Distraction Osteogenesis.ppt

5,935 views 44 slides Apr 27, 2022
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 44
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44

About This Presentation

Distraction Osteogenesis BY DR. CHITRACHAKRAVARTHY


Slide Content

DR.CHITRA CHAKRAVARTHY
PROF.& HOD DEPT OF OMFS
NAVODAYA DENTAL COLLEGE

Revolutionized the treatment options available to the
patients with craniofacial abnormalities.
Distraction osteogenesis (DO), is a technique by which
lengthening of a bone can be brought about by new
bone formation as a part of a normal healing process

Bone is osteotomised surgically
Ends are gradually distracted away from each other
Regular controlled force applied
New bone formation takes place between the 2
osteotomised segments.

Alternative to Orthognathic surgery.
Ability of the soft tissue envelope of the bone to
accommodate the gradually enlarging underlying
skeletal framework is its greatest advantage.
Factor unique to this technique -stability of this
procedure.

The concept originated as early as 1905 with
orthopedic surgeons. It was used to solve the problem
of leg length discrepancies

1950’s Ilizarov introduced distraction osteogenesis for
the treatment of fractures and non unions of the long
bones of Russian soldiers.
Snyder was the first to experiment on a canine
mandible in 1973.
1992 feasibility of distraction technique on
membranous bones of the craniofacial skeleton was
reported by Mc Carthy in his 4 cases of mandibular
lengthening

Advantages over Orthognathic
surgery:
Safer surgical technique
Decreases the length of hospitalization
Decreased operating time
More conservative procedure
Done at a younger age of the patient rather than waiting for
growth completion as is done in case of Orthognathic
surgery.
No need for autogenousbone grafting which may at times
be required in Orthognathicsurgery.
Associated soft tissues also grow with it, i.e. the muscles,
mucosa, skin etc.

Indications for Distraction
osteogenesis:
Mandibular procedures
Hemifacial microsomia
Bilateral mandibular hypoplasia
Syndromic conditions such as Pierre Robin’s
syndrome, Goldenhar syndrome etc.
TMJ ankylosis leading to bird face deformity
Traumatic injuries to the mandible or pathologies
resulting in mandibular deficiency
Transverse deficiency of the mandible.

Maxillary procedures
Maxillary deficiency due to presence of cleft lip/palate
Severe midfacial deficiency
Palatal expansion

Craniofacial procedures:
Apert’s syndrome
Frontofacial advancement
Crouzon’s syndrome
Alveolar augmentation in the upper and lower
atrophic ridges-implants.

Technique and principles:
Distraction osteogenesis -formation of a surgically
created fracture
Gradual and controlled movement of these segments
away from each other.
Bone formation begins to take place between the cut
ends of bone.
Initially-immature but later transforms into mature
strong bone similar to the remaining skeleton.

Defined by Ilizarov after whom the technique has been
named.
Basic principles :
Bone cut
Latency period
Rate
Rhythm and
Consolidation

Bone cut or osteotomy:
Surgical fracture is created in the planned site in the
bone.
Preserve the blood supply of the bone
Preserve the integrity overlying periosteal envelope
during the surgery.
At the end of the osteotomy, the distraction device is
attached to the bone

Latency
Advisable to retain the bone in position with the device
for a period of around 5-7 days.
This is known the period of latency.
Formation of an adequate fibrovascular bridge between
the bony ends of the osteotomy.
Just like what happens in a fractured wound-callus
Wound passes into phase II of wound healing -provides
a regenerative environment.
In younger patients , the latency period may be
shortened to 1-2 days.

Rate:
The amount of separation to be achieved between the
osteotomisedbone ends per day.
The tensile stress that is applied when the bone ends are
separated by 1mm per day creates the best regenerated bone.
For younger children the rate may be increased to 1.5-2.0mm
per day.
If the bone segments are advanced more than this, the blood
supply to the regenerated bone is compromised.
Also the vascular supply of the overlying and surrounding
soft tissues gets compromised and leads to necrosis.
Compromised blood supply 0.5-1.0mmper day.

Rhythm
Refers to the number of times the distraction force is
applied to the device in a day.
A distraction force is ideally applied continuously
throughout the day.
Clinically however he force is best applied twice a day.
This is done by activating the device 2 times; each time
0.5mm is done to make it 1.0mm a day.
This is known as the rhythm of distraction.

If the patient experiences pain during the process, the
rhythm altered to smaller increments per day.
Applied as 0.25mm in four increments which makes it
1.0mm in a full day.

Consolidation phase:
New bone formation takes place between the bony
segments.
The regenerate is stabilized in position for complete
ossification.
The distraction device is held in neutral position for a
period of 4-6 weeks similar to a healing fracture.
After adequate ossification, a cortical outline is seen
radiographically of the newly generated bone.
If the device is removed prematurely, the chances of
relapse

Retention phase:
The distraction device is removed
The jaws are stabilized with orthodontic appliances or
occlusal splints.

