Expert Evidence
MRINAL SATISH,
PROFESSOR OF LAW, NLSIU
Expert Evidence: Some basic principles
Section 45, Indian Evidence Act
Section 293, Cr.P.C.
Question of competency of experts and assessment
Expert evidence is opinion evidence – Court required to evaluate the
evidence
Expert has to provide the court with the basis for the opinion provided.
Lack of expert evidence not a ground for acquittal in criminal cases.
Medical evidence is only corroborative; it is not substantive evidence
Medical Evidence
What are the sorts of cases where medical evidence is given paramount
importance?
Medical Evidence in
Rape Adjudication
Definition of Rape in the IPC
Pre 2013
Non-consensual sexual intercourse
Sexual intercourse definition
Explanation to Section 375
Post 2013
Penile penetration of the vagina and other orifices
Object/Non-penile penetration of the vagina and other orifices
Application of mouth to vagina and other orifices
Evidence to prove rape in court
Testimony of the victim
Witness testimony (if any)
Medical Evidence (if any)
Other Forensic Evidence (if any)
Other corroborative evidence (if any)
What is the value of the victim’s testimony?
Is the victim an accomplice to the crime of rape?
Rameshwar v. State, AIR 1952 SC 54
No. Court can convict on the basis of the uncorroborated testimony. But, should
give reasons why it trusts the victim, and keep the “corroboration warning” in mind.
The 1990s jurisprudence: C K Jain & Gurmit Singh cases
Section 155(4), Indian Evidence Act
Mathura & Pratap Misra Cases
Pratap Misra, (1977) 3 SCC 41 and its use of medical evidence
Proving Rape in Court: Victim’s
Testimony
What are rape myths?
Prejudicial, stereotyped, or false beliefs about rape, rape victims , and rapists.
Types of stereotypes
Descriptive
Prescriptive
Examples of some stereotypes/rape myths
Calling rape offenders monsters, beasts, animals etc. – The concept of “othering”.
However, statistics on rape offenders (acquaintance rape)
Acquaintance rape is more traumatic than stranger rape.
Prompt reporting requirement
Victim will physically resist
Victims are visibly emotional while testifying
Women make false allegations of rape
Rape Myths/Stereotypes
Mathew Hale: “Rape accusations are easy to make, hard to be
proved and harder to be defended against.”
John Henry Wigmore: “Women are prone to falsely allege rape.
Hence, there is requirement for corroboration.”
Hale and Wigmore influenced evidence law of Britain, and we
accepted it.
Hale & Wigmore
Norman Chevers followed by other British doctors
Construction of stereotypes and rape myths
Women often falsely allege rape – Mathew Hale reasserted
It is not possible for a man to single handedly rape an adult woman
Modi writes in 1914.
Reinforces stereotypes
Brings in a class/caste angle – “Labouring woman”
Virginity testing becomes important [State of hymen becomes an
important factor]
Two finger test emerges.
History of Medical Evidence
Utility of Medical Evidence
Bodily Fluids
Proof of Injuries
History of Medical Evidence
Colonial Understanding of evidence by Indians
Colonial understanding of evidence by women
Colonial understanding of evidence by Indian women
Norman Chevers and his manual – Indian idiosyncrasies.
Medical Evidence
Modi starts being considered as authority
Modi starts getting cited as the authority, instead of looking at statute or
cases.
Lack of Injuries
Courts bring in the “utmost resistance standard”
Hari Singh Gour and “maidenly modesty”
Indian cases start citing Modi and Hari Singh Gour
Supreme Court in a number of cases – Not possible for man to single-
handedly rape an adult woman
“Labouring woman”
Sukru Gouda
Modi’s Impact on the Law
Since no protocol on medical exam, most of the stereotypes/myths
enter medical examination protocols. Courts start relying on them.
Impact of Modi on Medical
Protocols
Developments on Medical
Examination and Protocols
The Justice Verma Committee’s Recommendations
Lillu v. State of Haryana, (2013) 14 SCC 643
Protocol for Medical Examination in Rape cases
Revision of Modi’s Medical Jurisprudence
Developments in Bangladesh and Pakistan
Constitutional Issues in
Medical/Forensic Examination
Context of rape adjudication
Examination of the Victim
Examination of the accused