Gastroesophageal
Reflux Disease
Arthur Harris, M.D.
GI Division, Jacobi Medical Center/NCBH
Assistant Professor of Medicine, AECOM
Objectives
Definition of GERD
Epidemiology of GERD
Pathophysiology of GERD
Clinical Manifestations
Diagnostic Evaluation
Treatment
Complications
Definition
American College of
Gastroenterology (ACG)
Symptoms OR mucosal
damage produced by the
abnormal reflux of gastric
contents into the
esophagus
Often chronic and relapsing
May see complications of
GERD in patients who lack
typical symptoms
Physiologic vs Pathologic
Physiologic GERD
Post-prandial
Short-lived
Often asymptomatic
TLSER’s
No nocturnal sx
Pathologic GERD
Symptoms
Mucosal injury
Nocturnal sx
Epidemiology
About 44% of the US adult
population have heartburn at least
once a month
14% of Americans have symptoms
weekly
7% have symptoms daily
Pathophysiology
Primary barrier to
gastroesophageal
reflux is the lower
esophageal sphincter
LES normally works in
conjunction with the
diaphragm
If barrier disrupted,
acid goes from
stomach to esophagus
Clinical Manifestations
Most common symptoms
Heartburn—retrosternal burning
discomfort
Regurgitation—effortless return of
gastric contents into the pharynx
without nausea, retching, or
abdominal contractions
Diagnostic Evaluation
If classic symptoms of heartburn and
regurgitation exist in the absence of
“alarm symptoms” the diagnosis of
GERD can be made clinically and
treatment can be initiated
Potential Oral and Laryngopharyngeal Signs
Associated with GERD
Edema and hyperemia
of larynx
Vocal cord erythema,
polyps, granulomas,
ulcers
Hyperemia and
lymphoid hyperplasia
of posterior pharynx
Interarytenyoid
changes
Dental erosion
Subglottic stenosis
Laryngeal cancer
Alarms
Alarm Signs/Symptoms
Dysphagia
Early satiety
GI bleeding
Odynophagia
Vomiting
Weight loss
Iron deficiency anemia
Trial of Medications
H2RA or PPI
Expect response in 2-4 weeks
If no response
Change from H2RA to PPI
Maximize dose of PPI
Trial of Medications
If PPI response inadequate despite
maximal dosage
Confirm diagnosis
EGD
24 hour pH monitoring
Esophagogastrodudenoscopy
Endoscopy (with biopsy if
needed)
In patients with alarm
signs/symptoms
Those who fail medication trial
Those who require long-term Rx
Lacks sensitivity for
identifying pathologic reflux
Absence of endoscopic
features does not exclude a
GERD diagnosis
Allows for detection,
stratification, and
management of esophageal
manifestations or
complications of GERD
Ambulatory pH Testing
24-hour pH monitoring
Accepted standard for establishing or
excluding presence of GERD for those
patients who do not have mucosal
changes
Trans-nasal catheter or a wireless,
capsule shaped device
Ambulatory 24 hour pH Monitoring -1
Physiologic study
Quantify reflux in
proximal/distal
esophagus
% time pH < 4
DeMeester score
Symptom
correlation
Ambulatory 24 hour pH Monitoring -2
Normal
GERD
Wireless, Catheter-Free Esophageal pH Monitoring
Potential Advantages
●Improved patient
comfort and acceptance
●Continued normal
work, activities and diet
during study
●Longer reporting
periods possible (up to
48 hours)
●Maintain constant
probe position relative to
SCJ
Esophageal Manometry
Limited role in GERD
Assess LES
pressure, location
and relaxation
Assist placement of
24 hour pH catheter
Assess peristalsis
Prior to anti-reflux
surgery
Patient with heartburn
Initiate Rx with H2RA or PPI
H2RA taken
BID
Good response
Frequent relapses
On demand Rx
PPI taken QD
Good response
Maintenance therapy
with lowest effective dose
Symptoms persist
Consider EGD if
risk factors present
(> 45, white, male
and > 5 yrs of sx)
Increase to
max dose QD
or BID
Good response
Confirm diagnosis
EGD, ph monitor
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
GERD vs Dyspepsia
Distinguish from Dyspepsia
Ulcer-like symptoms-burning, epigastric
pain
Dysmotility like symptoms-nausea,
bloating, early satiety, anorexia
Distinct clinical entity
In addition to anti-secretory meds
and an EGD, need to consider testing
for Helicobacter pylori
