when to treat

hakeemzamano 4,478 views 87 slides Nov 28, 2014
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 87
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83
Slide 84
84
Slide 85
85
Slide 86
86
Slide 87
87

About This Presentation

Congenital melanocytic nevi when to worry & when to treat


Slide Content

Congenital Melanocytic Nevi:
When to Worry &
When to Treat
Julie V. Schaffer, MD
Associate Professor of Dermatology and Pediatrics
Director of Pediatric Dermatology
NYU School of Medicine

Congenital Melanocytic Nevi:
When NOTto Worry &
When NOTto Treat
Julie V. Schaffer, MD
Associate Professor of Dermatology and Pediatrics
Director of Pediatric Dermatology
NYU School of Medicine

Overview
•evolving definitions and concepts
•natural history
•risks
–neurocutaneous melanocytosis
–melanoma
•management strategies

Goal: Neither You nor Your Patients
Order These Products
McAllister et al Ped Derm 2009

Congenital Melanocytic Nevi:
Traditional Concepts

classic definition: present at birth
•1-6% of neonates in large series
–clinicaldiagnosis in older studies
–dermatoscopicdiagnosis more recently
–may be more evident in newborns with
darker skin

Congenital Melanocytic Nevi (CMN):
Traditional Classification by Size
•small

<1.5 cm final size
•medium
–1.5-20 cm final size
•large
–>20 cm final size
–≥9 cm on the head of an infant
–≥6 cm on the body of an infant

Congenital Melanocytic Nevi (CMN):
Growth in Proportion to Child
•estimated increase in
size from infancy to
adulthood
–~2-fold on head

~3-fold on trunk &
extremities

Congenital Melanocytic Nevi:
Histologic Features

nevomelanocytes extend
deeper into dermis and
subcutis
•single- file arrangement
between collagen bundles
•track along appendages &
neurovascular structures

Congenital Melanocytic Nevi:
Evolving Concepts
•‘tardive CMN’, ‘early onsetnevi’, ‘congenital
nevus- like nevi’
–become apparent during infancy or early childhood,
esp. before 2- 3 years of age

clinical, dermatoscopic & histologic features identical to ‘true’ CMN
•1-4% of children & adults have a CNLN ≥1.5
cm (medium-sized)
•in a recent series, 17% of Italian schoolchildren
(ages 12- 17y; 592/3406) had a CMN/CNLN
≥0.6 cm

Natural History of
Congenital Melanocytic Nevi
•darker or lighter color
•increase in overall thickness
•changes in topography

Development of a Verrucous Surface

Papules, Nodules and ‘Pebbling”

Speckled Lentiginous Nevus:
Subtype of CMN
•prevalence of ~2- 3%
–background tan patch apparent
at birth or during infancy

progressive development of spots
•patterns reflect origin during
embryogenesis
–block-like with sharp midline
demarcation

following lines of Blaschko

‘Hybrid’: SLN + Classic CMN

Evolution: SLN → Classic CMN
6 months
12 months
24 months

Speckled Lentiginous Nevus:
two variants
•exclusively macular speckles
•papular + macular speckles
–‘garden’ of nevi –any type
–‘SLN syndrome’ –weakness,
dysesthesia, hyperhidrosis
Vidaurri-de la Cruz & Happle. Dermatology 2006
Happle. Clin Exp Derm 2009

4 years 10 years 14 years
Haenssle et al. Clin Exp Derm 2009

CMN in Infants:
Transient Erosions
•skin breakdown due to skin
fragility in neonatal period
–evident at birth or during first
few days of life

favors thickest part of nevus
•heal spontaneously over
days to weeks
Giam et al Pediatr Derm 1999
Gonzalez et al JAAD 2003

CMN in Infants:
Proliferative Nodules
•can mimic melanoma, but benign course
–rapid growth

atypical histologic features
•clues from comparative genomic hybridization*
–no chromosomal aberrations or only numeric changes
–most often loss of chromosome 7
–notstructural changes (gains/losses of chromosomal
fragments) that characterize >95% of melanomas
Bastian et al Am J Pathol 2002
Murphy et al JAAD 2008
Phadke et al Am J Surg Path 2011
*Can use paraffin-embedded tissue

