Consumption theories.pdf

4,201 views 34 slides Mar 30, 2023
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 34
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34

About This Presentation

consumption theories


Slide Content

THEORIES OF
MACROECONOMICS
NtaUGC-NET dec-2018
UGC-NET PAPER-2 (ECO)
Online batch ,Lecture-19
Macro eco Topic-4
AIH, RIH, PIH, LCH

1.Absolute income hypothesis
Intro--
AIH developed by J.M.Keynes.
According to Keynes aggregate consumption is a function of current
disposable income.
AIH is either linear or non-linear consumption function.
This empirical consumption function derived from time series data for
1929-1944 .
His statement of the relationship between income and consumption
was based on the ‘fundamental psychological law’.

He said that consumption is a stable function of current
income (to be more specific, current disposable income—
income after tax payment).
Because of the operation of the ‘psychological law’,
His consumption function may be rewritten here with the form
His consumption function is such that 0 < MPC < 1 and MPC <
APC.
Thus, a non-proportional relationship (i.e., APC > MPC) between
consumption and income exists in the Keynesian absolute income
hypothesis.
C = a + bY,
where a > 0 and 0 < b < 1.

This consumption function is stablein both short run and long run.
In the short run consumption function is non-proportion(APC>MPC).
In long run consumption function is linear and proration.(APC=MPC)

income
consumption
C=Y
C
C2
C1
Y2Y1
0
C=a+bY
C=bY
APC= C/Y
MPC=ΔC/ΔY

Short run Long run
Least one factor of prod. Is
fixed. All factors are variables.
Law of variable proportion. Law of return to scale.
Consumption function is non-
linear(APC>MPC)
Consumption function is
linear(APC=MPC)
No changes in scale of
production.
changes in scale of
production.
Factor ratio changes
Factor ratio doesn’t changes
Consumption function is
C=bY
Consumption function is
C=a+bY
Different bwshort run and long run consumption function.

In the long run both APC & MPC will remain constant.
The relationship b/w income and consumption is based on fundamental
psychological law.
This law has three propositions
1.When income increases consumption also increases but less than
income.
2.Incease in income divide into saving and consumption with same
proportion
3.Increase in income will lead to increase in both , saving and
consumption.

This theory also called as cyclical consumption function
Acc. To Keynes consumption function is reversible.

2. Relative income hypothesis.
This theory developed by James Duesenberry(1949).
His theory is based on two assumptions of Keynesian
consumption function.
1.Every individual behavior is not independent but
interdependent.
2.Consmptions relation are irreversible and not reversible..
He used social character of consumption pattern means the
surpass of joneses.(neighbors)
Joneses means rich neighbors.

Duesenberrybelieved that the basic consumption function was long run and
proportional.
This means that average fraction of income consumed does not change in the
long run, but there may be variation between consumption and income within
short run cycles.
Duesenberry’sRIH is based on two hypotheseisfirst is the relative income hy-
pothesis and second is the past peak income hypothesis.
Duesenberry’sfirst hypothesis says that consumption depends not on the
‘absolute’ level of income but on the ‘relative’ income incomerelative to the
income of the society in which an individual lives.
A households consumption is determined by the income and expenditure
pattern of his neighbours.
Families with relatively highincomes experience lower APCs and families with
relatively low incomes experience high APCs.

Consumption pattern is effected by neighbors consumptions. This
consumption preferences are interdependent.
If absolute size of income in a country increases then the APC for
entire economy at higher level of absolute income would be constant.
But when income decreases consumption does not fall in same
proportion because of Retched effect/demonstration effect.
This imitative or emulative nature of consumption has been described by
Duesenberryas the “demonstration effect.”
Specifically, people with relatively low incomes attempt to ‘keep up with the
Joneses’—they consume more and save less.

Second part of his theory is past peak of income hypothesiswhich
shows short run fluctuations In consumption function.
Duesenberryhypothesized that the present consumption of the families is influenced
not just by current incomes but also by the levels of past peak incomes, i.e., C = f(Y
ri,
Y
pi), where Y
riis the relative income and Y
piis the peak income.
If current incomes rise, households tend to consume more but slowly.
This is because of the relatively low habitual consumption patterns and people adjust
their consumption standards established by the previous peak income slowly to their
present rising income levels.
On other hand, if current incomes decline these households do not immediately reduce
their consumption as they find if difficult to reduce their consumption established by
the previous peak income.
Thus, during depression consumption rises as a fraction of income and during
prosperity consumption does increase slowly as a fraction of income.

