-For phosphorylation to be an effective control mechanism allowing the activity of an enzyme to be both increased and decreased, the overall reaction has to be reversible. If, for example, the need for glycogen breakdown is suddenly increased by the need to supply the muscles with glucose, and hence energy, the enzyme responsible, phosphorylase, will become phosphorylated with a concomitant increase in its activity. However, on cessation of the muscle’s activity, the requirement for glucose will drop and therefore the rate of glycogen breakdown would need to be reduced. A quick and energetically favourable way to do this would be dephosphorylation of phosphorylase, thus lowering its activity, rather than, for example, destruction of the phosphorylase polypeptide to remove its activity—which would require the de novo synthesis of new enzyme if the activity was required in the future, which of course it would be. -The coordinated control of metabolic pathways also requires that futile cycles are avoided. Again using glycogen storage as an example, to facilitate glycogen usage phosphorylase is phosphorylated causing an increase in its activity, as already mentioned. However, there would appear to be little point in increasing glycogen breakdown if its synthesis continued unabated, or increased because of the rise in the concentration of intracellular glucose resulting from the enhanced glycogen breakdown. Indeed, this is coordinated. The enzyme responsible for synthesis of glycogen, glycogen synthase, is phosphorylated at the same time as phosphorylase, but in the case of the synthase phosphorylation causes a lowering of activity of the enzyme, hence slowing the production of glycogen. Therefore, by phosphorylation of the two key enzymes in the pathway at the same time, both the breakdown is increased and the synthesis decreased, resulting in the necessary effect.