Neurotized Nevi
A
B
C
Type of
Nevus Cell
Morphology of
Nevus Cell

Neurotized
Nevus Neurofibroma
S-100 + +
Leu-7 - +*
GFAP - +*
Myelin basic protein - +*
Factor XIIIa - +
GFAP = glial fibrillary acidic protein *Stains minority of cells

Halo Phenomenon

Regression of Halo CMN

Halo Nevus with Dermatitis
Rolland et al. Ped Derm 2009; Patrizi et al Br J Derm 2005

Tauscher et al. Arch Ped Adol Med 2007
vsPure ‘Meyerson Phenomenon’:
No Regression of the Nevus

1 month 1 year
2 years 3 years
Bonifazi et al. Eur J Ped Dermatol 2001

‘Disappearing’ CMN on the Scalp
•clinical fading over the first 1-4 years
of life
•histologic evaluation performed in 2 of 7 children recently reported
–nevomelanocytes remained in deep
dermis and adnexae
–no inflammation or fibrosis
Strauss & Newton Bishop JAAD 2008
Vilarrasa et al JAAD 2008

Strauss & Newton Bishop JAAD 2008
4 months
26 months
birth
21 months
birth
26 months

2 years 4 years

8 mos 6 years
5 mos 4 years
3 years 11 years
‘Peas in a pod’
(parallel furrow +
crista dotted
)
Decreased
pigmentation
Minagawa et al.
Arch Derm 2011

Desmoplastic Hairless
Hypopigmented CMN
•woody induration
•progressive loss
of pigmentation
•alopecia
•intense pruritus
Ruiz-Maldonado et al. Br J Dermatol 2003
Martin et al. JAAD 2007
1 month 5 months 2 years

Birth 2 years
Hernandez-Martin et al. Clin Exp Derm 2007

Gass et al. Ped Derm 206
Birth 5 years
S100

Spontaneous ‘Scarification’

Risks of Congenital Melanocytic Nevi
Small-&medium-sized
Large- or giant-sized
Skin disease
Systemic disease

Neurocutaneous Melanocytosis
•proliferation of melanocytes within the
leptomeninges (in addition to the skin)
–melanocytomas

melanomas

Risk Factors for
Neurocutaneous Melanocytosis (NCM)
•multiple satellite nevi
–5-fold increased risk with >20 satellites
(2.5%→12.5%)

~1/3 of NCM cases without ‘mother ship’
•final size of CMN >40 cm
•?posterior axial location
–inconsistent results
–no associated risk in recent large study of
high-risk CMN patients with CNS imaging
(n=120)
Kinsler et al. Br J Derm 2008
Hale et al. Br J Derm 2005
Marghoob AA et al. Arch Derm 2004

Multiple Satellites
associated with >75%
of large CMN
in the absence of a
‘mother ship’

Neurocutaneous Melanocytosis
•symptomatic NCM
–classically 3– 4% of those with high- risk nevi
–median onset ~2 y, median survival 6 months
–hydrocephalus, seizures, vomiting
–with localized mass, median onset ~9 y and more
likely focal sensorimotor deficits
•asymptomatic NCM
–+ MRI in 5–25% of those with high- risk nevi but no
neurologic symptoms
–in 5-y follow-up study, 1 of 10 asymptomatic patients
with +MRI developed neurologic symptoms
–?higher proportion symptomatic, e.g. recent Montreal series
Foster RD et al. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001
Hale EK et al. Br J Dermatol 2005
Lovett et al. JAAD 2009

Age 5 mos Age 18 mos Age 9 y

Neurocutaneous Melanocytosis:
MRI Findings
•best detected by MRI of brain and spine with
and without gadolinium

progressive myelination after 6 months of age may
obscure melanin T1 signal
•MRI findings
–areas of brain parenchyma (especially temporal lobes/amygdala) with increased T1 signal
–enhancement of diffusely thickened leptomeninges
–obvious masses
–other CNS/spinal malformations (e.g. Dandy Walker complex/posterior fossa cysts, intraspinal lipomas)

