fiscal space donor funding sri lanka draft.ppt

I wanted to share to all students, researchers ,....

1. Fiscal Space for Health:
Use of Donor Assistance
Dr. Pablo Gottret
Lead Economist
Human Development, South Asia Region
The World Bank
Colombo, March 18, 2009

2. Format
•What is fiscal space?
•Sources of fiscal space
•Fiscal space through donor financing
•Aid effectiveness
–Volatility
–Fungibility
–Fiscal Contingencies
–Fragmentation
–Vertical Programming
•Key messages
•The Financial Crisis and Health

3. What is Fiscal Space?
•Fiscal space refers to the availability of budgetary room that allows a
government to provide resources for a desired purpose without any
prejudice to the sustainability of a government’s financial position.
•Strong link to the notion of financial sustainability.
–Financial sustainability is the capacity of governments, in future,
to finance desired expenditure programs, service its debts, and
ensure its solvency.
–Financial returns generated by additional expenditure should
cover cost of borrowing
–Governments need to assess the availability of alternate source
of funds to replace donor funding (grants);
–Governments should be able to cover future recurrent costs, etc.

4. Types of Questions to Pose
•How are you going to finance additional expenditure?
•What are the implications for expenditure in future years and can these also be
financed?
•Any implications for other sectors’ expenditures? If so, how will these be financed?
•Is financing of today’s expenditures consistent with today’s macroeconomic policy
framework (exchange rates, inflation, growth)?
•Do we need to worry about how these expenditure programs, if continued, will fit into
the medium-term budget and macroeconomic policy framework?
•Does today’s expenditure create debt obligations that must be serviced in the future?
If so, will the expenditures have an impact on the underlying growth rate?

5. Key Expenditure Facts
•Public spending accounts for less than 25% percent of total health spending in LICs, some 50%
in MICs but over 60% in HICs:
– Policy-makers need to focus on private spending as well as public.
•Public spending on health is some $10 per capita in LICs, over $100 in MICs, and $2000 in HICs:
– Policy-makers in LICs will be challenged to provide an essential package of basic services.
•Out-of-pocket payments account for 70 percent of health spending in LICs, 40 percent in MICs
and 15 percent in HICs:
– Policy-makers need to focus on improving formal risk pooling mechanisms in order to provide
financial protection and protect the poor.
•Social health insurance accounts for some 1% of all health spending in LICs, 20% in MICs, and
30% in HICs:
– Policy-makers in LICs need to carefully evaluate whether they have the enabling conditions in place
for SHI to succeed.
•While external sources on average account for only some 6 percent of total health spending in
LICs, in over 20 African countries, it accounts for more than 30 percent:
– Policy-makers in LICs and MICs need to keep focused on internal sources of finance, as these
sources account for the bulk of their health revenues.

6. Is there Room to Increase Public
Expenditure on Health?
•With share of government expenditure to GDP of 30% (about twice the current
average for LIC), and health’s share at 15% of the budget (Abuja target for
African countries), fiscal space is likely to be limited to around 4.5% of GDP.
•Current average of public expenditure on health is about 1.35% in low-income
countries.
•In an average country with GDP per capita of US$400 and population of 44
million, increasing public expenditure on health from 1.35% to (say) 5% of
GDP would raise per capita health spending by less than
•US$15 per capita.
•There may be upper limits to increasing health spending in low-income
countries without economic growth.

7. Sources of Fiscal Space
•Government budget constraint:
G = Taxes + B (domestic) + ΔM + B (external) + Grants
–Is there potential to increase tax revenue?
–Can efficiency be improved?
–Can expenditure be reprioritized?
–Can borrowing be increased (domestic or external)?
–Is there room to print money to finance expenditure?
–Can you finance by receipt of grants?
–What is the effect of debt relief (frees up fiscal space previously used for debt
service)?
•Must be consistent within a reasonable macroeconomic framework (e.g.,
taking into account impact on the exchange rate, inflation rate, etc).

8. Fiscal Space* is Needed
*Budgetary room that allows a government to provide resources for a desired
purpose without any prejudice to the sustainability of its financial position
Aid
Borrow ing
Revenue
Expenditure
Efficiency
• Estimates of revenue effort may suggest that an additional several percent of GDP could be raised through domestic revenue
measures.
• Additional grants from donors are unlikely.
• Spending efficiency can be improved.
• Macroeconomic and debt management may suggest that new borrowing over the period should be limited.
• Seignorage (govt prints money which it loans to itself) is yet another, but generally limited, mechanism for creating fiscal space.
Source: World Bank, PREM:, 2007.

