Duodenal gist (gastrointestinal stromal tumor)

vedsah 1,191 views 67 slides Nov 10, 2017
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 67
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67

About This Presentation

Duodenal gist (gastrointestinal stromal tumor)


Slide Content

DUODENAL GIST Presentor : Dr. Ved Prakash Sah

Name: Mr. GS Age/Sex: 29 Yr /M Cr no: 2017…..6326 Admission no: 2017….600 Address: Karnal , Haryana DOA: 05.09.2017 DOSx : 27.09.2017 DOD: 10.10.2017 Index Case

Fever x 1 month Low grade, intermittent Not a/w chills & rigors Relieved on medication Pain abdomen RUQ x 20 days Dull aching, mild in intensity, Non-radiating No aggravating and relieving factors Generalised weakness x 15 days a/w easy fatiguability but no palpitation, LOC, blackout LOW & LOA + Clinical History

No h/o abdominal distension, vomiting, constipation & obstipation No h/o jaundice No h/o awareness of lump abdomen Clinical History

No known comorbities No h/o any previous surgery No h/o blood transfusion Vegetarian diet Non-smoker, non-alcoholic Past and personal history

No h/o similar illness in any family members No h/o any malignancy in any family members Family history

General examination P allor+/ icterus / cyanosis / clubbing / generalized lymphadenopathy / pedal edema No supraclavicular LAP Vitals PR: 88/min BP: 110/70mmHg RR: 18/Min Afebrile Clinical examination

Scaphoid Soft No lump palpable No Free Fluid Bowel sounds + PR examination – normal Abdominal examination

INVESTIGATIONS Pre Op 29/04 /17 Hb (g/ dL ) 9.0 TLC 12800 Platelet 700k Bil (T/C)mg/ dL 0.29/0.04 TP/Alb(g/ dL ) 8/3.6 OT/PT(U/L) 20/12 ALP(U/L) 129 Na + /K + 139/4.4 Ur/Cr 17/0.6

USG Abdomen (01/09/2017)-outside 10.8x8.2 cm heterogenous lesion with lobulated margins Ill defined fat planes between lesion and the inferior surface of the liver Lesion causing mass effect on the right kidney Investigations

Stomach Fundus Body pool of blood present with clots Antrum -normal D1D2 jxn : 3-4 cm large polypoidal mass with overlying unhealthy mucosa Sinus opening present through which necrotic material coming out Extremely friable mass with active blood ooze present Biopsy taken UGIE (08/09/17)

9.9x5.9x6.9 cm polypoidal partially exophytic enhancing growth in D2 & part of D1 No significant luminal compromise Fat planes with adjacent liver segment is illdefined Posteriorly abutting anterior surface of right kidney Increased mesenteric vascularity locally Rest of the visualised bowel loops are grossly unremarkable CECT Abdomen(11/09/17)-M19942/17

CECT ABDOMEN 11/9/2017

RADIOLOGICAL IMPRESSION Polypoidal partially exophytic enhancing growth involving D1 and D2 part of duodenum with hypodense areas within (Necrosis) with extent as described , likely s/o duodenal GIST

f/s/o Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) Tumor compromising of spindle cells seen Immunostains for SMA & C-kit are positive & chromogranin is negative Duodenal biopsy (S-24931/17)

D2 GIST Diagnosis

APPREPD ( Antrum preserving pyloric ring excision pancreaticoduodenectomy ) + External pancreatic stent + PJ+HJ+GJ+FJ+perianastomotic drain Surgery ( DOSx : 27.09.2017)

No ascites No liver/ omental /peritoneal deposits Replaced right hepatic artery arising from SMA 10x12 cm large lobulated mass arising from D2 Extensive large tumour and peritumoral collateralls CBD-1 cm in diameter Pancreas-soft, MPD-1.5mm in diameter SMV, Portal vein free from tumor mass Intraop findings

Cut Section Image

Whipple’s specimen Duodenal GIST High grade 12x9x5 cm Mitosis >5/50 hpf LN 0/9 All resection limit free HPR (S-27046/2017)

Pancreatic shaved off margin CBD margin Periportal LN CHA LN

Distal R/L Proximal R/L

C kit SMA Ki 67 Ki 67

Duodenum : Gastrointestinal stromal tumor, high malignant potential

POD0-1ʘ PRBC transfused POD1- Elemental feed started via FJ POD2- PUC removed, self voided POD3- Pt passed stool, RT removed and orally allowed POD7- central line removed, ↑ ed oral intake POD8- Drain removed Discharged on POD12 (27.09.2017) Post op period

6 weeks postop Pt is planned for adjuvant imatinib therapy Follow Up

DISCUSSION

Represents 0.1-3% of all gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy but 80% of GI mesenchymal tumors Term coined in the 1983 by Mazur and Clark I ncidence of 10–20 per million per year Site S tomach (60–70 %) Small intestine (20–25 %) (J>I>D) L arge intestine (5 %) Oesophagus (‹1 %) Extragastrointestinal stromal tumors (e-GIST) Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)

Cells of origin- interstitial cells of Cajal (aka pacemaker cells of the gut) Location-normally present in myenteric plexus Function- coordinates gut peristalsis by assisting the linkage of smooth muscle cells of the bowel wall with the ANS GIST…

B y Hirota and colleagues in 1998 Pathophysiology- gain of excess function at the tyrosine kinase receptor (KIT) on the cell membrane Molecular mechanism of carcinogenesis

KIT mutations (80%) PDGFRA mutations (5-10%) Wild-type GISTs (10-15%) MUTATIONS Markers of GIST CD117 (95%) CD34 (70%) Smooth Muscle Actin (25%) Desmin (<5 %) DOG1

Tumour size, mitotic count and anatomic location (Gastric<Small intestine<Rectum) are important prognostic factors All GISTs have some ability to metastasize and shouldn’t be considered truly benign Fletcher et al in 2002 characterized the malignant potential of GIST Predictors of malignancy in GIST Fletcher et al malignant potential of GIST

Represents 4–5 % of all GISTs & 30% of all primary duodenal tumors Most common site-D2 Age: >50 yrs (75%) Sex: M>F Duodenal GISTs Duodenal Portion Frequency (%) First 5-25 Second 33-64 Third 22-42 Fourth 8-21 Beltrán MA. Current Management of Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors . Clin Oncol . 2016; 1: 1156.