Neurocutaneous Melanocytosis:
Recent Clinical Insights
•study of 120 children with high- risk CMN who
underwent MRI of the CNS
–mean age at MRI = 2.5 y

mean follow-up = 8 y
•19% (23/120) had neurologic abnormalities
–11% clinical + MRI (most symptomatic by age 2 y)
–4% MRI only (asymptomatic)
–4% clinical only
–included relatively mild clinical findings, e.g.
developmental delay, abnormal muscle tone
–significantly more common in boys than girls
Kinsler et al Br J Derm 2008

Risk of Cutaneous Melanoma in CMN –
Correlated with Size
>60 cm
4 (2 cutaneous/axial,
2 extracutaneous)
20-60 cm
<20 cm
nevus size N*
204
94
28
multiple 13
melanomas
Kinsler et al Br J Derm 2009
0
0
1 (CNS)
*mean age at entry, 3 y; mean follow-up, 9 y

Risk of Cutaneous Melanoma in CMN –
Correlated with Size
>60 cm
4(2 cutaneous/axial,
2 extracutaneous)
20-60 cm
<20 cm
nevus size N*
204
94
28
multiple 13
melanomas
Kinsler et al Br J Derm 2009
0
0
1(CNS)
*mean age at entry, 3 y; mean follow-up, 9 y

Risk of Cutaneous Melanoma in CMN –
Correlated with Size
>60 cm
4(2 cutaneous/axial,
2 extracutaneous)
20-60 cm
<20 cm
nevus size N*
204
94
28
multiple 13
melanomas
Kinsler et al Br J Derm 2009
0
0
1(CNS)
*mean age at entry, 3 y; mean follow-up, 9 y

Caveatwith regard to
Statistics on Melanoma Risk in CMN
•selection biasin studies can lead to
overestimatesof melanoma incidence
–retrospective case collections
–tertiary referral centers
–small studies
Krengel et al Br J Dermatol 2006

Melanoma Risk for
Small and Medium-Sized CMN
•exact risk not known

estimated to be <1% over a lifetime
•3 large cohort studies (total n = 680)
–mean age at entry ~10 y
–mean follow-up period 13.5 y
–no melanomas observed
Kinsler et al. Br J Derm 2009
Swerdlow et al. JAAD 1995
Sahin et al. JAAD 2008

Melanomas in
Small and Medium-Sized CMN
•risk virtually all after
puberty
•tend to arise at the
dermo- epidermal
junction

Psychosocial/cosmetic concerns
Anxiety level
Ease of monitoring
Natural history
Factors that affect healing/scarring
Type of anesthesia required

THERE IS NOTONE ‘RIGHT’
ANSWER FOR EVERYONE

Psychosocial/Cosmetic Ramifications
•Face
>> other highly visible areas
–Larger lesions
–Conspicuous sites (eg tip of nose)
–‘Ugly’ lesions (eg thick, warty, hairy)

Subjectively unappealing lesions,
especially in visible sites
•Lesions that are clearly more cosmetically appealing than the
resultant SCAR
SOONER
LATER IF AT ALL
Removebeforebody image
begins to
solidify at ~age 4 y
Remove if/when
bothersome to the patient
EncourageNOTto
remove or to wait X

There is No ‘Mole Eraser’
McAllister et al Ped Derm 2009

Natural History
•Clinically and/or histologically worrisome
changes
•Functional issues (e.g. bulky/exophytic
lesions)
SOONER
LATER IF AT ALL
•Signs of involution
•Remember that risk of melanoma is low
and begins after puberty

BUTTOCK FOREARM
BLACK OR MOTTLED HOMOGENEOUS TAN
THICK, IRREGULAR,
MULTINODULAR
THIN, UNIFORM
VERY DENSE MINIMAL
location
pigmentation
topography
hypertrichosis
Factors that Affect Ease of Monitoring
patient/family
AWARE, MEDICALLY
SOPHISTICATED
RELUCTANT

Anxiety of Child & Family
•High level of anxiety
regarding the lesion
•High level of anxiety regarding the procedure
SOONER
LATER IF AT ALL

