Copy of Pastel Law School Center Theme by Slidesgo.pdf
simran341989
7 views
14 slides
Mar 05, 2025
Slide 1 of 14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
About This Presentation
law
Size: 273.52 KB
Language: en
Added: Mar 05, 2025
Slides: 14 pages
Slide Content
Criminal
justice
process and
procedure
By Gursimran Chodda
CONTENTS:
What is the current state of diversity
in the UK judiciary in terms of race,
gender, and socio-economic
background, and what impact does
this have?
What impact does social media
coverage have on public
perception of court cases, and how
might this affect the fairness of
trials?
01
02
Diversity in the UK
Judiciary: Challenges &
Impact
01
Gender diversity in the UK Judiciary
Women in the judiciary:
●Court Judges: 37% women, 63% men
●Tribunal Judges: 52% women, 48% men
●Magistrates: 56% women, 44% men
Senior positions
●High Court Judges: 30% women, 70% men
●No female Chief Justice or Supreme Court President
Proportion of female legal professionals by PQE band, April
2024
Racial Diversity in the UK
Judiciary (2024)
●Ethnic minority representation has increased across legal
professions but remains low at senior levels.
●Black and Asian lawyers are progressing more slowly into top
positions like King’s Counsel and senior judges.
●Ethnic minority candidates apply for judicial roles in high numbers
but are less likely to be shortlisted or appointed.
●Most ethnic minority judges are based in London, with very few in
other regions.
●Despite progress, barriers to career progression and judicial
appointments still exist.
Judicial appointment success rates by
ethnicity
Socio-economic background in the UK
Judiciary
Barrister vs Solicitor Disparity:
-Solicitors were 53% less likely to be
appointed than barristers.
Judicial Appointments:
-Solicitors made up 46% of
recommendations, barristers 54%.
Tribunal vs Court Judges:
-62% of tribunal judges were
non-barristers.
-31% of court judges were non-barristers
(5% drop since 2014).
Promotion & Seniority:
-Non-barristers were half as likely to be
promoted (2% vs. 4%).
-Only 5% of High Court+ judges were
non-barristers.
-54%+ of District Judges were
non-barristers.
The Impact of Social
Media on Court Cases
and Trial Fairness
02
The role of social media in shaping public perception
Statistics
●80% of UK adults use social media
●56% of Americans say social media has influenced their
views on legal cases
Influence
●Real-time updates and personal opinions from the public
and influencers.
●High-profile cases often go viral, amplifying public opinion
on both sides.
Johnny depp and Amber Heard defamation
trial (2022) -The trial received extensive media and social media attention
across platforms like Twitter, TikTok, and Instagram.
-Public Reactions: Social media became a platform for both
supporting Johnny Depp and criticizing Amber Heard, heavily
influencing public opinion.
IMPACT ON PUBLIC PERCEPTION:
1.Social Media Role: Memes, commentary, and influencer
narratives created a polarized public opinion before the trial
conclusion.
2.Legal Implications: The viral nature of coverage raised
concerns about fairness, as potential jurors were exposed to
pre-trial opinions.
The Trial of George Floyd (2020)
The trial of Derek Chauvin, charged with the murder of George
Floyd, was covered globally on social media platforms.
Public Reactions: Social media amplified protests and activism,
driving the Black Lives Matter movement.
IMPACT ON TRIAL FAIRNESS:
●Activism and Protests: The viral sharing of
footage of Floyd’s death, as well as subsequent
protests, impacted the trial's atmosphere.
●Concerns on Bias: Intense media coverage may
have influenced the jury's impartiality.
Bibliography
1.Books and Articles:
○Floyd Alexander-Hunt, 'Trial by Tik Tok: How social media is affecting the Johnny
Depp and Amber Heard case' (Law Society Journal, 17 May 2022)
https://lsj.com.au/articles/trial-by-tik-tok-how-social-media-is-affecting-the-johnny-d
epp-and-amber-heard-case/ accessed 4 March 2025.
○Kathryn Diss, 'George Floyd's death shows the power of social media as the US
reacts' (ABC News, 28 May 2020)
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-28/minneapolis-george-floyd-protests-amplif
y-bad-us-race-relations/12294626 accessed 4 March 2025.
○Peter Suciu, 'There Will Be No Winner As Social Media Continues To Shape The
Reputations Of Johnny Depp And Amber Heard' (Forbes, 10 May 2022)
https://www.forbes.com/sites/petersuciu/2022/05/10/there-will-be-no-winner-as-soc
ial-media-continues-to-shape-the-reputations-of-johnny-depp-and-amber-heard/
accessed 4 March 2025.
2.Case Law:
○R v Whelan [2013] UKSC 2.
○R v John Darwin [2008] EWCA Crim 1873.
3.Websites:
○Pew Research Center, Social Media and Legal Perception in the U.S. (Pew
Research, 2020) https://www.pewresearch.org accessed 4 March 2025.