Early pregnancy ultrasonographic evaluation

walidahmed1276 20,449 views 49 slides Oct 28, 2014
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 49
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49

About This Presentation

Early pregnancy ultrasonographic evaluation


Slide Content

Early Pregnancy Ultrasound
Presented byPresented by
Dr/ Ahmed Walid AnwarDr/ Ahmed Walid Anwar
Assistant professor of Obs & Gyn Assistant professor of Obs & Gyn
Benha Faculty of MedicineBenha Faculty of Medicine
EgyptEgypt
20142014

OBJECTIVES
Ultrasonographic evaluation of early
pregnancy and its complications

Early Pregnancy Ultrasound report
NORMAL
ABNORMAL
Location
Structure
Viability
Dating
Number


•Assessment of other pelvic masses ????
•Screening for fetal abnormalities ????
•Assisting CVS and amniocentesis????

Structure & Viability

Structures of 1st Trimester
Pregnancy
Gestational sac
Yolk sac
Embryo/fetus
Presence of cardiac activity

Gestational sac
Visible at 4-5wks GA with
TVUS & at 6 wks GA with
TAUS.
Eccentric echogenic ring with
anechoic center .
Measure by Mean Sac
Diameter.
GS size increases by about
1mm/day in early pregnancy
Discriminatory zone: serum
hCG level in which GS is
expected to be visible by US :
hCG >2000 mIU/ml by
TVUS& hCG >6000 mIU/ml
by TAUS

Structures of 1st Trimester
Pregnancy
Yolk sac: : bright ring with anechoic center located inside GS
seen at 5wk GA & persists to 11-12 weeks.
Embryo/fetus: seen by TVUS as thickening of yolk at 6wks GA.
Presence of cardiac activity: usually seen around the time
fetal pole is present, further confirming viability (6
th
wks)
Yolk sac
Fetal pole

Confirming intrauterine
gestation

Confirming intrauterine gestation
1) Double decidual
sac sign
3) Double bleb sign2) Intradecidual
sign

Dating

10/28/14
12
Early dating of pregnancyEarly dating of pregnancy
5 – 9 weeks : use of mean GS diameter
6 – 12 weeks : use of CRL (most accurate
dating of early pregnancy)
After 12 weeks : use of BPD

Formulas to Calculate
gestational age
MGSD (mm) + 30
= gestational age
(days) (between 5
and 9 weeks)
CRL (mm) + 42 =
gestational age
(days) (between 6
and 12weeks)

Diagnosis of multiple Diagnosis of multiple
pregnancypregnancy

Types of multiple pregnancyTypes of multiple pregnancy

Twin peak (or Lambda sign) pathognomonic
for dichorionic placentation
T-sign pathognomonic
for monochorionic placentation

Other roles of US
Confirm fetal number .
Confirm viability.
Diagnosis of vanishing twin syndrome.
Exclude any malformation or conjoined twins
(especially at age > 35y = genetic
amniocentesis)
Needed with other procedures
 CVS
 fetal reduction

Abnormal early (first
trimester) pregnancy

Abnormal early (first trimester)
pregnancy
Failed early pregnancy.Failed early pregnancy.
Pregnancy of uncertain viability (i.e. IU pregnancy in a situation with no
enough criteria (usually on ultrasound grounds) to confidently categorize a pregnancy
as a miscarriage).
Pregnancy of unknown location.
Ectopic pregnancy
Trophoblastic disease
Subchrionic hemorrhage
Incomplete abortion (retained products of conception)

Failed early pregnancyFailed early pregnancy
& &
Pregnancy of uncertain viability

Failed early
pregnancy
(FEP(
Pregnancy of
uncertain viability
(PUV(
No No cardiaccardiac activity activity
with with CRLCRL
≥≥77mmmm < 6mm
No fetal pole with
MSD
> 25 mm
(Anembryonic
Pregnancy)
< 20mm
Others Absence or inadequate
growth on serial scans
at least 7-10 days
Mean GSD < 25mm
and containing yolk
sac only
Management Termination
Follow up US in 7-14 days with
serial beta HCG correlation…
viable or nonviable.
TVUS criteria of :
Doubilet et al., N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct
10;369(15):1443-51

US poor prognostic indicators of
pregnancy include:
No yolk sac, where:
MSD > 8 mm
embryo seen
Irregular gestational sac
Low position of the gestational sac
Doubilet et al., N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct
10;369(15):1443-51

Anembryonic
Pregnancy

Pregnancy of unknown location

Pregnancy of unknown location
(PUL)
PUL = +ve pregnancy test + no IU or
Ext.U pregnancy in US scan
↓↓↓↓↓
Differential diagnosis is:
1.very early pregnancy, not detected with
ultrasound
2.complete miscarriage
3.unidentified ectopic pregnancy

Ectopic Pregnancy

True vs. pseudo-gestational sac

True GS (DDSS)
Fluid collection (or sac) shows a small “beak sign” that
connects with or points toward the uterine cavity
line

HETEROTOPIC PREGNANCY

Yolk
sac
Fetal pole

Other types of ectopic pregnancy

Cervical ectopic pregnancy
GS within the cervix .
Abnormally low sac position.
Colour Doppler : hypervascular trophoblastic
ring in the cervical region .

Interstitial ectopic pregnancy
Eccentric gestational sac: the diagnosis is suggested by
visualisation of an intrauterine gestational sac or
decidual reaction located high in the fundus, that is
surrounded by less than 5 mm of myometrium in all
planes.
Interstitial line sign : an echogenic line from the mass to
the endometrial echo .

Sonographic features of Caesarean scar
ectopic pregnancy (CSEP)
empty uterus
empty cervical canal
GS in the anterior part of
the lower uterine segment
absence of myometrium
between the bladder wall
and the GS

Molar Pregnancy

Molar pregnancy
( Snow storm+ Theca-lutein cysts )

Subchorionic
Hemorrhage

Retained products of conception
(incomplete abortion)

Thickened Nuchal Tanslucency (NT):
Used for screening (SS) for Down’s syndrome in first trimester
Serial screening: Pregnancy associated plasma protein levels, hCG levels, NT
thickness
Measured during 11-14 wks gestational age
Seen on sagittal image as increased subcutaneous non-septated fluid in posterior
fetal neck
Measurement >3mm usually considered abnormal, however exact cut off
measurements are dependent on maternal age/gestational age
Detection rate of screening for Down’s Syndrome in first trimester:
sequential screening with NT: 82-87%
NT alone: 64-70%

Safety of ultrasound in pregnancy
General perception is that ultrasound is safe (It is not
ionising radiation)
However, bioeffects can be either thermal or mechanical
(i.e. cavitations) with high power ultrasound
One RCT of repeated routine ultrasound with Dopplers in
the 3
rd
trimester found a small but significant decrease in
birth weight in the exposed cohort
A meta analysis showed males exposed to ultrasound in
uterus are more likely to be left-handed

How to reduce biohazards
ALARA
As Low As Reasonably Achievable
ALARA principle:
Lowest acoustic power
Shortest duration
Least exposure to sensitive target tissues

Take home message
Ultrasound is no substitute for a good history
ALWAYS do an abdominal scan with ( Full bladder)
before using the vaginal probe with ( Empty bladder)
You will always be better than sonographers because
you know the anatomy and pathology
Avoid premature conclusions

Take home message
Systematic scan should be performed
US scans are useful to be combined with HCG tests
before decision.
With ultrasound , an early intervention or
conservative management in pregnancy can be
determined.
General perception is that ultrasound scan is safe in
pregnancy.

Tags