Factors that Affect Healing/Scarring
•Scalp, lower legs, forearms,
palms/soles

Increased tissue flexibility and less scar
spread in 1
st
year of life
•Risk of functional impairment
from scar (e.g. over joint/
circumferential, eyelid margin)
•Sports season currently or in
the near future
SOONER
LATER IF AT ALL

Type of Anesthesia Required
•General anesthesia required even if
done in an adolescent or adult
•Local anesthesia
–Girls: average 9-10years
–Boys: average 10-11 years
–VARIES CONSIDERABLY!
SOONER
LATER

Margulis, Alder, Bower Plast Reconst Surg 2009

Small and Medium-Sized CMN:
Longitudinal Evaluation

baseline photography
•(self) skin examination by patient/parents
–bring focal changes in color, border or
topography to dermatologist’s attention

Small and Medium:
risk ~all after puberty
Large:
~half of risk in 1
st
5 y
~5-10%

Large/Giant CMN –Risk of Melanoma
•higher risk
–posterior axial location
–large number of satellite nevi
–larger size of CMN (e.g. >50 cm)
•lower risk
–restricted to an extremity or the head
–satellite nevi themselves
Hale EK et al. Br J Dermatol 2005
Bett BJ. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005

Melanomas Associated with
Large/Giant CMN
•cutaneous melanomas often arise sub-epidermally, making recognition
difficult
•extracutaneous primary sites are
relatively common
–CNS
–retroperitoneum

occasionally, the primary site is not found

Large/Giant CMN –
Prospective Studies on Risk of Melanoma
Ruiz-Maldonado, 1992
Hale, 2005
Egan, 1998
80
46*
170**
8.6 y
7.3 y
5.3 y
2 (2.5%)
(cutaneous/axial)
2 (4%)
(cutaneous/axial)
4 (2.5%)
(all extracutaneous)
* mean age = 8 years
**mean age = 6 years
Nstudy follow- up melanomas

Large/Giant CMN –Internet Registry-Based
Data on Risk of Melanoma
Nevus
Network*
(Bett, 2005)
Nevus
Outreach*
(Ka, 2005)
524 truncal/garment
336 head/extremity
379
5.2 y
**
15 (2.9%)
1 (0.3%)
(2 extracutaneous)
0
* no physician confirmation
** median age = 4 y
N follow- upmelanomasstudy

How Does Excision of Large CMN
Affect the Risk of Cutaneous Melanoma?
•no clear-cut answer in the literature
–trend toward lower incidence of melanoma in patients
whose nevi were excised
–however, the largest nevi (which have a higher
melanoma risk) are more likely to be ‘inoperable’
•although early and ‘complete’ excision is often
recommended, it is usually impossible to remove
every nevus cell in the lesion
–location
–extensive size
–involvement of deeper structures

Other Considerations Regarding
Excision of Large CMN
•cons
–scar may restrict joint
mobility or impair
function
–morbidities of
procedures, e.g.
discomfort, limitation
of activity, risk of
infection, anesthesia
risk
•pros
–functional benefits
(e.g. bulky lesions)

scar more
cosmetically
acceptable than
nevus

Procedures for Cosmetic and Psychological
Benefit (not to decrease melanoma risk)
•neonatal curettage
–takes advantage of a cleavage plane between the
upper dermis (where ‘active’ nevus cells are
concentrated) and mid dermis in first 2- 3 weeks of life

dermabrasion
•laser resurfacing (e.g. CO
2, erbium:YAG)
•other lasers (e.g. Nd- YAG, ruby, alexandrite)

Age 6 mos Age 7 mos,
1 mo after
curettage
Age 7 mos,
2 wks after
Q-switched
ruby laser
Age 8 mos,
1 mo after
Q-switched
ruby laser
Kishi et al. Br J Derm. 2007

36 mos latertreated at ages:
2 wks with CO
2
5 wks with Nd-YAG
Dave et al. Br J Plast Surg 2004
27-y-old woman –melanoma
10 y s/p argon laser therapy
Woodrow et al. Br J Derm 2003
Tags