rahulammavaiokkanum
43 views
30 slides
Mar 02, 2025
Slide 1 of 30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
About This Presentation
continuous improvement
Size: 1.13 MB
Language: en
Added: Mar 02, 2025
Slides: 30 pages
Slide Content
Developing a Continuous Improvement
ulture
A Mana gement Per sgppective
I think and
solve problems
Manager/strong partner
I don’t think or
solve problems
Because they don’t
Because they do
Operator/weak partner
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
WORLD CLASS SMEDD
AANGES TO
NCREASE M/C CCAPACITY
WORK FLOOW
OORKFLOW
EENTORY
IPMENT
LABLE
TIME
QQUALITY
PROBLEM SOLVING TOOLS
QQUICK TOOL CH
COONTINUOUS W
AND LOW INV
TPM
EFFECTIVE EQU
ALWAYS AVAI
TQM
RIGHT FIRST
EVERY TIME
I
ELIMINATION OF WASTE
WORKPLACE ORGANISATION
Failure
Appraisal
Failure
Appraisal
Prevention
Prevention
Method Man
MaterialMachine
Kanban Si ggnal
KANBAN
To request a new
delivery
What is CI?
•A long term people & process oriented programme •Customer driven
Ui dt t i & tt d d
•
U
s
ing
d
a
t
a
t
o
improve
&
se
t
s
t
an
d
ar
d
s
•Using employees to work together to improve
So that CI becomes So that CI becomes So that CI becomes So that CI becomes “that’s the way we do it here” “that’s the way we do it here”
What are the benefits of CI? •Typically 25 to 30 good suggestions per employee, per year,
and to
have over 90% of those implemented (Toyota had 75 000 have
over
90%
of
those
implemented
.
(Toyota
had
75
,
000
suggestions from
7,000 employees and 99% were implemented).
•Small im
p
rovements add u
p
to ma
jor benefits - im
p
roved
ppj
p
productivity, improved quality, better safety, faster delivery,
lower
costs,
and greater customer satisfaction.
El fid ktb i d jbl
lti i
•
E
mp
loyees
fi
n
d
wor
k
t
o
b
e eas
ier an
d
more en
joya
bl
e - resu
lti
ng
in
higher employee moral and job satisfaction,
and lower turn-over.
•
CI
reduces waste in areas such as inventory waiting times
•
CI
reduces
waste
in
areas
such
as
inventory
,
waiting
times
,
transportation,
worker motion, employee
skills, over production,
excess
quality and in processes.
•CIimproves space utilisation, pr oduct quality,
use of capital,
communications, production capacity
and employee
retention.
The winning formula
QQQQ
E Q A E Q A E
=
Q
x
A E
=
Q
x
A
AA
E
ffectiveness = Q
uality of problem solving skills x cultural A
cceptance
Quality of problem solving skills
E = Q x AE = Q x A
•Like any new activity people have to practice to get good
atit at
it
•Training in problem solving skills
Facilitatorstoleadprojects1%
2%ofworkforce
•
Facilitators
to
lead
projects
1%
-
2%
of
workforce
•Time and resources to make improvements and develop
skills
criticalmass>50%ofworkforceinvolved
skills
–
critical
mass
>50%
of
workforce
involved
•Coaching, support and feedback system
I think and
solve problems
Manager/strong partner
I don’t think or
solve problems
Because they don’t
Because they do
Operator/weak partner
Problem solving tools Kaizen/Lean
Six
-
Sigma
Kaizen/Lean •People/Team based
structuredmodules
Six
-
Sigma
•Structured data centric
problemsolving
structured
modules
•Elimination of waste
problem
solving
methodology
•Elimination of
variation
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
WORLD CLASS
D
efine the exact focus of the improvement project
M
easure current performance against agreed targets
A
nalysethedatatofindthecausesofvariation
D
ANGES TO
CAPACITY
OW
ORKFLOW
ENTORY
IPMENT
LABLE
TIME
QUALITY
PROBLEM SOLVING TOOLS
A
nalyse
the
data
to
find
the
causes
of
variation
I
mprove the process to fix the causes of variation
C
ontrol the process so that it stays that way
SMED
QUICK TOOL CHA
NCREASE M/C C
WORK FLO
ONTINUOUS WO
AND LOW INVE
TPM
EFFECTIVE EQU
ALWAYS AVAI
TQM
RIGHT FIRST
EVERY TIME Q
Q
I
CO
ELIMINATION OF WASTE
WORKPLACE ORGANISATION
Waste Elimination
WASTE
Over
Production
Defects
Operator
Motion
Inventory
Inefficient
Process
Transport Waiting
Operation
55555
Wh ?Wh ?