Treatment
Goals of therapy
Symptomatic relief
Heal esophagitis
Avoid complications
Better Living
Lifestyle modifications
Avoid large meals
Avoid acidic foods (citrus/tomato), alcohol, caffeine,
chocolate, onions, garlic, peppermint
Decrease fat intake
Avoid lying down within 3-4 hours after a meal
Elevate head of bed 4-8 inches
Avoid meds that may potentiate GERD (CCB, alpha
agonists, theophylline, nitrates, sedatives, NSAID’s)
Avoid clothing that is tight around the waist
Lose weight
Stop smoking
Treatment
Antacids
O-T-C acid
suppressants and
antacids may be
appropriate initial
therapy
Approx 1/3 of patients
with heartburn-related
symptoms use at least
twice weekly
More effective than
placebo in relieving
GERD symptoms
Treatment
Histamine H2-Receptor Antagonists
More effective than placebo and
antacids for relieving heartburn in
patients with GERD
Faster healing of erosive esophagitis
when compared with placebo
Can use regularly or on-demand
Treatment
Proton Pump Inhibitors
Better control of symptoms with PPI’s vs
H2RAs and better remission rates
Faster healing of erosive esophagitis
with PPIs vs H2RAs
Treatment
H2RAs vs PPI’s
12 week freedom from symptoms
48% vs 77%
12 week esophagitis healing rate
52% vs 84%
Speed of healing
6%/wk vs 12%/wk
Treatment Modifications for Persistent Symptoms
Improve compliance
Optimize pharmacokinetics
Adjust timing of medication to 15 – 30 minutes
before meals (as opposed to bedtime)
Allows for high blood level to interact with
parietal cell proton pump activated by the meal
Consider switching to a different PPI
Treatment
Anti-reflux surgery - Indications
Failed medical management
Patient preference
GERD complications
Medical complications attributable to a
large hiatal hernia
Atypical symptoms with pathologic
reflux documented on 24-hour pH
monitoring
Treatment
Anti-reflux surgery candidates
EGD proven esophagitis
?Normal esophageal motility
Incomplete response to acid suppression
Treatment
Anti-reflux surgery (laparoscopic)
Tenets of surgery
Reduce hiatal hernia
Repair diaphragm
Strengthen GE junction
Strengthen anti-reflux barrier via gastric wrap
75-90% effective at alleviating symptoms of
heartburn and regurgitation
Treatment
Post-surgery
10% have solid food dysphagia
2-3% have permanent symptoms
7-10% have gas, bloating, diarrhea,
nausea, early satiety
Within 3-5 years, up to 52% of patients
back on anti-reflux medications
Treatment
Endoscopic treatment
Relatively new
No clearly established indications
Well-informed patients with well-documented
GERD responsive to PPI therapy may benefit
Three categories
Radiofrequency application to increase LES reflux
barrier
Endoscopic sewing devices
Injection of a non-resorbable polymer into LES
region
Complications
Erosive esophagitis
Responsible for 40-60% of GERD
symptoms
Severity of symptoms often fail to
match severity of erosive esophagitis
Complications
Esophageal
stricture
Occurs as a
result of healing
of erosive
esophagitis
May need
dilation
Peptic Stricture
Barium swallow
Endoscopy
Complications
Barrett’s Esophagus
Columnar metaplasia
of the esophagus
Associated with the
development of
adenocarcinoma
Complications
Barrett’s Esophagus
Acid damages lining of
esophagus and causes
chronic esophagitis
Damaged area heals in
a metaplastic process
with abnormal columnar
cells replacing
squamous cells
This specialized
intestinal metaplasia
can progress to
dysplasia and
adenocarcinoma
Complications
Patient’s who need EGD
Alarm symptoms
Poor therapeutic response
Long symptom duration
“Once in a lifetime” EGD for patient’s
with chronic GERD becoming accepted
practice
Many patients with Barrett’s are
asymptomatic
Complications
Barrett’s Esophagus
Manage in same manner as GERD
EGD every 3 years in patient’s without
dysplasia
In patients with dysplasia, annual to
even shorter interval surveillance is
recommended
Summary
Definition of GERD
Epidemiology of GERD
Pathophysiology of GERD
Clinical Manifestations
Diagnostic Evaluation
Treatment
Complications