Pathophysiology
Similar to the tension-stress model
When a slow steady traction is applied to soft tissues,
it makes them metabolically active
This metabolically active tissue has the capacity to
proliferate.
It also behaves similar to the tissues in that region.

Gradual distraction force-fibrous tissue and bone
formed in the interfragmentary area tends to
proliferate.
Since the rate of distraction is slow-more immature
bone is formed.
When retained in stable position -transform into
mature bone and then remodels
Whether in the long bones or in the bones of the
craniofacial region, distraction osteogenesis basically
takes place through intramembranous ossification.

STAGES OF MATURE BONE
FORMATION
Stage 1:
Stage of fibrous tissue:
Region between the cut bone segments consists of
fibrous tissue.
Histologically this is composed of longitudinally
oriented spindle shaped fibroblasts contained within a
mesenchymal matrix of undifferentiated cells.

Stage 2:
Stage of extending bone formation:
A slender trabecular pattern of bone is observed along
the bony edges towards the fibrous tissue.
Early bone formation is seen to advance from the bony
edges along the collagen fibres.
The osteoblasts lay down the bone matrix.
Blood histochemical investigations will reveal an
increased level of alkaline phosphatase, pyruvic acid
and lactic acid.

Stage 3
Stage of bone remodeling:
There are advancing fields of bone resorption and
apposition.
There is increase in the number of osteoclasts.

Stage 4:
Stage of mature bone formation:
Early areas of compact cortical bone are seen to form
close to the mature bone of the non distracted areas.
This bone is less longitudinally oriented and resembles
the normal bone architecture.
By around 8 months the newly formed bone achieves
almost 90% of the bony architecture.
The bone then responds to the functional loads
applied to it.

Types of distractors:
Extraoral distraction devices
These can further be divided into:
Unidirectional appliances
Bidirectional appliances
Multidirectional appliances

Intraoral devices
Intraoral devices can further be divided into:
tooth borne appliances
Bone supported devices

Extraoral devices-disadvantage
An external scar formation
Infection along the extraoral pins
Loosening of the pins
Hypertropic scar formation
Damage to extraoral structures such as facial nerve
and salivary glands
Lack of patient cooperation

Intraoral devices –advantage
Devices are concealed therefore better patient
compliance
Simpler to apply and to use
No extraoral scars
No inhibition of patient’s social activity

Disadvantage -intraoral devices
Does not allow multidirectional forces for lengthening
in more than one direction
If the appliance is bone supported, a second surgical
procedure is required for its removal.

Presurgical planning
Clinical examination
Radiographs with cephalometricanalysis
Other radiographs-OPG, PA view etc
CT scan, 3D reconstruction
Photographs taken in profile view and frontal view
Fabrication of study models of the occlusion to assess the
changes
Blood investigations for surgery
Selection of the direction of the device placement or the
vector
Selection of the device required for distraction.

VECTORS OF DISTRACTION
Vertical orientation: increase the vertical dimension of
the mandibular ramus.
Horizontal orientation: results in the increase in the
anteroposterior dimension of the mandibular body.
This results in an increased sagittal projection of the
symphysis.
Oblique orientation: increase in both the vertical and
horizontal dimensions of the ramus and the body of
the mandible.

Surgical phase
Anesthesia:Thesurgical phase is usually performed under
general anesthesia..
Incision:
intraorallyor extraorallydepending on the exposure
required.
intraoral incision -crevicularincision or a translabial
incision.
Subperiostealexposure of the buccalsurface of the
mandible taking care to protect the mental nerve.
If vertical device is to be placed, the ramusof the mandible
is exposed.

Osteotomy:
Placement of the device and not the osteotomydirection
dictates the distraction vector.
The osteotomyplaced in such a way so as to avoid injury to
any important structures
The osteotomysite is marked out on the bone.
The device is placed prior to making the osteotomycut.
A reciprocating saw or a fissure bur is used to initially place
a cut through the buccalcortex.
To osteotomisethe lingual cortex, care is to be taken to
avoid damage to the inferior alveolar nerve
check for mobility in all directions and the distraction
device is fixed to it.

Fixation of device:The device is then checked by
turning the screws to create a distraction of 3-4 mm.
The fragments are then brought back in close
approximation and the device left in this position.
Wound closure: Prior to wound closure, the direction
of turning of the device is to be noted. The incision is
then closed with mattress sutures.

Midfacialdistraction:
Le Fort I osteotomy

PALATAL EXPANSION

MANDIBULAR DISTRACTION

Complications of distraction
osteogenesis
Failure of the device or breakage
Loosening of the device due to lack of adequate bone
structure
Injury to the developing tooth bud
Injury to vital structures such as inferior alveolar nerve
Pin track infection in case of extraoraldevices
Relapse of the distraction achieved.
Early removal of the device may lead to fracture of the
jaw due to inadequate bone formation
Fibrous union instead of a mature bony union.