Production
Motion
Process
Delay
Inspection
Storage Transportation
Wh
y
?
Wh
y
?
Why? Why?
Why? Why?
Why? Why?
Why?Why?
Transportation
Why?Why?
Method Man
5CMdl
PblSliTl
1
2
3
4
5
Machine Material
5
C
ore
M
o
d
u
les
P
ro
bl
em
S
o
lv
ing
T
oo
ls
Workplace Organisation
Establish norms
dh
ST
R A
5S ‐Housekeeping
5S
Housekeeping
Standard Ops.
Visual Controls
SkillMiti
an
d
respect t
h
em
YES
Dimanche
Lundi
MardiMercredi
Jeudi
VendrediSamedi
1
23
4
8
9
10
11
15
16
17
18
29
30
31
5
6
7
12
13
14
26
27
28
22
23
24
25
19
20
21
NO
SORT
R A
IGHTE N
1
2
5
Skill
M
on
it
or
ing
Pro 1
Pro 2
Pro 4
P1 P2 P3 P4
SIMPLIFY
SWEEP
SI MP LI FY
STA N DARDI S E
SUSTAIN
3
4
1
Visual
50
ONE
Form #
XXXX
Form #
XXZZ
Form #
YYXX
Form #
ZZXYVisual
Controls
50
recipes
ONE
recipe
documented
50 results
(
deviations
)
Quality the
first time
(iti)
Example : Skills matrix
4101
4102
4103
4104 4105 41064107 4108 4109 4116 411641184111
Mat' l
Handli ng
Tie
Wra p
Work Station #'S
Work Description
Dorothy H.
Stuff
Channel
Stuff
Top
Shel f
20 GA
Harne ss
14, 16,
18 GA
Ha r n e ss
18 / 2 0
Ha rnes s
18 GA
Asb.
Ha rn es s
PC
Br d
Ha r n e ss
Heavy
Wire
Paint
Si lk-
Screen
Pack
Out
Tap
Licenced
ELECTRO MECHANICAL SPECIALISTS
MAX
MIN
()
(
no var
i
a
ti
on
)
Standard Ops.
Ellen B.
Pat M.
LeRoy W.
Steve H.
Bi ll B.
Lawrence D.
Diane M.
Rhea F.
Glenda M.
Legend
:
Knows
Basi cs
Training
Can Do
With Help
Can Do
Without Help
Can Teach
Someone Else
Can I mprove
the process
WorkFlow
PullSystems
Fishbone
Line
Fishbone
Line
Fishbone
Line
Pull
Systems
1 Piece Flow
Takt Time Kanban
U Line U Line U Line
Kanban
Cells
L Line
Back to Back
Lines
L Line L Line
Back to Back
Lines
Back to Back
Lines
2
ILine ILine ILine
Zeit
pro Tag
Zeit
pro Tag
Kanban Si
g
nal
Zeit
pro
Tag
Abrufe pro Tag
Taktzeit =Zeit
pro
Tag
Abrufe pro Tag
Taktzeit =
g KANBAN
To request a new
delivery
SMED -Quick Tool Changeovers
400
S
ingle
M
inute
E
200400
Set-up is:
E
xchange of
100200
D
ies, tools
& fixtures
3
10
Et l E
x
t
erna
l
Before
External
Before
Internal External
Internal External
A
fte
r
After
Total Quality Management / Six-sigma
Error Proofin
g
WARNING
Indicates an error situation
requiring intervention
CONTROL
P
pk
δ∑x
g
Cost of Quality MSA –GR&R
CONTROL Stops production
Prevents mistakes
Listen up!
