Ek Ruka Hua Faisla~case study-2011

Presentation on OB

1. Case Study
“Ek Ruka Hua Faisla”
1
Prepared by : Rajesh Srivastava
Roll No. : 20
(EPGDIM – IIFT, New Delhi)

2. Ek Ruka Hua Faisla
Directed by Basu Chatterjee
Produced by Basu Chatterjee
Written by
Screenplay: Ranjit Kapur
Basu Chatterjee
Dialogue: Ranjit Kapur
[1]
Music by Basu Chakravarti
Cinematography Ajay Prabhakar
Editing by Kamal A. Sehgal
Release date(s) 1986
Running time 117 min.
Language Hindi
Introduction : Ek Ruka Hua Faisla (एक रका ह
ुआ फै सला
) is a Bollywood film of
1986, directed by Basu Chatterjee. It is a remake of the Golden Bear winning,
American motion picture 12 Angry Men (1957), which was directed by Sidney
Lumet.
2
Ek Ruka Hua Faisla
The Golden Bear is the highest prize awarded for the best film at the
Berlin International Film Festival. Bears are the symbol of Berlin,

3. Re - take
3

4. Few Facts – the Character
•The story moves around a boy who is 19 years old.
•Lives in slums
•Belongs to minority
•Childhood was in miserable conditions
•His mother died when he was 9 years old
•His father was a drinker, quarrelsome & a cruel person, used to beat him daily
•He hit a stone on his teacher when he was 10 years old
•Engaged in Car theft & gambling
•Expert in knife playing
•He was sent to Reformity School for 1.5 years against a case.
4
Background : There is a 19 yrs old boy who has been alleged as murder of
his father by the court .
Court Decision : A panel of 12 Juror appointed to decide that, the boy has
actually murdered his father or not.
Clause in Court’s statement : Jurors have to make One Decision either
murder or not-murderer.
Re-take :
The Character

5. Juror of the Case
Deepak Kejriwal
1 2 3 4
Pankaj Kapur S. M. Zaheer
5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12
Subhash Udghate Hemant Mishra M. K. Raina K. K. Raina
Annu Kapoor Subbiraj Shailendra Goel Aziz Qureshi
5
C. D. Sindhu
Amitabh Srivastava

6. 6
The knife; the tool used to murder the old man
Eye witness 1 – an old man who was the neighbor of the victim
Eye witness 2 – a lady who lives opposite to the victim’s house
Key evidences in the Murder Case

7. Deepak Kejriwal
1 2 3 4
S. M. Zaheer
5
9
Subhash Udghate
Annu Kapoor
Subbiraj
Shailendra Goel Aziz Qureshi
Sitting arrangement
Amitabh Srivastava Pankaj Kapur
6 7 8
10 11
12
Hemant Mishra M. K. Raina K. K. Raina
7
Architect
Contractor (House painting)
4 53 62
1
89101112
Jurors Sitting Arrangement
Moderator
Professional
(Advertising)
Architect
ContractorLawyer
“Is the Boy a murder ?”
(Voting was taken as a criteria)

8. Deepak Kejriwal
1 2 3 4
S. M. Zaheer
5
9
Subhash Udghate
Annu Kapoor
Subbiraj
Shailendra Goel Aziz Qureshi
Amitabh Srivastava Pankaj Kapur
6 7 8
10 11
12
Hemant Mishra M. K. Raina K. K. Raina
8
Architect
Contractor (House painting)
4 53 62
1
89101112
Root Cause
One of the Jurors voted against the motion
that “the Boy might not be a murder”.

9. Deepak Kejriwal
1 2 3 4
S. M. Zaheer
5
9
Subhash Udghate
Annu Kapoor
Subbiraj
Shailendra Goel Aziz Qureshi
Amitabh Srivastava Pankaj Kapur
6 7 8
10 11
12
Hemant Mishra M. K. Raina K. K. Raina
9
Voting ~ 1
Architect
Contractor (House painting)
4 53 62
1
89101112
1 /12
Juror’s Decision
“The Boy might not be a murder”.

10. Deepak Kejriwal
1 2 3 4
S. M. Zaheer
5
9
Subhash Udghate
Annu Kapoor
Subbiraj
Shailendra Goel Aziz Qureshi
Amitabh Srivastava Pankaj Kapur
6 7 8
10 11
12
Hemant Mishra M. K. Raina K. K. Raina
10
Voting ~ 2
4 53 62
1
89101112
2 /12
Juror’s Decision
“The Boy might not be a murder”.

11. Deepak Kejriwal Amitabh Srivastava
1 2 3 4
Pankaj Kapur S. M. Zaheer
5 6 7 8
9 10 11
12
Subhash Udghate Hemant Mishra M. K. Raina K. K. Raina
Annu Kapoor
Subbiraj
Shailendra Goel Aziz Qureshi
11
4 53 62
1
89101112
Voting ~ 3
5 /12
Juror’s Decision
“The Boy might not be a murder”.

