Flap surgery

hishashwati 16,923 views 70 slides Jun 17, 2016
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 70
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70

About This Presentation

flap surgery


Slide Content

57 Good morning

FLAP SURGERY PRESENTER: SHASHWATI PAUL II YR PG DEPT. OF PERIODONTOLOGY

CONTENTS INTRODUCTION DEFINITION HISTORY RATIONALE CLASSIFICATION OF FLAPS FACTORS AFFECTING FLAP DESIGN INCISIONS PROPERTIES OF IDEAL FLAP PRE-OPERATIVE CHECK LIST INDICATIONS CONTRAINDICATIONS FLAP DESIGNS CLOSURE OF FLAPS HEALING AFTER FLAP SURGERY COMPLICATIONS CONCLUSION REFERENCES

INTRODUCTION The surgical phase of periodontal therapy has the following objectives Improvement of prognosis of teeth Improvement of esthetics It consists of techniques for pocket therapy and for the correction of osseous and mucogingival defects.

DEFINITION Is a loosened section of tissue separated from the surrounding tissues except at its base Glossary of Periodontal Terms, 4 th Edition Is a section of the gingiva and/or mucosa surgically separated from the underlying tissues to provide visibility of and access to the bone and the root surface Carranza’s Clinical Periodontology, 10 th Edition

HISTORY n . Robicsek 1884 Neuman 1911 Widman 1916 Kronfeld 1935 Nabers 1954 Apically repositioned flap 1962 Modified Widman 1974 Papillary preservation 1985

RATIONALE Means of gaining access to diseased root surfaces For pocket elimination / reduction To eliminate the infected and necrotic alveolar bone To maintain the mucogingival complex Possibility of regeneration of periodontal tissues

CLASSIFICATION OF FLAPS

I ) Purpose of Surgery: ( Ramfjord 1979) Pocket elimination Re-attachment flap surgery Mucogingival repair

II) Bone exposure after flap reflection: (Carranza) Full thickness ( mucoperiosteal flap) Partial thickness (mucosal flap)

MUCOPERIOSTEAL V/S MUCOSAL FLAPS Full Thickness Flap Partial Thickness Flap Healing Primary Intention Secondary Intention Bone defect treatment Possible Difficult Blood supply to flap Sufficient Decreased Pocket elimination/ reduction Possible Possible Bleeding Less More Post operative swelling Less Severe Post operative pain and discomfort Less More (Periodontal Surgery: A Clinical Atlas by Sato)

III) Flap placement after surgery: (Carranza) Non displaced flap Displaced flap Coronally displaced flap Apically displaced flap Laterally/ Horizontally displaced flap

IV) Management of papilla: (Carranza) Conventional flap Papilla preservation flap

FACTORS AFFECTING FLAP DESIGN Necessary access to the underlying bone and root surfaces Final posision of the flap Preservation of good blood supply to the flap

TWO BASIC FLAP DESIGNS ARE: Conventional flap Papilla preservation flap

INCISIONS HORIZONTAL INCISIONS Internal bevel incision/ first incision Crevicular incision/ second incision Interdental incision/ third incision VERTICAL INCISION

Horizontal Incisions: along the margin of the gingiva Coronally directed or Apically directed Externel bevel * Internal bevel * Sulcular / intra crevicular * Interdental incision

Internal bevel Incision : first/ primary/ reverse bevel incision From a designated area on the gingiva to an area at or near the crest of bone #11 0r #15 surgical scalpel

Objectives Removes the pocket lining Preserves the uninvolved outer surface of gingiva Produces a sharp, thin margin for adaptation at bone-tooth junction Indications: -Presence of moderate/deep periodontal pocket -Desire to correct bone morphology Pre-requisite: Sufficient Keratinized tissue

Crevicular Incision : second/ sulcular incision from base of pocket to crest of bone V-shaped wedge : inflammed and granulomatous areas of lateral pocket wall JE and connective tissue fibres

Indications: Periodontal pocket elimination/ reduction As a secondary incision for flap surgery to lessen post operative gingival recession in anterior maxillary regions Decisive Criteria: Narrow band of keratinized tissue Thin gingival biotype

Internal Bevel Incision Crevicular Incision

The Interdental Incision : separates the collar of gingiva around the tooth Orban’s interdental knife

Vertical Incisions: Must extend beyond the mucogingival line reaching the alveolar mucosa when displacement of flap is desired At line angles of the tooth – to include/exclude the papilla from flap Never over height of contour or root Avoid short ( mesio -distal) flaps

Incisions Description Indication External Bevel Coronally Directed Gingivectomy , crown lengthening, Gingivoplasty Internal Bevel Apically directed, placed at the crest of the gingival margin or stepped back from the margin 0.5 to 2.0 mm Excisional new attachment procedure, modified Widman flap, flap and curettage, crown lengthening Sulcular Apically directed, placed in the gingival crevice and directed toward the alveolar crest When preservation of gingiva. is critical, as in esthetic areas or areas of minimal keratinized tissue, guided tissue regeneration (GTR) procedures