During recession when current income (Yt) falls below the previews
peak income (Y0) then current consumption-income ratio Ct/Ytwill
increase
Retched effect is developed whenever there is a cyclical decline or
recovery in come.
.(Y↓→APC↑)
He introduced retched effect
When Y ↑ →C↑→Living of stand.↑
But When Y↓→C(constant)→dis-saving↑
He refutes the Keynes function of reversible.

RIH assume that there is proportion increase in income and consumption.
There is direct relation bwconsumption and income.
The distribution of income almost unchanged with the change in
aggregate level of income..
Consumers consumption is related to his previous peak income.(Yo)
Reverse lighting bolt effect-gradually increased in consumption due to
increase in income.

3.Permanent income hypothesis.
This theory is developed nobelprize winner Milton Friedman(1957).
His theory is contradiction(opposite) to long run proportion and short
run no-proportion consumption function..
Acc. To him current income is not determinant of consumption
expenditure.
He divide consumption and income into permanent and transitory
component .
Consumption of a person depend upon future expected income or
permanent income only.

Like Duesenberry’sRIH, Friedman’s hypothesis holds that the basic
relationship between consumption and income is proportional.
But consumption, according to Friedman, depends neither on ‘absolute’
income, nor on ‘relative’ income but on ‘permanent’ income, based on
expected future income.
His hypothesis is then described as the ‘permanent income
hypothesis’ (PIH)..
Thus, he finds a relationship between consumption and permanent
income.
Friedman’s basic argument is that permanent consumption depends on
permanent income.

Y= Yp+Yt
C=Cp+Ct
income
Consumption.

In the long run consumption is increases to proportion to change in
permanent income
APC or permanent consumption is independent or not depend on size of
income.
In long run APC=MPC.
There is proportion relationship bwpermanent income and
consumption.
Permanent income is based on time series.
Permanent income depend partly on current income(Y1) and partly on
previous income.(Yo)

Assumptions
1.There is No co-relationship b/w transitory income and permanent
income
2.No correlation b/w permanetconsumption and transitory consumption
.
3.No correlation bwtransitory consumption and transitory income.
4. Only permanent income affect the consumption (proportional
relation.)

Permanent income is based on backward looking expectation.
Short run consumption function is non-proportion.(APC>MPC)
Long run consumption function is proportional.(APC=MPC)
Friedman assumed in long run APC of all families(rich or poor) are
same.
Acc. To him consumptionneither depend on absolute income nor on
relative income but on permanent income.

The basic relationship of PIH is that permanent
consumption is proportional to permanent income that
exhibits a fairly constant APC.

4.Life cycle hypothesis
This theory developed by Modigliani, Brumberg, and
Ando.(MBA)(1950)
This theory is also known as wealth theory of consumption.
Consumption is the function of life time expected income, wealth, and
number of years until retirement.
This theory states that individuals seek to smooth consumptionover the
course of lifetime.

It suggests for the whole economy consumption will be a function of
both wealth and income.
Individuals are assumed to plan a pattern of consumer expenditure
based on expected earnings over their lifetime.
An individual’s or household’s level of consumption depends not just
on current income but also, and more importantly, on long-term
expected earnings.
C =
T
W+RY
C-Consumption
R-Remaining years of retirement.
Y-income
T-remaining years of life.
W-wealth
Consumption will depend on

Lifetime
income
Student loans
Income curve
saving
Retirement
consumption
0 40
20 65
Dis-saving.
This saving during working life enables you to maintain similar levels of
income during your retirement.
Graph shows individuals
save from 20 to 65
As a student, it is rational to borrow
to fund education.
Then during your working life, you pay off student loans and begin saving for your
retirement.

This theory assumed-consumption is directly related with asset.
Tistheory solve the consumption puzzle .
They used wealth as variable.
ROI on asset is zero.
Net asset are result of consumer own saving.
Maximization of utility depend upon resources available.
Total resources consist of his income and wealth.

The theory states that individuals seek to smooth consumption
over the course of a lifetime –borrowing in times of low-income and
saving during periods of high income.
The theory states consumption will be a function of wealth, expected
lifetime earnings and the number of years until retirement.

Prev. years que.

1.Absolute income hypothesis
This empirical consumption function derived from time
series data for 1929-1944 .
2.Relative income hyp.
1948
3.Permanent income hyp.
1957
4.Life cycle hyp
1950

THEORIES OF investment
NtaUGC-NET dec-2018
UGC-NET PAPER-2 (ECO)
Online batch ,Lecture-20
Macro eco Topic-5
Tags