Line 12 is
stopped !!!
Bip! Bip
3σ3σ
C
pk
P
pk
Capability/SPC
Reliability
120 V
1.5 A
12
Visual aids
Reliability
Regression Design of
Experiments
Hthi
4
% of
DOE
H
ypo
th
es
is
ANOVA
Failure
Appraisal
Failure
Appraisal
Turnover
HARDNES S
MIN MIN MAX MAX
A
VG MEA
N
AMLC L AMUC L AVG RNG AVG S D S DS TDEV S DLC L S DUC L
LOW HI S CALE
678 975 832 740 924 81 30.6 13.3 -9.3 70.66 7 0 N/A HV1 0
550
650
750
850
950
Hardne ss HV
UCL LCL AVG MEAN MEA N
FREQ
525600
675
750
825
900
Prevention
Prevention
450
1
5
9
13
17
21
25
29
33
37
41
45
49
53
57
61
65
69
73
77
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
Hardne ss HV
UCL LCL AVG SD STDEV
0 5 10 15 20 25
450
525
FREQ
2035
50
65
80
95
MSA ‐GR&R Regression Analysis
0.0
1
5
9
13
17
21
25
29
33
37
41
45
49
53
57
61
65
69
73
77
02 4681012
5
20
Total Preventative Maintenance
Effectiveness /
Capability
Desc r i pti on of Malf unc ti on Mac hi ne Name & Number
Date of I nspec ti on
Depar tment Team I nspec tor
TPM
INSPECT ION T AG No.:
Autonomous
Preventative
Preventive
maintenance
Predictive
maintenance
Capability
Planned Date
of Ac ti on
Per son Responsi ble Planned
C o mp le ti o n D a te
Ac ti on ver i f i ed by :
C o r r e c ti ve A c ti o n
Desc r i pti on
of
Ma l f u n c t i o n
Predictive
Autonomous
maintenance
Reactive
5
time
Reactive
maintenance 9Equipment failure
9Idling and minor stoppages
9
Tlh
Calibr
05/87
9Scrap/rewor
k
9Set-up/
adjustments
9Start-up losses
9
T
oo
l
c
h
anges
Simplify Access...
F
E
9Reduced
speed
Pear holes
Numerous
bolts
HingesGrooves
TPM =
elimination of waste + continuous improvement
Windows
Handles
Tools -Problem Solving Tools
55555
100 %
80
60
40
20
0
20
40
60
55555
Why? Why?
Why? Why?
Why?Why?
A B C D E F
Why?Why? Why? Why?
Why? Why?
Pareto 80%/20%
Value stream mapping
5 Why Root Cause
FOR
AGAINST
8D
Decision
Decision
Operation Delay
Method
Man
Force field
8D
Input
Operation
Output
Start
process
End
Operation
Operation
Operation
Operation
No
Yes
No
Yes
Input
Operation
Output
Start
process
End
Operation
Operation
Operation
Operation
No
Yes
No
Yes
Decision
Decision
//// ///
?
