i= 17 ested witeFa 5 Ra fe paints were hopitaed
(Fengamere Rett [RG abe ge Nov2021= apn 2024 [ras patent reduced trod cose
Ut cenas R= wena win oS
(Don quer: Gi Ave with on arch 2022 = iy 2028 cae atan erates
|EPO-200) [MG-ADL score 25 points june rm
Germany =2cenres = 68 rested with FG o REN E
ir moderate short ficcy RVZ ad E
(Stascheit F et al: (EFG:n = 21; RZN:n = 42) [san 2023 - Dec 2023 5
(essen Ro menu y Ma AL and O core
[China - 14 centres IN = 61 treated with EFG |CMI was rapidly achieved in 97% of patients at 13 + 0.7
[(Luo S et al; |AChR Ab+ gMG (n = 56) [Sept 2023 - Dec 2023 | weeks -70% of all participants had a mild disease
lEpR=244) 'ACHR Ab- gMG (n = 5) [status with MG-ADL s4 after EFG treatment
hay 4 cones i= 63 weoted with €or EGU ECUhadebttr affect nthe QU score beter NG
\(Sacca F et al; KEFG: n = 31; ECU: n = 32) [Sept 2023 - Jan 2024 _|deterioration/crisis prevention, and better steroid-
[OPR-081) JACHR Ab+ gMG |sparing effect compared with EFG.
* Based on data presented at the 10th Congress of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN 2024).
iv-sc sc-sc
o sara ° a
sE one, ES se yee en
CEN 20290) 74(030) 837 20:0 6005)
98: ow par
de ite
HE E
s s
Wao 1 2 3 4 > weno Tr
En
TORT tt tttt
Sc dosing Sc dosing
Data shown in AChR Ab+ patients.
CMI: 22-point improvement in total MG-ADL score from study baseline.
Hoffmann $ et al EAN 2024. EPO-802.
HRQOL Improvements
m0-201-180
ÿ my m erase
$ en de ES
o
23
21, =
so 23
HE s
BP 4| See
1e roma
nor" ADAPT-SC+
nv M me
ER (em)
Bs
33% ns
5S 0
is”
HR “
HE
g 6
Soced Feta EN 2024 EPO-208
Improvement in Mean MG-ADL Score Across 6 Cycles MG-ADL Improvement
RWD (IV administration of EFG)
ADAPTS ADAPT-sc+ re E
Orce 1 2 3 4 5 6 [
8 00-400 5 HE ss
Mean Change in Tots! MG-ADL Score
From Study Baseline, Wook 4
‘Mean Change in Total MG-ADL Score
From Study Being, Wook 3
6
8
0
mano 107 NO m 108 00 103 Memo 89 85 82 82 04 77
eee EE) (020) (050) (95) (000) (00 (72) denna (066) (052) (002) (084) (07) (020)
eoncagynsere
Data shown in AChR Ab- patients.
MG-ADL measured at week 3 during ADAPT+ when maximal IgG reduction
and clinical improvement may have occurred.
(CMI: 22-point improvement in total MG-ADL score.
en Change see
EAN 2024. EPO-209, Antozzi C et al EAN 2024. OPR-080.
Nipocalimab: Efficacy Outcomes From the Vivacity-MG3 Trial
Mean Change in MG-ADL NP + soc(n= 77) LS Mean QMG Change
2 A PBO + SOC (n = 76)
se 4 o
88 £ à
2S 2 $
sl lo
08 + 23°
si HA
2
5 s
~
gaine 2 4 6 2 + 22
6
077 4176 8 6 0 4 6 B20 2% À
Time Since Baseline, wk TAN
Average (SE) change with NIP from baseline over Average (SE) change with NIP from baseline over
weeks 22, 23, 24: -4.7 (0.329) vs -3.25 (0.335) with PBO weeks 22, 24: -4.86 (0.504) vs -2.05 (0.499) with PBO
Difference of LS means (SE): -1.45 (0.470); P = .002 Difference of LS means (SE): -2.81 (0.710); P < .001
Part 2 of 2: Identifying the Need for and Optimal Management of
Myasthenia Gravis With FcRn Inhibitors in the Real World:
How the Latest Insights Inform Clinical Practice
Francesco Saccá, MD
Associate Professor of Neurology
Federico Il University of Naples
Assistant Medical Director of Neurology
AOU Federico Il
i= 17 ested witeFa 5 Ra fe paints were hopitaed
(Fengamere Rett [RG abe ge Nov2021= apn 2024 [ras patent reduced trod cose
Ut cenas R= wena win oS
(Don quer: Gi Ave with on arch 2022 = iy 2028 cae atan erates
|EPO-200) [MG-ADL score 25 points june rm
Germany =2cenres = 68 rested with FG o REN E
ir moderate short ficcy RVZ ad E
(Stascheit F et al: (EFG:n = 21; RZN:n = 42) [san 2023 - Dec 2023 5
(essen Ro menu y Ma AL and O core
[China - 14 centres IN = 61 treated with EFG |CMI was rapidly achieved in 97% of patients at 13 + 0.7
[(Luo S et al; |AChR Ab+ gMG (n = 56) [Sept 2023 - Dec 2023 | weeks -70% of all participants had a mild disease
lEpR=244) 'ACHR Ab- gMG (n = 5) [status with MG-ADL s4 after EFG treatment
hay 4 cones i= 63 weoted with €or EGU ECUhadebttr affect nthe QU score beter NG
\(Sacca F et al; KEFG: n = 31; ECU: n = 32) [Sept 2023 - Jan 2024 _|deterioration/crisis prevention, and better steroid-
[OPR-081) JACHR Ab+ gMG |sparing effect compared with EFG.
* Based on data presented at the 10th Congress of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN 2024).
ADAPT NXT: Cyclic and Continuous Dosing of IV Efgartigimod
Entry Criteria
+ Adults (218 y) with ACHR
Ab+ gMG
+ MG-ADL score 25 (>50%
nonocular)
MGFA Class I I, or IV
Concomitant gMG
treatment required®
IgG 26 g/L
EFG IV 10 mg/kg, fix
AAAA_AAAA AAAA
4 weeks
Part A
Part B (<105 weeks)
(21 weeks) i
Ongoing extension pr
>
With option to
extend to @3W
4 weeks 4 weeks
r
Week 0 3.
Triangles indicate EFG infusion.
* Including NSISTs and/or AChEls. If receiving corticosteroids and/or NSISTs, must be on a stable dose for 21 month prior to screening
» All patients entering Part B to be transitioned to Q2W with the option to extend to @3W dosing; patients in the fixed cycle arm will
LS Mean Change From Baseline in MG-ADL Total Score (Week 1-21)
e EFGIV fixed cycles (n=17) e EFGIVQ2W (n= 52)
LS Mean (+SE) Change in
MG-ADL Total Score
0123456789101121314 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Time, wk
Solid data points indicate weeks in which EFG was administered and open data points indicates weeks in which EFG was not
administered in each respective dosing regimen.
Cortes-Vicente E et al EAN 2024. EPO-612
Average (SE) change with NIP from baseline over
weeks 22, 24: -4.86 (0.504) vs -2.05 (0.499) with PBO
Difference of LS means (SE): -2.81 (0.710); P < .0O1