9. We were asked to talk about financing public
expenditure through donor funding
One of the MDGs on global partnerships for development itself recognizes
the need for donor assistance to attain MDGs. ODA is rising but is far short
of what is needed to meet the MDGs. Moreover, ODA is largely irrelevant for a large number of
countries in the region

10. Financing Public Expenditure via
Donor Funding
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1980 1990 2000
%

o
f

n
e
t

O
D
A
Debt Forgiveness Grants Technical Cooperation
Administrative Costs Program and Project Aid
Emergency and Food Aid
Much of the increase in aid is not directed towards financing the incremental
costs of attaining the MDGs.

11. Growth in Bilateral Donor
Assistance for Health

12. Aid Effectiveness
Aid has diminishing returns.
There are limits to country ‘absorptive capacity’.
Aid is fungible overall (can offset budget contributions) and among sectors.
Aid achieves better results in good policy environments.
Aid requires ownership by countries (e.g., donor imposed conditionalities or preferences
rarely work).
Aid is related to increased investments and growth.
Aid has high transaction costs for countries.

Aid makes governments accountable to donors as opposed to their citizens.
Aid in the form of grants instead of loans may reduce domestic resource mobilization efforts.

13. Financing Public Expenditure via
Donor Funding
Trend in HIV/AIDS Financing Relative to Total DAH
2000-2005
84 85
68
57
16 15
32
43
0
20
40
60
80
100
2000 2002 2004 2005
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
HealthHIV/AIDS Financing
Large part of the increase is going to vertical programs.
Source: OECD DAC

14. Some Key Problems mentioned
about donor aid
•Volatility: Making it difficult to finance recurrent
expenditures
•Fungibility: Government expenditures decline as donor
funding increases and therefore there is no real
additional financing for health
•Distortions generated by donor funding, specially through
the financing of vertical programs
•Sustainability: Donor funding must be replaced at some
reasonable point in time for domestic financing. This
domestic financing must fit appropriately within the
domestic macroeconomic framework

15. 0 10 20 30
Percent of Total Health Expenditure
Bhutan
Nepal
Bangladesh
Afghanistan
Pakistan
Maldives
Sri Lanka
India
Source: World Health Organization
External Resources for Health, Average 2000-2006
Donors are not a really big player in
health financing in most counties

16. 0 20 40 60 80 100
Percent of Total Health Expenditure
Sri Lanka
Pakistan
Nepal
Maldives
India
Bhutan
Bangladesh
Afghanistan
Source: World Health Organization
Categories of Health Expenditure, Average 2000-2006
Government
Out-of-pocket
Private (w/o out-of-pocket)
Households (OOP) finance a large
proportion of health expenditures

17. 0 20 40 60
Percent of Government Health Expenditure
Afghanistan
Nepal
Bhutan
Bangladesh
Pakistan
India
Sri Lanka
Maldives
Source: World Health Organization
External Resources for Health, Average 2004-2006
Donors seem to play an increasing role as a %of GE, but
some of the funding may be off budget

18. Bhutan
Bangladesh
Afghanistan
Nepal
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
5
0

P
e
r
c
e
n
t

o
f

T
o
t
a
l

H
e
a
l
t
h

E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
1995 2000 2005
Year
Source: World Health Organization
External Resources for Health, 1995 - 2006
Volatility is still an issue

19. 0 20 40 60 80 100
Sri Lanka
Pakistan
Nepal
Maldives
India
Bhutan
Bangladesh
Afghanistan
Percent of Total ODAH
Source: OECD DAC
Official Development Assistance for Health (ODAH) by Category
Average 2004-2006
Health Systems/Pop RH Disease Specific
No excessive donor concentration on
disease specific funding

20. No excessive donor concentration on
disease specific funding
0 50 100 150 200
Sri Lanka
Pakistan
Nepal
Maldives
India
Bhutan
Bangladesh
Afghanistan
Source: OECD DAC
Official Development Assistance for Health
(as % of Government Health Expenditure)
Average 2004-2006
Health Systems/Pop RH Disease Specific

21. Fungibility of Aid
Some evidence that aid is fungible: e.g., increasing aid for health
may imply that the government reduces expenditure on health
and spends it on something else.
Some estimates show that only 3.6% of total aid is used to
finance health expenditure, even though health’s proportion in
total aid tends to be around 17%.
Others have argued that it is important to distinguish between
aid that is in the budget versus aid that is off-budget.