Delay Inspection
Storage
Transportation
Method
Man
Machine Materia
l
Fishbone Tally Chart Brainstorm Process mapping
Acceptance within organisation
E = Q x A E = Q x A
•Management commitment
Mttt
•
M
anagemen
t
suppor
t
sys
t
em
•A mission/strategy/objectives/targets to aim for
•Delegation of responsibilities and authority to sections
•Training in problem solving skills
•Time and resources to make improvements and develop
skills
F ilit t t l d j t
•
F
ac
ilit
a
t
ors
t
o
lea
d
pro
jec
t
s
•Communication and feedback system
•Learning dissemination system
Dependency Loop
M/tt
I think and
solveproblems
M
anager
/
s
t
rong par
t
ner
solve
problems
Becausetheydon
’
t
Because the
y
do
I don’t think or
Because
they
don t
y
solve problems
Operator/weak partner
Learned helplessness
& low esteem
Both
must change
Both
must change
Solution to Dependency Loop Don
’
tsolveotherpeoplesproblems!!!
I think and
solve problems
Because they don
’t
Because they do
Manager/strong partner
I think and
solve problems
Because they don
’t
Because they do
Manager/strong partner
•
Setsmartobjectives
Dont
solve
other
peoples
problems!!!
I don’t think or
solve problems
Because
they
don
t
Because
they
do
Operator/weak partner
I don’t think or
solve problems
Because
they
don
t
Because
they
do
Operator/weak partner
Learned helplessness
& low esteem
Learned helplessness & low esteem
Set
smart
objectives
•Support & guide •
Coach
Support
•
Coach
–Situation
–Options
C
Guide
Solve
–
C
onsequence
–Select
Solve Problems
Learn to co‐operate &
ttbiihth t
rus
t
b
y g
iv
ing eac
h
o
th
er
new experiences
Frustration drives people back in to dependency
13/09/2008 Managing Kaizen 16
Frustration drives people back in to dependency
Bolman’s Change Model
External/Environment
4.Commitment
•New
objectives
1. Denial Stage •Numbness •
Reactioninternal
Denial
Commitment
objectives
•Action plans
•Team work
•
Reaction
internal
•Disbelief
Pas
t
Future
Resistance
Exploration
Internal/Self
3. Exploratory •Begin to
tth
2. Resistance •Anger
accep
t
th
e
inevitability
•Negotiation
•Anxiety
•Fear
•
Verbalreaction
•Looking for
benefits
•
Verbal
reaction
Traditional Method vs Kaizen
Thetraditional
An ANALYSIS COMMITTEE
makes
The
traditional
method
The KAIZEN
method
makes
RECOMMENDATIONS
MANAGERS
take the
DECISIONS
method
A MULTIDISPLINARY TEAM
analyses the situation,
An IMPLEMENTATION
COMMITTEE
implements
CHANGES
takes the decisions,
takes actions and
implements the changes
The EMPLOYEES
ADAPT
to changes
Weeks
and
months
A FEW DAYS
Fire Fighting vs CI
FiFi htiSi l
CtiItSi l
Many Problems,
tk
Very few problems
Fi
re
Fi
g
hti
ng
S
p
ira
l
C
on
ti
nuous
I
mprovemen
t
S
p
ira
l
was
t
e, rewor
k
problems
Fire fighting
Few
Improvement
efforts
Time to think
about
improvements
Continuous
improvement
Focus on present
Focus on future
present
The Route to
CI
1.
Establishtheneed
1.
Establish
the
need
2. Create a sense of direction 3. Build a supportive climate
4. Launch the initiative
5. Maintain the momentum
1. Establish the Need •Benchmarking
Lfti
•
L
ong range
f
orecas
ti
ng
•Highlight declines
•Share market, company performance and competitor
information with everyone
SWOT/STEP l i
•
S
.
W
.
O
.
T
.
/S
.
T
.
E
.
