data analysis gp 1.pptxecxezeEzezezezezzeez

Na thaan leo dass

1. SECTION 2 B TELLS ABOUT DOMESTIC HAZARDS, IMMEDIATE SURROUNDINGS, HEALTH CARE UTILISATION, NUTRITION . Reg. no. 23770801-23770807 Moderator: Dr. Swathy mam A NILAVAN M AAKASH D ABISHEK R ABINAYA M ADITYAN S AKASH AMAN SHREY

2. DOMESTIC HAZARDS Section II(D)

3. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON ANY CHEMICAL HAZARDS ( N=143) Types of chemical hazards Number of households Percentage Nil 142 99.3% Paints 1 0.699% Grand Total 143 100% Interpretation: what we infer from the data is majority of households are not vulnerable to chemical hazards however only 1 household is prone to chemical hazards(paints). TABLE NO: 1

4. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON ANY ELECTRICAL HAZARDS ( N=143) Types of electrical hazards Number of households Percentage Nil 141 98.6 % Open wires 2 1.39 % Grand Total 143 100 % Interpretation: what we infer from the data is that majority of the houses are not vulnerable to any electrical hazards only however 2 households are presented with open wires . TABLE NO: 2

5. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON ANY PHYSICAL HAZARDS Types of physical hazards Number of households Percentage Nil 135 94.40% Slippery floor* 6 4.19% Sharp edges* 4 2.79% Interpretation: what we infer from the data is that majority of the households are not vulnerable to any physical hazards while some are prone to physical hazards like sharp edges and slippery floors. *multiple responses TABLE NO: 3 BAR CHART NO: 1

6. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON REARING OF ANIMALS IN HOUSE ( N=143) Rearing of animal in house Number of households Percentage No 128 89.5 % Yes 15 10.48 % Grand Total 143 100 % Interpretation: what we infer from the data is that almost 90 percentage of the households do not rear any sort of animals while 10 percent of households rear animals. TABLE NO: 4 PIE CHART NO: 1

7. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON DOMESTIC ANIMALS PRESENT ( N=143) Types of domestic animals Number of households Percentage Birds 4 2.79% Dog 10 6.99% Nil 127 88.81% Others 2 1.39% Grand Total 143 100% Interpretation: what we infer from the data is that majority of the households are not rearing any animals however few houses rear dogs and birds. TABLE NO: 5

8. SAME LIVING SPACE USED FOR HUMANS AND ANIMALS? Number of households percentage No 24 16.78% Not Applicable 110 76.92% Yes 9 6.29% Grand Total 143 100% DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON SAME LIVING SPACE USED FOR HUMANS AND ANIMALS ( N=143) Interpretation: From the surveyed data it is interpreted that ¾ th of the households do not have animals . Among the 1/4 th of households that have animals, 3/4 th keep them in a separate space, while 1/4 th share the same living space TABLE NO: 6 BAR CHART NO: 2

9. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON PROBLEMS OF PEST Pests Number of households percentage Cockroaches* 29 13.94% Flies* 15 7.21% Mosquitoes* 109 52.40% Nil* 31 14.90% Rats* 24 11.54% Interpretation: From the surveyed data it is interpreted that mosquitos are the predominant pest variety causing problem to the households in the community. *multiple responses TABLE NO: 7 BAR CHART NO: 3

10. NFHS 5 DATA COMPARISON R E G I O N HOUSE HOLD REPORTING PEST PROBLEM MOST COMMON PEST India ~60-65% Mosquitoes Puducherry ~50% Mosquitoes Among surveyed households Majority (Mosquitoes 52.4%) Mosquitoes Interpretation: - Pest problems are prevalent in all data sets, with mosquitoes being the most reported pest. - survey ed house hold aligns with NFHS-5 findings, confirming mosquitoes as the leading household pest problem. N F H S DATA 2019- 2021 •

11. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON PEST CONTROL MEASURES Interpretation: From the surveyed data it is interpreted that mosquitoes control are the predominant pest control measure that is been used. *multiple responses P est control measures Number of households Percentage cockroach- hit, repellents* 9 5.96% mosquitoe repellent, nets, coils bats* 91 60.26% Nil* 42 27.81% rat mat, trap, repellents* 9 5.96% TABLE NO: 8 BAR CHART NO: 4

