Differences and similarities between arguments of Hobbes and Locke

Differences and similarities between arguments of Hobbes and Locke

1. International Ataturk Ala -Too University Department of International Relation Differences and similarities between arguments of Hobbes and Locke Subject: History and Theory of International Relation Lecturer: Ibrahim Koncak Student: Dosalieva Aizhan IR-13A

2. Differences and similarities between arguments of T.Hobbes and J.Locke Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) John Locke (1632-1704)

3. T. Hobbes J. Locke "The philosophical beginning of doctrine about the Citizen" (1642) Leviathan, or the Matter, form and power of the church and the civil state“ (1651) The views were formed under the influence of the English Revolution in the XVII century "Two treatises on Governance" (1690) The views were formed in the post-revolutionary period

4. The similarities in the teachings of T. Hobbes and J. Locke T. Hobbes and J. Locke were the most famous philosophers of the theory of social contract. Before the emergence of the state people were in the natural state They considered the individual as an essential element and interpreted the state as a result of the social contract between individuals, concluded to stop the natural state

5. The similarities in the teachings of T. Hobbes and J. Locke The theory of social contract is theory of nature of the state, not the theory of the origin of the State Laws are created by the freedom of the majority, subordination of the minority to decision of the majority T. Hobbes and J. Locke shared natural and civil law

6. The Differences in the teachings of T. Hobbes and J. Locke THOMAS HOBBES JOHN LOCKE NATURAL STATE – IT IS A WAR OF ALL AGAINST ALL, AS EACH PURSUES ITS OWN INTERESTS, AND THIS LEADS TO MUTUAL DESTRUCTION People give r ights and freedom to one person, elected by universal agreement - to monarch PEOPLE DO AGREEMENT NOT BEACAUSE THEY NEED for protection from each other, because THEY need to live together They do transmit NOT all the power TO the monarch, but only part of it - the execution of laws. Another part of the power - the legislative, and the third - justice

7. The Differences in the teachings of T. Hobbes and J. Locke Monarch has the absolute right and absolute freedom (absolute power ) The contract between the citizens themselves THOMAS HOBBES JOHN LOCKE The principle of separation of powers The contract between the citizens and the ruling power

8. The Differences in the teachings of T. Hobbes and J. Locke Complete failure of individuals from all of their natural rights and freedoms in favor of the state It denies the right of rebellion THOMAS HOBBES JOHN LOCKE INDIVIDUALS DO NOT GIVE UP THEIR NATURAL RIGHTS. Natural rights are not transmitted to anybody and nobody limited. people retain the sovereignty and the right to remove those in power, WHO did not justify the people's trust

9. The Differences in the teachings of T. Hobbes and J. Locke A supporter of absolute monarchy Natural law is the requirement of natural mind and civil law is enforcement OF the supreme power THOMAS HOBBES JOHN LOCKE CRITICIZED ABSOLUTE MONARCHY Natural law is innate and inalienable human rights and freedoms, and civil law is an obligatory act of the legislature, which expresses the will of society

10. The Differences in the teachings of T. Hobbes and J. Locke people's fear of other people causes them to seek protection from the state, whose laws they are obligated to obey. When all are equal before the law , foundation for fear of fellow citizens disappears THOMAS HOBBES JOHN LOCKE THE STATE ITSELF MAY CAUSE FEAR. IT IS NECESSARY To KEEP THE STATE IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE LAW, FORCING STATE LEADERS TO KEEP THEM