Incisions Description Indication Releasing Perpendicular to the gingival margin at line angles of teeth To increase access, to allow apical or coronal positioning of flap Thinning Internal or undermining incision extending from gingival margin toward the base of the flap to decrease the bulk of connective tissue on the underside of the flap Palatal flaps, distal wedge procedures, internal bevel gingivectomy , bulky papillae Periosteal Incision at the base of the flap severing the underlying periosteum To release flap tension allowing coronal advancement of the flap

PROPERTIES OF IDEAL FLAP Ideal Flap/ Section of a soft tissue: Is outlined by a surgical incision Carries its own blood supply Allows surgical access to underlying tissues Can be placed in the original position Can be maintained with sutures in a particular desired position And is expected to heal

Sharp incisions heal rapidly Flap extension- 2 teeth anterior and 1 tooth posterior to area of surgery Incisions- over intact bone/ 6-8mm away from diseased bone. ( Peterson )

PRE OPERATIVE CHECKLIST Review case history and Phase I therapy Informed Consent Cessation of medication: Anti coagulants 48hours prior to procedure To quit or stop smoking for minimum of 3-4 weeks after the procedure. Daily dose of particular medication/ meal taken Patient records Emergency equipment/ medication Tests: Hb %, Clotting time 6-10mins, Bleeding time 1-6mins Appropriate infection control

INDICATIONS OF FLAP SURGERY To gain access for root debridement Bone regeneration in infrabony defects Pockets on teeth in which a complete removal of root irritants is not possible by non surgical therapy Areas with irregular bone contours or defects which need to be corrected Infrabony pockets distal to first molars In grade II and grade III furcations Persistent inflammation in moderate to deep pockets

CONTRAINDICATIONS OF FLAP SURGERY Lack of patient motivation or compliance Acute oral infections which may spread Systemic conditions / Medically compromised patients. Eg . Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus

FLAP DESIGNS

THE NEUMANN FLAP: 1911 Intracrevicular incision full thickness flap reflected Sectional releasing incisions made Inside of flap curetted Root surfaces “cleaned” Irregular alveolar bone corrected Flaps trimmed Replacing flap at crest of alveolar bone ( Periodontal Surgery: Resection to Regeneration, Richard Young, 2003)

THE ORIGINAL WIDMAN FLAP: 1918 Gingival incision follows outline of gingival margin 2 vertical release incisions Physiologic contour of alveolar bone re-established

Aimed at: Elimination of pocket epithelium Accessibility to root surfaces Bone Recontouring Sufficient ATTACHED GINGIVA is a pre-requisite. Advantages: Soft tissue margin at alveolar bone crest- no pockets remained Less discomfort- faster healing Recontour bone Disadvantage: Exposure of root surfaces vertical incisions

Sutured to original position Intracrevicular incision Expose diseased roots THE MODIFIED FLAP OPERATION: KIRKLAND 1931 Roots debrided - defects corrected

The Modified Flap Operation: Kirkland 1931 Did not include extensive sacrifice of non inflammed tissue No apical displacement of gingival margin Indicated in anterior aesthetic areas Potential for bone regeneration in intrabony defects

THE MODIFIED WIDMAN FLAP: Ramfjord and Nissle 1974 *1 st incision: 0.5-1mm away from gingival margin. *Accentuated initial incision : 1-2mm from mid palatal surface of tooth * Bone architecture not corrected *No inter proximal bone exposure *Interrupted inter proximal sutures

Indications: 1 .Moderate-deep periodontal pockets 2 .In sufficient attached gingiva 3 .Patients with sensitivity 4 .Reattachment with minimal gingival recession is desired

ADVANTAGES: Access and visualization of root surfaces Good adaptation of healthy connective tissue to root surfaces Better aesthetics Less potential root hypersensitivity Preservation of gingival width DISADVANTAGES : Residual probing depths in presence of infra bony pockets

The Original Widman Flap The Modified Widman Flap

THE UNDISPLACED FLAP: ‘Internal bevel gingivectomy ’- surgically removes the pocket wall Sufficient keratinized tissue a pre-requisite, to avoid mucogingival problem

The Undisplaced Flap: Pockets measured- Bleeding points produced Internal bevel incision- thinning of flap done Crevicular incision- full thickness flap reflected Interdental incision- triangular tissue wedge removed Edge of flap re-scalloped/ trimmed to rest on ‘root-bone’ junction Continuous sling suture

THE PALATAL FLAP: Initial incision varies with anatomic situation- internal bevel incision Thick tissue- horizontal gingivectomy incision Scalloping narrower apically than line angle areas Blade angled towards lateral surface of palatal bone while thinning flap Thin, knife-like gingival margin and sharp, thin gingival papilla

The Palatal Flap: * Thickness of palatal tissue * Purpose of palatal flap

THE APICALLY REPOSITIONED FLAP: FRIEDMAN 1962 Indications: Pocket reduction Increasing the zone of attached gingiva Disadvantages: Unaesthetic results- root exposure Hypersensitivity Incision is unrelated to pocket depth Not necessary to accentuate scallop interdentally

The Apically Displaced Flap: Classification of primary incision and displaced flap positions ( Periodontal Surgery: A Clinical Atlas by Sato)

THE BEVELED FLAP :FRIEDMAN Modification of apically repositioned flap For treatment of periodontal pockets on the palatal aspect of teeth. First, a conventional mucoperiosteal flap Debridement and osseous recontouring performed. The palatal flap prepared with a secondary scalloped and beveled incision Secured with interproximal sutures.