P
. ana
lys
is
Show need in a clear and
ifl
mean
i
ng
f
u
l
wa
y
2. Create a Sense of Direction •Create a vision -paint a ‘picture’/anecdotes
strategy
–
strategy
–values & behaviors
–goals
Il ti& itifii
•
I
nvo
lvemen
t
in
&
commun
ica
ti
on o
f
v
is
ion
•Budget plans -how does it relate to individuals
•Show the whole plan not just their bit
•Show how the resources are to be used
•Keep reinforcing the vision
–mission statements
news letters
–
news
letters
–CI boards
–mention at every opportunity
3. Build a Supportive Climate
•Define roles & criteria for success
•Communicate values, beliefs & behaviors
•Get managers to adopt the ‘smart’ coaching style
•Develop alternative job roles for middle management
•Demonstrate management commitment
•Seek out and council worried employees
Some Turn Offs
Wet Blankets •
Iamtoobusyrightnow
•
I
am
too
busy
right
now
.
•It’s a good idea, but the timing is wrong.
•It is not in the bud g
et.
g
•We don’t do it like that here.
•Theory is different from practice.
•That’s a good idea BUT...
•Isn’t their something else for you to do?
•
Itdoesn
'tmatchcorporatepolicy
•
It
doesnt
match
corporate
policy
.
•It isn’t our business. Let someone else think about
it.
People are not the problem. Blaming them will not solve the p
roblem. The answer is to make
p
eo
p
le
p
roblem solvers!
p ppp
4. Launch the Initiative •Not big bang and fizzle out! •
Startsmallandbuild
•
Start
small
and
build
–Training
–appoint a coordinator
–start with one initiative
–see it through!
•
Publiciseinitiatives Publicise
initiatives
–announcements
–display boards
KAïZEN
Processes:
•Praise successes & good tries
•
Body text
INFO KAIZEN
Opportunity Improvement Who
Date co mp l eted
Date
Opportunities
For Waste Elimination
•
Body
text
SMED
Non-
conforman ce
Lead-time
5. Maintain Momentum
•Reinforce as often as possible •
Communicateresults
•
Communicate
results
•Measure progress
•Give su
pp
ort -both financial & verbal
pp
•Start new initiatives based on the theme
–refresh notice boards
communicate in other ways
–
communicate
in
other
ways
–ask team to give presentation
–appoint new facilitators
tt th
–
s
t
ar
t
nex
t
p
h
ase
•Management commitment & stamina
Sabota
g
e to enthusiasm
g
•Enthusiasm
•Co-o
p
eration
p
•Co-operation with assistance
•Acceptance
•Passive Resi
g
nation
Acceptance
g
•Indifference
•Apathy
•Doing only what is ordered
Indifference
•Regressive behaviou
r
•Non-learning
•Protests
Wki t l
Passive resistance
•
W
or
ki
ng
t
o ru
le
•Doing as little as possible
•Slowing down
Personal withdrawal
Activeresistance
•
Personal
Engage the Champions
Champions
StrawWatchers
Scall
y
wa
g
s
20% 30% 30% 10%10%
Champions
Straw
Watchers
yg
Refuseniks
Convert
Some Pitfalls •The supportive sceptic-lip service only
Bdtblkthl
j
•
B
e prepare
d
t
o un
bl
oc
k
th
e
log-
jam
•Managers get too involved
•Not setting tough but achievable targets
•Underestimating resources/effort required to finish
i iti ti
80/20 l
in
iti
a
ti
ves -
80/20
ru
le
•Not making it someone's job to ‘make it happen’
I’ t b i l
•
I’
m
t
oo
b
usy sp
ira
l
Many Problems,
waste, rework
Fire fighting
Few
Improvement
efforts
Focus on
present
Next Steps
•CIsteering group at top level •
A
ppoint a coordinato
r
•Identify best in class and set targets
Etblih
CI
iti &tii l
•
E
s
t
a
bli
s
h
a
CI
commun
ica
ti
on
&
t
ra
in
ing p
lan
•Complete actions identified on workshop
•
Identifynext
CI
workshop
•
Identify
next
CI
workshop
•Build systems, procedures & structures conducive to
CICI
•Promote CIin your supply base
Achieve Continuous
ItI
mprovemen
t