12. Deepak Kejriwal Amitabh Srivastava
1 2 3 4
Pankaj Kapur S. M. Zaheer
5 6 7 8
9 10 11
12
Subhash Udghate Hemant Mishra M. K. Raina K. K. Raina
Annu Kapoor
Subbiraj
Shailendra Goel Aziz Qureshi
12
4 53 62
1
89101112
Voting ~ 4
6 /12
Juror’s Decision
“The Boy might not be a murder”.
50 : 50

13. Deepak Kejriwal Amitabh Srivastava
1 2 3 4
Pankaj Kapur S. M. Zaheer
5 6 7 8
9 10 11
12
Subhash Udghate Hemant Mishra M. K. Raina K. K. Raina
Annu Kapoor
Subbiraj
Shailendra Goel Aziz Qureshi
13
4 53 62
1
89101112
Voting ~ 5
9 /12
Juror’s Decision
“The Boy might not be a murder”.

14. Deepak Kejriwal Amitabh Srivastava
1 2 3 4
Pankaj Kapur S. M. Zaheer
5 6 7 8
9 10 11
12
Subhash Udghate Hemant Mishra M. K. Raina K. K. Raina
Annu Kapoor
Subbiraj
Shailendra Goel Aziz Qureshi
14
4 53 62
1
89101112
Voting ~ 6
8 /12
Juror’s Decision
“The Boy might not be a murder”.

15. Deepak Kejriwal Amitabh Srivastava
1 2 3 4
Pankaj Kapur S. M. Zaheer
5 6 7 8
9 10 11
12
Subhash Udghate Hemant Mishra M. K. Raina K. K. Raina
Annu Kapoor
Subbiraj
Shailendra Goel Aziz Qureshi
15
4 53 62
1
89101112
Voting ~ 7
11 /
12
Juror’s Decision
“The Boy might not be a murder”.

16. Deepak Kejriwal Amitabh Srivastava
1 2 3 4
Pankaj Kapur S. M. Zaheer
5 6 7 8
9 10 11
12
Subhash Udghate Hemant Mishra M. K. Raina K. K. Raina
Annu Kapoor
Subbiraj
Shailendra Goel Aziz Qureshi
16
4 53 62
1
89101112
Final
12/12
Juror’s Decision
The Group jointly decided
“The Boy is not a murder”
Moderator
Professional
(Advertising)
Architect
ContractorLawyer

17. ...
Learning

18. Deepak Kejriwal Amitabh Srivastava
1 2 3 4
Pankaj Kapur S. M. Zaheer
5 6 7 8
9 10 11
12
Subhash Udghate Hemant Mishra M. K. Raina K. K. Raina
Annu Kapoor
Subbiraj
Shailendra Goel Aziz Qureshi
18
4 53 62
1
89101112
Learning…
Moderator
Advertising Architect
ContractorLawyer
“Business Organisation”
•Different People
•Different Background
•Different Profession
•Different Age Groups
•Different Mindsets
HEAD
Sales Marketing
Purchase
Service Parts
OperationsManufacturingHR Finance
R&D
SIS

19. Deepak Kejriwal
1 2 3 4
S. M. Zaheer
5
9
Subhash Udghate
Annu Kapoor
Subbiraj
Shailendra Goel Aziz Qureshi
Amitabh Srivastava Pankaj Kapur
6 7 8
10 11
12
Hemant Mishra M. K. Raina K. K. Raina
19
Voting
Architect
Contractor (House painting)
4 53 62
1
89101112
1 /12
Reason for Difference
“The Boy might not be a murder”.
Conflict
Power
Politics
•Different People
•Different Background
•Different Profession
•Different Age Groups
•Different Mindsets

20. 20
Conflict in Juror

21. 21Either Convince /Get convinced
Conflict
Why Conflict Occurs :
•Differences in information, beliefs, values, interests, or desires.
•A scarcity of some resource.
•Rivalries in which one person or group competes with another

22. There are 5 ways to manage conflict
Ways to Manage Conflict
•Avoidance (just leave it)
•Competition (I win, you lose)
•Accommodation (I lose or give in)
•Compromise (we both get something)
•Collaboration (we both “win”)

23. 23
•Build good relationships before conflict occurs
•Do not let small problems escalate; deal with them as they arise
•Respect differences
•Listen to others’ perspectives on the conflict situation
•Acknowledge feelings before focussing on facts
•Focus on solving problems, not changing people
•If you can’t resolve the problem, turn to someone who can help
•Remember to adapt your style to the situation and persons involved
Tips to Manage Conflict

24. 24
Power : (Make things happen in the way you want)
A capacity that “A” has to influence the behavior of
“B” so that “B” acts in accordance with “A’s”
wishes.
Politics :
Behavior to influence or attempt to influence the
distribution of advantages and disadvantages
within the organization/group
Power & Politics

25. 25
Way to win

26. 26
•Personal oriented to goal oriented
•Individual driven to team driven
•Enforcement to facilitation
•Present oriented to future oriented
Be the Change

27. Feedback
for
improvements
Thanks for given an opportunity to
present the case.