22. Is Aid Fungible?
Some empirical evidence that aid is fungible, but there is high variance across
countries and across sectors.

23. How bad is the current crisis
•Growth in emerging and
developing countries will fall
from 6.25% in 2008 to 3.25% in
2009 (World Bank, 2009)
•GDP expected to decline by 4-6%
in the euro area in 2009 (World
Bank, 2009)
•The US and Europe have been the
hit first, with US GDP falling by
3.8% (annualized) in the fourth
quarter of 2008 (World Bank, 2009)
•Many currencies have experienced
large devaluations
Growth is expected to decline significantly across developed and developing
countries in 2009

24. How does the current crisis
compare with previous ones
•Current Crisis
–Originated in developed countries
–Many countries with better fiscal
positions also likely to face a crisis.
–The importance of FDI has
increased
–Large number of poor countries,
especially in Africa are Aid
dependent for financing
government expenditure in general
and health in particular.
–Remittances constitute an
important source of foreign
exchange and direct support to
household in many developing
countries
•Previous Crisis
–Originated in developing countries
–Many countries had large fiscal &
external deficits
–A large part of the effort to resume
growth was to increase exports to
developed countries.
East Asian Crisis (1997-1998), Argentinian Crisis (2001), Russian Crisis (1997-1998),
Peruvian Crisis (1988-92), Mexican Crises (1980s and 1990s)

25. Economic
•Unemployment
•Foreign aid/FDI
•Tax Revenue
•Demand for exports
Household Income Government Resources
Capacity of other actors
(NGOs, private sector)
Demand for health
services
Supply of health
Services / Quality
Access to quality
health care
Health Status
From Crisis to Health Status

26. Potential consequences of the crisis
•Women and Children are the worst affected. Nutrition outcomes and IMR increase
are decline at slower rates. The impact of outcomes tends to be more severe
in the poorest quintiles of the population.
•Previous crises in Asia and LAC show the negative impact that crises can have
on health and nutrition outcomes - may have been the result of sharp reductions
of utilization of essential health services.
•Devaluation increases the price of drugs in local currency and impacts access by the
population, specially the poor.
•Faced with reduced income, households may increase demand for publically
financed (and in many countries provided) health services. However:
–Total public expenditures in social sectors in many crises countries (those
facing high external and internal imbalances) tend to be pro-cyclical.
–Government Health Expenditures (GHE) per capita in real terms declined in
all countries reviewed immediately after a crisis. This decline occurred even as
many countries protected GHE as a proportion of total government expenditures
–Capture of government services by the non-poor was known to have
increased during crises in some cases

27. Good and not so good efforts by
governments in past crisis
–Not so good
•Protecting expenditures for the whole sector as a proportion of
Government Expenditures.
•Targeting budgetary commitments which may be quite different from
actual government expenditures in health.
•Protecting expenditures without evaluating whether the
expenditures were pro-poor to start with.
–Good practices
•Supporting the financing of the initiation or expansion of a
sustainable safety net that tied essential health services to identified
financing on a per capita basis with an appropriate system of
monitoring and evaluation

28. THUS….
•Fundamental objective of public policy in health during a crisis must be to
maintain/improve access to essential services by the population, especially
the poor and vulnerable –
•From this perspective, protecting government health expenditures is not an
objective in itself, but maintaining/improving access to essential services is

29. Key Messages
•Domestic financing
–Low levels of public spending on health in many countries
–Large OOP with the corresponding implications regarding the absence of
financial protection from catastrophic spending
–Increasing expenditures in the short-term must take into consideration Fiscal
Space constraints
•Donor funding for health is increasing rapidly but is largely concentrated in SSA.
–Donor funding is not as relevant as a percentage of Total Health Expenditures in
the SA Region
–However, Donor Funding is still important for the financing of certain government
programs
•Challenges of current donor assistance for health in the region
–Insufficient resources
–Volatility
–Fungibility
•The financial crisis
–Will impact the ability of governments to increase and even sustain current levels
of domestic expenditures in health
–Government must aim ensuring access to essential services specially for the
poor and vulnerable with particular attention to mothers and children that are the
hardest hit during crisis.

30. THANK YOU