S.No . Characteristic Frequency (%) 1. Asymptomatic/incidental finding 9-33 2. Hemorrhage and anemia 22-100 3. Abdominal pain 16-45 4. Palpable abdominal mass 4-18 5. Weight loss 2-14 6. Jaundice 9-11 7. Anorexia 1-9 8. Obstruction 1-3 Clinical presentation Beltrán MA. Current Management of Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. Clin Oncol . 2016 ; 1: 1156.

At the time of presentation, most tumors are solitary (89 %) Metastases ( hematogenous spread) Liver-m/c Peritoneum Clinical presentation Beltrán MA. Current Management of Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. Clin Oncol . 2016 ; 1: 1156.

UGIE Sub-mucosal mass seen as smooth in appearance and as a bulge in the bowel lumen ± ulceration EUS Differentiates submucosal GIST mass versus impingement from surrounding organs like pancreatic mass, pseudocyst Seen as homogenous, hypoehoic lesion with regular margin Cystic spaces and irregular margin on EUS s/o malignant GIST EUS-guided FNA biopsy Diagnosis

CECT ABDOMEN Submucosal mass with smooth borders or a rounded appearance Exophytic lobulated lesion Irregular margin, size>10cm, calcification, internal cyst and central necrosis are suggestive of malignant GIST on CT PET-CT Small and metastatic lesion as GIST is FDG-avid Early assessment of therapeutic response after imatinib therapy IMAGING

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment Surgical principles: Limited intramural extension Segmental or wedge resection with negative margin Lymphadenectomy not required due to low incidence of lymph node metastasis Avoid tumor spillage Spillage of tumor cells in the peritoneal cavity - very high risk of peritoneal relapse Complete R0 resection is the treatment of choice TREATMENT

Local resection (LR) Wedge resection Segmental resection Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) Surgical options

Local Resection Wedge resection small (<1 cm) GISTs of the duodenum if they are localized more than 2 cm from the ampulla of Vater . Segmental duodenectomy large (>3 cm) tumors located in the third or fourth or first portions of the duodenum. Cavallaro et al. Int J Surg. 2012

Local resection (LR) A- Wedge resection with primary suture B- Segmental resection with primary anastomosis

I ndicated if: T umor size (≥5 cm ) T umors with high mitotic count ≥5/50 HPF Location proximity to the ampulla of Vater in D2 Medial wall of duodenum Invasion or adherence to adjacent organs Pancreaticoduodenectomy Chok AY et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing pancreaticoduodenectomy versus limited resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Annals of surgical oncology. 2014 Oct 1;21(11):3429-38.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD)

S.No Local resection (LR) Pancreatiocodudenectomy (PD) PROS 1. Simpler to perform Negative margin 2. Decreased perioperative morbidity Appropriate for lesion in m edial wall and close to ampulla of vater 3. Does not compromise on oncological outcomes ( depends on tumor biology ) CONS 1. Higher positive margin (16% vs 5%) Higher postop morbidity (48% vs 20%) Reconstruction can be difficult because of undilated duct LR versus PD

LR was found to be associated with Lower recurrence rate B etter DFS Lower rate of distant metastasis Reason: Selection bias (And it was not due to the type of resection because larger and higher-risk tumors were subjected to PD) LR versus PD Chok AY et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing pancreaticoduodenectomy versus limited resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Annals of surgical oncology. 2014 Oct 1;21(11):3429-38.

Recurrence rate:40-50% Depends on tumor size, site, mitotic rate, surgical margin and tumor rupture Follow up H&P , and CT scan q3-6 months for 3 to 5 years f/by annually Duodenal GIST

No role of radiotherapy and conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy Biologic agents Imatinib Mesylate Sunitinib Malate Adjuvant therapy

MOA -Binds to the tyrosine kinase receptor preventing phosphorylation Uses : First line of therapy Recurrent, locally invasive, metastatic GIST In adjuvant setting if T>3 cm(ACOSOG trial by DeMatteo et al in 2009) S/E Periorbital edema (m/c) -74% Diarrhoea-45% Myalgia-40% Rashes-30% Headache-25% Bleeding-5% , most worrisome, when used in neoadjuvant setting Dose? How long? Imatinib resistance! BIOLOGIC AGENT- Imatinib

MOA -inhibits multiple receptor tyrosine kinases, including KIT, PDGFRs (alpha and beta), VEGF receptor 1, -2, and - 3 USE : as a second-line therapy GIST pts refractory to imatinib or unable to tolerate imatinib S/E Fatigue , diarrhea, abdominal pain , nausea, hand-foot skin reaction, mucositis , hypertension, hypothyroidism Other kinase inhibitors Regorafenib Nilotinib Sorafenib Masitinib Valatinib Dasatinib Pazopanib   BIOLOGIC AGENT- Sunitinib

Prognosis is mainly dependent on malignant status , which is determined by size and mitotic rate (Fletcher scale) Predictors of outcome

Take home message Duodenal GIST are fairly rare Complete R0 resection is the treatment of choice Due to the complex anatomy of the duodenum, local resections are not always feasible PD remains a good alternative for large tumors and tumors in the vicinity of the ampulla of Vater
Tags