12. RISK OF BURNS Number of households percentage COOKING PLACE ACCESS TO CHILDREN 3 2.10% NIL 140 97.90% GRAND TOTAL 143 100% Interpretation: Almost all the surveyed households has no risk of burns except 3 households in which the cooking place acess to children. All the surveyed households has no risk of drowning. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON RISK OF BURNS AND DROWNING ( N=143) TABLE NO: 9

13. IMMEDIATE SURROUNDINGS Section II(E)

14. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON ACCESS TO STRAY ANIMALS ( N=143) ACCESS TO STRAY ANIMALS Number of households PERCENTAGE NO 63 44.1 YES 80 55.9 TOTAL 143 100 Interpretation: Data from the survey shows that Almost more than half of the surveyed households has been access able to stray animals . TABLE NO: 10 PIE CHART NO: 2

15. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON DRAINS ( N=143) DRAINS Number of households PERCENTAGE NO 69 48.3 YES 74 51.7 TOTAL 143 100 Interpretation: By the surveyed data, it is found that a significant portion of households have direct exposure to open drains, which may contribute to hygiene and health concerns . TABLE NO: 11 PIE CHART NO: 3

16. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON GARBAGE DUMPING ( N=143) GARBAGE DUMPING Number of households PERCENTAGE NO 107 74.8 YES 36 25.2 TOTAL 143 100 Interpretation: By the surveyed data, it is found that a significant number(25%) of households dispose of garbage in open spaces or improper locations, which may contribute to environmental pollution and public health hazards. TABLE NO: 12 PIE CHART NO: 4

17. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON BREEDING PLACE OF MOSQUITOES ( N=143) BREEDING PLACE FOR MOSQUITOES Number of households PERCENTAGE NO 63 44.1 YES 80 55.9 TOTAL 143 100 Interpretation: By the surveyed data, it is found that a considerable number of households have potential breeding sites for mosquitoes, increasing the risk of vector-borne diseases . TABLE NO: 13 PIE CHART NO: 5

18. HEALTHCARE UTILIZATION Section II(F)

19. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON HEALTH INSURANCE COVERED ( N=143) HEALTH INSURANCE Number of households PERCENTAGE NO 116 81.1 YES 27 18.9 TOTAL 143 100 Interpretation: Data from the survey shows that more than 3/4th of the population are not covered under any sort of health insurance however only 28 percent of households is benefitted by health insurance . TABLE NO: 14 PIE CHART NO: 6

20. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON NAME OF THE INSURANCE C0VERED (N=143) INSURANCE Number of households percentage GOVERNMENT INSURANCE 8 AB-PMJAY 6% PRIVATE INSURANCE 11 8% NIL 124 87% TOTAL 143 100%  Interpretation: Low Enrollment : The 6% coverage in the dataset is much lower than the national 40%, indicating a gap in access or awareness High Uninsured Population: 87% of families have no insurance, highlighting a need for better health coverage outreach TABLE NO: 15 PIE CHART NO: 7

21. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON BEING PART OF ICDS SERVICES (N=143) RECEVING ICDS SERVICES NO OF FAMILY PERCENTAGE No 134 94% Yes 9 6% Grand Total 143 100%  Interpretation: Data from the survey shows that A large number of households are not receiving ICDS benefits, despite the program's aim to support child nutrition, healthcare, and education TABLE NO: 16 PIE CHART NO: 8

22. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON BEING PART OF SELF HELP GROUP (N=143) PART OF SELF HEALTH GROUP Number of households PERCENTAGE NO 136 95% YES 7 5% TOTAL 143 100%  Interpretation: From the surveyed data it is interpreted that majority of households do not engage in self-help groups TABLE NO: 17 PIE CHART NO: 9

23. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON UTILIZATION OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS ( N=143) SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS Number of households PECENTAGE NO 85 59% YES 58 41% TOTAL 143 100% Interpretation: In the surveyed population a significant portion of the general population benefits from social security programs TABLE NO: 18 PIE CHART NO: 10

24. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON HEALTH FACILITY UTILIZED FOR MINOR ILLNESS (N =143) INTERPRETATION –Tertiary health care centre is the most preferred health care centre for minor illness BAR CHART NO: 5

25. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON HEALTH CARE FACILITY UTILISED FOR MAJOR ILLNESS ( N=143) Health care facility Number of households Percentage GH 56 39.16% Medical College 60 41.96% PHC 5 3.50% Private Clinic 12 8.39% Private Hospital 10 6.99% Grand Total 143 100%  Interpretation: Data from the survey shows that Almost 80% of the surveyed households use GH (39%) and Medical college (41%) for the treatment of major illness. TABLE NO: 19 BAR CHART NO: 6

26. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON HEALTH CARE FACILITY UTILISED FOR IMMUNIZATION ( N=143) Health care facility Number of households Percentage GH 46 32.17% Medical College 32 22.38% Others 3 2.10% PHC 53 37.06% Private Clinic 4 2.80% Private Hospital 5 3.50% Grand Total 143   100% Interpretation: Data from the survey shows that 2\3 rd of the surveyed households uses GH and PHC for Immunization TABLE NO: 20 BAR CHART NO: 7

27. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON HEALTH CARE FACILITY UTILISED FOR DELIVERY ( N=143) Health care faciltity Number of households Percentage Medical College 63 44.06% GH 37 25.87% Others 17 11.89% PHC 1 0.70% Private Hospital 25 17.48% Grand Total 143 100%  Interpretation: Data from the survey shows that Almost half of the surveyed households utilize medical college for delivery. A good amount of surveyed households utilize GH and private hospital also. TABLE NO: 21 BAR CHART NO: 8

28. NUTRITION Section II(G)

29. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON WASHING VEGETABLES BEFORE COOKING ( N=143) Interpretation: Data from the survey shows that All the surveyed households are washing vegetables before cooking.

30. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON VEGETABLES ARE WASHED BEFORE OR AFTER CUTTING ( N=143) vegetables are washed Number of households Percentage after Cutting 3 2.10% Before cutting 140 97.90% Grand Total 143 100%   Interpretation: Data from the survey shows that Almost all of the surveyed households wash vegetables before cutting but only 3 households wash vegetables after cutting. TABLE NO: 22 PIE CHART NO: 11

31. Type of oil used Number of house holds Percentage Coconut oil 1 0.70% Groundnut oil 58 40.56% Palm oil 5 3.49% Sunflower oil 74 51.74% Vegetable oil 5 3.49% Grand total 143 100% Interpretation: By the survey , it is found that majority of the households use sunflower oil(52%) followed by ground nut oil(41%) This shows better awareness among people about the adverse effects of using palm oil DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON TYPE OF COOKING OIL USED ( N=143) TABLE NO: 23

32. Interpretation: Data from the survey shows that All the surveyed households are using iodized salt . DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON TYPE OF SALT USED ( N=143)

33. Comparison with NFHS-5 Data Interpretation: All the surveyed households use iodized salt. So on comparison with NFHS-5 data, consumption of iodized salt among the surveyed households is better than the national and state standards. The surveyed population's 100% iodized salt usage indicates better awareness and access, promoting iodine sufficiency and preventing deficiency disorders Region Iodised Salt consumption India 94.3% Puducherry 93.4% Among surveyed households 100% TABLE NO: 24

34. Frequency of fruit consumption Number of Households Percentage 1 to 6 days a week 55 38.47% Daily 37 25.88% Less than once a week 51 35.67% Grand total 143 100% Interpretation: By the surveyed data, almost 65% of the households consume fruits regularly (more than once in a week). But 35% of the households consume less frequently, whom are to be advised to increase the consumption of fruits. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON FREQUENCY OF FRUIT CONSUMPTION ( N=143) TABLE NO: 25 BAR CHART NO: 9

35. Frequency of Vegetable consumption Number of Households Percentage 1 to 6 days a week 20 13.99% Daily 123 86.01% Grand total 143 100% Interpretation: By the surveyed data, majority of the households consume vegetables daily (86%), while a few households consume it 1 to 6 days a week. DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEYED HOUSEHOLDS BASED ON FREQUENCY OF VEGETABLE CONSUMPTION ( N=143) TABLE NO: 26 BAR CHART NO: 10

36. THANK YOU….