PAPILLA PRESERVATION FLAP: TAKEI ET AL, 1985 In Conventional flap: incise from bottom of pocket to crest of bone- splitting papilla below contact point In reconstructive surgery Maximum amount of gingiva and papilla are retained to cover the materials placed in the pocket Intra crevicular incision Semilunar incision across interdental area Wide osseous defect lingually / palatally - semilunar incision on facial aspect

Preserved papilla can be incorporated into the facial or lingual/palatal flap. The lingual or palatal incision should be semilunar incision across the interdental papilla. This incision dips apically from the line angle of the tooth so that the papillary incision is at least 5 mm from the crest of the papilla.

4. An orban knife is introduced into this incision to sever half to two-thirds the base of the interdental papilla. 5. The papilla is then dissected from the lingual or palatal aspect and elevated intact with the facial flap. 6. The flap is elevated without thinning the tissue.

Palatal semilunar incision Crevicular incision Papilla reflected sutures

5mm

SIMPLIFIED PAPILLA PRESERVATION TECHNIQUE Cortellini et al. in 1999 For narrow interdental spaces (< 2mm). An oblique incision across the defect-associated papilla, starting from the buccal line angle of the involved tooth to reach the mid- interdental part of the papilla at the adjacent tooth below the contact point. The papilla is cut into two equal parts

Oblique incision Intrasulcular incisions Horizontal inc at base sutures

DISTAL WEDGE PROCEDURE: ROBINSON (1966) AND BRADEN (1969 ) Treatment of periodontal pockets on the distal surface of terminal molars is complicated by the presence of bulbous fibrous tissue over the maxillary tuberosity or prominent retromolar pads in the mandible. Deep vertical defects may often present in conjunction with redundant fibrous tissue. These osseous lesions may result from incomplete repair after the extraction of impacted third molars

Location of incision: 1)Amount of attached gingiva 2)Available distance from distal aspect of molar to end of retromolar pad/ tuberosity 3) Pocket depth Simple gingivectomy incision can be used for soft tissue pocket and adja c ent fibrous tissue.

MODIFIED DISTAL WEDGE PROCEDURE In case of a deep periodontal pocket combined with angular bone defect at distal aspect of a maxillary molar. Two parallel reverse bevel incisions. Rectangular wedge tissue is removed. Root debridement, recontouring bone, flaps trimmed and sutured.

CLOSURE OF FLAPS OBJECTIVES Supporting and strengthening the wounds until healing increases their tensile strength. Minimizing the risk of infection and control of bleeding . Continuous Sling Suture Interrupted suture Mattress Sutures Periosteal Sutures Anchor sutures

HEALING AFTER FLAP SURGERY

COMPLICATIONS Periodontal surgery can produce profuse bleeding,especially during initial incisions and flap reflection. Excessive haemorrhaging after initial incisions and flap reflection may be caused by venules,arterioles and vessels. Anatomic variation- inadvertent laceration Root exposure post flap surgery- hypersensitivity Liver clot/ currant jelly clot – repeated delayed organisation of blood coagulum. Sensitivity to percussion Prolnged exposure or dryness of bone

Correction of Soft Tissue Pockets Closed Procedures. Modified Widman flap Apically positioned (repositioned) flap a . Full thickness b. Partial thickness ( supraperiosteal ) Distal wedge procedure Open Procedures. Gingivectomy Surgery for Correction of Osseous Deformities and Osseous Enhancement Procedures Closed Procedures. 1. Full- or partial-thickness flap a. Undisplaced flap b . Modified flap c. Modified Widman flap 2. Modified Distal wedge procedure 3. Conventional flap/ papilla preservation flaps

Correction of Mucogingival Problems Preservation of Existing Attached Gingiva. 1 . Apically positioned (repositioned) flap a . Full thickness b . Partial thickness 2. C onventional flap Increasing Dimension of Exisiting Attached Gingiva. Laterally positioned flap ( pedicle) a . Full thickness b . Partial thickness 2. Papillary flaps a . Double papillae b . Rotated papillae 3. Free soft tissue autografts a . Partial thickness b . Full thickness 4. Connective tissue autograft 5. Subepithelial connective tissue graft

Procedures Commonly Used for Root Coverage Pedicle Flaps (Full or Partial Thickness ). Laterally positioned flaps Double-papillae flaps 3 Coronally positioned flaps 4. Semilunar flap Free Soft Tissue Autografts .

CONCLUSION Proper understanding and knowledge of different incisions and flaps results in better treatment results with greater patient satisfaction.

REFERENCES CARRANZA 10 TH EDITION LINDHE 4 TH EDITION PERIODONTAL SURGERY BY SATO COHEN
Tags